![]()
|
[Frontiers in Bioscience 3, d125-135, January 15, 1998] Reprints PubMed CAVEAT LECTOR |
|
|---|---|---|
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
DOES CALORIC RESTRICTION ALTER IL-2 TRANSCRIPTION?
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System and Department of Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78284 Received 1/5/98 Accepted 1/9/98 2. INTRODUCTION The initial experiments in the 1930's by McCay et al. (1) showed that severe reduction of food intake in rats increased their life spans dramatically. Subsequent studies in the 1950s and 1960s demonstrated that dietary restriction (i.e., undernutrition, not malnutrition) significantly prolonged the survival of rodents. This prolongation has been observed with a variety of different techniques that reduce the amount of food consumed by rodents (reviewed in 2-4). Over the past decade, it has become apparent that the reduction in total calories is the component of the dietary restriction regimen responsible for the increase in survival (5,6). In other words, reducing the caloric intake of the rodents through any nutritional modification increases survival compared to that of rodents fed the normal calories in the laboratory chow diet (ad libitum). All evidence currently suggests that caloric restriction increases the survival of rodents by retarding the aging process (2-6). Therefore, caloric restriction has become a powerful technique for studying the process of aging. Although it is well established that caloric restriction increases survival of rodents and reduces the pathology of diseases associated with aging, the physiological and biochemical basis for this effect have not been estabilished. The view that caloric restriction alters the aging process at the level of gene expression was first suggested by Barrows (7) in 1972. He proposed that protein synthesis was reduced in tissues of rats fed caloric restricted diets, and that the reduction in protein synthesis resulted in a reduced use of the genetic code. Barrows (7) suggested that caloric restriction increased longevity because the genetic code was used less by cells. The view that caloric restriction alters gene expression was expanded further in 1979 when Young (8) introduced the concept that nutrition might alter the aging process(es) by interacting at the structural and functional level of the gene by specifically altering translation and/or posttranslational processes. In 1982, Lindell (9) suggested that caloric restriction was a "physiological stress" that enhanced gene expression and that the enhancement in gene expression was a significant factor in maintaining cellular homeostasis in the caloric restricted rodents. In 1985, Richardson (10) proposed that caloric restriction retards the age-related decline in gene expression. Thus, over the past two decades, several investigators have put forward the view that caloric restriction might act through changes in gene expression. In recent years, a number of reviews have been written on the aging immune system (11-15) and the anti-aging (2-6,10) and anti-immunosenescent (16-18) effects of caloric restriction. This review is more specifically focused on the influence of caloric restriction on IL-2 expression. In addition, the role of signal transduction molecules that are known to regulate the activity of transcription factors involved in IL-2 transcription will be discussed. |