[Frontiers in Bioscience 14, 72-111, January 1, 2009]

The molecular "Jekyll and Hyde" duality of PARP1 in cell death and cell survival

Paul O. Hassa

European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Gene Expression Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Programmed cell death mechanisms
3.1. Apoptosis
3.1.1. Collective apoptotic cell death
3.2. Macroautophagocytotic cell death
3.3. Programmed-necrotic cell death
3.4. Mitotic catastrophe
3.5. Senescence induced cell death?
4. PARP1-mediated cell death
4.1. PARP1-mediated programmed-necrotic cell death
4.1.1. NAD depletion/PARP1-suicide Model
4.1.2. AIF shuttling/signaling model
4.1.2.1. Molecular mechanisms underlying the PARP1-mediated shuttling of AIF
4.1.2.1.1. NAD/ATP depletion
4.1.2.1.2. Enhanced cytosolic retention of AIF by HSP70 in Parp1 knockout mice
4.1.2.1.3. Free poly-ADP-ribose could serve as nucleus-to-mitochondria signaling molecule and death signal
4.1.2.1.4. Shuttling of nuclear proteinaceous pro-necrotic factors to mitochondria
4.1.2.1.5. Activation of an unknown cytoplasmic isoform of PARP1 or PARP2
4.1.3. Kinase-mediated activation of PARP1 in programmed-necrotic cell death
4.1.4. PARP1 independent AIF mediated cell death processes
4.1.5. Secondary necrosis in the surrounding tissue as a result of poly-ADP-ribosylation mediated release of HMGB1?
4.1.6. The Role of other PARP family members and PARGs in necrotic cell death
4.1.6.1. PARP2
4.1.6.2. Tankyrases
4.1.6.3. Poly-ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG)
4.2. PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation in apoptosis
4.2.1. Caspase-mediated cleavage of PARP1; a proposed hallmark of apoptosis
4.2.2. Poly-ADP-ribosylation induced changes of chromatin structure during apoptosis
4.2.3. Poly-ADP-ribosylation/PARG-mediated activation of TRPM calcium channels during oxidant induced apoptosis
4.2.4. PARP/PARG-mediated hyperglycation and glyoxidation could induce apoptotic cell death
4.2.5. Proposed role of poly-ADP-ribosylation of p53 in apoptosis
4.2.6. PARP1 mediated transcriptional upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes
4.3. Role of PARP1 in programmed macroautophagocytotic cell death
4.4. PARP1 may regulate senescence-induced programmed cell death
5. PARPs as survival Factors
5.1. PARP1 is essential for cell cycle progression of highly proliferating cells upon cellular stress
5.2. PARP1 and PARP2 are essential for repression of DNA damage induced apoptotic cell death
5.3. PARP1 and PARP2 serve as survival factors for neuronal cells by modulating ROS levels
5.4. ADP-ribose-AMP/cAMP-mediated AMPK / survival signaling
6. Poly-ADP-ribosylation/PARP1-mediated switches between PCD and cell survival
6.1. A PARP1/ poly-ADP-ribosylation-mediated switch between different PCD pathways?
6.2. A poly-ADP-ribose code for cell death and cell survival
6.3. Gender effects
6.4. Crosstalk of ADP-ribosylation and other NAD+-dependent reactions in cell death and survival pathways
8. Conclusions and future perspectives
9. Acknowledgement

1. ABSTRACT

The current literature clearly indicates that PARP1 but also PARP2 play a pivotal role in modulating the cellular responses to stress. Genetic and pharmacological studies demonstrated that overactivation of PARP1 is a key mediator of programmed-necrotic cell death in vivo. PARP1 appears to be also involved in programmed cell death processes others than necrosis, such as apoptosis or macroautophagocytotic cell death. On the other hand, growing evidence suggests that both PARP1 and PARP2 are multi-faced enzymes also playing important roles in cell survival processes. PARP1 and PARP2 were shown to be required for the maintenance of genomic integrity and to act as a survival factor for highly proliferating cells such as stem cells but also non-proliferating neuronal cells against cell death induced by oxidative stress under mild and moderate progressive damage in vivo. This review briefly summarizes the recent findings, which support a crucial role of PARP1 in different programmed cell death and cell survival processes. A special focus is placed on the proposed molecular mechanisms underlying the "Jekyll and Hyde" duality of PARP1 in cell death and cell survival pathways. A potential crosstalk between PARP1, PARP2 and other NAD+-dependent ADP-ribosyling enzymes such as Sirtuins and CD38 in cell death and survival pathways is discussed.

2. INTRODUCTION

Poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions are phylogenetically ancient as evidenced by the poly-ADP-ribosylating activities reported in dinoflagellates and archaebacteria and the identification of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase-like genes in bacterial and archaeal genomes (reviewed in ). Poly-ADP-ribose has a widespread occurrence and is present in most multicellular and unicellular organisms with few exceptions such as the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (reviewed in ). In mammalians, poly-ADP-ribose synthesis and degradation occurs in all mitotic and post-mitotic cells (reviewed in ). Homeostasis of poly-ADP-ribose metabolism is thought to play an essential function in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes, such as maintenance of genomic integrity, inter- and intracellular signaling, transcriptional regulation, cell differentiation and proliferation, energy metabolism and cell death (reviewed in ).

Poly-ADP-ribose is a homopolymer of ADP-ribose units linked by glycosidic ribose-ribose 1'-2' bonds and synthesized by the poly-ADP-ribose polymerase family of enzymes (PARPs) (reviewed in ). Poly-ADP-ribose polymerases are an ancient family of enzymes. Six genes encoding "bona fide" PARP enzymes have been identified in mammalians: PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, PARP4/vPARP, PARP5/Tankyrases-1 and PARP6/Tankyrases-2 (reviewed in ). The best-studied PARP enzyme, PARP1, plays a primary role in the process of poly-ADP-ribosylation. PARP1 is a nearly ubiquitously expressed and highly abundant nuclear chromatin-associated enzyme. According to textbook models, on average, approximately one molecule of this enzyme is present per 1000 base pairs of DNA (reviewed in ). Like mono-ADP-ribose synthesis, poly-ADP-ribose synthesis requires nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) as precursor and immediate substrate of the reaction with the release of nicotinamide. The constitutive levels of poly-ADP-ribose are usually very low in unstimulated cells. However, in response to mitogenic stimuli or genotoxic stress (i.e. in the presence of DNA strand breaks), the PARP activity and the levels of poly-ADP-ribose may increase 10- to 500-fold, while cellular NAD+ levels are correspondingly reduced (reviewed in ). Both constitutive and activated levels of poly-ADP-ribose are functions of the concentration of NAD+ in cells. Most free or protein-associated poly-ADP-ribose polymers are rapidly degraded by poly-ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG) in vivo. PARG is a key enzyme for poly-ADP-ribose catabolism by hydrolyzing both terminal ADP-ribose units from poly-ADP-ribose polymers via exoglycosidic activity and removing larger oligo-ADP-ribose fragments via endoglycosidic cleavage (reviewed in ). The endoglycosidase activity releases larger poly/oligo-ADP-ribose fragments and could be of particular physiological importance due to the generation of various types of free poly/oligo-ADP-ribose . These products are thought to be important signaling molecules involved in cell death and cell growth (reviewed in ).

PARP1 and to a lesser extend PARP2 play a pivotal role in modulating the cellular responses to stress (reviewed in ). Based on careful analysis of the literature, overactivation of PARP1, initiated through severe stress, appears to be a key mediator of cell death in low or non-proliferating cells in vivo. Uncontrolled poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions can result in massive necrotic cell death and tissue damage, which in turn often lead to severe inflammatory or neurodegenerative disorders (reviewed in ). Overactivation of PARP1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes, shock and allergy (reviewed in ). On the other hand, PARP1 and PARP2 were shown to be also required for the maintenance of genomic integrity and to protect highly proliferating cells such as stem cells but also non-proliferating neuronal cells against cell death induced by oxidative stress under mild and moderate progressive damage . The current literature clearly demonstrates that poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions play dual roles in cell death and survival pathways. The PARP/poly-ADP-ribosylation system was recently proposed to function as a sensor that integrates, in a "yin/yang"-like manner, information from the mitochondria and nucleus on the metabolic and oxidative states of cells, thus acting as a double-edged sword in ROS-dependent death/survival pathways ). However, the exact molecular mechanisms of how poly-ADP-ribosylation/PARPs act in these pathways are still under debate. This review briefly summarize the recent advances on the physiological functions of PARP1 in cell death and cell survival pathways and highlights the proposed molecular mechanisms underlying its "Jekyll and Hyde" duality. A special focus is placed on the potential crosstalk between poly-ADP-ribosylation and other NAD+-dependent reactions in these pathways. For a detailed description of cell death and cell survival non-related functions of distinct PARP family members, the reader is referred to the accompanying review (Hassa and Hottiger, Frontiers in Bioscience 2008; ).

3. PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH MECHANISMS

Programmed cell death (PCD) is an essential physiological process used by metazoans for successful embryonic and postembryonic development, maintenance of tissue homeostasis as well as a defensive strategy against pathogens and cancer (reviewed in ). PCD is a genetically regulated process of cell suicide. During embryogenesis PCD plays a major role in sculpting the shape of organs and limbs . For instance, generation of specific cell types, morphogenesis and the development of the inner organs depend on PCD pathways . PCD is also necessary for proper development of the immune system and homeostasis of T- and B-cells . Negative selection of auto-reactive immature T-cells is a typical cell death process . PCD prevents the activation of irrelevant B cell clones and is required for affinity maturation during the antibody response process. PCD is also involved in cytotoxic killing of target cells such as tumor/malignant cells or virally infected cells by cytolytic activity of natural killer cells, granulocytes, or macrophages . Abnormal regulation of PCD pathways often contributes to major pathologies, including many types of cancer, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases and ischemic damage (reviewed in ). Defective apoptosis due to mutation or biochemical inhibition of pro-apoptotic gene products often results in uncontrolled cell proliferation, which in turn leads to autoimmunity or cancer (reviewed in ). Exaggerated PCD can cause hypotrophy, such as in ischemic damage (reviewed in ). Excessive or defective PCD processes during embryogenesis may cause developmental abnormalities . Currently, PCD can be subdivided into at least four major types of cell death in mammalian cells, based on morphological and ultra-structural criteria, initiating death signal and the implication of caspases: apoptosis (type I), macroautophagy, (type II), programmed necrosis (type III) and mitotic catastrophe (type IV) (reviewed in ). Other more restraining classifications, subdivide PCDs into classical apoptosis, apoptosis-like PCD, necrosis, necrosis-like PCD, classical macroautophagy-like PCD and mitotic catastrophe (reviewed in ). Thus, the current classifications might soon change, based on our rapidly evolving understanding of programmed cell death processes.

3.1. Apoptosis

Classical apoptosis is the best-characterized form of PCD. Apoptotic cell death is an energy-(ATP)-dependent form of programmed cell death processes and characterized by the activation of caspases, cleavage of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins, DNA fragmentation, nuclear chromatin condensation (pyknosis), membrane blebbing and cell fragmentation into apoptotic bodies (reviewed in ). Apoptosis is generally restricted to single cells and associated with the retention of plasma membrane integrity, however induces cell surface changes that are important for the recognition and removal of apoptotic cells/bodies by phagocytic cells in a safe, non-inflammatory manner (reviewed in ). Clearance of apoptotic cells by phagocytic cells plays an essential role in the resolution of inflammation, protecting the surrounding tissue from harmful exposure to intracellular potentially pro-inflammatory substances of dying cells. Defective clearance of apoptotic cells is thought to contribute to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (reviewed in ). Apoptosis is positively regulated by balancing pro-survival signals or negatively regulated by a diverse range of extracellular and intracellular signals . In mammals, apoptotic cell death consists of at least two phases, initiation and execution phase (reviewed in ). The initiation phase can be subdivided in two major independently acting pathways: extracellular (extrinsic) death receptor pathways and intracellular (intrinsic) apoptotic pathways. Extrinsic apoptotic pathways are initiated by activated cell-surface-expressed death receptors, with signaling cascades orchestrated in part by the Bcl-2 and death receptors-mediated recruitment of procaspase-8 or procaspases-2/-10 . Intrinsic apoptotic pathways are mainly initiated following perturbation of intracellular organelle function (dysfunction of mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum) and induce the activation of caspase-9 via release of toxic mitochondrial proteins into the cytoplasm (i.e. cytochrome c) or inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)-mediated Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum . Both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways converge to the activation of procaspase-3 and of caspases-6 and -7, the canonical routes of caspase activation during the execution phase . For a detailed description of apoptotic cell death pathways, the readers are referred to the recent excellent reviews

3.1. 1. Collective apoptotic cell death

A recent study provided evidence for a novel communal form of cell death, cellular mass-suicide in flies during development . Unlike conventional apoptotic pathways, this novel form of apoptosis is not restricted to single cells. However, this unique communal form of cell death appears to be controlled through the same apoptosome proteins regulating conventional apoptosis . It remains to be investigated whether collective apoptotic cell death might be a more widespread phenomenon and occur also in mammals, for example during development and in inflammatory/neurodegenerative disorders

3.2. Macroautophagocytotic cell death

A second distinct form of programmed cell death is the recently described macroautophagocytotic cell death. Controlled autophagy is a process of cellular "self-eating", a highly conserved ATP-dependent bulk degradation process in eukaryotes that usually promotes cell survival under metabolic stress (reviewed in ). Various types of metabolic stress, including nutrient and energy starvation, mitochondrial dysfunction or endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, and infections can activate autophagy (reviewed in ). Controlled autophagy helps to maintain a balance between the synthesis, degradation, and subsequent recycling of cellular products. On the other hand, inappropriate activation of autophagy can trigger cell death under specific conditions (reviewed in . For instance, in starved cells, autophagy works as an alternative energy source and promotes cell survival while various cytokines and chemicals have been shown to induce cell death caused by autophagy. At least four distinct pathways of autophagy are described: microautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, macroautophagy and programmed macroautophagocytotic cell death (reviewed in ). Microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy occurs directly into the lysosomes and is not involved in programmed cell death. In contrast, macroautophagy is characterized by the sequestration of bulk cytoplasm including excess or aberrant organelles, within double- or multi-membraned autophagic vacuoles, called autophagosome. There is growing evidence that, under certain conditions, organelles or even proteins can be selectively degraded by autophagy . Autophagosomes are delivered to the degradative organelle, the lysosome/vacuole, for bulk degradation and eventual recycling of the resulting low molecular weight degradation products (reviewed in ). Macroautophagocytotic cell death is a form of non-apoptotic, non-necrotic cell death (reviewed in ). However, the exact mechanisms by which autophagy contributes programmed cell death is only partially understood. Macroautophagy has been suggested to promote or execute programmed cell death especially under conditions when the apoptosis and programmed-necrotic cell death machineries are compromised (reviewed in ). Macroautophagocytotic cell death has been shown to play a prominent role in PCD during developmental processes and in both innate and adaptive immunity against intracellular bacteria and viruses by degrading the pathogens in autolysosomes (reviewed in ). In addition, recent reports suggested that abnormal regulation of autophagy could be a major cause for neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. For a detailed description of autophagic cell death pathways, the readers are referred to the recent excellent reviews .

3.3. Programmed-necrotic cell death

Necrosis has been initially defined as an uncontrolled or default pathway of cell death (reviewed in ). However several studies have clearly demonstrated that necrotic cell death is as well controlled and programmed as caspase-dependent apoptosis ( and reviewed in ). Programmed-necrotic cell death largely lacks the features of apoptosis and autophagy and is characterized by swelling of cellular organelles, leading to loss of plasma membrane integrity, nuclear disintegration (pyknotic nuclei) and cell lysis (reviewed in ). Programmed-necrotic cell death is defined as an acute ATP/energy-independent type of cell death usually initiated following mitochondrial dysfunction, ATP depletion and energy loss. Necrosis is typically followed by pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, which are initiated through the active release of inflammatory cytokines when the cells lyse (reviewed in ). Unlike classical apoptosis, programmed necrosis is thought to be the result of extensive crosstalk between several signaling cascades. Several studies suggested that the serine/threonine kinase RIP1, a component of the death receptor TNFRI signaling complex, acts as a major initiator of signaling cascades contributing to necrotic cell death ( and reviewed in . The propagation and execution phases of necrotic cell death includes calcium release, enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of calpains and cathepsins . In addition, upon ATP depletion, energy loss and permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane, the mitochondrial flavoprotein apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) often translocates to the nucleus under these conditions, where it participates in chromatin condensation and large-scale DNA fragmentation (reviewed in ). Mitochondria serve as the central relay station in cell death through the release of pro-apoptotic and pro-necrotic factors such as cytochrome c and AIF, which activate caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death signaling cascades, respectively (reviewed in ). AIF is a phylogenetically conserved 57kDa flavoenzyme that is restricted to the mitochondrial intermembrane space in healthy cells where it exerts protective functions in bioenergetic and redox metabolism . AIF exhibits both reactive oxygen species (ROS)-generating NAD(P)H oxidase and monodehydroascorbate reductase activity . The primary non-pathophysiological role of AIF appears to be the maintenance of a fully functional respiratory chain. However, under pathological conditions, opening of the outer mitochondrial transition pore is induced by high doses of genotoxic agents or NMDA, AIF is cleaved by a mitochondria-associated calpain-like protease, which mediates its release from mitochondria to the cytoplasm, where it combines with cyclophilin A (CypA) and EndoG to form an active DNAse . This activated complex then translocates to the nucleus and contributes to nuclear DNA fragmentation into 50-kbp fragments and chromatinolysis . AIF was shown to participate in both caspase-dependent and -independent cell death processes . The current models suggest that AIF serves as the main mediator of caspase-independent apoptosis/necrosis-like programmed cell death processes. The exact functional role of EndoG is still under debate since different knockout mice strains of the EndoG gene showed different defects in apoptosis, even opposite phenotypes . Under normal physiological conditions AIF plays an important physiological role in mitochondria . Studies using Aif knockout cells and Harlequin (Hq) mutant mice, which have only 20% AIF expression strongly suggested that AIF serves as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger . Moreover, oxidative phosphorylation is compromised in cells with depleted AIF due to reduced expression of the electron transport chain complex I in the mitochondria . Recent data strongly indicate, that the redox-active enzymatic region of AIF is associated with anti-apoptotic functions, while its DNA binding region possesses pro-apoptotic/necrotic activities ( and reviewed in ). Finally, a very recent genetic study, using knock-in mice expressing an AIF mutant that cannot be released from mitochondria and thus doesn't translocate into the nucleus, clearly demonstrated that AIF plays an active role during programmed cell death processes in the nucleus but not in the mitochondria . Reconstitution of mitochondrial AIF was not sufficient to rescue cell death .

Recent studies provided evidence that there might be a continuum of apoptosis and necrosis in response to the same cell death stimulus. Indeed, many cell death inducing agents, such as MNNG induce apoptosis at lower doses and necrosis at higher doses . Treatment of thymocytes in vitro with peroxynitrite at low concentrations (10 m M) led to apoptosis, whereas higher concentrations (50 m M) resulted in programmed necrosis . It was therefore suggested that features of both apoptosis and necrosis could coexist in the same cell. In addition, inhibition of apoptosis or autophagy can change the type of cell death to necrosis (reviewed in ). Programmed-necrotic cell death occurs in both physiological and pathophysiological processes. Programmed necrosis is suggested to be crucial for the killing of tumor cells that have developed strategies to evade apoptosis. On the other hand, programmed-necrotic cell death plays a major role in inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders and is therefore a major target for therapeutic strategies . For a detailed description of programmed-necrotic cell death, the readers are referred to the recent excellent reviews

3.4. Mitotic Catastrophe

Mitotic catastrophe represents a caspase-dependent and caspase-independent form of programmed cell death that occurs during mitosis. Mitotic catastrophe is triggered by a combination of defective cell cycle checkpoints, accumulation DNA damage and the development of aneuploid cells (reviewed in ). Agents that disrupt the mitotic spindle also induce mitotic catastrophe. Thus, mitotic catastrophe is conceived as a molecular mechanism that protects against unwarranted (and possibly oncogenic) aneuploidization, which may participate in oncogenesis . Mitotic catastrophe is a complex process that is suggested to be in large part dependent on the activation of caspase-2 and mitochondrial membrane permeabilization . However, the exact molecular events, which activate mitotic catastrophe remains to be elucidated. Recent studies provided preliminary evidence that mitotic catastrophe is tightly controlled by cell-cycle-specific kinases, cell cycle checkpoint proteins, such as Chk1, ATR/ATM, p53, members of the Bcl-2 family as well as survivin .

3.5. Senescence induced cell death?

A number of recent studies in the field of cellular senescence have provided preliminary evidence that cellular senescence or a subtype of it may represent an additional form of programmed cell death in vivo ( and reviewed in ). Cellular senescence was first described by Hayflick and Moorhead in 1961 as replicative senescence, a mechanism that irreversibly arrested the growth of normal human fibroblasts cells and prevented them from growing indefinitely in culture ("old cells") . According to Hayflick's model, normal somatic cells possess only a limited mitotic division potential. Later on, cellular senescence was subdivided in two major categories: (1) Replication history-dependent or telomere attrition-induced senescence, termed "replicative senescence" and (2) telomere attrition-independent or replication/proliferative history-independent senescence, termed premature or accelerated senescence . Premature "extrinsic" senescence can be induced by a large number of stressors, such as increased levels of ROS, in response to oncogenes, pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF-α or IL-1), γ-radiation, UV light and accumulation of DNA strand breaks ("young cells") (reviewed in ). Both types of cellular senescence were suggested to serve as a tumor suppressor mechanism (reviewed in ). Indeed, numerous studies clearly demonstrated that both Rb and p53 tumor suppressors are key regulators of the senescence program, consistent with their roles in mediating cell-cycle checkpoints and tumor suppression (reviewed in ). On the other hand, senescence has also been shown to contribute to age-related pathology by disrupting local tissue integrity and stimulating tumorigenesis in aged mice and humans (reviewed in ). Senescent cells have been initially described as resistant to programmed cell death. However, apoptosis-resistance is not a general feature of senescent cells, which may also be apoptosis prone. Indeed, several studies provided evidence that both replicative and premature senescent cells may eventually undergo programmed cell death in vivo and in vitro, depending on the cell type and apoptotic stimuli ( and reviewed in ). For instance replicative and premature senescent human endothelial cells and porcine pulmonary artery endothelial cells can undergo apoptotic cell death when cultured for a prolonged period of time . Clearance of senescent neutrophils and eosinophils can occur through apoptosis- or necrosis-like programmed cell death and subsequent phagocytosis by macrophages , while aged human senescent fibroblasts appears to eliminate themselves by macroautophagocytotic cell death . However the exact molecular mechanisms linking premature senescence to apoptotic, necrotic, autophagy- or mitotic catastrophe-like cell death remain to be investigated.

4. PARP1-MEDIATED CELL DEATH

Numerous genetic studies with Parp1- or Parp2-deficient mice and pharmacological approaches demonstrated that poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions play crucial roles in cell death pathways under lethal oxidative stress conditions (reviewed in ). Genetic knockout of the Parp1 or Parp2 gene or pharmacological inhibition of enzymatic PARP activity protects from several oxidative stress-dependent pathophysiological conditions, leading to aberrant cell death, in a variety of experimental models including endotoxin induced septic shock, streptozotocin-induced diabetes, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) toxicity, traumatic spinal cord injury, myocardial infarction, cerebral and cardiac ischemia (reviewed in ). The use of PARP inhibitors has been proposed as a protective therapy in decreasing cell death and other tissue damage in inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders (reviewed in ). The involvement of nuclear and cytoplasmic isoforms of PARG in these processes is less well understood . However, recent studies using pharmacological inhibitors of PARG and Parg knockout mice demonstrated that PARG could also enhance the pathogenesis induced by acute tissue injury, ischemia and inflammation ( and reviewed in ). Homeostasis of poly-ADP-ribosylation regulated by PARP1 and PARG has been proposed to be an important regulator of programmed cell death processes in multicellular organisms . The extent of poly-ADP-ribosylation appears to correlates with the severity of genotoxic stress and this might determine the cellular response. Under mild to moderate non-lethal oxidative stress conditions, it plays important roles in maintenance of genomic stability and transcriptional regulation in pro-inflammatory/cellular defense processes (reviewed in ). However, severe stress following acute neuronal injury, which causes the overactivation of PARP1 (i.e upon cellular damage by oxygen radicals or excitotoxicity) often results in unregulated poly-ADP-ribose synthesis, which in turn can lead to significant decrements in NAD+, ATP depletion and widespread cell death (reviewed in ).

The exact mechanisms by which poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions lead to cell death are currently under debate. Several short term, primary mechanism were proposed, including poly-ADP-ribosylation-induced energy-failure and nuclear translocation of AIF in programmed-necrotic cell death or an increase in susceptibility of chromatin to cellular endonucleases and internucleosomal DNA fragmentation by poly-ADP-ribosylation of chromatin in the early stage of apoptosis. Poly-ADP-ribosylation-mediated cell death is currently thought to be solely manifested through programmed-necrotic cell death but this view is most likely too simple and not reflecting the (patho)physiological situation. Different alternative models are discussed in the following sections.

4.1. PARP1-mediated programmed-necrotic cell death.

In 1983, N. Berger suggested first that overstimulation of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions might be linked to necrotic cell death and thus initiate cell-autonomous programmed necrosis . Indeed, recent studies using DNA damaging agents such as N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or peroxynitrite, which are well known to induce necrosis at high concentrations, showed that pharmacological inhibition of PARP activity or knockout of the Parp1 gene blocks programmed-necrotic cell death induced by these agents (reviewed in ). Numerous reports from various laboratories indicate that inhibition or absence of PARP1 provides remarkable protection in disease models such as septic shock, diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction and ischemia, which are characterized predominantly by programmed-necrotic cell death (reviewed in ). These studies clearly demonstrated that PARP1 and to a much lesser extend also PARP2 play an essential role in programmed-necrotic cell death. Remarkably, the contribution of PARP1- and PARP2-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions to programmed-necrotic cell death, appears to be dependent on the cell type, cellular metabolic states and on the expression levels and activity potential of PARP1, PARP2 and PARG. Poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions seem to play an important role in necrotic cell death of various endothelial and epithelial cells, as well as in several types of neuronal cells, whereas necrotic cell death caused by oxidative damage in other cell types, such as hepatocytes, is not dependent on PARP1 or PARP2 (reviewed in ). However, the exact biochemical pathways and sequence of events leading from PARP1 activation to programmed-necrotic cell death are not fully understood. At least two (partially overlapping) models were proposed: The NAD-depletion/PARP1-suicide model proposed by N. Berger and the apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) shuttling model, recently suggested by V. and T. Dawson (reviewed in ).

4.1.1. NAD depletion /PARP1-Suicide Model

According to the �PARP-suicide" model proposed by N. Berger, lethal levels of DNA damage lead to overactivation of PARP(s) and a rapid decline of cellular NAD+, which in turn affects the activities of the enzymes involved in glycolysis, the pentose phosphate shunt and the Krebs cycle thereby preventing glucose-dependent ATP production . In an attempt to restore the NAD+ pools, NAD+ is re-synthesized with a consumption of 2-4 molecules of ATP per molecule of NAD+ (depending on which salvage pathway it is used in the cell) and as a consequence cellular ATP levels become depleted, leading to subsequent cellular energy failure, cellular dysfunction and in necrotic cell death . Several studies suggested that excessive poly-ADP-ribosylation by PARP1 contributes to mitochondrial failure and mitochondria permeability transition (MPT) . MPT results from the opening of a large conductance channel in the inner mitochondrial membrane and is a crucial factor leading to cell death during conditions of oxidative stress and energy depletion . This hypothesis could be partially confirmed in numerous studies by using novel PARP inhibitors, NAD+ replenishment or cells from Parp1 knockout mice. Repletion of intracellular NAD+ through liposome-mediated delivery of NAD+ partially preserved mitochondrial membrane potential, restored glycolytic function and rescues cells from PARP-mediated cell death . Moreover delivery of alternative substrates such as alpha-ketoglutarate, glutamate, glutamine and/or pyruvate that can be metabolized independent of cytosolic NAD+ have been shown to reduced cell death from approximately 70% to near basal levels after PARP activation . These studies also strongly indicate that PARP1 activation may only lead to rapid depletion of the cytosolic but not the mitochondrial NAD+ pool . Thus, pharmacological inhibition of the enzymatic activity of PARPs or the complete absence of PARP1 significantly appears to improve the cellular energetic state and cell viability after exposure to necrotic cell death-inducing agents. DNA damage-induced NAD+ depletion is a poly-ADP-ribosylation-dependent process that can be completed within 15 min, and therefore, precedes by far the execution of the apoptotic process (reviewed in ). Since ATP is required for the execution of apoptosis, overstimulation of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions in vivo can result in necrotic cell death, even in a situation where the stimulus is definitely pro-apoptotic (reviewed in ).

Recent studies clearly demonstrated that the cellular metabolic state is a key factor in determining how ATP levels are affected by overstimulation of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions . The massive generation of poly-ADP-ribose in the nucleus by overactivation of PARP1 and, to a much lower extent, PARP2, has been suggested to preferentially deplete the nuclear and cytosolic pools of NAD+, but not the mitochondrial pools, thereby inhibiting glycolysis but not oxidative phosphorylation . Thus, under conditions where glucose is the only available metabolic substrate, depletion of the cytosolic NAD+ pool leads to cell death of highly glycolytic cells . Actively proliferating cells use almost exclusively glucose through aerobic glycolysis for the production of ATP and die from NAD+ and ATP depletion, as a consequence of overactivation of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions. In contrast, non-proliferating cells can catabolize a mixture of metabolic substrates, including amino acids and lipids, and maintain ATP levels through oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria and are resistant or less sensitive to ATP depletion and cell death under the same conditions . These latter, not actively growing cells are therefore more sensitive to inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The decision between cell death and survival after exposure to necrosis inducing agents is therefore mainly regulated by the availability of metabolic substrates and the expression levels or enzymatic activities of PARP1 and in part of PARP2 . Thus, the contribution of PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions to programmed-necrotic cell death depends on the cell type and cellular metabolic state of the cell. PARP1 appears to play an important role in programmed-necrotic cell death of various types of endothelial and epithelial cells, as well as several types of neuronal cells (reviewed in ). Taken together, there is clear evidence that poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions play a central role in programmed-necrotic cell death pathways .

4.1.2. AIF shuttling/signaling model

NAD+/ATP depletion through excessive enzymatic activity of PARP1 has long been thought to be the sole mechanism of eliciting programmed-necrotic cell death upon genotoxic stress. However, recent genetic studies, using Parp1 knockout mice, provided preliminary evidence that energy depletion alone might not be sufficient to mediate poly-ADP-ribosylation-dependent cell death . Deadly NAD+ depletion (60-95% of their normal levels) occurs only under very high levels of DNA damage, while under moderate levels of DNA damage the intracellular NAD+ levels undergo a decrease of only 5-10%, thus other mechanisms are required for poly-ADP-ribosylation-dependent necrotic cell death . Several groups suggested that excessive activation of PARP1 most likely initiates a nuclear signal that spreads to the cytoplasm and triggers the release of AIF from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm and its translocation to the nucleus (reviewed in ). Translocation of AIF has been shown to occur quickly after overactivation of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions (reviewed in ). Whether poly-ADP-ribosylation could also induce cytochrome c release is under debate. Some studies demonstrated that this process is only associated with the mitochondrial release of AIF, but not of cytochrome c (reviewed in ). Pharmacological inhibition of the enzymatic activity of PARPs or the complete absence of PARP1 in different cells derived from Parp1 knockout mice blocks the release of AIF and its translocation to the nucleus in various cell types .

Does poly-ADP-ribosylation-mediated programmed-necrotic cell death requires the activation of caspase or other proteolytical (calpain-like protease) signaling cascades? Previous studies did not support any role for caspases in PARP1 dependent neuronal cell death. On the other hand, as already mentioned, cleavage of AIF by a mitochondria-associated calpain-like protease is crucial for the release of AIF from mitochondria and is suggested to play a general role in mitochondrial cell death processes . Calpain activation has been shown to contribute to necrotic cell death . Calpains are a family of cytoplasmic Ca2+-dependent cysteine proteases. Indeed, using a panel of gene knockout cells, a very recent genetic study from the Susin lab clearly demonstrated that PARP1-mediated mitochondrial AIF release and programmed-necrotic cell death is a p53-independent mechanism, which requires calpains, but not cathepsins or caspases . Furthermore, these study revealed that the enzymatic activity of PARP1 could even regulate/induce calpain activation during alkylating DNA damage-induced programmed-necrotic cell death . However the exact molecular mechanisms underlying PARP1-mediated calpain activation remains to be elucidated.

4.1.2.1 Molecular mechanisms underlying the PARP1-mediated shuttling of AIF

Despite its pathophysiological importance and the tremendous efforts that has been made in the recent years, the exact poly-ADP-ribosylation dependent mechanisms by which PARP1 activation leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and release of AIF are still not clear. At present, more than 5 different, but partially overlapping nucleus-to-mitochondria signaling mechanisms were proposed. (1) Cytoplasmic and nuclear NAD+/ATP depletion. (2) Cytoplasmic retention of AIF by HSP70 in Parp1 knockout cells. (3) Free poly-ADP-ribose polymers serving as a nuclear-to-mitochondria signaling molecule and death signal. (4) Shuttling of nuclear pro-necrotic factors (potentially attached with poly-ADP-ribose) such as PARP1 itself or HMGB1 into cytoplasm or to mitochondria. (5) Activation of putative cytoplasmic isoforms of PARP1 and PARP2.

4.1.2.1.1. NAD/ATP depletion

Several studies support a model in which NAD+ depletion as well as ROS-induced mitochondrial dysfunction may lead to mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) and trigger AIF-induced cell death . These studies demonstrated that PARP1-dependent depletion of NAD+/ATP levels appears to precede MPT and the release of AIF. Treatment of cells with PARP inhibitors, submicromolar concentrations of cyclosporine A, an inhibitor of MPT or with liposome-encapsulated NAD+ preserved mitochondrial transmembrane potential, rescued cellular respiration and ATP levels, blocked nuclear translocation of AIF and subsequent cell death in cells undergoing hyper-poly-ADP-ribosylation . These observations suggest that NAD+ depletion and MPT may be at least partially required for poly-ADP-ribosylation-mediated AIF translocation and cell death, under the tested conditions.

4.1.2.1.2. Enhanced cytosolic retention of AIF by HSP-70 in Parp1 knockout mice

Several studies demonstrated that the expression levels of heat-shock protein HSP70 are increased in several types of primary cells derived from Parp1 knockout mice when compared with wild-type mice . PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation appears to repress heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1) activity and the heat shock response in these cell types . Transcription of the Hsp70 gene requires HSF-1, the primary mediator of the heat shock response. Recent evidence suggests that HSP70, an inducible cytoprotectant protein can antagonize AIF-mediated cell death by both inhibiting mitochondrial AIF release and retaining leaked AIF in the cytoplasm . Although, HSP70 antagonizes apoptosis and programmed-necrotic cell death by interfering with multiple checkpoints in these cell death pathways, cytoplasmic retention of AIF has been suggested to be the major mechanism of HSP70-mediated cytoprotection. Interestingly, a very recent report provided preliminary evidence that the ATPase domain of HSP70 is critical for sequestering AIF in the cytoplasm under conditions of ATP depletion . Although the relative importance of the ATPase domain of HSP70 for sequestering leaked AIF in the cytoplasm remains controversial , it is possible that the mitochondrial interaction between HSP70 and AIF might be indeed regulated through the ATP/NAD+ levels, and thus implying that HSP70 may act as an ATP sensor under conditions of physiological injury.

4.1.2.1.3. Free poly-ADP-ribose could serve as nucleus-to-mitochondria signaling molecule and death signal

It has been recently suggested that certain types of free poly-ADP-ribose are involved in stress-dependent signaling processes in vivo . Free or protein-associated poly-ADP-ribose could activate pro-apoptotic/necrotic factors. This hypothesis is partially supported by three recent studies. Complete Parg loss-of-function in Drosophila melanogaster was shown to result in cytoplasmic accumulation of free or protein-associated poly-ADP-ribose and in severe neurodegeneration . This observation led several investigators to speculate whether a poly-ADP-ribosylation product could indeed directly serve as an AIF-releasing factor . Remarkably, two recent reports provided preliminary evidence that poly-ADP-ribose polymers, produced by PARP1, may act directly as a non-proteinaceous AIF-releasing factor and cell death signal . When exogenously added to neurons at very high concentration, poly-ADP-ribose polymers cause the translocation of AIF from the mitochondria to the nucleus in intact cells and subsequent cell death . Exogenous delivery of poly-ADP-ribose polymers was also inducing necrotic cell death in primary cortical neurons isolated from Parp1 knockout mice indicating that the presence of free or protein-associated poly-ADP-ribose polymers in the cytoplasm might indeed be essential for cell death signaling in programmed necrosis . Furthermore, purified poly-ADP-ribose polymers, generated by PARP1 in vitro induced AIF release from isolated mitochondria in vitro. When cortical neurons were treated ex vivo with very high doses of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; 500�M) endogenous poly-ADP-ribose polymer accumulated primarily in the nucleus 15 minutes after NMDA receptor stimulation, but 30 and 60 min after treatment, poly-ADP-ribose polymers appears to colocalize in the cytoplasm and to mitochondria, though at very low levels . Moreover, the Dawson lab recently identified a protein termed Iduna that could bind to and neutralize endogenous poly-ADP-ribose polymers accumulating in the cytoplasm, thereby fine-tuning the outcome of cell death (reviewed in ). Interestingly, poly-ADP-ribose polymer toxicity appears to be length-, structure- and dose-dependent. Increasing length and complexity of poly-ADP-ribose polymers resulted in increased cell death . Thus, it seems that the size and structural complexity of poly-ADP-ribose produced by PARP1 is essential in MNNG-induced programmed-necrotic cell death. It remains to be elucidated whether poly-ADP-ribose polymers synthesized by the other members of the PARP family, such as PARP2, may also activate the AIF-mediated necrotic pathway.

However, despite the abundance of indications, further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis. The concentration of poly-ADP-ribose polymers used in these two studies to exogenously induce AIF release and translocation is unexpected high compared with the very low levels of endogenous poly-ADP-ribose polymer supposed to exist in the cytoplasm . Indeed, endogenous PAR in the cytoplasm was barely detectable. Due to the extremely high NMDA concentration (500m M) used in the poly-ADP-ribose polymer localization studies , one cannot exclude the possibility that NMDA could have indirectly lead to disruption of the nuclear envelope architecture and integrity and thus may result in a non-physiologically relevant release of the highly negatively charged, large and branched poly-ADP-ribose polymer to the cytoplasm. Indeed, based on the physico-chemical behavior of the highly negative charge and branched structure of poly-ADP-ribose polymers, one could even assume that poly-ADP-ribose polymers are most likely retained in the nucleus, indicating that the observed cytoplasmic poly-ADP-ribose polymers may alternatively synthesized in the cytoplasm or mitochondria under these conditions (see next sections). In addition, no clear correlation in the kinetics between the accumulation of poly-ADP-ribose polymers in the cytoplasm and nuclear AIF shuttling were presented in these studies . A recent study showed that PARP appears to be rapidly activated in two distinct phases, an initial immediate activation within the first 5-10 minutes and a late PARP activation between 60-240 minutes, dependent on the stimuli and cell type . On the other hand, it is quite possible that another AIF releasing event precedes the (weak!) accumulation of poly-ADP-ribose polymers in the cytoplasm. Thus it remains to be further investigated whether this shuttling will occur under pathophysiological more relevant conditions in vivo. It would be interesting to investigate whether pre- or post-treatment of cells with leptomycin B (LMB), an inhibitor of CRM-dependent nuclear protein export, could inhibit the cell death process in different cell types and under different pro-necrotic/apoptotic conditions (see also the next section). Moreover the mechanism by which poly-ADP-ribose polymers induces AIF release is not known. The authors of both studies proposed that the highly charged poly-ADP-ribose polymers could depolarize the mitochondrial membrane, which in turn would lead to permeability transition and subsequent AIF release . An alternative scenario might be the activation of calpains or pro-apoptotic kinases mediated by direct protein-poly-ADP-ribose interactions in the cytoplasm or at the mitochondria, which then triggers AIF release from the mitochondria. Finally, it appears unlikely that poly-ADP-ribose polymers serve as a general nuclear/mitochondrial AIF-releasing signal in PARP1-dependent programmed-necrotic cell death since AIF-release was also observed independent of PARP1 (, see also next sections). Potential poly-ADP-ribose target proteins in the cytoplasm and mitochondria are shown in Table 1.

4.1.2.1.4. Shuttling of nuclear proteinaceous pro-necrotic factors to mitochondria

A recent report provided first evidence that PARP1 might translocate to the cytoplasm under cytotoxic conditions . When cells were exogenously treated with high doses of purified HIV1-Vpr proteins, PARP1 shuttled to the cytoplasm in a glucocorticoid receptor complex-dependent manner . Several previous studies demonstrated that high levels of extracellular HIV1-Vpr exhibit cytotoxicity to uninfected bystander cells through apoptotic or necrotic mechanisms, resembling programmed-necrotic cell death (reviewed in ). Two other recent studies identified the linker histone variant H1.2 as an apoptogenic factor released from the nucleus to the cytosol and translocated to the mitochondria, exclusively in response to DNA double strand breaks . Mitochondria-associated H1.2 co-localized with Bak and promotes the activation of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, mitochondrial cytochrome c release, and ultimately, cell death in a p53-dependent manner . Although there is so far no clear evidence supporting such a hypothesis, certain poly-ADP-ribose-associated chromatin proteins, such as histones, high-mobility-group box proteins, or PARPs might also be used as AIF-releasing signals during apoptosis and programmed necrosis, respectively.

4.1.2.1.5. Activation of an unknown cytoplasmic isoform of PARP1 or PARP2

Most studies have localized PARP1 exclusively to the nucleus. However, several previous studies suggested the existence and activation of unknown mitochondrial or cytoplasmic potentially alternatively spliced isoforms of PARP1 and PARP2 ( and reviewed in ). In fact, data from P. Mandels group provided preliminary evidence for the existence of cytosolic and mitochondria-associated poly-ADP-ribose polymerase and poly-ADP-ribose glycohydrolase activity in primary human liver cells, rat cortical neurons and mouse fibroblasts . Interestingly, PARP2 was recently suggested to be also perinuclear localized under normal physiological conditions but localized exclusively to the nucleus 6 h after irradiation at 0.5 Gy in Parp1(+/+) MEFs cells . Surprisingly in unirradiated Parp1(-/-) cells, PARP2 distribution was nuclear with no change after 0.5 Gy, indicating that PARP2 could shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus in a stimuli and PARP1-dependent manner . The possible existence of cytosolic and mitochondria-associated poly-ADP-ribose polymerase activities may argue in favor of a direct interaction between PARP1 and AIF or mitochondrial components involved in MPT. This would also obviate any need for nuclear-to-mitochondria signaling molecules. However, one has to be cautious, despite that many groups have been actively involved in the search for a mitochondrial poly-ADP-ribosylation neither poly-ADP-ribose formation in the mitochondria nor localization of PARP1 protein to the mitochondria have been reported by other labs.

Taken together, it is possible that all suggested mechanisms of nuclear-to-(cytoplasmic)-to-mitochondrial communication could indeed serve as a trigger, dependent on the stimuli, metabolic state and on the cell lines in which PARP1 activation occurs. This could even taken place in the same cell in parallel or sequentially in waves.

4.1.3. Phosphorylation-dependent activation of PARP1 in programmed-necrotic cell death

A recent study from the Swanson lab provided first evidence that the activity of PARP1 is controlled by phosphorylation of PARP1 during programmed-necrotic cell death . Using a rat model of hypoglycemic brain injury, these authors demonstrated that PARP1-mediated programmed-necrotic cell death of neuronal cells induced by NMDA, peroxynitrite, or DNA alkylation agents is blocked by pharmacological inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and 2 (ERK1/2) inhibitors and by siRNA knockdown of ERK2 expression . In vitro kinase assays with recombinant proteins and in vivo studies using PARP1 mutants revealed that direct phosphorylation of PARP1 by ERK1/2 on S372 and T373 is required for maximal PARP1 activation after DNA damage. Inhibition of PARP1 phosphorylation by ERK1/2 was proposed to be the major mechanism by which inhibitors of the ERK2 signaling cascade reduce cell death rates following ischemia-reperfusion . Furthermore, based on genetic approaches and pharmacological inhibition, two other recent reports showed that c-Jun N-terminal kinase-1 (JNK-1), but not the other groups of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), is required for H2O2- and MNNG induced PARP1-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction, AIF translocation and subsequent cell death . However, the data of these studies are at least in part conflicting. It is not yet clear whether JNK-1 activation occurs upstream or downstream of PARP1. The first study demonstrated that MEFs derived from knockout mice of JNK-1, receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) are highly resistant to PARP1-induced cell death in vitro . This study also suggested that JNK-1 acts downstream of PARP1 as the main executor in MNNG-induced programmed-necrotic cell death and comprises together with RIP1 and TRAF2 a pathway to mediate the signaling from PARP1 over-activation to mitochondrial dysfunction . The rapid activation of the JNK-1 cascade was blocked in presence of non-specific PARP inhibitors while pharmacological inhibition of JNK and deletion of the Jnk1 gene did not prevent the activation of PARP1 . This observation is also partially supported by previous reports using non-specific PARP and kinase inhibitors . Both, RIP1 and TRAF2 appears to act upstream of JNK-1 in this pathway . In contrast, the second study demonstrated using the same pharmacological or genetic approach that H2O2-mediated PARP1 activation is dependent on JNK-1 activation . JNK-1 was also previously shown to act as the main executor in H2O2-induced programmed-necrotic cell death. Pharmacological inhibition of JNK-1 or genetic deletion suppressed the sustained activation of PARP-1 induced by H2O2, suggesting that JNK-1 acts upstream of PARP1 . Similar to ERK1/2, JNK-1 appears to promote the sustained activation of PARP1 activation through a direct protein-protein interaction and phosphorylation of PARP1 . This discrepancies might be explained by the different cell types and stimuli used in these studies. Indeed the high concentration of MNNG used in the first study (500 μM), MNNG could directly activate JNK-1 or induce mitochondrial depolarization, including direct facilitation of mitochondrial permeability transition, independent of PARP1 ( and reviewed in ). Alternatively, one cannot fully exclude the possibility that a overlooked positive poly-ADP-ribose-dependent feed back loop may exist, which could be triggered by PARP1, PARP2 or another PARP family member.

Interestingly, in the last 6 years, several studies provided preliminary data, indicating that PARP1-catalyzed poly-ADP-ribosylation might negatively affect cytoprotective kinase signaling pathways, which play a significant role in cell survival and cell death . Inhibitor studies demonstrated that several different non-specific PARP inhibitors may enhance the endotoxin-induced or ischemia-reperfusion-induced activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT/protein kinase B (PKB) and p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (p38-MAPK) in ex vivo and in vivo models . Moreover, PARP inhibition causes activation of ATM, which is known to be involved in the DNA DSB response . However, the exact molecular mechanism remains to be investigated. There are no combined biochemical and genetic studies reported, which could support the hypothesis that PARP1-catalyzed poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions negatively affect cytoprotective kinases through direct modulation of distinct kinase activities. The specificity of PARP inhibitors is in general very questionable due to their ADP-ribosylation non-related off-target activities, including ROS scavenging (reviewed in ). Thus, it is not yet clear whether the observed effect is directly mediated through PARP1-catalyzed poly-ADP-ribosylation or indirectly through PARP1 independent mechanisms. Whether poly-ADP-ribosylation directly affects these pathways can therefore only be addressed in vivo by using knock-in mice models expressing enzymatic mutants of distinct PARP enzymes and in vitro by subsequent poly-ADP-ribose-binding and kinase activity assays.

4.1.4. PARP1 independent AIF mediated cell death processes

Necrotic cell death caused by oxidative damage in other cell types, such as hepatocytes, does not depend on poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions (reviewed in ). Indeed, mitochondrial AIF release and shuttling of AIF to the nucleus is not exclusively dependent on poly-ADP-ribosylation and PARP1 or other PARPs. Several reports suggested that programmed-necrotic cell death can be also mediated independent of PARP activation or caspase activity, but through other not yet fully understood pathways . As already mentioned above, high concentration of MNNG (>100μM) can directly induce mitochondrial depolarization, including facilitation of mitochondrial permeability transition, independent of PARP1 ( and reviewed in ). MNNG is used as a standard tool for the functional characterization of PARP1 activation during PCD. However, the concentration of MNNG used for PARP studies varies between 100 and 500 μM, wich is 10-50 times the IC50 value of MNNG for most cells. Indeed, recent studies demonstrated that MNNG induced NAD+ depletion and cell death can be prevented by inhibition of the permeability transition pore opening. MNNG appears to act as an inhibitor of respiration and promotes opening of the permeability transition pore in intact cells independent of PARP1 . These studies suggest that DNA damage and PARP1 activation are not in general the primary events in the sequence leading to MNNG induced NAD+/ATP depletion and cell death . Thus, mitochondrial dysfunction appears to be the cause rather than the consequence of MNNG induced NAD+ depletion ( and reviewed in ).

The activities of other factors such as p53 and caspase-2 were also shown to be required for this process to a similar extent ( and reviewed in ). Recent studies demonstrated that both AIF and caspase-12 dependent PCD pathways are coactivated during degenerative processes in an animal model of retinitis pigmentosa, independent of poly-ADP-ribosylation and PARP1. The co-translocation to the nucleus of caspase-12 and AIF appears to occur in response to two endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stresses: protein misfolding and disruption of calcium homeostasis . AIF has been suggested to primarily control programmed cell death caused by changes in calcium homeostasis while caspase-12 may have a main role in programmed cell death induced by protein misfolding . The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) appears to be a key factor for these processes, in presence or absence of poly-ADP-ribosylation and caspase activation (reviewed in ). Moreover, it is not yet investigated whether the short isoforms of AIF (AIFsh and AIFsh2) and the AIF-related factor, AIF-homologous mitochondria-associated inducer of death (AMID) , might also be (partially) poly-ADP-ribosylation-dependent. The new pro-apoptotic/necrotic isoform AIFsh, when overexpressed, translocates to the nucleus and leads to a caspase-independent necrotic cell death. AMID is a pro-apoptotic flavoprotein with similarity to AIF, possessing NAD(P)H oxidase activity and is localized to the outer mitochondrial membrane and the cytosol . Several studies suggested that the mechanism is similar to that induced by AIF, but appears to be independent of caspase-12 and p53 . Thus, it will be important to elucidate the factors, which determine whether a programmed-necrotic cell death process is PARP dependent or independent.

Taken together PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions appear to play an important but not exclusive role in AIF-dependent programmed-necrotic cell death pathways. It was recently proposed that the PARP/poly-ADP-ribosylation system and AIF may function together as a mitochondria-nucleus interconnected Yin/Yang-like sensor of metabolic or oxidative state of cells, acting as a double-edged sword in ROS-dependent death/survival pathways . One edge would protect the animal from the development of tumors by turning off the anti-apoptotic functions of certain kinases, such as AKT/PKB and switching the dual functions of AIF towards apoptosis, thereby limiting the development of cancer. By the opposite edge, uncontrolled poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions can result in massive necrosis and tissue damage, which in turn often leads to severe inflammatory or neurodegenerative disorders.

4.1.5. Secondary necrosis in the surrounding tissue as a result of poly-ADP-ribosylation mediated release of HMGB1?

High-mobility group protein box 1 (HMGB1) is a nuclear non-histone chromatin-associated protein with widely studied functions as a transcription factor (reviewed in ). HMGB1 has been reported to be actively secreted by activated monocytes and macrophages as a damage signal (alarmin) and to function as a late mediator of inflammation (reviewed in ). Recent studies indicate that HMGB1 undergoes nuclear-cytosolic relocalization during early stages of DNA-damage induced programmed-necrotic cell death and is "passively released" from necrotic cells into the extra-cellular milieu at late stage of necrosis (reviewed in ). HMGB1 translocation into the cytoplasm of neurons was also observed in vivo within the ischemic brain of mice . HMGB1 is released in the culture media of murine neurons and astrocytes upon treatment with pro-necrotic but not pro-apoptotic stimuli . Indeed, apoptotic cells bind HMGB1 irreversibly to their chromatin (reviewed in ). Extracellular released HMGB1 can act as a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine by promoting inflammation and participating to the pathogenesis of diverse inflammatory and infectious disorders in peripheral organs (reviewed in ). For instance, microinjection of HMGB1 into the brain of mice was shown to increase the levels of pro-inflammatory mediators and sensitizes the tissue to the ischemic injury . HMGB1 has been suggested to act as a messenger of death, thereby signaling the necrotic state of cells to the surrounding tissue (reviewed in ). HMGB1 signaling occurs via the receptor for advanced glycated-end-products and via members of the Toll-like receptor family (reviewed in ). The HMGB1 mediated inflammatory responses include the production of multiple pro-inflammatory mediators, chemoattraction of certain stem cells, induction of vascular adhesion molecules and impaired function of intestinal epithelial cells (reviewed in ). HMGB1 has been shown to serve as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice and as a mediator of post-ischemic brain damage by increasing excitotoxic as well as ischemic neuronal death in vitro and in vivo . Indeed, HMGB1 is a crucial therapeutic target in experimental models of ischemia/reperfusion, rheumatoid arthritis, endotoxin induced septic shock and cancer ( and reviewed in ).

The active secretion of HMGB1 by stimulated macrophages or monocytes requires acetylation of HMGB1, which in turn induces its relocalization to the cytosol into secretory lysosomes and subsequent release into the extracellular environment . Activation of monocytes and macrophages by inflammatory signals shifts the balance towards chromatin acetylation and leads to hyperacetylation of HMGB1. Acetylation of HMGB1 at two specific lysines was shown to interfere with nuclear import but not with nuclear export of HMGB1 . Hyperacetylated cytosolic HMGB1 is then concentrated into secretory lysosomes and secreted when monocytic cells receive an appropriate second signal . However, the exact mechanism of how HMGB1 is released from chromatin during necrotic cell death was not known, until recently. In addition to acetylation, HMGB1 can be post-translationally modified by lysine and arginine methylation, phosphorylation, and glycosylation, which were also suggested to regulate its relocalization and extracellular release . It was speculated that PARP1 mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation might also be required for the nuclear export and release of HMGB1 during programmed-necrotic cell death . Indeed, in a recent study redistribution of HMGB1 was identified to be dependent on PARP1 and on its enzymatic activity . Following MNNG induced DNA damage and/or mitochondrial stress, relocalization of HMGB1 was only observed in wild-type cells, while HMGB1 remained nuclear in Parp1(-/-) or in the presence of the general PARP inhibitor DHIQ . It has been suggested that the release of HMGB1 from chromatin and its relocalization is regulated by the attachment of poly-ADP ribose to HMGB1 and chromatin thereby destabilizing the association of HMGB1 with chromatin . However the exact molecular mechanism remains to be further investigated. Potential poly-ADP-ribose-binding proteins in the nucleus and cytoplasm that may serve as alarmin are presented in Table 2

4.1.6. The Role of other PARP family members and PARGs in cell death

PARP1 appears to be the major PARP member playing a crucial role in programmed cell death processes. However several studies provided evidence that PARP2 and both Tankyrase-PARPs, TANK1 and TANK2, may also function as a novel executor of cell death pathways. Thus, further investigations are needed to determine if poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions mediated by family members other than PARP1 are also required for AIF shuttling. On the other hand there is already good evidence demonstrating that PARG and its alternatively spliced isoforms are crucial players in programmed cell death pathways.

4.1.6.1. PARP2

Similar to PARP1, PARP2 has been suggested to synthesize poly-ADP-ribose polymers in a DNA-dependent manner. PARP2 has been suggested to contribute only 5% to 10% of total PARP activity in response to DNA damage . Thus, PARP2 may indeed account for the residual poly-ADP-ribose synthesis observed in Parp1 knockout cells. PARP2 is mainly expressed in actively dividing tissues during mouse development, similar to PARP1, but to a much smaller extent . A recent study indicate that PARP1 and PARP2 may possess both overlapping and non-redundant functions in programmed cell death pathways . PARP2 has been shown to function, at least in part, as a novel executioner of cell death pathways in focal cerebral ischemia . However, since PARP activity is reduced by maximal 10% in most Parp2(-/-) cells tested, its unlikely that PARP2 activity could directly contribute to the NAD depletion during programmed necrosis in focal cerebral ischemia. Unfortunately, these studies did not provide any information regarding the amount of NAD+ depletion after genotoxic stimuli in Parp2(-/-) cells or mice . Moreover, it remains to be investigated whether poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions mediated by PARP2 may also induce AIF shuttling during programmed necrosis in focal cerebral ischemia. A recent study using immortalized MEFs derived from Parp2(-/-) and Parp2(+/+) mice suggested a PARP2 and p53-independent role of PARP1 in MNNG-induced AIF release from mitochondria . However, no direct evidence is available at the moment to rule out that activation of PARP2 does induce AIF translocation in vivo, in a stimuli and cell type specific manner. Moreover, these preliminary observations have to be confirmed by an additional independent Parp2 KO model since the observed effects could be caused by a dominant negative activity of a potentially expressed N-terminal DNA binding fragment of PARP2 in the current Parp2 knockout mice model .

4.1.6.2. Tankyrases

PARP5/tankyrase-1 (TANK1) and PARP6/tankyrase-2 (TANK2) were identified as components of a telomeric complex and functions both as oligo-ADP-ribosyltransferases ( and reviewed in ). Human Tankyrase-1, PARP5/TANK1 binds the telomere-binding protein TRF1 and increases telomere length when overexpressed in human cells . Surprisingly, in contrast to PARP5/TANK1, PARP6/ TANK2 causes programmed-necrotic cell death when highly over-expressed in human immortalized cells . Programmed-necrotic cell death, induced by PARP6/TANK2 can be blocked by non-specific PARP inhibitors, suggesting that either the enzymatic activity of PARP6/TANK2 is required or PARP6/TANK2 may modulate the enzymatic activity of PARP1 . On the other hand, PARP5/tankyrase-1 appears to protect cells from genotoxin induced cell death and injury through inhibition of PARP1-mediated NAD depletion and cell death . Thus, Both PARP5/tankyrase-1 and PARP6/tankyrase-2 may modulate PARP1 or PARP2-mediated programmed cell death pathways in an antagonistic manner.

4.1.6.3. Poly-ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG)

The major enzyme rapidly hydrolyzing poly-ADP-ribose polymers formed by PARP1 and PARP2 is the well-characterized poly-ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG) . The endoglycosidase activity of PARG releases free poly-ADP-ribose from PARP1 and PARP2, suggested to serve as signaling molecules involved in cell-death . The mammalian Parg gene encodes for at least five alternative spliced isoforms; the nuclear mPARG-110/hPARG-111 isoform representing the full-length 110/111 kDa PARG protein in human and mice, the cytoplasmic and nuclear localized isoform mPARG-63/hPARG-60, the strictly mitochondrial localized mPARG-59/hPARG-55, and the two cytoplasmic isoforms PARG-102, PARG-99, mainly characterized in human . Mice with a targeted deletion of exons 2 and 3 of the Parg gene, which results in depletion of the nuclear PARG-110 protein and the cytoplasmic isoforms PARG-101 and PARG-99, are viable and phenotypically normal but show an increased sensitivity to alkylating agents and ionizing radiation . In addition these mice were susceptible to streptozotocin-induced diabetes or endotoxic shock and showed an enhancement of ischemic brain injury, most likely due to abnormal regulation of the nuclear and cytoplasmic poly-ADP-ribosylation metabolism and accumulation of poly-ADP-ribose . Surprisingly, ATP depletion was found to be similar in Parg-D 2-D 3/D 2-D 3-knockout and wild type mice after ischemia, indicating that impairment of PARG-110-, PARG-102- and PARG-99-dependent poly-ADP-ribosylation catabolism does not significantly affect the brain's energy dynamic during hyper-poly-ADP-ribosylation. Remarkably, the activity of both the mPARG-63/hPARG-60 isoform and PARP1 in intact cells is increased in Parg-D 2-D 3/D 2-D 3-knockout cells upon oxidative stress . Mice with a targeted deletion of exons 3 and 4 of the Parg gene, resulting in a complete depletion of all isoforms, show early embryonic lethality and increased sensitivity to alkylating agents and ionizing radiation . The lethality results from the failure to hydrolyze poly-ADP-ribose. These PARG-deficient cells accumulate very high levels of poly-ADP-ribose and undergo increased cell death. Conversely, transgenic neuronal cells overexpressing PARG appears to be partially resistant to programmed necrosis in vivo, after focal ischemia . These genetic studies suggest that a precise coordination of PARPs and PARG activities is important for cellular responses under normal physiological as well as cytotoxic stress conditions. The disruption of poly-ADP-ribose homeostasis due to a failure to degrade poly-ADP-ribose polymers appears to have deleterious consequences in pathological processes. Strangely, other pharmacological and genetic studies provided evidence that PARG may also mediates oxidative and excitotoxic neuronal death . Mice deficient for the nuclear PARG-110 isoform appears to be protected against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury, under the tested conditions . Moreover, siRNA-mediated Parg-knockdown in immortalized human cells results in an increased resistance to oxidant-induced apoptosis concomitant with a delayed PAR degradation and transient accumulation of ADP-ribose polymers longer than 15-mers at early stages of drug treatment . Surprisingly no increased resistance or sensitivity was observed in response to the DNA alkylating agent NMNG . This discrepancy strongly indicates that the specific outcome (pro- or anti-apoptotic) could be mediated by the putative opposite functional roles of distinct PARG isoforms, dependent on the cellular context, species and stimuli.

4.2. PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation in Apoptosis

PARP1 and its poly-ADP-ribosylation activity have been initially proposed to play an important pro-apoptotic role. Several studies reported a transient burst of poly-ADP-ribosylation occurs early in various cell lines undergoing apoptosis, such as in human osteosarcoma HL-60 cells, human Jurkat T cells, mouse 3T3-L1 and immortalized fibroblasts derived from PARP1 wild type mice ( and reviewed in ). Thus, it was suggested that an early transient burst of poly-ADP-ribosylation in the nucleus prior commitment to death is required for apoptosis to proceed . However, the majority of studies using Parp1(-/-) mice and primary cells derived thereof suggest that PARP1 appears not to play a mayor role in apoptosis. These studies have shown that primary Parp1(-/-) cells, including hepatocytes and thymocytes display normal susceptibility towards ceramide, dexamethasone, etoposide or TNFa -mediated apoptosis (reviewed in ). On the other hand, a few studies have demonstrated that PARP1-depleted human Jurkat T-cells and certain immortalized cell lines derived from Parp1(-/-) mice are resistant to CD95/FasL induced apoptosis ( and reviewed in ), indicating that PARP1 could indeed activate apoptosis under some, most likely non-genotoxic conditions. However, the exact role of the enzymatic activity of PARP1 remains conflicting. Several pro- and anti-apoptotic factors were suggested to bind poly-ADP-ribose. For instance, the apoptosis-associated Ca2+/Mg2+-dependent DNA endonuclease and topoisomerase-I and -II might be kept inactive by attached poly-ADP-ribose polymers during the initiation phase of apoptosis . It was suggested that poly-ADP-ribose polymers are in turn removed from the endonuclease and topoisomerase II during the execution phase of Apoptosis . Thus, poly-ADP-ribosylation might coordinate apoptotic processes under certain conditions. Potential pro- and anti-apoptotic poly-ADP-ribose binding proteins in the nucleus are presented in Table 3.

4.2.1. Caspase-mediated cleavage of PARP1, a proposed hallmark of apoptosis

During the execution phase of apoptosis, PARP1 and also PARP2 are specifically cleaved by caspases to generate N-terminal DNA-binding and C-terminal catalytic fragments, thereby inactivating PARP1 and PARP2 . However, the N-terminal apoptotic fragments of PARP1 and PARP2 have been thought to retain their strong DNA-binding activity upon cleavage . The functional consequence of this proteolytic event is still under debate. The rapid cleavage of PARP1 into the N-terminal 25 kDa DNA-binding domain (DBD) and the C-terminal 89 kDa proteolytic fragment was suggested to enhance the apoptosis process (reviewed in ). The DBD of PARP1 could be irreversibly recruited to sites of DNA breaks during early stages of the execution phase and thereby preventing subsequent genome repair events . Caspase-mediated inactivation of PARP1 and PARP2 has been proposed to prevent depletion of NAD+ and ATP, which are required for full execution of apoptosis . Several studies, overexpressing the apoptotic DNA-binding domain of PARP1 in various human cells and mouse fibroblasts provided preliminary evidence that the apoptotic DNA-binding domain of PARP1 may indeed inhibit the endogenous catalytic activity of uncleaved PARP1 in a dominant-negative manner, in vivo . Thus, proteolytic cleavage of PARPs by caspases is thought to be a hallmark and regulatory event for apoptotic cell death. Subsequent studies using Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts stably expressing either wild type PARP1 or a caspase-noncleavable PARP1 mutant, containing a point mutation in the cleavage site DEVD(214) partially confirmed these initial observations . Cells expressing this mutant PARP exhibited an accelerated necrotic cell death upon treatment with staurosporine, TNFa and genotoxic stress . This accelerated necrotic cell death was suggested due to NAD+ depletion. Thus PARP1 cleavage was proposed to prevent the induction of necrosis during apoptosis and ensures appropriate execution of caspase-mediated programmed cell death . Moreover, PARP1 cleavage was suggested to function as a molecular switch between apoptotic and necrotic cell death . However these data have to be cautiously interpreted. The recent generation of a Parp1 knock-in mice model, expressing a caspase-noncleavable PARP1 mutant (Parp1mutD214N/mutD214N) could not confirm these in vitro data . While Parp1mutD214N/mutD214N mice developed normally, they were highly resistant to endotoxic shock and to intestinal and renal ischemia-reperfusions due to the compromised production of specific inflammatory mediators . No direct effect of PARP1 cleavage on the preservation of cellular pools of NAD+/ATP and rate of cell death could be observed in vivo . This study clearly demonstrated that PARP1 cleavage is physiologically relevant in the regulation of an inflammatory response but very unlikely directly modulating programmed cell death processes, in vivo.

4.2.2. Poly-ADP-ribosylation induced changes of chromatin structure during apoptosis

A recent study suggested that internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, mediated by apoptosis/necrosis inducers such as DNA-damaging agents (i.e. UV light and chemotherapeutic drugs) correlated with enhanced poly-ADP-ribosylation of chromatin . Remarkably internucleosomal DNA fragmentation could be prevented when cells were treated with nonspecific PARP inhibitors . Thus, poly-ADP-ribosylation of chromatin in the early stages of apoptosis could facilitate internucleosomal DNA fragmentation by increasing the susceptibility of chromatin to cellular endonucleases under certain conditions. Over 20 years ago, several groups demonstrated that poly-ADP-ribosylated chromatin adopts a more relaxed structure than its native counterpart ( and reviewed in ). When isolated polynucleosomes of interphase chromatin were poly-ADP-ribosylated in vitro by a highly purified preparation of PARP1 at low and moderate ionic strengths, the solenoid structure (30-nm fiber) unwound into the 10-nm fiber and adopted the fully extended "beads-on-a-string" structure characteristic of H1-depleted chromatin ( and reviewed in ). Poly-ADP-ribosylation of polynucleosomes rendered chromatin more susceptible to micrococcal nuclease digestion ( and reviewed in ). Thus, poly-ADP-ribosylation-induced relaxation of the chromatin structure, observed in vitro, may explain the partial dependency of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation on poly-ADP-ribose under certain conditions that occurs during apoptosis in vivo.

4.2.3. Poly-ADP-ribosylation/PARG-mediated activation of TRPM calcium channels during oxidant induced apoptosis

Recent studies demonstrated that TRPM2, a cation channel, widely expressed in neuronal cells, blood cells and in pancreatic cells, plays an essential role in programmed apoptotic cell death (reviewed in ). TRPM2 can be activated by oxidative stress (H2O2) or TNFa (reviewed in ). Once activated, TRPM2 enables influx of Na+ and Ca2+, sustained elevation in intracellular free Ca2+ concentration, increased activity of caspase 3, 7, 8 and 9, and subsequent apoptotic cell death and reviewed in ). Free ADP-ribose, which can serve as a second messenger, has been recently identified as a major regulator of TRPM2 channel gating ( and reviewed in ). ADP-ribose binds to a Nudix homology domain in the cytosolic C-terminus of TRPM2. However, The molecular mechanism leading to accumulation of free ADP-ribose in the cytosol is not fully clear. It has been thought that the mayor source for accumulation of free ADP-ribose in the cytoplasm under condition of oxidative stress is the degradation of poly-ADP-ribose-polymers by poly-ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG isoforms) and ADP-ribosyl-protein-lyase activities. Remarkably several recent reports provided first evidence that TRPM2 channel opening in response to oxidative stress might be indeed dependent on activation of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase . Oxidant-induced TRPM2 gating and subsequent TRPM2-mediated apoptosis was blocked when cells were treated with the non-specific PARP inhibitory compounds SB750139-B, PJ34 and DPQ . However more detailed studies including genetic approaches will be required to elucidate the exact roles of PARP/PARG enzymes in TRPM2 mediated, oxidant induced apoptosis.

4.2.4. PARP/PARG-mediated hyperglycation and glyoxidation could induce apoptotic cell death

In addition to the suggested role as a second messenger and regulator of TRPM2 channel gating, free ADP-ribose and poly/oligo-ADP-ribose may also induce programmed cell death pathways through its non-enzymatic reactivity towards protein side chains and formation of protein glycation/glycoxidation products at high concentrations. The massive accumulation of poly-ADP-ribose-polymers produced by PARP1 upon oxidative stress, are in turn rapidly hydrolyzed into free ADP-ribose by PARG (reviewed in ). Several Studies suggested that non-enzymatic ADP-ribose-mediated glycation is initiated by the reaction of free ADP-ribose with lysines through Schiff bases or with cysteines to form an ADP-ribosyl-thiazolidine . This is often followed by a complex chemistry leading to protein glycoxidation products referred to as advanced glycosylation end products (AGE) . Although the reactions are favored at higher pH 8-9.0, the cross-linking of histones and the formation of AGE were also detectable in vitro at pH values in the physiological range ( and reviewed in ). In vitro studies with nuclear proteins demonstrated that the lysine-rich histone H1 appears to be a preferential glycation and glycoxidation target of this intranuclear non-enzymatic ADP-ribosylation . However, the glycation/glycoxidation reactions in vivo are poorly understood due to the technical difficulties to measure glycation/glycoxidation products in vivo ( and reviewed in ). Preliminary data indicate that oxidative stress i.e. nitric oxide (NO) may enhance non-enzymatic ADP-ribosylation of proteins such as histones, b -actin and glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate dehydrogenase in the presence of free ADP-ribose in vivo . Although the intracellular levels of ADP-ribose under normal physiological conditions are not known, the intracellular concentrations of free ADP-ribose achieved upon oxidative stress have been proposed to be in the range of up to 100 m M . Recent studies demonstrated that ADP-ribose concentrations of 50-500 �M resulted in efficient histone glycation and glycoxidation in vitro .

Glycation leads to the formation of protein-bound free radicals, which may further attack on proteins and could lead to the formation of protein-bound amino acid oxidation products, peptide cross-linking or peptide bond cleavage . Indeed, glycation of proteins and glycoxidation has been linked to the pathophysiology of aging and a number of specific diseases, especially diabetes, and Alzheimer's disease . Massive non-enzymatic protein glycation and glycoxidation by ADP-ribose has been proposed to induce protein damage and eventually apoptotic cell death . The cytotoxity of free ADP-ribose is counteracted in vivo by the housecleaning enzymes, members of the super family of Nudix hydrolases that catalyze the hydrolysis of free ADP-ribose to AMP and ribose 5'-phosphate (reviewed in ). The mammalian ADP-ribose-specific pyrophosphatases NUDT9 and NUDT5 are thought to serve as protective enzymes to prevent non-enzymatic ADP-ribosylation by limiting the intracellular accumulation of free ADP-ribose during oxidative/nitrosative stress (reviewed in ). However, the exact molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated.

4.2.5. Proposed role of poly-ADP-ribosylation of p53 in apoptosis

Many studies have been shown that p53 can be associated with poly-ADP-ribose polymers generated by PARP1 . It is still not yet clear whether poly-ADP-ribose is covalently attached to an acceptor protein or simply associated in a non-covalent manner. It has been speculated that PARP1-mediated attachment of poly-ADP-ribose polymers onto p53 may influence its pro-apoptotic function . Interestingly, a recent report claimed to have identified the major sites in p53 covalently poly-ADP-ribosylated by PARP1 in vivo . In mouse p53, three glutamic and aspartic acid residues, namely E255, D256 and E268 have been suggested to be covalently poly-ADP-ribosylated by PARP1 . PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation has been proposed to inhibit the interaction between p53 and the nuclear export receptor CRM1, resulting in nuclear accumulation of p53 . These authors claimed that nuclear accumulation and upregulation of the transactivation activities of endogenous p53 in response to DNA damage require PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation of p53 . Thus, poly-ADP-ribosylation of p53 may promote its pro-apoptotic function.

However, these data are quite conflicting and thus have to be very cautiously interpreted. Kanai and colleagues mainly used overexpressed GFP fusion proteins and observed this effect also in complete absence of PARP1 activation . Moreover, since no mass spectrometric data were presented in this study it remains still elusive whether poly-ADP-ribose is covalently attached to p53 on the proposed acceptor sites. Several reports clearly demonstrated that free and PARP1-bound poly-ADP-ribose polymers target p53 for strong non-covalent salt-, acid-, and detergent-resistant interaction ( and reviewed in ). The polymer binding sites could be mapped to two amino acid sequences in the sequence-specific core DNA binding domain of p53. The same studies demonstrated that poly-ADP-ribose can bind in a non-covalent manner to proteins that carry 20 to 30 amino acid long stretches containing a cluster rich in basic amino acids and a pattern of hydrophobic amino acids interspersed with basic and in part, with acidic residues . Remarkably, the proposed poly-ADP-ribose acceptor sites are exactly located within the C-terminal boundary of a poly-ADP-ribose-binding motif located in the DNA binding domain of p53 ! The simultaneous amino acid exchange from E/D to A of all three putative sites could indeed strongly affect the protein structure in this domain of p53, thereby disrupting the non-covalent interaction of p53 with poly-ADP-ribose. Moreover, the suggested functional consequences appear not to be supported by other studies . Several independent previous reports even suggested the contrary . For instance, PARP inhibition has been demonstrated to sensitize p53-deficient breast cancer cells to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis, an observation that is in sharp contrast to the findings of Kanai and colleagues . Moreover several in vitro studies, using purified recombinant PARP1 and p53 proteins or nuclear extracts derived from early apoptotic cells suggested that poly-ADP-ribosylation suppressed p53 interaction with its DNA consensus sequence in p53-dependent promoters . This observation is partially supported by gene expression studies using freshly isolated primary Parp1(+/+) and Parp1(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) . On the other hand, the expression levels of tumor suppressor p53 and Rb1 proteins have been reported to be strongly reduced in immortalized long passaged, partially senescent Parp1(-/-) cells .

One possibility for this discrepancy could be a stimuli and cell type specific regulation of p53 by PARP1: For instance, treatment of MEFs derived from Parp1(-/-) with the single alkylating agent 2'-methyl-2'-nitrose-urea (MNU) has been shown to result in rapid and sustained accumulation and activation of p53 in Parp1(-/-) cells, while accumulation and activation was strongly reduced in Parp1(+/+) cells . In contrast primary Parp1(-/-) MEFs display delayed p53 accumulation and activation upon exposure to g -irradiation, when compared to Parp1(+/+) cells . Moreover, overactivation of PARP1 by hyperoxia was recently reported to be associated with activation of p53 and premature senescence in immortalized long passaged human cells (see also next sections). On the other hand nuclear translocation of p53 appears to be normal in all different primary Parp1(-/-) cells, tested so far . Taken together, due to these conflicting data, the exact mechanism how poly-ADP-ribosylation regulates 53 has to be carefully re-evaluated.

4.2.6. PARP1-mediated transcriptional upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes

In addition to PARP1-mediated short-term cell death mechanisms discussed above, several long-term mechanisms such as regulating of cell death inducing transcriptional processes were also proposed (reviewed in ). It is now widely established that PARP1 can also act as transcriptional coactivator for different transcription factors, which play a crucial role in inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders (reviewed in ).

PARP1 has been shown to play a key role in AP-1 and NF-k B-mediated gene expression of pro-inflammatory mediators (reviewed in ). PARP1 interacts directly with both subunits of NF-k B, p50 and RelA/p65 . NF-k B was initially thought to act generally cytoprotective toward apoptotic or necrotic PCD by inducing the expression of genes encoding anti-apoptotic and anti-oxidizing proteins in response to a variety of death-inducing stimuli (reviewed in ). However, recent evidence strongly indicates that depending on the specific cell type and the stimulus involved, NF-k B can also sensitize cells to death-inducing stimuli and enhance programmed cell death (PCD) via apoptosis or necrosis (reviewed in ). The exact molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. Recent studies suggested that pro-apoptotic transcriptional target genes of NF-k B including the death receptors Fas (CD95), TRAIL, DR4-6, the death-inducing ligands FasL, TNF and TRAIL as well as pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members may be required for this effect (reviewed in ). Moreover, NF-k B can also function indirectly through upregulation of other transcription factors such as p53 or IRF-1, which acts along with NF-k B to enhance the expression of pro-apoptotic genes (reviewed in ). Whether PARP1 is also required for the expression of these pro-apoptotic NF-k B transcriptional target genes remains to be investigated. In addition to its role as a transcriptional coactivator for the upregulation of pro-inflammatory and potentially pro-apoptotic genes, PARP1 may also serve as a transcription repressor for the transcriptional downregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2. Indeed, atypical activators of NF-k B such as the tumor suppressor protein ARF that is activated in response to DNA damage, UV-C radiation, and the chemotherapeutic drugs daunorubicin, and cisplatin, have been found to convert the transactivating property of RelA into a promoter-specific transcriptional repressor of anti-apoptotic factors such as Bcl-xL, XIAP and A20 (reviewed in ). However, the exact mechanisms to achieve this pro-apoptotic shift in NF-k B activity remain to be elucidated. Both cisplatin and alternative reading frame protein (ARF) have been suggested to promote the recruitment of histone deacetylase-1 (HDAC1) to actively repress expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins and sensitize cells to apoptosis (reviewed in ). PARP1 has been recently found to interact with histone deacetylases (HDACs) 1-3, in vivo . These findings suggest a model in which PARP1 might function as a promoter-specific corepressor/coactivator exchange factor for NF-k B-mediated gene activation . Whether the enzymatic activity of PARP1 is required for the observed effects remains elusive. Pharmacological studies suggested that the enzymatic activity of PARP1 appears to be required for NF-k B-mediated transcriptional activation in a context and promoter-specific manner.

4.3. Role of PARP1 in programmed macroautophagocytotic cell death

There is preliminary evidence suggesting that PARP1 may also play an important role in autophagocytotic programmed cell death processes, thereby contributing to caspase- and AIF-independent PCD of macrophages. Treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the presence of chemical cysteine protease inhibitors like zVAD-fmk or specific siRNA-mediated casp8 knockdown can cause macroautophagocytotic cell death instead of necrosis in certain cell types such as human Jurkat T cell lymphoma, L929 mouse fibrosarcoma, U937 monocytoid cells and macrophages ( and reviewed in ). A recent study strongly indicates that Toll/interleukin-1 receptor-domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-beta protein (TRIF), receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1), ROS production and PARP1 activation are involved in macroautophagocytotic programmed cell death of activated macrophages . Treatment of macrophages with LPS in the presence of zVAD-fmk resulted in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, PARP1 activation and an increase in poly-ADP-ribose polymer formation. Genetic and pharmacological approaches revealed that TRIF, RIP1 and ROS acts upstream of PARP1 . PARP1 activation occurs downstream of ROS production but upstream of autophagic body formation in macrophages . Interestingly, it has been recently shown that cause of ROS accumulation upon caspase inhibition is the selective autophagic degradation of the major enzymatic ROS scavenger, catalase . The molecular basis of selective protein targeting of autophagy is not yet known. One cannot exclude that even an endogenous inhibitor of PARPs could be selectively degraded by autophagy. It will be of great interest to determine the exact role of PARP1 in programmed autophagocytotic cell death using Parp1-deficient mice.

4.4. PARP1 may regulate senescence-induced programmed cell death

During the last decade evidence has been arising that PARP1 may serve as an important factor regulating premature senescence. The first report suggested that PARP1 activity could regulate post-translational activation of p53 protein in immortalized very long-passaged aging cells . Surprisingly, inhibition of PARP activity with a broad range inhibitor increased cellular lifespan while overactivation of PARP1 by hyperoxia was associated with activation of p53 and premature senescence . Subsequent studies using immortalized very long-passaged aging MEF cells derived from Parp1(+/+) and Parp1(-/-) mice demonstrated that the expression levels of tumor suppressor p53 and Rb1 proteins were strongly reduced in immortalized long passaged/aging Parp1(-/-) cells . Moreover when these long passaged/aging Parp1(+/+) and Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts were treated with colcemid, a mitotic spindle disrupting agent, Parp1(-/-) cells showed an drastic increased escape from mitotic arrest within 24 h compared with Parp1(+/+) cells . Moreover, while both Parp1(+/+) and Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts genotypes arrived in G1 tetraploid state, only the G1 tetraploid Parp1(+/+) cells were eliminated by apoptotic cell death . Remarkably stable re-expression of PARP1 in these long passaged/aging Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts restored p53 and Rb protein expression levels and susceptibility to G1 tetraploidy checkpoint-induced programmed cell death . These data strongly suggest a PARP1-dependent negative selection of cells with these genetic aberrations. Indeed, several studies clearly demonstrated that premature senescent cells could become polyploid by endomitosis and endoreduplication (reviewed in ). Most of these cells die through mitotic catastrophe-induced apoptotic cell death. However, a few of the tetraploid senescent cells with genetic mutations or epigenetic alterations in the senescence pathway may escape cell death and undergo neosis (reviewed in ). Neosis is a parasexual, somatic, reductive division that occurs only in senescent, multinucleate and/or polyploid giant cells, formed during the replicative ore premature senescent phase of normal or tumor cells (reviewed in ). Neosis is characterized by production of aneuploid daughter cells via nuclear budding . The immediate neotic aneuploid progeny are termed the Raju cells, which seem to transiently display stem cell properties . Raju cells were suggested to immediately undergo symmetric mitotic division and mature into tumor cells (reviewed in ). Taken together these results suggest that PARP1 may fulfill its role as a guardian of the genome even without exogenous DNA damage through its role as a cell death-promoting factor in mitotic and post-mitotic G1 tetraploidy checkpoints during senescence-induced programmed cell death. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of how PARP1 might suppress neosis of senescent cells are not understood and remain to be investigated.

5. PARPs AS SURVIVAL FACTORS

The current literature clearly demonstrates that PARP1 and to a lesser extend PARP2 play important roles in programmed cell death processes. However, growing evidence suggest that PARP1 and PARP2 are multi-faced enzymes involved in both programmed cell death and cell survival processes. The precise molecular and cellular mechanisms regulating this "Jekyll and Hyde" duality of PARP1 in programmed cell death and cell survival are unclear. Under normal physiological conditions and mild progressive damage, PARP1 and PARP2 appear to play a protective role as survival factors while under severe oxidative stress conditions, in which free radicals can damage DNA, PARP1 and PARP2 overactivation results in programmed cell death. Several mechanisms were proposed for their protective roles: (1) promoting cell cycle progression upon cellular stress, (2) direct inhibition of DNA damage-induced apoptotic cell death and (3) regulator of ROS levels (reviewed in ).

5.1. PARP1 is essential for cell cycle progression of highly proliferating cells upon cellular stress.

Experimental data have demonstrated that all three different Parp1 knockout mice as well as mice carrying a targeted disruption of the Parp2 gene are hypersensitive to whole body g -irradiation . Remarkably, Parp1(-/-)/Parp2(-/-) double knockout mice are not viable and die at the onset of gastrulation due to massive cell death, suggesting that PARP1 and PARP2 are both essential during early embryogenesis . Both Parp1 and Parp2 knockout mice showed gastrointestinal failure due to massive cell death and hemorrhage in villi of the small intestine and systemic dehydration, suggesting that the absence of PARP1 and PARP2 could promote the gastrointestinal lethality (GI) syndrome . Whole body g -irradiation preferentially damages endothelial cells of the gut microvasculature in the gastrointestinal tract . Intestinal epithelium is one of the most proliferative tissues in the mammalian body and its stem cells show extreme sensitivity to low-level genotoxic stress . Several studies implies a two-compartment model for the irradiation-induced death of intestinal cells: endothelial cells in the gut microvasculature die first, followed by epithelial stem cells that depend on the endothelial cell support . This is consistent with a two-compartment model for normal growth of tissue, which seems to depend on the prior expansion of endothelial cells and angiogenesis. Expansion of the endothelial cell population in the microvasculature of several tissues is required before these tissues can grow, expand or regenerate. PARP1 has been therefore suggested to act as a survival factor for intestinal stem cells in vivo at low DNA damage levels . These observations/hypothesis are supported by ex vivo and in vitro studies, which clearly demonstrated that deletion of the Parp1 gene drastically increases the sensitivity of highly proliferative cells like splenocytes and bone marrow cells to apoptosis induced by mono-functional alkylating agents or g -irradiation (reviewed in . Remarkably, susceptibility to g -irradiation is not significantly increased ex vivo in various normal proliferating cell types derived from Parp1(-/-) mice when compared with wild type control cells (reviewed in ). Thus PARP1 appears to play a crucial role in the regulation of cell cycle progression of highly proliferating cells . This would be consistent with the observation that PARP1 expression levels strongly correlate with cell proliferation ( and reviewed in ). Moreover, pharmacological and genetic studies have been recently demonstrated that inhibition of PARPs or complete absence of PARP1 reduces angiogenesis induced by growth factors, such as VEGF and FGF, in ex vivo and in vivo models . The observed effects derived from a decrease of endothelial cell migration, proliferations and tube formation .

The exact molecular mechanisms are not yet clear but a functional role of PARP1 as transcriptional coactivator of genes required for cell cycle progression under cellular stress was suggested . Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that the expression of genes required for cell cycle progression or mitosis, DNA replication or chromosome assembly are down-regulated in immortalized Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts . For instance, microarray hybridization, immunoblot analysis revealed a reduction in expression of p55CDC (CDC20), cyclins A and B1 in immortalized Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts when compared with wild-type cells under the tested conditions . PARP1 was suggested to serve as coactivator for the transcription factor E2F1 and c-Myc . Moreover, two recent studies identified PARP1 as a critical coactivator of HIF-1-dependent gene expression and regulation of cell death in both neoplastic and ischemic conditions . PARP1 appears to regulate the expression of critical HIF-1 target genes expression of genes such as GLUT-1, CAIX and VEGF. Remarkably, for at least a subset of PARP1-dependent HIF-1 target genes, the enzymatic activity of PARP1 was necessary for full activation .

5.2. PARP1 and PARP2 are essential for repression of DNA damage induced apoptotic cell death.

Several genetic studies strongly suggested that PARP1 and PARP2 might participate as a component of molecular complexes with other molecules involved in genome surveillance, such as Ku70/86, BRCA1/2 or ATM ( and reviewed in ). Human Ku is an abundant heterodimeric nuclear protein, consisting of 70- and 86-kDa tightly associated DNA binding subunits, which is together with the DNA-dependent protein kinase involved in DNA repair mediated by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) (reviewed in ). Recent studies have revealed that PARP1 can interact with Ku70, Ku86 and ATM in vitro ( and reviewed in ). The tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 appear to be required for DNA repair processes mediated by homologous recombination (HR) (reviewed in ). Indeed, haploid loss of Parp1 is sufficient to induce lethality of Brca1-deficient cells. Haploinsufficiency of Parp1 in Brca1(mut/mut) embryos dramatically accelerates BRCA1-associated chromosome aberrations, centrosome amplification, and telomere shortening, leading to apoptosis and embryonic lethality caused by Brca1 deficiency . Moreover, homozygous disruption of both the Parp1 and Ku80 genes cause embryonic lethality and display an increased level of apoptosis around the gastrulation stage . Mice lacking Ku80 are viable but growth retarded and show deficiency in V(D)J recombination. The early embryonic lethality observed in Parp1/Ku80 double-knockout mice was explained by an increase in DNA damage induced cell death . Remarkably, the phenotype of the Parp1/Ku80 double-knockout mouse resembles the phenotype of Parp1/Atm double-knockout mice . A similar function has been observed for PARP2 (reviewed in ). A recent report provided evidence that in the absence of PARP2 but not of PARP1, the survival of DP thymocytes undergoing TCR-alpha recombination is affected despite normal amounts of Bcl-xL . Thus, PARP2 has been suggested to be an important mediator of T-cell survival during thymopoiesis by preventing the activation of DNA damage-dependent apoptotic response during the multiple rounds of TCR-alpha rearrangements preceding a positively selected TCR .

The exact molecular mechanism underlying these observations remains to be elucidated. Absence of PARP2 leads to transcriptional upregulation of the pro-apoptotic proteins Noxa and Puma DP thymocytes . Thus, both PARP1 and PARP2 were proposed to participate as a component of transcriptional corepressor/coactivator complexes in transcriptional DNA damage response pathways . The proposed function of DNAPK-Ku70/86-PARP1 coactivator/corepressor complexes in genomic stability processes is supported by biochemical evidence. PARP1 was identified as a regulated promoter-specific exchange factor and component of Ku70/86-DNAPK/Rad50/topoisomerase-I and-II-containing complexes ( and reviewed in ). Recent studies found that the corepressor-silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT) can associate with a DNA-PK/Ku70/Ku86/PARP1 complex . The SMRT/HDAC-3 complex was required for the transcriptional repressive property of the Ku70 subunit and for cellular recovery from DNA DSBs induced by ionizing radiation or DNA damage-inducing drugs . Unliganded thyroid hormone receptor (TR) can function as a transcriptional repressor of specific cellular target genes by acting in concert with a corepressor complex harboring histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity . Thus, it was proposed that DNA-PK promotes the establishment of transcriptionally repressive chromatin at TR target promoters by enhancing the HDAC activity of the TR-bound SMRT/DNA-PK/Ku70/86/PARP1 corepressor complex in response to DNA DSBs ( and reviewed in )

5.3. PARP1 and PARP2 serve as survival factors for neuronal cells by modulating ROS levels

Recent studies suggested a dual function of PARP1 and PARP2 in neuronal cell death pathways . Inactivation of PARP1 activity in primary cortical neurons by pharmacological inhibition or by siRNA can either enhance or prevent apoptotic death, depending on the degree of oxidative damage . PARP1 appears to protect neurons against apoptosis induced by mild oxidative stress . There is preliminary evidence that PARP2 has also differential effects on cell survival depending on the experimental model and mode of cell death . PARP2 appears to act as an executioner of cell death pathways in focal cerebral ischemia with energy failure and a largely necrotic pathology, while it could also function as a survival factor after global ischemia with a delayed apoptosis-like cell death . However the molecular mechanism by which PARP1 and PARP2 provides protection against neuronal cell death is not known . Surprisingly two recent studies using Parp1 knockout mice and Parp2-deficient plants lines of Arabidopsis thaliana and oilseed rape (Brassica napus) indicate, that both PARP1 and PARP2, may play a role in ROS homeostasis, probably in a antagonistic manner . Remarkably, adult Parp1 knockout mice were found to exhibit a strong increase in accumulation of ROS levels (25%) and lipid peroxidation in their serum with age compared with wild type mice . Moreover, microarray studies revealed that approximately 40% of genes found to be misregulated in Parp1 knockout mice under normal conditions are known to be influenced by oxidative stress or are known to modify levels of cellular ROS . The increased DNA damage induced cell death and genomic instability observed in Parp1 knockout mice might be a direct result of this increase of ROS . On the other hand, Parp2-deficient plant lines showed a delayed, reduced or even completely abolished expression of many oxidative stress-related genes, including the superoxide-producing NADPH respiratory burst oxidase homolog C . The observed impaired oxidative stress response and decrease of superoxide levels during stress have been suggested to be caused by a more efficient scavenging of ROS in the Parp2-deficient plant lines . However the exact molecular mechanism is not known. In addition it remains to be investigated whether mammalian PARP2 has a similar function .

5.4. ADP-ribose-AMP/cAMP-mediated AMPK / survival signaling

Metabolic stress often leads to a decline of ATP/ADP ratios with a subsequent increase in AMP concentrations , which in turn can stimulate the activity of the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK) (reviewed in ). The AMPK cascade has been suggested to act as a cellular energy sensor system, which is conserved in all eukaryotic cells . AMPK has been shown to promote cell survival under conditions of growth-factor withdrawal and metabolic stress ( and reviewed in ). AMPK is an important regulator of diverse cellular pathways in the setting of energetic stress and has been suggested to act as a cellular fuel gauge by promoting ATP generating pathways, including glucose transport, glycolysis, and fatty acid oxidation, while inhibiting energy/ATP-consuming anabolic pathways . Genetic and pharmacological studies using transgenic mice expressing a kinase dead form of AMPK or 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside, a chemical activator of AMPK demonstrated that both isoforms AMPKa -1 and AMPKa -2 are responsible for activation of glucose uptake and glycolysis during low-flow ischemia in vivo. Both AMPKa -1 and AMPKa -2 play an important protective role in limiting damage and apoptotic activity associated with ischemia/reperfusion in the heart and type 2 diabetes . Ischemia and reperfusion have been recently shown to stimulate autophagy in the mouse heart in vivo (reviewed in ). Autophagy during ischemia appears to be protective, but detrimental during reperfusion . Remarkably autophagy induced during myocardial ischemia in vivo is strongly dependent on AMPK while reperfusion after ischemia promotes autophagy through AMPK-independent mechanisms . Thus, the coordinated action of PARP1, PARG and NUDT5/NUDT9-ADP-ribose pyrophosphatases, which results in an increase in cellular AMP levels, could indeed activate AMPK-dependent survival pathways. In addition, there might also exist a feedback regulation of PARP1 by AMPK. A recent study provided preliminary evidence that AMPK could physically interact with PARP1 and that phosphorylation of PARP1 by AMPK may modulate positively or negatively PARP1 activity . Moreover, moderate increased levels could also activate adenylate cyclase/cAMP cAMP-dependent protein kinase pathways that play an essential role in cell survival. Indeed, several studies provided evidence that the breakdown of ATP and ADP ribose can lead to an up to 30-fold increase in cAMP levels during ischemia and inflammation . Taken together a moderate increase of free ADP ribose and subsequent AMP levels could eventually activate cAMP- and AMP-dependent protein kinase survival pathways while under high genotoxic stress conditions the detrimental effects of free poly-ADP-ribose polymers, free ADP-ribose and NAD depletion will overcome the beneficial effect of cAMP and AMP.

6. Poly-ADP-RIBOSYLATION/PARP1-MEDIATED SWITCHES BETWEEN PCD AND CELL SURVIVAL

Tissue homeostasis requires a carefully orchestrated balance between cell proliferation, cellular senescence and cell death. Cell death and survival pathways are tightly regulated through genetic and epigenetic networks (for a detailed overview and discussion of these networks, the reader is referred to the excellent reviews ). Accumulating evidence indicates that the metabolic state of the cells mainly determines whether they undergo cell death or cell survival. High ATP levels promote cell survival, while lowering the ATP levels in cells can make them more susceptible to cell death. Several studies have been suggested that the enzymatic activity of PARP1 is also regulated by the metabolic state of the cell. Physiologic concentrations of ATP (1 to 10 mM ) can inhibit the auto-poly-ADP-ribosylation activity of PARP1 (about 3- to 5-fold over a physiological range of ATP concentrations) in vitro using purified proteins and in isolated nuclei. Interestingly, nearly complete inhibition of PARP1 enzymatic activity is only observed at higher concentrations of ATP (6 to 10 mM ). In contrast, the transfer of poly-ADP-ribose polymers to histones is only slightly affected by ATP, indicating that the massive auto-ADP-ribosylation but not trans-ADP-ribosylation activity of PARP1 might be suppressed in bioenergetically intact cells . The inhibitory site of ATP on PARP1 was identified as arginine 34 in the first zinc finger of the DNA binding domain of PARP1 . In addition, these studies also demonstrated that ATP could directly activate the enzymatic activity of PARG in vitro using purified proteins and in isolated cell nuclei . Thus under normal physiological condition with high ATP levels, the reduced PARP1 activity may promote cell survival and cellular proliferation of bioenergetically intact cells. In contrast, under stress conditions and lower ATP levels in cells the enzymatic activity of PARP1 could increase and promote programmed cell death processes. Whether this proposed mechanism will exist in vivo remains to be investigated.

6.1. A PARP1/poly-ADP-ribosylation-mediated switch between different PCD pathways?

Co-activation and crosstalk of different types of PCD pathways have been observed in several systems. However, the molecular mechanisms have not been well characterized. It has been suggested that the type and exposure time of the initiating stimulus and the metabolic status/ "history" of the cell mainly influence the switch between apoptotic, macroautophagocytotic and programmed-necrotic cell death processes (reviewed in ). Decreases in cellular level of ATP can induce a switch in the death mode apoptotic to necrotic cell death. High levels of ATP are crucial for the enzymatic activities of caspases and optimal activation of caspase-mediated execution of apoptosis (reviewed in ). Indeed, inhibition of the caspase cascade with zVAD-fmk has been shown to induce a switch from apoptosis to programmed-necrotic cell death (reviewed in ). In addition, the intracellular level of ROS could also be major factor directly related to the switch mechanism from apoptosis to programmed-necrotic cell death . Nitric oxide, which has been shown to inhibit caspases in vitro by covalently modifying the prosthetic cysteine group, can induce a switch from apoptosis to programmed-necrotic cell death in vivo . The regulatory mechanism underlying the switch from apoptosis to macroautophagocytotic cell death or between programmed-necrotic cell death and macroautophagocytotic cell death are far more complicated and not yet well understood (reviewed in ).

The role of PARP1 in these crosstalk and switch processes is only poorly understood. It is not yet clear whether PARP1 plays an active role in these switch processes or is just a target downstream of these regulatory events. Preliminary data suggest both mechanisms may exist in vivo. Pretreatment of cells upon with the PARP inhibitors can resulted in a switch from necrosis to apoptosis in cells depending on the stimuli and cell types (reviewed in ). At least two molecular mechanisms underlying this PARP-mediated switch have been proposed: (1) Inhibition of PARP1 could retain NAD+ and ATP levels required for apoptosis. (2) Rapid intracellular acidification induced by alkylating DNA damage has been shown to be strongly decreased in the presence of PARP inhibitors or in Parp1(-/-) fibroblasts, indicating that PARP1 activation and poly-ADP-ribose production is the major cause of acidification . Intracellular acidification has been suggested to suppress apoptosis while permitting necrotic death of cells with extensively damaged DNA . On the other hand, inhibition of the caspase cascade with zVAD-fmk switched the apoptotic response to necrotic cell death, accompanied by a strong activation of PARP1 activity . Prior treatment of cells with broad range PARP inhibitors preserved intracellular ATP levels and prevented the cells from undergoing necrotic cell death . These findings indicate that PARP1 acts downstream of these regulatory events as an executioner enzyme of programmed-necrotic cell death process.

6.2. A poly-ADP-ribose code for Cell death and Cell Survival

Given the complexity of poly-ADP-ribose structures observed in vitro and the existence of distinct PARP enzymes in vivo, it has been suggested that most of these poly-ADP-ribose structures may also exist in vivo and vary depending on the cellular context and stimuli (reviewed in ). In analogy to the "glyco code" hypothesis of the highly diverse oligosaccharide moieties of glycoproteins, glycolipids, proteoglycans, and polysaccharides, a putative "poly-ADP-ribose code" has been recently proposed to exist in vivo and to dictate the outcome of distinct poly-ADP-ribose signaling pathways to reflect the different signaling functions of PARP family members . Distinct types of free poly-ADP-ribose polymers could regulate stress-dependent signaling processes in vivo and could recruit or regulate the activities of pro- or anti-apoptotic/necrotic signaling factors . Interestingly, poly-ADP-ribose polymer toxicity appears to be length-, structure- and dose-dependent . High-molecular-weight poly-ADP-ribose polymers resulted in increased programmed-necrotic cell death with polymers >60 ADP-ribose units inducing >80% cell death while polymers of 16 and 30 ADP-ribose residues induce only a small amount of cell death, at an equivalent poly-ADP-ribose polymer concentration . It remains to be elucidated whether poly-ADP-ribose polymers synthesized by the other members of the PARP family, such as PARP2, may also activate the AIF-mediated necrotic pathway. Finally the specific enzymatic activities of distinct PARG isoforms and endogenous cofactors regulating the specific branching activities of different poly-ADP-ribose polymerases in vivo could also determine whether programmed cell death or cell survival pathways are activated.

6.3. Gender effects

Surprisingly, recent studies provided preliminary evidence that the role of PARP1 in neuronal cell death and survival appears to be gender specific, at least in mice. Protective effects of Parp1 gene disruption on neuronal cell death are only observed in males ( and reviewed in ). In contrast, PARP1 appears even to protect tissue damage in female in systemic inflammatory response and upon stroke . Pharmacological inhibition of PARP even appears to result in a worsening of the outcome of stroke and endotoxin-treatment in the female animals . In addition, female 'tolerance' is also strongly mediated through nNOS . Loss of either of these enzymes strongly enhances infarction in female animals . A similar observation was made for the susceptibility to NMDA toxicity and focal ischemia. However the molecular mechanisms underlying this observed phenomena is not known . Whether activation of these enzymes directly protects against cell death or if the observed protection is indirect, remains to be elucidated. Several recent studies indicated that female sex hormones might be responsible for these observations , at least in shock- or inflammation-related studies: Parp1 gene disruption resulted in reversal of the neuroprotective activity by the female sex steroid, 17beta estradiol ( and reviewed in ). In addition, pretreatment of mice with 17beta-estradiol appears to prevent endotoxin-induced hepatic injury and reduces poly-ADP-ribosylation in vivo in male but not female mice . Thus, 17beta estradiol has been suggested to be partially responsible for this gender difference . Other reports even observed major differences between male and female neurons grown separately in cell culture . Moreover differences in the degree of PARP1 activation were observed between cells incubated in male versus female serum . However, 17beta estradiol does not directly inhibit the enzymatic activity of recombinant PARP1 in vitro . An additional mode of action might be the antioxidant property of the female sex hormones, which can exert cytoprotective effects, even at very low concentrations. Thus, further investigations are required for defining the exact molecular mechanism responsible for the observed gender differences.

6.4. Crosstalk of ADP-Ribosylation and Other NAD+-Dependent Reactions in cell death and survival pathways

Cell survival upon genotoxic stress is determined by a counterbalance of pro- and anti-death factors. It has been recently proposed that PARPs and other NAD+ consuming ADP-ribosylating enzymes could either directly regulate each other in a positive and/or negative manner through trans-ADP-ribosylation or indirectly through modulation of the NAD+ levels and/or ADP-ribose metabolites . Indeed, Parp1(-/-)/Parp2(-/-) double mutant mice are not viable and die at the onset of gastrulation . PARP5/tankyrase-1 appears to protect cells from genotoxin induced cell death and injury through inhibition of PARP1-mediated NAD+ depletion and cell death while PARP6/tankyrase-2 causes rapid necrotic cell death when highly over-expressed in human immortalized cells . Thus, PARP1, PARP2, PARP5/tankyrase-1 and PARP6/tankyrase-2 may modulate each other in an antagonistic or synergistic manner during cell death and survival processes. It has been recently suggested that NAD+/nicotinamide levels could serve as converging points for interactions of PARP/poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions and SIRT-dependent pathways . Crosstalk of SIRT1 and poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions has been suggested to provide the balance between cell survival and cell death, longevity, and senescence . Sirtuins (SIRTs) encompass a family of NAD+-depended deacetylases and mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases that have been implicated in mediating cell survival and growth, longevity, and genome stability (reviewed in ). For example, Sirt1-deficient cells exhibited p53 hyperacetylation after DNA damage and increased ionizing radiation-induced thymocyte apoptosis . Acetylation of p53 at lysine residues K320 and K373 was shown to be essential for the upregulation of p53-dependent pro-apoptotic genes . Moreover, SIRT1 deacetylates the DNA repair factor Ku70, causing it to sequester the pro-apoptotic factor Bax from mitochondria and thereby inhibiting stress-induced cell death . Inhibition of SIRT1 enhances acetylation of Ku70 and induces release of Bax, allowing it to translocate to mitochondria and trigger cytochrome c release, leading to caspase-dependent cell death . Thus, different poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions could modulate the NAD+-dependent deacetylation of proteins by SIRTs via the NAD+/nicotinamide connection. The decline of NAD+ levels and the rise of nicotinamide on activation of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions may downregulate the activity of SIRTs since the enzymatic activity of SIRT1 is dependent on high concentrations of NAD+ and inhibited by low physiological levels of nicotinamide (IC50 < 50 �M) (reviewed in ). This hypothesis is indeed, at least partially supported by three independent studies, which provided preliminary evidence for a functional link between SIRT1 and PARP1 . The first two studies provided preliminary evidence that increased activity of PARP1 upon genotoxic stress, associated with depletion of cellular NAD+ levels may reduce SIRT1 deacetylase activity in myocyte cells, contributing to myocyte cell death during heart failure . Remarkably, PARP1-mediated myocyte cell death is protected by replenishing cellular NAD+ levels as well as by activation of SIRT1 . Conversely, the third report showed a drastic increase in poly-ADP-ribosylation in immortalized Sirt1-deficient cells upon DNA damage . The unbalanced regulation of PARP1 in the absence of SIRT1 resulted in AIF-mediated cell death . These findings provide the first evidence that the two NAD+-dependent enzymes SIRT1 and PARP1 might modulates each other's enzymatic activity under pathophysiological conditions. However, the exact molecular mechanisms and hierarchy of regulation underlying this putative antagonistic crosstalk remain to be elucidated. There is so far no genetic study that could support these in vitro observations. Indeed, one cannot rule out the possibility that SIRT1 and PARPs are even acting synergistically under normal physiological conditions but antagonistically under pathophysiological conditions. If such a scenario would be true, these effects will be only detectable in conditional double knockout mice for Sirt1 and Parp1 or Sirt1 and Parp2.

A recent report demonstrated that during the exposure of activated T cells to NAD+, the ADP-ribosyl cyclase/cyclic-ADP-ribose-hydrolase CD38 is modified by ecto-mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases (e-mART)-specific for arginine residues . E-mART-mediated mono-ADP-ribosylation of CD38 on arginine residues inactivates both cyclase and hydrolase activities and causes a decrease in intracellular cyclic-ADP-ribose and a subsequent decrease in Ca2+ influx, resulting in apoptosis of the activated T-cells . On the other hand, PARPs might be indirectly regulated by the ADP-ribosyl cyclase/cyclic-ADP-ribose hydrolase CD38 through the modulation of NAD+ levels under normal physiological conditions. CD38 seems to be a key regulator of cellular NAD+ levels under normal physiological conditions , while PARP1 appears to be the key factor determining intracellular NAD+ levels under genotoxic stress conditions . Indeed, several studies demonstrated that tissue levels of NAD+ in Cd38-deficient mice are up to 10-fold higher than that in wild-type animals . Moreover, the endogenous activity of SIRT1 was several-fold higher in nuclear extracts from Cd38 knockout mice when compared to wild type nuclear extracts , strongly indicating that the non-membranous nuclear localized CD38 isoform , linked to structural nuclear proteins of the inner nuclear matrix is a major regulator of cellular/nuclear NAD+ level, and SIRT1 activity . It will be interesting to investigate using genetic approaches, how these three crucial players PARP1, SIRT1 and CD38 could act together. It would be not surprising if they may even function together antagonistically as well as synergistically, depending on the cell type, metabolic state and stimuli.

Taken together, PARP1, SIRT1 and nuclear CD38-dependent pathways may provide a unified network for multicellular eukaryotes to deal with nutritional supply and environmental stress . The net result, such as survival or death, proliferation or terminal differentiation, will depend on the equilibrium between specific pathways and the local cellular environment .

7. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Since N. Berger proposed the �PARP-suicide" model in 1983, a tremendous amount of work has been done to elucidate the molecular mechanism how PARP1-mediated ADP-ribosylation reactions can promote programmed cell death. The current literature indicates that PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions play a predominant role in programmed-necrotic cell death processes. Moreover, new studies clearly demonstrate that energy collapse is not the sole mechanism by which PARP1 contributes to programmed-necrotic cell death. A nucleus-to-mitochondria death-signaling cascade between PARP1 and AIF has been established. The contribution of PARP1 to programmed cell death may fulfill its role as a guardian of the genome under controlled non-pathophysiological conditions. PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions has been suggested to protect the animal from the development of tumors by switching the dual functions of AIF towards programmed cell death, thereby limiting the development of cancer . The PARP/poly-ADP-ribosylation system and AIF may function together as a sensor that integrates, in a "yin/yang"-like fashion, information from the mitochondria and nucleus on the metabolic and oxidative states of cells, acting as a double-edged sword in ROS-dependent death/survival pathways . On the other hand, uncontrolled PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions can also result in massive necrotic cell death and tissue damage, which in turn often lead to severe inflammatory or neurodegenerative disorders. Overactivation of PARP1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, circulatory shock, colitis and allergy. Growing evidence suggest that both PARP1 and PARP2 are also involved in cell survival pathways. PARP1 appears to act as a survival factor for stem cells and neuronal cell types at low levels of oxidative stress and DNA damage in vivo.

However, despite the tremendous progress that has been made in the last decade, several crucial questions remain: How are these distinct roles of poly-ADP-ribosylation between programmed cell death and cell survival regulated? Is the outcome of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions between life and death determined by the proposed "poly-ADP-ribose code" or, alternatively, by a shift in the homeostasis of the poly-ADP-ribosylation metabolism? Considering that even small changes in poly-ADP-ribose levels might be physiologically meaningful such changes might disturb untargeted pathways. How many different structural types of poly-ADP-ribose do exist in vivo and what are their exact structures? Moreover, if the existence of such a poly-ADP-ribose code can be confirmed in vivo, it will be important to identify the putative cofactors regulating elongation and branching activities of PARPs in vivo.

Another aspect is the nucleus-to-mitochondria death-signaling cascade. How do PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions in the nucleus trigger events in mitochondria? It remains unclear whether ROS-induced PARP1 activation and depletion of cellular NAD+, may also indirectly cause MTP opening and AIF release via inhibition of glycolysis and ATP depletion. Despite the growing evidence, which suggests that poly-ADP-ribose may directly serve as death signal, it is still elusive how such highly negative charged and branched poly-ADP-ribose polymers could shuttle from the nucleus to the cytoplasm/mitochondria. Thus the role of NAD+ depletion and poly-ADP-ribose as death signal in AIF shuttling needs to be carefully re-evaluated.

An even more crucial and conflicting issue is the a recent hypothesis that highly negative charged and branched poly-ADP-ribose polymers could be covalently attached to p53 by PARP1 and inhibit the interaction between p53 and the nuclear export receptor CRM1, which may in turn result in nuclear accumulation of p53 and increased p53-dependent apoptosis. Indeed, such a scenario would have fare reaching negative consequences for the application of PARP inhibitors in cancer treatment, because both programmed-necrotic cell death and apoptosis, would be blocked by PARP inhibitors. Thus, the data concerning the putative covalent poly-ADP-ribosylation of p53 and its functional consequences have to be re-evaluate in vivo using mass spectrometry approaches combined with genetic studies (i.e. knock-in of modification mutants of p53 and/or enzymatic inactive mutants of PARP1)

Several recent studies provided preliminary evidence that a crosstalk between different programmed cell-death pathways may exist in vivo (reviewed in . Future investigations of the interdependency of these programmed cell-death pathways will certainly answer the question whether PARP1 or another PARP family member might be involved in such a crosstalk.

Regarding the clinical application of pharmaceutical PARP inhibitors, the most important questions remain: How important is the presence of PARP1 for cell survival pathways? And what is the exact molecular mechanism by which PARP1 mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions may lead to cell survival?

An aspect that might be underestimated and certainly needs more attention in future studies is the role of other PARPs in programmed cell death and cell survival pathways. What is the exact molecular mechanism underlying the observed crosstalk between PARP1 and PARP2 in cell survival? Do PARP2 mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions also contribute to programmed cell death processes or is it just the physical presence of PARP2, i.e. through the formation of PARP1/PARP2 hetero-oligomers, which may promote or modulate PARP1-dependent poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions?

A may be rather obscure but just as important observation are mitochondria-associated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions in mammalian cells. Although, mitochondrial poly-ADP-ribosylation has been reported repeatedly, the responsible PARP isoform could not be identified. The discovery of two mitochondria-associated PARG isoforms capable of preventing poly-ADP-ribose accumulation in close proximity to, or possibly within mitochondria, led to the hypothesis that full mitochondria-associated poly-ADP-ribosylation cycles may exist in mammalian cells. Genetic studies indicate that these two mitochondria-associated PARG isoforms could block AIF release from mitochondria and eventually cell death, thus acting as survival factors. On the other hand it has been suggested that the novel PARG isoforms could contribute to oxidative stress induced cell death through the release of free ADPR from the mitochondria and specific activation of the cell membrane Ca2+ channel TRPM2. Therefore, the existence of an entirely mitochondrial poly-ADP-ribose metabolism is of great interest. Selective knockout and knock-in studies will be required to elucidate the exact roles of the mitochondria localized ARH3 and PARG isoforms in programmed cell death and cell survival pathways.

An additional interesting issue, which needs further careful investigations, is the proposed crosstalk of different NAD+-metabolizing enzymes in cell death and cell survival processes. Could NAD+/nicotinamide levels serve as a converging point for interactions of poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions and other NAD+-metabolizing pathways? Since recent studies claimed that SIRT1-dependent mechanisms could be modulated by poly-ADP-ribosylation and vice versa, it will be important to test whether conditional double knockouts of Parp1/Sirt1 or Parp2/Sirt1 could rescue the lethality phenotype observed with single knockout mice for the Sirt1 gene.

Taken together a powerful method to establish the physiological relevance of the proposed functions PARPs and PARGs in vivo might be the generation of knock-in mice expressing enzymatic mutants of PARP family members, PARG isoforms as well as of ARH3. Genetic studies using combinations of double knockouts and knock-in mice expressing enzymatic dead mutants of different PARPs are needed to elucidate potential roles of poly-ADP-ribosylation in programmed cell death and cell survival processes associated with aging and cancer in vivo. Such approaches should also clarify whether mono-ADP-ribosylation reactions, mediated by Pl-mARTs or SIRTs, might be involved in these processes and regulate PARP1-mediated poly-ADP-ribosylation reactions. Targeted genetic approaches will also provide suitable in vivo platforms for the development of highly selective isoform-specific pharmaceutical inhibitors of PARPs and PARGs.

8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I apologize to those investigators whose work I could not cite due to the limit on the number of references and gratefully acknowledge their contributions to the field. This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (FNSNF) (PA00A-115384/1) to P.O.H. 9. RFERENCES
1. Hassa, P. O. & M. O. Hottiger: The diverse biological roles of mammalian PARPS, a small but powerful family of poly-ADP-ribose polymerases. Front Biosci, 13, 3046-82(2008)
doi:10.2741/2909
http://dx.doi.org/10.2741/2909
2. Hassa, P. O., S. S. Haenni, M. Elser & M. O. Hottiger: Nuclear ADP-ribosylation reactions in mammalian cells: where are we today and where are we going? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 70, 789-829(2006)
doi:10.1128/MMBR.00040-05
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00040-05
3. Althaus, F. R. & C. Richter: ADP-ribosylation of proteins. Enzymology and biological significance. Mol Biol Biochem Biophys, 37, 1-237(1987)
 
4. D'Amours, D., S. Desnoyers, I. D'Silva & G. G. Poirier: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions. Biochem J, 342 (Pt 2), 249-68(1999)
doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3420249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3420249
5. Schreiber, V., F. Dantzer, J. C. Ame & G. de Murcia: Poly(ADP-ribose): novel functions for an old molecule. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 7, 517-28(2006)
doi:10.1038/nrm1963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1963
6. Scovassi, A. I. & G. G. Poirier: Poly(ADP-ribosylation) and apoptosis. Mol Cell Biochem, 199, 125-37(1999)
doi:10.1023/A:1006962716377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006962716377
7. Hassa, P. O. & M. O. Hottiger: The functional role of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 as novel coactivator of NF-kappaB in inflammatory disorders. Cell Mol Life Sci, 59, 1534-53(2002)
doi:10.1007/s00018-002-8527-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8527-2
8. Jagtap, P. & C. Szabo: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the therapeutic effects of its inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 4, 421-40(2005)
doi:10.1038/nrd1718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd1718
9. Szabo, C. & V. L. Dawson: Role of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase in inflammation and ischaemia-reperfusion. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 19, 287-98(1998)
doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(98)01193-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(98)01193-6
10. Ishizuka, S., K. Martin, C. Booth, C. S. Potten, G. de Murcia, A. Burkle & T. B. Kirkwood: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is a survival factor for radiation-exposed intestinal epithelial stem cells in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res, 31, 6198-205(2003)
doi:10.1093/nar/gkg840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg840
11. de Murcia, J. M., C. Niedergang, C. Trucco, M. Ricoul, B. Dutrillaux, M. Mark, F. J. Oliver, M. Masson, A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, C. Walztinger, P. Chambon & G. de Murcia: Requirement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in recovery from DNA damage in mice and in cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94, 7303-7(1997)
doi:10.1073/pnas.94.14.7303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.14.7303
12. Kofler, J., T. Otsuka, Z. Zhang, R. Noppens, M. R. Grafe, D. W. Koh, V. L. Dawson, J. M. de Murcia, P. D. Hurn & R. J. Traystman: Differential effect of PARP-2 deletion on brain injury after focal and global cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 26, 135-41(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600173
13. Yelamos, J., Y. Monreal, L. Saenz, E. Aguado, V. Schreiber, R. Mota, T. Fuente, A. Minguela, P. Parrilla, G. de Murcia, E. Almarza, P. Aparicio & J. Menissier-de Murcia: PARP-2 deficiency affects the survival of CD4+CD8+ double-positive thymocytes. Embo J, 25, 4350-60(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601301
14. Menissier de Murcia, J., M. Ricoul, L. Tartier, C. Niedergang, A. Huber, F. Dantzer, V. Schreiber, J. C. Ame, A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, L. Sabatier, P. Chambon & G. de Murcia: Functional interaction between PARP-1 and PARP-2 in chromosome stability and embryonic development in mouse. Embo J, 22, 2255-63(2003)
doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg206
15. Schreiber, V., J. C. Ame, P. Dolle, I. Schultz, B. Rinaldi, V. Fraulob, J. Menissier-de Murcia & G. de Murcia: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 (PARP-2) is required for efficient base excision DNA repair in association with PARP-1 and XRCC1. J Biol Chem, 277, 23028-36(2002)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M202390200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202390200
16. Zhang, J.: Are poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by PARP-1 and deacetylation by Sir2 linked? Bioessays, 25, 808-14(2003)
doi:10.1002/bies.10317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.10317
17. Huang, J. & D. J. Klionsky: Autophagy and human disease. Cell Cycle, 6, 1837-49(2007)
 
18. Castedo, M., J. L. Perfettini, T. Roumier, K. Andreau, R. Medema & G. Kroemer: Cell death by mitotic catastrophe: a molecular definition. Oncogene, 23, 2825-37(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207528
19. Debnath, J., E. H. Baehrecke & G. Kroemer: Does autophagy contribute to cell death? Autophagy, 1, 66-74(2005)
 
20. Ferri, K. F. & G. Kroemer: Organelle-specific initiation of cell death pathways. Nat Cell Biol, 3, E255-63(2001)
doi:10.1038/ncb1101-e255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1101-e255
21. Galluzzi, L., M. C. Maiuri, I. Vitale, H. Zischka, M. Castedo, L. Zitvogel & G. Kroemer: Cell death modalities: classification and pathophysiological implications. Cell Death Differ, 14, 1237-43(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402148
22. Golstein, P. & G. Kroemer: Cell death by necrosis: towards a molecular definition. Trends Biochem Sci, 32, 37-43(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.001
23. Green, D. R. & G. Kroemer: The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science, 305, 626-9(2004)
doi:10.1126/science.1099320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1099320
24. Kroemer, G., L. Galluzzi & C. Brenner: Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death. Physiol Rev, 87, 99-163(2007)
doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00013.2006
25. Kroemer, G. & S. J. Martin: Caspase-independent cell death. Nat Med, 11, 725-30(2005)
doi:10.1038/nm1263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1263
26. Modjtahedi, N., F. Giordanetto, F. Madeo & G. Kroemer: Apoptosis-inducing factor: vital and lethal. Trends Cell Biol, 16, 264-72(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2006.03.008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.03.008
27. Levine, B. & D. J. Klionsky: Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell, 6, 463-77(2004)
doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00099-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00099-1
28. Pinkoski, M. J., N. J. Waterhouse & D. R. Green: Mitochondria, apoptosis and autoimmunity. Curr Dir Autoimmun, 9, 55-73(2006)
 
29. Gatzka, M. & C. M. Walsh: Apoptotic signal transduction and T cell tolerance. Autoimmunity, 40, 442-52(2007)
doi:10.1080/08916930701464962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08916930701464962
30. Sehra, S. & A. L. Dent: Caspase function and the immune system. Crit Rev Immunol, 26, 133-48(2006)
 
31. DosReis, G. A., F. L. Ribeiro-Gomes, L. V. Guillermo & M. F. Lopes: Cross-talk between apoptosis and cytokines in the regulation of parasitic infection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 18, 97-105(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.01.009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.01.009
32. Sebzda, E., S. Mariathasan, T. Ohteki, R. Jones, M. F. Bachmann & P. S. Ohashi: Selection of the T cell repertoire. Annu Rev Immunol, 17, 829-74(1999)
doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.829
33. Minter, L. M. & B. A. Osborne: Cell death in the thymus--it' s all a matter of contacts. Semin Immunol, 15, 135-44(2003)
doi:10.1016/S1044-5323(03)00029-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5323(03)00029-0
34. Barber, G. N.: Host defense, viruses and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ, 8, 113-26(2001)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400823
35. Brown, J. M. & L. D. Attardi: The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response. Nat Rev Cancer, 5, 231-7(2005)
doi:10.1038/nrc1560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1560
36. Gozuacik, D. & A. Kimchi: Autophagy as a cell death and tumor suppressor mechanism. Oncogene, 23, 2891-906(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207521
37. Boyce, M. & J. Yuan: Cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum stress: a matter of life or death. Cell Death Differ, 13, 363-73(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401817
38. Testa, U. & R. Riccioni: Deregulation of apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica, 92, 81-94(2007)
doi:10.3324/haematol.10279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.10279
39. Bidere, N., H. C. Su & M. J. Lenardo: Genetic disorders of programmed cell death in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol, 24, 321-52(2006)
doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090513
40. Prasad, K. V. & B. S. Prabhakar: Apoptosis and autoimmune disorders. Autoimmunity, 36, 323-30(2003)
doi:10.1080/08916930310001604207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08916930310001604207
41. Lipton, P.: Ischemic cell death in brain neurons. Physiol Rev, 79, 1431-568(1999)
 
42. Koh, D. W., T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Mediation of cell death by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Pharmacol Res, 52, 5-14(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2005.02.011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2005.02.011
43. Koh, D. W., T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulation of life and death in the nervous system. Cell Mol Life Sci, 62, 760-8(2005)
 
44. Baehrecke, E. H.: How death shapes life during development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 3, 779-87(2002)
doi:10.1038/nrm931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm931
45. Hotchkiss, R. S. & D. W. Nicholson: Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol, 6, 813-22(2006)
doi:10.1038/nri1943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri1943
46. Jin, Z. & W. S. El-Deiry: Overview of cell death signaling pathways. Cancer Biol Ther, 4, 139-63(2005)
 
47. Zhivotovsky, B. & G. Kroemer: Apoptosis and genomic instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 5, 752-62(2004)
doi:10.1038/nrm1443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1443
48. Fadeel, B.: Plasma membrane alterations during apoptosis: role in corpse clearance. Antioxid Redox Signal, 6, 269-75(2004)
doi:10.1089/152308604322899332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/152308604322899332
49. Krysko, D. V., K. D'Herde & P. Vandenabeele: Clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells and its immunological consequences. Apoptosis, 11, 1709-26(2006)
doi:10.1007/s10495-006-9527-8
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-9527-8
50. Lauber, K., S. G. Blumenthal, M. Waibel & S. Wesselborg: Clearance of apoptotic cells: getting rid of the corpses. Mol Cell, 14, 277-87(2004)
doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00237-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00237-0
51. Platt, N., R. P. da Silva & S. Gordon: Recognizing death: the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Trends Cell Biol, 8, 365-72(1998)
doi:10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01329-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01329-4
52. Savill, J. & V. Fadok: Corpse clearance defines the meaning of cell death. Nature, 407, 784-8(2000)
doi:10.1038/35037722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35037722
53. Stuart, L. M. & R. A. Ezekowitz: Phagocytosis: elegant complexity. Immunity, 22, 539-50(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.05.002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.05.002
54. Budd, R. C., W. C. Yeh & J. Tschopp: cFLIP regulation of lymphocyte activation and development. Nat Rev Immunol, 6, 196-204(2006)
doi:10.1038/nri1787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri1787
55. Martinon, F. & J. Tschopp: Inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes: master switches of inflammation. Cell Death Differ, 14, 10-22(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402038
56. Harada, H. & S. Grant: Apoptosis regulators. Rev Clin Exp Hematol, 7, 117-38(2003)
 
57. Budihardjo, I., H. Oliver, M. Lutter, X. Luo & X. Wang: Biochemical pathways of caspase activation during apoptosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 15, 269-90(1999)
doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.269
58. Ho, P. K. & C. J. Hawkins: Mammalian initiator apoptotic caspases. Febs J, 272, 5436-53(2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04966.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04966.x
59. Tibbetts, M. D., L. Zheng & M. J. Lenardo: The death effector domain protein family: regulators of cellular homeostasis. Nat Immunol, 4, 404-9(2003)
doi:10.1038/ni0503-404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni0503-404
60. Garrido, C., L. Galluzzi, M. Brunet, P. E. Puig, C. Didelot & G. Kroemer: Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Differ, 13, 1423-33(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401950
61. Riedl, S. J. & G. S. Salvesen: The apoptosome: signalling platform of cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 8, 405-13(2007)
doi:10.1038/nrm2153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2153
62. Schafer, Z. T. & S. Kornbluth: The apoptosome: physiological, developmental, and pathological modes of regulation. Dev Cell, 10, 549-61(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.008
63. Link, N., P. Chen, W. J. Lu, K. Pogue, A. Chuong, M. Mata, J. Checketts & J. M. Abrams: A collective form of cell death requires homeodomain interacting protein kinase. J Cell Biol, 178, 567-74(2007)
doi:10.1083/jcb.200702125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200702125
64. Levine, B. & V. Deretic: Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol, 7, 767-77(2007)
doi:10.1038/nri2161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2161
65. Mizushima, N. & D. J. Klionsky: Protein Turnover Via Autophagy: Implications for Metabolism (*). Annu Rev Nutr, 27, 19-40(2007)
doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093749
66. Rubinsztein, D. C., J. E. Gestwicki, L. O. Murphy & D. J. Klionsky: Potential therapeutic applications of autophagy. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 6, 304-12(2007)
doi:10.1038/nrd2272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd2272
67. Scherz-Shouval, R. & Z. Elazar: ROS, mitochondria and the regulation of autophagy. Trends Cell Biol(2007)
 
68. Schmid, D. & C. Munz: Innate and adaptive immunity through autophagy. Immunity, 27, 11-21(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.004
69. Bellu, A. R., A. M. Kram, J. A. Kiel, M. Veenhuis & I. J. van der Klei: Glucose-induced and nitrogen-starvation-induced peroxisome degradation are distinct processes in Hansenula polymorpha that involve both common and unique genes. FEMS Yeast Res, 1, 23-31(2001)
doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2001.tb00010.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2001.tb00010.x
doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(00)00004-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1567-1356(00)00004-0
70. Onodera, J. & Y. Ohsumi: Ald6p is a preferred target for autophagy in yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem, 279, 16071-6(2004)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M312706200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312706200
71. Webb, J. L., B. Ravikumar, J. Atkins, J. N. Skepper & D. C. Rubinsztein: Alpha-Synuclein is degraded by both autophagy and the proteasome. J Biol Chem, 278, 25009-13(2003)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M300227200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300227200
72. Yu, L., F. Wan, S. Dutta, S. Welsh, Z. Liu, E. Freundt, E. H. Baehrecke & M. Lenardo: Autophagic programmed cell death by selective catalase degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 4952-7(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0511288103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511288103
73. Espert, L., P. Codogno & M. Biard-Piechaczyk: Involvement of autophagy in viral infections: antiviral function and subversion by viruses. J Mol Med, 85, 811-23(2007)
doi:10.1007/s00109-007-0173-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00109-007-0173-6
74. Luzio, J. P., P. R. Pryor & N. A. Bright: Lysosomes: fusion and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 8, 622-32(2007)
doi:10.1038/nrm2217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2217
75. Schmid, D., J. Dengjel, O. Schoor, S. Stevanovic & C. Munz: Autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity against intracellular pathogens. J Mol Med, 84, 194-202(2006)
doi:10.1007/s00109-005-0014-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00109-005-0014-4
76. Schmid, D. & C. Munz: Immune surveillance of intracellular pathogens via autophagy. Cell Death Differ, 12 Suppl 2, 1519-27(2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401727
77. Farre, J. C. & S. Subramani: Peroxisome turnover by micropexophagy: an autophagy-related process. Trends Cell Biol, 14, 515-23(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.014
78. Zong, W. X., D. Ditsworth, D. E. Bauer, Z. Q. Wang & C. B. Thompson: Alkylating DNA damage stimulates a regulated form of necrotic cell death. Genes Dev, 18, 1272-82(2004)
doi:10.1101/gad.1199904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1199904
79. Moubarak, R. S., V. J. Yuste, C. Artus, A. Bouharrour, P. A. Greer, J. Menissier-de Murcia & S. A. Susin: Sequential activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1, calpains, and Bax is essential in apoptosis-inducing factor-mediated programmed necrosis. Mol Cell Biol, 27, 4844-62(2007)
doi:10.1128/MCB.02141-06
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02141-06
80. Edinger, A. L. & C. B. Thompson: Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 16, 663-9(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.011
81. Zong, W. X. & C. B. Thompson: Necrotic death as a cell fate. Genes Dev, 20, 1-15(2006)
doi:10.1101/gad.1376506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1376506
82. Chan, F. K., J. Shisler, J. G. Bixby, M. Felices, L. Zheng, M. Appel, J. Orenstein, B. Moss & M. J. Lenardo: A role for tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 and receptor-interacting protein in programmed necrosis and antiviral responses. J Biol Chem, 278, 51613-21(2003)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M305633200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M305633200
83. Mareninova, O. A., K. F. Sung, P. Hong, A. Lugea, S. J. Pandol, I. Gukovsky & A. S. Gukovskaya: Cell death in pancreatitis: caspases protect from necrotizing pancreatitis. J Biol Chem, 281, 3370-81(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M511276200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M511276200
84. Xu, Y., S. Huang, Z. G. Liu & J. Han: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 signaling to mitochondria in necrotic cell death requires RIP1/TRAF2-mediated JNK1 activation. J Biol Chem, 281, 8788-95(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M508135200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M508135200
85. Festjens, N., T. Vanden Berghe, S. Cornelis & P. Vandenabeele: RIP1, a kinase on the crossroads of a cell's decision to live or die. Cell Death Differ, 14, 400-10(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402085
86. Festjens, N., T. Vanden Berghe & P. Vandenabeele: Necrosis, a well-orchestrated form of cell demise: signalling cascades, important mediators and concomitant immune response. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1757, 1371-87(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014
87. Yang, P. M., H. C. Chen, J. S. Tsai & L. Y. Lin: Cadmium induces Ca2+-dependent necrotic cell death through calpain-triggered mitochondrial depolarization and reactive oxygen species-mediated inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB activity. Chem Res Toxicol, 20, 406-15(2007)
doi:10.1021/tx060144c
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx060144c
88. Deiss, L. P., H. Galinka, H. Berissi, O. Cohen & A. Kimchi: Cathepsin D protease mediates programmed cell death induced by interferon-gamma, Fas/APO-1 and TNF-alpha. Embo J, 15, 3861-70(1996)
 
89. Krantic, S., N. Mechawar, S. Reix & R. Quirion: Apoptosis-inducing factor: a matter of neuron life and death. Prog Neurobiol, 81, 179-96(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.12.002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.12.002
90. Cregan, S. P., V. L. Dawson & R. S. Slack: Role of AIF in caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death. Oncogene, 23, 2785-96(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207517
91. Dawson, V. L.: Inhibition of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in experimental models of neurologic diseases: cell death prevention. Retina, 25, S31-S32(2005)
doi:10.1097/00006982-200512001-00012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200512001-00012
92. Dawson, V. L. & T. M. Dawson: Deadly conversations: nuclear-mitochondrial cross-talk. J Bioenerg Biomembr, 36, 287-94(2004)
doi:10.1023/B:JOBB.0000041755.22613.8d
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBB.0000041755.22613.8d
93. van Wijk, S. J. & G. J. Hageman: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 mediated caspase-independent cell death after ischemia/reperfusion. Free Radic Biol Med, 39, 81-90(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.021
94. Feraud, O., N. Debili, J. M. Penninger & G. Kroemer: Cavitation of embryoid bodies requires optimal oxidative phosphorylation and AIF. Cell Death Differ, 14, 385-7(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402041
95. Urbano, A., U. Lakshmanan, P. H. Choo, J. C. Kwan, P. Y. Ng, K. Guo, S. Dhakshinamoorthy & A. Porter: AIF suppresses chemical stress-induced apoptosis and maintains the transformed state of tumor cells. Embo J, 24, 2815-26(2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600746
96. Lorenzo, H. K., S. A. Susin, J. Penninger & G. Kroemer: Apoptosis inducing factor (AIF): a phylogenetically old, caspase-independent effector of cell death. Cell Death Differ, 6, 516-24(1999)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400527
97. Susin, S. A., H. K. Lorenzo, N. Zamzami, I. Marzo, B. E. Snow, G. M. Brothers, J. Mangion, E. Jacotot, P. Costantini, M. Loeffler, N. Larochette, D. R. Goodlett, R. Aebersold, D. P. Siderovski, J. M. Penninger & G. Kroemer: Molecular characterization of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature, 397, 441-6(1999)
doi:10.1038/17135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/17135
98. Klein, J. A., C. M. Longo-Guess, M. P. Rossmann, K. L. Seburn, R. E. Hurd, W. N. Frankel, R. T. Bronson & S. L. Ackerman: The harlequin mouse mutation downregulates apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature, 419, 367-74(2002)
doi:10.1038/nature01034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01034
99. Vahsen, N., C. Cande, J. J. Briere, P. Benit, N. Joza, N. Larochette, P. G. Mastroberardino, M. O. Pequignot, N. Casares, V. Lazar, O. Feraud, N. Debili, S. Wissing, S. Engelhardt, F. Madeo, M. Piacentini, J. M. Penninger, H. Schagger, P. Rustin & G. Kroemer: AIF deficiency compromises oxidative phosphorylation. Embo J, 23, 4679-89(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600461
100. Zhu, C., X. Wang, Z. Huang, L. Qiu, F. Xu, N. Vahsen, M. Nilsson, P. S. Eriksson, H. Hagberg, C. Culmsee, N. Plesnila, G. Kroemer & K. Blomgren: Apoptosis-inducing factor is a major contributor to neuronal loss induced by neonatal cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. Cell Death Differ, 14, 775-84(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402053
101. Cande, C., N. Vahsen, C. Garrido & G. Kroemer: Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF): caspase-independent after all. Cell Death Differ, 11, 591-5(2004)
 
102. Cande, C., N. Vahsen, I. Kouranti, E. Schmitt, E. Daugas, C. Spahr, J. Luban, R. T. Kroemer, F. Giordanetto, C. Garrido, J. M. Penninger & G. Kroemer: AIF and cyclophilin A cooperate in apoptosis-associated chromatinolysis. Oncogene, 23, 1514-21(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207279
103. Cande, C., N. Vahsen, D. Metivier, H. Tourriere, K. Chebli, C. Garrido, J. Tazi & G. Kroemer: Regulation of cytoplasmic stress granules by apoptosis-inducing factor. J Cell Sci, 117, 4461-8(2004)
doi:10.1242/jcs.01356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01356
104. Zhu, C., X. Wang, J. Deinum, Z. Huang, J. Gao, N. Modjtahedi, M. R. Neagu, M. Nilsson, P. S. Eriksson, H. Hagberg, J. Luban, G. Kroemer & K. Blomgren: Cyclophilin A participates in the nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor in neurons after cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. J Exp Med, 204, 1741-8(2007)
doi:10.1084/jem.20070193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070193
105. Ye, H., C. Cande, N. C. Stephanou, S. Jiang, S. Gurbuxani, N. Larochette, E. Daugas, C. Garrido, G. Kroemer & H. Wu: DNA binding is required for the apoptogenic action of apoptosis inducing factor. Nat Struct Biol, 9, 680-4(2002)
doi:10.1038/nsb836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsb836
106. Wang, H., S. W. Yu, D. W. Koh, J. Lew, C. Coombs, W. Bowers, H. J. Federoff, G. G. Poirier, T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Apoptosis-inducing factor substitutes for caspase executioners in NMDA-triggered excitotoxic neuronal death. J Neurosci, 24, 10963-73(2004)
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3461-04.2004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3461-04.2004
107. Yu, S. W., H. Wang, T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and apoptosis inducing factor in neurotoxicity. Neurobiol Dis, 14, 303-17(2003)
doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2003.08.008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2003.08.008
108. Yu, S. W., H. Wang, M. F. Poitras, C. Coombs, W. J. Bowers, H. J. Federoff, G. G. Poirier, T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Mediation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-dependent cell death by apoptosis-inducing factor. Science, 297, 259-63(2002)
doi:10.1126/science.1072221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1072221
109. David, K. K., M. Sasaki, S. W. Yu, T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: EndoG is dispensable in embryogenesis and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ, 13, 1147-55(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401787
110. Zhang, J., M. Dong, L. Li, Y. Fan, P. Pathre, J. Dong, D. Lou, J. M. Wells, D. Olivares-Villagomez, L. Van Kaer, X. Wang & M. Xu: Endonuclease G is required for early embryogenesis and normal apoptosis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 15782-7(2003)
doi:10.1073/pnas.2636393100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2636393100
111. Brown, D., B. D. Yu, N. Joza, P. Benit, J. Meneses, M. Firpo, P. Rustin, J. M. Penninger & G. R. Martin: Loss of Aif function causes cell death in the mouse embryo, but the temporal progression of patterning is normal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 9918-23(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0603950103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603950103
112. Cheung, E. C., N. Joza, N. A. Steenaart, K. A. McClellan, M. Neuspiel, S. McNamara, J. G. MacLaurin, P. Rippstein, D. S. Park, G. C. Shore, H. M. McBride, J. M. Penninger & R. S. Slack: Dissociating the dual roles of apoptosis-inducing factor in maintaining mitochondrial structure and apoptosis. Embo J, 25, 4061-73(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601276
113. van Empel, V. P., A. T. Bertrand, R. van der Nagel, S. Kostin, P. A. Doevendans, H. J. Crijns, E. de Wit, W. Sluiter, S. L. Ackerman & L. J. De Windt: Downregulation of apoptosis-inducing factor in harlequin mutant mice sensitizes the myocardium to oxidative stress-related cell death and pressure overload-induced decompensation. Circ Res, 96, e92-e101(2005)
doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000172081.30327.28
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000172081.30327.28
114. El Ghouzzi, V., Z. Csaba, P. Olivier, B. Lelouvier, L. Schwendimann, P. Dournaud, C. Verney, P. Rustin & P. Gressens: Apoptosis-inducing factor deficiency induces early mitochondrial degeneration in brain followed by progressive multifocal neuropathology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 66, 838-47(2007)
 
115. Stringer, J. R., J. S. Larson, J. M. Fischer & S. L. Stringer: Increased mutation in mice genetically predisposed to oxidative damage in the brain. Mutat Res, 556, 127-34(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.07.010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.07.010
116. Vahsen, N., C. Cande, P. Dupaigne, F. Giordanetto, R. T. Kroemer, E. Herker, S. Scholz, N. Modjtahedi, F. Madeo, E. Le Cam & G. Kroemer: Physical interaction of apoptosis-inducing factor with DNA and RNA. Oncogene, 25, 1763-74(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209206
117. Lipton, S. A. & E. Bossy-Wetzel: Dueling activities of AIF in cell death versus survival: DNA binding and redox activity. Cell, 111, 147-50(2002)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01046-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01046-2
118. Hansen, T. M. & P. Nagley: AIF: a multifunctional cog in the life and death machine. Sci STKE, 2003, PE31(2003)
doi:10.1126/stke.2003.193.pe31
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/stke.2003.193.pe31
119. Lee, M. W., W. J. Kim, D. I. Beardsley & K. D. Brown: N-Methyl-N'-Nitro-N-Nitrosoguanidine Activates Multiple Cell Death Mechanisms in Human Fibroblasts. DNA Cell Biol, 26, 683-694(2007)
doi:10.1089/dna.2007.0594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dna.2007.0594
120. Virag, L., A. L. Salzman & C. Szabo: Poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase activation mediates mitochondrial injury during oxidant-induced cell death. J Immunol, 161, 3753-9(1998)
 
121. Virag, L., G. S. Scott, S. Cuzzocrea, D. Marmer, A. L. Salzman & C. Szabo: Peroxynitrite-induced thymocyte apoptosis: the role of caspases and poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase (PARS) activation. Immunology, 94, 345-55(1998)
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00534.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00534.x
122. Vandenabeele, P., T. Vanden Berghe & N. Festjens: Caspase inhibitors promote alternative cell death pathways. Sci STKE, 2006, pe44(2006)
doi:10.1126/stke.3582006pe44
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/stke.3582006pe44
123. Broker, L. E., F. A. Kruyt & G. Giaccone: Cell death independent of caspases: a review. Clin Cancer Res, 11, 3155-62(2005)
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2223
124. Erenpreisa, J., M. Kalejs & M. S. Cragg: Mitotic catastrophe and endomitosis in tumour cells: an evolutionary key to a molecular solution. Cell Biol Int, 29, 1012-8(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.005
125. Castedo, M., J. L. Perfettini, T. Roumier, A. Valent, H. Raslova, K. Yakushijin, D. Horne, J. Feunteun, G. Lenoir, R. Medema, W. Vainchenker & G. Kroemer: Mitotic catastrophe constitutes a special case of apoptosis whose suppression entails aneuploidy. Oncogene, 23, 4362-70(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207572
126. Mansilla, S., W. Priebe & J. Portugal: Mitotic catastrophe results in cell death by caspase-dependent and caspase-independent mechanisms. Cell Cycle, 5, 53-60(2006)
 
127. Blagosklonny, M. V.: Mitotic arrest and cell fate: why and how mitotic inhibition of transcription drives mutually exclusive events. Cell Cycle, 6, 70-4(2007)
 
128. Vogel, C., C. Hager & H. Bastians: Mechanisms of mitotic cell death induced by chemotherapy-mediated G2 checkpoint abrogation. Cancer Res, 67, 339-45(2007)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2548
129. Castedo, M., J. L. Perfettini, T. Roumier, K. Yakushijin, D. Horne, R. Medema & G. Kroemer: The cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk2 is a negative regulator of mitotic catastrophe. Oncogene, 23, 4353-61(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207573
130. Garcia-Muse, T. & S. J. Boulton: Distinct modes of ATR activation after replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans. Embo J, 24, 4345-55(2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600896
131. Niida, H., S. Tsuge, Y. Katsuno, A. Konishi, N. Takeda & M. Nakanishi: Depletion of Chk1 leads to premature activation of Cdc2-cyclin B and mitotic catastrophe. J Biol Chem, 280, 39246-52(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M505009200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505009200
132. Nitta, M., O. Kobayashi, S. Honda, T. Hirota, S. Kuninaka, T. Marumoto, Y. Ushio & H. Saya: Spindle checkpoint function is required for mitotic catastrophe induced by DNA-damaging agents. Oncogene, 23, 6548-58(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207873
133. Reinhardt, H. C., A. S. Aslanian, J. A. Lees & M. B. Yaffe: p53-deficient cells rely on ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage. Cancer Cell, 11, 175-89(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.024
134. Rosa, J., P. Canovas, A. Islam, D. C. Altieri & S. J. Doxsey: Survivin modulates microtubule dynamics and nucleation throughout the cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell, 17, 1483-93(2006)
doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0723
135. Shankar, S. L., S. Mani, K. N. O'Guin, E. R. Kandimalla, S. Agrawal & B. Shafit-Zagardo: Survivin inhibition induces human neural tumor cell death through caspase-independent and -dependent pathways. J Neurochem, 79, 426-36(2001)
doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00596.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00596.x
136. Tu, S. P., X. H. Jiang, M. C. Lin, J. T. Cui, Y. Yang, C. T. Lum, B. Zou, Y. B. Zhu, S. H. Jiang, W. M. Wong, A. O. Chan, M. F. Yuen, S. K. Lam, H. F. Kung & B. C. Wong: Suppression of survivin expression inhibits in vivo tumorigenicity and angiogenesis in gastric cancer. Cancer Res, 63, 7724-32(2003)
 
137. Murphy, J. F., J. L. McGregor & L. L. Leung: Senescent human neutrophil binding to thrombospondin (TSP): evidence for a TSP-independent pathway of phagocytosis by macrophages. Br J Haematol, 102, 957-64(1998)
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00851.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00851.x
138. Savill, J. S., P. M. Henson & C. Haslett: Phagocytosis of aged human neutrophils by macrophages is mediated by a novel "charge-sensitive" recognition mechanism. J Clin Invest, 84, 1518-27(1989)
 
139. Savill, J. S., A. H. Wyllie, J. E. Henson, M. J. Walport, P. M. Henson & C. Haslett: Macrophage phagocytosis of aging neutrophils in inflammation. Programmed cell death in the neutrophil leads to its recognition by macrophages. J Clin Invest, 83, 865-75(1989)
 
140. Gerland, L. M., S. Peyrol, C. Lallemand, R. Branche, J. P. Magaud & M. Ffrench: Association of increased autophagic inclusions labeled for beta-galactosidase with fibroblastic aging. Exp Gerontol, 38, 887-95(2003)
doi:10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00132-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00132-3
141. Zhang, J., J. M. Patel & E. R. Block: Enhanced apoptosis in prolonged cultures of senescent porcine pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Mech Ageing Dev, 123, 613-25(2002)
doi:10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00412-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00412-2
142. Unterluggauer, H., B. Hampel, W. Zwerschke & P. Jansen-Durr: Senescence-associated cell death of human endothelial cells: the role of oxidative stress. Exp Gerontol, 38, 1149-60(2003)
doi:10.1016/j.exger.2003.08.007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2003.08.007
143. Wagner, M., B. Hampel, D. Bernhard, M. Hala, W. Zwerschke & P. Jansen-Durr: Replicative senescence of human endothelial cells in vitro involves G1 arrest, polyploidization and senescence-associated apoptosis. Exp Gerontol, 36, 1327-47(2001)
doi:10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00105-X
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00105-X
144. Rajaraman, R., D. L. Guernsey, M. M. Rajaraman & S. R. Rajaraman: Stem cells, senescence, neosis and self-renewal in cancer. Cancer Cell Int, 6, 25(2006)
doi:10.1186/1475-2867-6-25
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-6-25
145. Hayflick, L. & P. S. Moorhead: The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res, 25, 585-621(1961)
doi:10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6
146. Hayflick, L.: The Limited in Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains. Exp Cell Res, 37, 614-36(1965)
doi:10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9
147. Hayflick, L.: The biology of human aging. Am J Med Sci, 265, 432-45(1973)
doi:10.1097/00000441-197306000-00001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441-197306000-00001
148. Hayflick, L.: The strategy of senescence. Gerontologist, 14, 37-45(1974)
 
149. Hayflick, L.: The longevity of cultured human cells. J Am Geriatr Soc, 22, 1-12(1974)
 
150. Tomkins, G. A., E. J. Stanbridge & L. Hayflick: Viral probes of aging in the human diploid cell strain WI-38. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 146, 385-90(1974)
 
151. Linskens, M. H., C. B. Harley, M. D. West, J. Campisi & L. Hayflick: Replicative senescence and cell death. Science, 267, 17(1995)
doi:10.1126/science.7848496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7848496
152. Dimri, G. P.: What has senescence got to do with cancer? Cancer Cell, 7, 505-12(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.025
153. Itahana, K., J. Campisi & G. P. Dimri: Mechanisms of cellular senescence in human and mouse cells. Biogerontology, 5, 1-10(2004)
doi:10.1023/B:BGEN.0000017682.96395.10
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BGEN.0000017682.96395.10
154. Nakagawa, H. & O. G. Opitz: Inducing cellular senescence using defined genetic elements. Methods Mol Biol, 371, 167-78(2007)
 
155. Rubin, H.: The disparity between human cell senescence in vitro and lifelong replication in vivo. Nat Biotechnol, 20, 675-81(2002)
doi:10.1038/nbt0702-675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0702-675
156. Russell, M., P. Berardi, W. Gong & K. Riabowol: Grow-ING, Age-ING and Die-ING: ING proteins link cancer, senescence and apoptosis. Exp Cell Res, 312, 951-61(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.01.020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.01.020
157. von Zglinicki, T., G. Saretzki, J. Ladhoff, F. d'Adda di Fagagna & S. P. Jackson: Human cell senescence as a DNA damage response. Mech Ageing Dev, 126, 111-7(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.mad.2004.09.034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2004.09.034
158. Lauber, K., E. Bohn, S. M. Krober, Y. J. Xiao, S. G. Blumenthal, R. K. Lindemann, P. Marini, C. Wiedig, A. Zobywalski, S. Baksh, Y. Xu, I. B. Autenrieth, K. Schulze-Osthoff, C. Belka, G. Stuhler & S. Wesselborg: Apoptotic cells induce migration of phagocytes via caspase-3-mediated release of a lipid attraction signal. Cell, 113, 717-30(2003)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00422-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00422-7
159. Bonicalzi, M. E., J. F. Haince, A. Droit & G. G. Poirier: Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase: where and when? Cell Mol Life Sci, 62, 739-50(2005)
 
160. Gagne, J. P., M. J. Hendzel, A. Droit & G. G. Poirier: The expanding role of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism: current challenges and new perspectives. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 18, 145-51(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.013
161. Haince, J. F., M. Rouleau, M. J. Hendzel, J. Y. Masson & G. G. Poirier: Targeting poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation: a promising approach in cancer therapy. Trends Mol Med, 11, 456-63(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2005.08.003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2005.08.003
162. Huber, A., P. Bai, J. M. de Murcia & G. de Murcia: PARP-1, PARP-2 and ATM in the DNA damage response: functional synergy in mouse development. DNA Repair (Amst), 3, 1103-8(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.002
163. Shall, S. & G. de Murcia: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1: what have we learned from the deficient mouse model? Mutat Res, 460, 1-15(2000)
 
164. Andrabi, S. A., N. S. Kim, S. W. Yu, H. Wang, D. W. Koh, M. Sasaki, J. A. Klaus, T. Otsuka, Z. Zhang, R. C. Koehler, P. D. Hurn, G. G. Poirier, V. L. Dawson & T. M. Dawson: Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer is a death signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 18308-13(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0606526103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606526103
165. Cuzzocrea, S., E. Mazzon, T. Genovese, C. Crisafulli, W. K. Min, R. Di Paola, C. Muia, J. H. Li, G. Malleo, W. Xu, E. Massuda, E. Esposito, J. Zhang & Z. Q. Wang: Role of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase in the development of inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Free Radic Biol Med, 42, 90-105(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.09.025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.09.025
166. Gao, H., D. L. Coyle, M. L. Meyer-Ficca, R. G. Meyer, E. L. Jacobson, Z. Q. Wang & M. K. Jacobson: Altered poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism impairs cellular responses to genotoxic stress in a hypomorphic mutant of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. Exp Cell Res, 313, 984-96(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.025
167. Keil, C., T. Grobe & S. L. Oei: MNNG-induced cell death is controlled by interactions between PARP-1, poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase, and XRCC1. J Biol Chem, 281, 34394-405(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M606470200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M606470200
168. Meyer, R. G., M. L. Meyer-Ficca, C. J. Whatcott, E. L. Jacobson & M. K. Jacobson: Two small enzyme isoforms mediate mammalian mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) activity. Exp Cell Res, 313, 2920-36(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.043
169. Cortes, U., W. M. Tong, D. L. Coyle, M. L. Meyer-Ficca, R. G. Meyer, V. Petrilli, Z. Herceg, E. L. Jacobson, M. K. Jacobson & Z. Q. Wang: Depletion of the 110-kilodalton isoform of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase increases sensitivity to genotoxic and endotoxic stress in mice. Mol Cell Biol, 24, 7163-78(2004)
doi:10.1128/MCB.24.16.7163-7178.2004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.16.7163-7178.2004
170. Cozzi, A., G. Cipriani, S. Fossati, G. Faraco, L. Formentini, W. Min, U. Cortes, Z. Q. Wang, F. Moroni & A. Chiarugi: Poly(ADP-ribose) accumulation and enhancement of postischemic brain damage in 110-kDa poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase null mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 26, 684-95(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600222
171. Cuzzocrea, S., R. Di Paola, E. Mazzon, U. Cortes, T. Genovese, C. Muia, W. Li, W. Xu, J. H. Li, J. Zhang & Z. Q. Wang: PARG activity mediates intestinal injury induced by splanchnic artery occlusion and reperfusion. Faseb J, 19, 558-66(2005)
doi:10.1096/fj.04-3117com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-3117com
172. Koh, D. W., A. M. Lawler, M. F. Poitras, M. Sasaki, S. Wattler, M. C. Nehls, T. Stoger, G. G. Poirier, V. L. Dawson & T. M. Dawson: Failure to degrade poly(ADP-ribose) causes increased sensitivity to cytotoxicity and early embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 17699-704(2004)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0406182101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406182101
173. Patel, N. S., U. Cortes, R. Di Poala, E. Mazzon, H. Mota-Filipe, S. Cuzzocrea, Z. Q. Wang & C. Thiemermann: Mice lacking the 110-kD isoform of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase are protected against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol, 16, 712-9(2005)
doi:10.1681/ASN.2004080677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2004080677
174. Cuzzocrea, S. & Z. Q. Wang: Role of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) in shock, ischemia and reperfusion. Pharmacol Res, 52, 100-8(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2005.02.009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2005.02.009
175. Koh, D. W., V. L. Dawson & T. M. Dawson: The road to survival goes through PARG. Cell Cycle, 4, 397-9(2005)
 
176. Woon, E. C. & M. D. Threadgill: Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibition - where now? Curr Med Chem, 12, 2373-92(2005)
doi:10.2174/0929867054864778
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867054864778
177. Davidovic, L., M. Vodenicharov, E. B. Affar & G. G. Poirier: Importance of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase in the control of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism. Exp Cell Res, 268, 7-13(2001)
doi:10.1006/excr.2001.5263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.2001.5263
178. Berger, N. A.: Poly(ADP-ribose) in the cellular response to DNA damage. Radiat Res, 101, 4-15(1985)
doi:10.2307/3576299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3576299
179. Berger, N. A., J. L. Sims, D. M. Catino & S. J. Berger: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase mediates the suicide response to massive DNA damage: studies in normal and DNA-repair defective cells. Princess Takamatsu Symp, 13, 219-26(1983)
 
180. Sims, J. L., S. J. Berger & N. A. Berger: Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase inhibitors preserve nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and adenosine 5'-triphosphate pools in DNA-damaged cells: mechanism of stimulation of unscheduled DNA synthesis. Biochemistry, 22, 5188-94(1983)
doi:10.1021/bi00291a019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00291a019
181. Hammerman, P. S., C. J. Fox & C. B. Thompson: Beginnings of a signal-transduction pathway for bioenergetic control of cell survival. Trends Biochem Sci, 29, 586-92(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2004.09.008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2004.09.008
182. Plas, D. R. & C. B. Thompson: Cell metabolism in the regulation of programmed cell death. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 13, 75-8(2002)
doi:10.1016/S1043-2760(01)00528-8
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1043-2760(01)00528-8
183. Rathmell, J. C. & C. B. Thompson: Pathways of apoptosis in lymphocyte development, homeostasis, and disease. Cell, 109 Suppl, S97-107(2002)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00704-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00704-3
184. Virag, L. & C. Szabo: The therapeutic potential of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev, 54, 375-429(2002)
doi:10.1124/pr.54.3.375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.54.3.375
185. Hong, S. J., T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Nuclear and mitochondrial conversations in cell death: PARP-1 and AIF signaling. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 25, 259-64(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.tips.2004.03.005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2004.03.005
186. Alano, C. C., A. Tran, R. Tao, W. Ying, J. S. Karliner & R. A. Swanson: Differences among cell types in NAD(+) compartmentalization: A comparison of neurons, astrocytes, and cardiac myocytes. J Neurosci Res(2007)
 
187. Alano, C. C., W. Ying & R. A. Swanson: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-mediated cell death in astrocytes requires NAD+ depletion and mitochondrial permeability transition. J Biol Chem, 279, 18895-902(2004)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M313329200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M313329200
188. Suh, S. W., K. Aoyama, Y. Matsumori, J. Liu & R. A. Swanson: Pyruvate administered after severe hypoglycemia reduces neuronal death and cognitive impairment. Diabetes, 54, 1452-8(2005)
doi:10.2337/diabetes.54.5.1452
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.5.1452
189. Ying, W., P. Garnier & R. A. Swanson: NAD+ repletion prevents PARP-1-induced glycolytic blockade and cell death in cultured mouse astrocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 308, 809-13(2003)
doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01483-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01483-9
190. Zeng, J., G. Y. Yang, W. Ying, M. Kelly, K. Hirai, T. L. James, R. A. Swanson & L. Litt: Pyruvate improves recovery after PARP-1-associated energy failure induced by oxidative stress in neonatal rat cerebrocortical slices. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 27, 304-15(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600335
191. Zhou, H. Z., R. A. Swanson, U. Simonis, X. Ma, G. Cecchini & M. O. Gray: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 hyperactivation and impairment of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I function in reperfused mouse hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 291, H714-23(2006)
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00823.2005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00823.2005
192. Zhu, K., R. A. Swanson & W. Ying: NADH can enter into astrocytes and block poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-mediated astrocyte death. Neuroreport, 16, 1209-12(2005)
doi:10.1097/00001756-200508010-00015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200508010-00015
193. Cipriani, G., E. Rapizzi, A. Vannacci, R. Rizzuto, F. Moroni & A. Chiarugi: Nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 rapidly triggers mitochondrial dysfunction. J Biol Chem, 280, 17227-34(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M414526200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414526200
194. Du, L., X. Zhang, Y. Y. Han, N. A. Burke, P. M. Kochanek, S. C. Watkins, S. H. Graham, J. A. Carcillo, C. Szabo & R. S. Clark: Intra-mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) contributes to NAD+ depletion and cell death induced by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem, 278, 18426-33(2003)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M301295200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301295200
195. Ying, W., C. C. Alano, P. Garnier & R. A. Swanson: NAD+ as a metabolic link between DNA damage and cell death. J Neurosci Res, 79, 216-23(2005)
doi:10.1002/jnr.20289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20289
196. Ying, W., Y. Chen, C. C. Alano & R. A. Swanson: Tricarboxylic acid cycle substrates prevent PARP-mediated death of neurons and astrocytes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 22, 774-9(2002)
doi:10.1097/00004647-200207000-00002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200207000-00002
197. Yang, H., T. Yang, J. A. Baur, E. Perez, T. Matsui, J. J. Carmona, D. W. Lamming, N. C. Souza-Pinto, V. A. Bohr, A. Rosenzweig, R. de Cabo, A. A. Sauve & D. A. Sinclair: Nutrient-Sensitive Mitochondrial NAD(+) Levels Dictate Cell Survival. Cell, 130, 1095-107(2007)
 
198. Hassa, P. O. & M. O. Hottiger: An epigenetic code for DNA damage repair pathways? Biochem Cell Biol, 83, 270-85(2005)
doi:10.1139/o05-034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/o05-034
199. Bouchard, V. J., M. Rouleau & G. G. Poirier: PARP-1, a determinant of cell survival in response to DNA damage. Exp Hematol, 31, 446-54(2003)
doi:10.1016/S0301-472X(03)00083-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-472X(03)00083-3
200. Decker, P. & S. Muller: Modulating poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activity: potential for the prevention and therapy of pathogenic situations involving DNA damage and oxidative stress. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 3, 275-83(2002)
doi:10.2174/1389201023378265
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389201023378265
201. Borst, P. & S. Rottenberg: Cancer cell death by programmed necrosis? Drug Resist Updat, 7, 321-4(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.drup.2004.11.003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2004.11.003
202. Kofler, J., T. Otsuka, Z. Zhang, R. Noppens, M. R. Grafe, D. W. Koh, V. L. Dawson, J. M. de Murcia, P. D. Hurn & R. J. Traystman: Differential effect of PARP-2 deletion on brain injury after focal and global cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab(2005)
 
203. Virag, L.: Structure and function of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1: role in oxidative stress-related pathologies. Curr Vasc Pharmacol, 3, 209-14(2005)
doi:10.2174/1570161054368625
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570161054368625
204. Virag, L.: The expanding universe of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Cell Mol Life Sci, 62, 719-20(2005)
 
205. Goto, W., T. Ota, N. Morikawa, Y. Otori, H. Hara, K. Kawazu, N. Miyawaki & Y. Tano: Protective effects of timolol against the neuronal damage induced by glutamate and ischemia in the rat retina. Brain Res, 958, 10-9(2002)
doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03372-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03372-3
206. Fossati, S., G. Cipriani, F. Moroni & A. Chiarugi: Neither energy collapse nor transcription underlie in vitro neurotoxicity of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase hyper-activation. Neurochem Int, 50, 203-10(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2006.08.009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2006.08.009
207. Chen, M., Z. Zsengeller, C. Y. Xiao & C. Szabo: Mitochondrial-to-nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor in cardiac myocytes during oxidant stress: potential role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Cardiovasc Res, 63, 682-8(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.018
208. Cregan, S. P., A. Fortin, J. G. MacLaurin, S. M. Callaghan, F. Cecconi, S. W. Yu, T. M. Dawson, V. L. Dawson, D. S. Park, G. Kroemer & R. S. Slack: Apoptosis-inducing factor is involved in the regulation of caspase-independent neuronal cell death. J Cell Biol, 158, 507-17(2002)
doi:10.1083/jcb.200202130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200202130
209. Xiao, C. Y., M. Chen, Z. Zsengeller, H. Li, L. Kiss, M. Kollai & C. Szabo: Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase promotes cardiac remodeling, contractile failure, and translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor in a murine experimental model of aortic banding and heart failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 312, 891-8(2005)
doi:10.1124/jpet.104.077164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.104.077164
210. Cao, G., J. Xing, X. Xiao, A. K. Liou, Y. Gao, X. M. Yin, R. S. Clark, S. H. Graham & J. Chen: Critical role of calpain I in mitochondrial release of apoptosis-inducing factor in ischemic neuronal injury. J Neurosci, 27, 9278-93(2007)
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2826-07.2007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2826-07.2007
211. Ozaki, T., H. Tomita, M. Tamai & S. Ishiguro: Characteristics of mitochondrial calpains. J Biochem (Tokyo), 142, 365-76(2007)
doi:10.1093/jb/mvm143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvm143
212. Polster, B. M., G. Basanez, A. Etxebarria, J. M. Hardwick & D. G. Nicholls: Calpain I induces cleavage and release of apoptosis-inducing factor from isolated mitochondria. J Biol Chem, 280, 6447-54(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M413269200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M413269200
213. Danial, N. N. & S. J. Korsmeyer: Cell death: critical control points. Cell, 116, 205-19(2004)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00046-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00046-7
214. Knoblach, S. M., D. A. Alroy, M. Nikolaeva, I. Cernak, B. A. Stoica & A. I. Faden: Caspase inhibitor z-DEVD-fmk attenuates calpain and necrotic cell death in vitro and after traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 24, 1119-32(2004)
doi:10.1097/01.WCB.0000138664.17682.32
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WCB.0000138664.17682.32
215. Liu, X., T. Van Vleet & R. G. Schnellmann: The role of calpain in oncotic cell death. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 44, 349-70(2004)
doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121804
216. Yamashima, T.: Ca2+-dependent proteases in ischemic neuronal death: a conserved 'calpain-cathepsin cascade' from nematodes to primates. Cell Calcium, 36, 285-93(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2004.03.001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2004.03.001
217. Fossati, S., L. Formentini, Z. Q. Wang, F. Moroni & A. Chiarugi: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulates heat shock factor-1 activity and the heat shock response in murine fibroblasts. Biochem Cell Biol, 84, 703-12(2006)
doi:10.1139/O06-083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/O06-083
218. Zingarelli, B., P. W. Hake, M. O'Connor, A. Denenberg, H. R. Wong, S. Kong & B. J. Aronow: Differential regulation of activator protein-1 and heat shock factor-1 in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury: role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 286, H1408-15(2004)
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00953.2003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00953.2003
219. Sevigny, M., P. Garnier, T. Kauppinen & R. Swanson: Heat shock - induced Hsp70 expression in murine astrocytes does not require poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. Cell Physiol Biochem, 13, 297-300(2003)
doi:10.1159/000074544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000074544
220. Cande, C., I. Cohen, E. Daugas, L. Ravagnan, N. Larochette, N. Zamzami & G. Kroemer: Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF): a novel caspase-independent death effector released from mitochondria. Biochimie, 84, 215-22(2002)
doi:10.1016/S0300-9084(02)01374-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(02)01374-3
221. Gurbuxani, S., E. Schmitt, C. Cande, A. Parcellier, A. Hammann, E. Daugas, I. Kouranti, C. Spahr, A. Pance, G. Kroemer & C. Garrido: Heat shock protein 70 binding inhibits the nuclear import of apoptosis-inducing factor. Oncogene, 22, 6669-78(2003)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206794
222. Matsumori, Y., S. M. Hong, K. Aoyama, Y. Fan, T. Kayama, R. A. Sheldon, Z. S. Vexler, D. M. Ferriero, P. R. Weinstein & J. Liu: Hsp70 overexpression sequesters AIF and reduces neonatal hypoxic/ischemic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 25, 899-910(2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600080
223. Ravagnan, L., S. Gurbuxani, S. A. Susin, C. Maisse, E. Daugas, N. Zamzami, T. Mak, M. Jaattela, J. M. Penninger, C. Garrido & G. Kroemer: Heat-shock protein 70 antagonizes apoptosis-inducing factor. Nat Cell Biol, 3, 839-43(2001)
doi:10.1038/ncb0901-839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb0901-839
224. Ruchalski, K., H. Mao, Z. Li, Z. Wang, S. Gillers, Y. Wang, D. D. Mosser, V. Gabai, J. H. Schwartz & S. C. Borkan: Distinct hsp70 domains mediate apoptosis-inducing factor release and nuclear accumulation. J Biol Chem, 281, 7873-80(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M513728200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513728200
225. Kalinowska, M., W. Garncarz, M. Pietrowska, W. T. Garrard & P. Widlak: Regulation of the human apoptotic DNase/RNase Endonuclease G: involvement of Hsp70 and ATP. Apoptosis, 10, 821-30(2005)
doi:10.1007/s10495-005-0410-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-005-0410-9
226. Malanga, M. & F. R. Althaus: The role of poly(ADP-ribose) in the DNA damage signaling network. Biochem Cell Biol, 83, 354-64(2005)
doi:10.1139/o05-038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/o05-038
227. Hanai, S., M. Kanai, S. Ohashi, K. Okamoto, M. Yamada, H. Takahashi & M. Miwa: Loss of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase causes progressive neurodegeneration in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 82-6(2004)
doi:10.1073/pnas.2237114100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237114100
228. Yu, S. W., S. A. Andrabi, H. Wang, N. S. Kim, G. G. Poirier, T. M. Dawson & V. L. Dawson: Apoptosis-inducing factor mediates poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer-induced cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 18314-9(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0606528103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606528103
229. Golstein, P. & G. Kroemer: A multiplicity of cell death pathways. Symposium on apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death pathways. EMBO Rep, 8, 829-33(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401042
230. Vodenicharov, M. D., M. M. Ghodgaonkar, S. S. Halappanavar, R. G. Shah & G. M. Shah: Mechanism of early biphasic activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in response to ultraviolet B radiation. J Cell Sci, 118, 589-99(2005)
doi:10.1242/jcs.01636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01636
231. Muthumani, K., A. Y. Choo, W. X. Zong, M. Madesh, D. S. Hwang, A. Premkumar, K. P. Thieu, J. Emmanuel, S. Kumar, C. B. Thompson & D. B. Weiner: The HIV-1 Vpr and glucocorticoid receptor complex is a gain-of-function interaction that prevents the nuclear localization of PARP-1. Nat Cell Biol, 8, 170-9(2006)
doi:10.1038/ncb1352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1352
232. Moon, H. S. & J. S. Yang: Role of HIV Vpr as a regulator of apoptosis and an effector on bystander cells. Mol Cells, 21, 7-20(2006)
 
233. Konishi, A., S. Shimizu, J. Hirota, T. Takao, Y. Fan, Y. Matsuoka, L. Zhang, Y. Yoneda, Y. Fujii, A. I. Skoultchi & Y. Tsujimoto: Involvement of histone H1.2 in apoptosis induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Cell, 114, 673-88(2003)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00719-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00719-0
234. Okamura, H., K. Yoshida, B. R. Amorim & T. Haneji: Histone H1.2 is translocated to mitochondria and associates with bak in bleomycin-induced apoptotic cells. J Cell Biochem(2007)
 
235. Jesser, M., C. Chypre, F. Hog & P. Mandel: Cytoplasmic poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase from mouse plasmacytoma free messenger ribonucleoprotein particles: purification and characterization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 195, 558-64(1993)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1993.2082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1993.2082
236. Jesser, M., F. Hog, C. Chypre, J. F. Leterrier & P. Mandel: ADP-ribosylation of neurofilaments by a cytoplasmic ADP-ribose transferase associated with free mRNP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 194, 916-22(1993)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1993.1908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1993.1908
237. Masmoudi, A., J. el-Fetouaki, D. Weltin, O. Belhadj & P. Mandel: Association of mitochondrial ADP-ribosyl transferase activity with the DNA-protein complex. Biochem Mol Biol Int, 29, 77-83(1993)
 
238. Thomassin, H., C. Niedergang & P. Mandel: Characterization of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase associated with free cytoplasmic mRNA-protein particles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 133, 654-61(1985)
doi:10.1016/0006-291X(85)90955-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(85)90955-6
239. Scovassi, A. I.: Mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation): from old data to new perspectives. Faseb J, 18, 1487-8(2004)
doi:10.1096/fj.04-1841rev
http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1841rev
240. Chalmers, A., P. Johnston, M. Woodcock, M. Joiner & B. Marples: PARP-1, PARP-2, and the cellular response to low doses of ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 58, 410-9(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.053
241. Kauppinen, T. M., W. Y. Chan, S. W. Suh, A. K. Wiggins, E. J. Huang & R. A. Swanson: Direct phosphorylation and regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 7136-41(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0508606103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508606103
242. Zhang, S., Y. Lin, Y. S. Kim, M. P. Hande, Z. G. Liu & H. M. Shen: c-Jun N-terminal kinase mediates hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death via sustained poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activation. Cell Death Differ, 14, 1001-10(2007)
 
243. Kovacs, K., A. Toth, P. Deres, T. Kalai, K. Hideg, F. Gallyas, Jr. & B. Sumegi: Critical role of PI3-kinase/Akt activation in the PARP inhibitor induced heart function recovery during ischemia-reperfusion. Biochem Pharmacol, 71, 441-52(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2005.05.036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2005.05.036
244. Palfi, A., A. Toth, K. Hanto, P. Deres, E. Szabados, Z. Szereday, G. Kulcsar, T. Kalai, K. Hideg, F. Gallyas, Jr., B. Sumegi, K. Toth & R. Halmosi: PARP inhibition prevents postinfarction myocardial remodeling and heart failure via the protein kinase C/glycogen synthase kinase-3beta pathway. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 41, 149-59(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.03.427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.03.427
245. Palfi, A., A. Toth, G. Kulcsar, K. Hanto, P. Deres, E. Bartha, R. Halmosi, E. Szabados, L. Czopf, T. Kalai, K. Hideg, B. Sumegi & K. Toth: The role of Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase systems in the protective effect of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition in Langendorff perfused and in isoproterenol-damaged rat hearts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 315, 273-82(2005)
doi:10.1124/jpet.105.088336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.105.088336
246. Toth, O., C. Szabo, M. Kecskes, L. Poto, A. Nagy & H. Losonczy: In vitro effect of the potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor INO-1001 alone and in combination with aspirin, eptifibatide, tirofiban, enoxaparin or alteplase on haemostatic parameters. Life Sci, 79, 317-23(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2006.01.007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2006.01.007
247. Veres, B., F. Gallyas, Jr., G. Varbiro, Z. Berente, E. Osz, G. Szekeres, C. Szabo & B. Sumegi: Decrease of the inflammatory response and induction of the Akt/protein kinase B pathway by poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitor in endotoxin-induced septic shock. Biochem Pharmacol, 65, 1373-82(2003)
doi:10.1016/S0006-2952(03)00077-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(03)00077-7
248. Veres, B., B. Radnai, F. Gallyas, Jr., G. Varbiro, Z. Berente, E. Osz & B. Sumegi: Regulation of kinase cascades and transcription factors by a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor, 4-hydroxyquinazoline, in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 310, 247-55(2004)
doi:10.1124/jpet.104.065151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.104.065151
249. Dodoni, G., M. Canton, V. Petronilli, P. Bernardi & F. Di Lisa: Induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition by the DNA alkylating agent N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. Sorting cause and consequence of mitochondrial dysfunction. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1658, 58-63(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.05.005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.05.005
250. Alano, C. C. & R. A. Swanson: Players in the PARP-1 cell-death pathway: JNK1 joins the cast. Trends Biochem Sci, 31, 309-11(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2006.04.006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2006.04.006
251. Tapodi, A., B. Debreceni, K. Hanto, Z. Bognar, I. Wittmann, F. Gallyas, Jr., G. Varbiro & B. Sumegi: Pivotal role of Akt activation in mitochondrial protection and cell survival by poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 inhibition in oxidative stress. J Biol Chem, 280, 35767-75(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M507075200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M507075200
252. Aguilar-Quesada, R., J. A. Munoz-Gamez, D. Martin-Oliva, A. Peralta, M. T. Valenzuela, R. Matinez-Romero, R. Quiles-Perez, J. Menissier-de Murcia, G. de Murcia, M. R. de Almodovar & F. J. Oliver: Interaction between ATM and PARP-1 in response to DNA damage and sensitization of ATM deficient cells through PARP inhibition. BMC Mol Biol, 8, 29(2007)
doi:10.1186/1471-2199-8-29
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-29
253. Haince, J. F., S. Kozlov, V. L. Dawson, T. M. Dawson, M. J. Hendzel, M. F. Lavin & G. G. Poirier: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling network is modulated by a novel poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent pathway in the early response to DNA-damaging agents. J Biol Chem, 282, 16441-53(2007)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M608406200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608406200
254. Baud, O., J. Li, Y. Zhang, R. L. Neve, J. J. Volpe & P. A. Rosenberg: Nitric oxide-induced cell death in developing oligodendrocytes is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis-inducing factor translocation. Eur J Neurosci, 20, 1713-26(2004)
doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03616.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03616.x
255. Sanges, D., A. Comitato, R. Tammaro & V. Marigo: Apoptosis in retinal degeneration involves cross-talk between apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and caspase-12 and is blocked by calpain inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 17366-71(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0606276103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606276103
256. Sanges, D. & V. Marigo: Cross-talk between two apoptotic pathways activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress: differential contribution of caspase-12 and AIF. Apoptosis, 11, 1629-41(2006)
doi:10.1007/s10495-006-9006-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-9006-2
257. Seth, R., C. Yang, V. Kaushal, S. V. Shah & G. P. Kaushal: p53-dependent caspase-2 activation in mitochondrial release of apoptosis-inducing factor and its role in renal tubular epithelial cell injury. J Biol Chem, 280, 31230-9(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M503305200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503305200
258. Zhang, Y., H. Wang, J. Li, D. A. Jimenez, E. S. Levitan, E. Aizenman & P. A. Rosenberg: Peroxynitrite-induced neuronal apoptosis is mediated by intracellular zinc release and 12-lipoxygenase activation. J Neurosci, 24, 10616-27(2004)
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2469-04.2004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2469-04.2004
259. Christophe, M. & S. Nicolas: Mitochondria: a target for neuroprotective interventions in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Curr Pharm Des, 12, 739-57(2006)
doi:10.2174/138161206775474242
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161206775474242
260. Gechev, T. S., F. Van Breusegem, J. M. Stone, I. Denev & C. Laloi: Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. Bioessays, 28, 1091-101(2006)
doi:10.1002/bies.20493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20493
261. Skulachev, V. P.: Bioenergetic aspects of apoptosis, necrosis and mitoptosis. Apoptosis, 11, 473-85(2006)
doi:10.1007/s10495-006-5881-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-5881-9
262. Delettre, C., V. J. Yuste, R. S. Moubarak, M. Bras, J. C. Lesbordes-Brion, S. Petres, J. Bellalou & S. A. Susin: AIFsh, a novel apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) pro-apoptotic isoform with potential pathological relevance in human cancer. J Biol Chem, 281, 6413-27(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M509884200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509884200
263. Delettre, C., V. J. Yuste, R. S. Moubarak, M. Bras, N. Robert & S. A. Susin: Identification and characterization of AIFsh2, a mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) isoform with NADH oxidase activity. J Biol Chem, 281, 18507-18(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M601751200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M601751200
264. Marshall, K. R., M. Gong, L. Wodke, J. H. Lamb, D. J. Jones, P. B. Farmer, N. S. Scrutton & A. W. Munro: The human apoptosis-inducing protein AMID is an oxidoreductase with a modified flavin cofactor and DNA binding activity. J Biol Chem, 280, 30735-40(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M414018200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414018200
265. Mei, J., S. Webb, B. Zhang & H. B. Shu: The p53-inducible apoptotic protein AMID is not required for normal development and tumor suppression. Oncogene, 25, 849-56(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209121
266. Wu, M., L. G. Xu, X. Li, Z. Zhai & H. B. Shu: AMID, an apoptosis-inducing factor-homologous mitochondrion-associated protein, induces caspase-independent apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 277, 25617-23(2002)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M202285200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202285200
267. Wu, M., L. G. Xu, T. Su, Y. Tian, Z. Zhai & H. B. Shu: AMID is a p53-inducible gene downregulated in tumors. Oncogene, 23, 6815-9(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207909
268. Muller, S., L. Ronfani & M. E. Bianchi: Regulated expression and subcellular localization of HMGB1, a chromatin protein with a cytokine function. J Intern Med, 255, 332-43(2004)
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01296.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01296.x
269. Muller, S., P. Scaffidi, B. Degryse, T. Bonaldi, L. Ronfani, A. Agresti, M. Beltrame & M. E. Bianchi: New EMBO members' review: the double life of HMGB1 chromatin protein: architectural factor and extracellular signal. Embo J, 20, 4337-40(2001)
doi:10.1093/emboj/20.16.4337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.16.4337
270. Bianchi, M. E. & A. Manfredi: Chromatin and cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1677, 181-6(2004)
 
271. Czura, C. J., H. Wang & K. J. Tracey: Dual roles for HMGB1: DNA binding and cytokine. J Endotoxin Res, 7, 315-21(2001)
doi:10.1177/09680519010070041401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09680519010070041401
doi:10.1179/096805101101532891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/096805101101532891
272. Fossati, S. & A. Chiarugi: Relevance of high-mobility group protein box 1 to neurodegeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol, 82, 137-48(2007)
doi:10.1016/S0074-7742(07)82007-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(07)82007-1
273. Raucci, A., R. Palumbo & M. E. Bianchi: HMGB1: a signal of necrosis. Autoimmunity, 40, 285-9(2007)
doi:10.1080/08916930701356978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08916930701356978
274. Faraco, G., S. Fossati, M. E. Bianchi, M. Patrone, M. Pedrazzi, B. Sparatore, F. Moroni & A. Chiarugi: High mobility group box 1 protein is released by neural cells upon different stresses and worsens ischemic neurodegeneration in vitro and in vivo. J Neurochem, 103, 590-603(2007)
doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04788.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04788.x
275. Kim, J. B., J. Sig Choi, Y. M. Yu, K. Nam, C. S. Piao, S. W. Kim, M. H. Lee, P. L. Han, J. S. Park & J. K. Lee: HMGB1, a novel cytokine-like mediator linking acute neuronal death and delayed neuroinflammation in the postischemic brain. J Neurosci, 26, 6413-21(2006)
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3815-05.2006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3815-05.2006
276. Liu, K., S. Mori, H. K. Takahashi, Y. Tomono, H. Wake, T. Kanke, Y. Sato, N. Hiraga, N. Adachi, T. Yoshino & M. Nishibori: Anti-high mobility group box 1 monoclonal antibody ameliorates brain infarction induced by transient ischemia in rats. Faseb J(2007)
 
277. Tsung, A., R. Sahai, H. Tanaka, A. Nakao, M. P. Fink, M. T. Lotze, H. Yang, J. Li, K. J. Tracey, D. A. Geller & T. R. Billiar: The nuclear factor HMGB1 mediates hepatic injury after murine liver ischemia-reperfusion. J Exp Med, 201, 1135-43(2005)
doi:10.1084/jem.20042614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20042614
278. Bonaldi, T., F. Talamo, P. Scaffidi, D. Ferrera, A. Porto, A. Bachi, A. Rubartelli, A. Agresti & M. E. Bianchi: Monocytic cells hyperacetylate chromatin protein HMGB1 to redirect it towards secretion. Embo J, 22, 5551-60(2003)
doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg516
279. Scaffidi, P., T. Misteli & M. E. Bianchi: Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature, 418, 191-5(2002)
doi:10.1038/nature00858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature00858
280. Ulloa, L. & D. Messmer: High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein: friend and foe. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 17, 189-201(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2006.01.003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2006.01.003
281. Hoppe, G., K. E. Talcott, S. K. Bhattacharya, J. W. Crabb & J. E. Sears: Molecular basis for the redox control of nuclear transport of the structural chromatin protein Hmgb1. Exp Cell Res, 312, 3526-38(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.07.020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.07.020
282. Ditsworth, D., W. X. Zong & C. B. Thompson: Activation of poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP-1) induces release of the pro-inflammatory mediator HMGB1 from the nucleus. J Biol Chem, 282, 17845-54(2007)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M701465200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M701465200
283. Ame, J. C., V. Rolli, V. Schreiber, C. Niedergang, F. Apiou, P. Decker, S. Muller, T. Hoger, J. Menissier-de Murcia & G. de Murcia: PARP-2, A novel mammalian DNA damage-dependent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. J Biol Chem, 274, 17860-8(1999)
doi:10.1074/jbc.274.25.17860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.25.17860
284. Johansson, M.: A human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene family (ADPRTL): cDNA cloning of two novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase homologues. Genomics, 57, 442-5(1999)
doi:10.1006/geno.1999.5799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/geno.1999.5799
285. Urbanek, P., J. Paces, J. Kralova, M. Dvorak & V. Paces: Cloning and expression of PARP-3 (Adprt3) and U3-55k, two genes closely linked on mouse chromosome 9. Folia Biol (Praha), 48, 182-91(2002)
 
286. Kaminker, P. G., S. H. Kim, R. D. Taylor, Y. Zebarjadian, W. D. Funk, G. B. Morin, P. Yaswen & J. Campisi: TANK2, a new TRF1-associated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, causes rapid induction of cell death upon overexpression. J Biol Chem, 276, 35891-9(2001)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M105968200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M105968200
287. Smith, S., I. Giriat, A. Schmitt & T. de Lange: Tankyrase, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase at human telomeres. Science, 282, 1484-7(1998)
doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5393.1484
288. Yeh, T. Y., J. I. Sbodio, M. T. Nguyen, T. N. Meyer, R. M. Lee & N. W. Chi: Tankyrase-1 overexpression reduces genotoxin-induced cell death by inhibiting PARP1. Mol Cell Biochem, 276, 183-92(2005)
doi:10.1007/s11010-005-4059-z
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11010-005-4059-z
289. Brochu, G., C. Duchaine, L. Thibeault, J. Lagueux, G. M. Shah & G. G. Poirier: Mode of action of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1219, 342-50(1994)
 
290. Brochu, G., G. M. Shah & G. G. Poirier: Purification of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase and detection of its isoforms by a zymogram following one- or two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal Biochem, 218, 265-72(1994)
doi:10.1006/abio.1994.1177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1177
291. Meyer-Ficca, M. L., R. G. Meyer, D. L. Coyle, E. L. Jacobson & M. K. Jacobson: Human poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase is expressed in alternative splice variants yielding isoforms that localize to different cell compartments. Exp Cell Res, 297, 521-32(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.050
292. Cuzzocrea, S., T. Genovese, E. Mazzon, C. Crisafulli, W. Min, R. Di Paola, C. Muia, J. H. Li, E. Esposito, P. Bramanti, W. Xu, E. Massuda, J. Zhang & Z. Q. Wang: Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase activity mediates post-traumatic inflammatory reaction after experimental spinal cord trauma. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 319, 127-38(2006)
doi:10.1124/jpet.106.108076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.108076
293. Falsig, J., S. H. Christiansen, S. Feuerhahn, A. Burkle, S. L. Oei, C. Keil & M. Leist: Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase as a target for neuroprotective intervention: assessment of currently available pharmacological tools. Eur J Pharmacol, 497, 7-16(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.06.042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.06.042
294. Blenn, C., F. R. Althaus & M. Malanga: Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase silencing protects against H2O2-induced cell death. Biochem J, 396, 419-29(2006)
doi:10.1042/BJ20051696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20051696
295. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., D. S. Rosenthal, S. Iyer, A. H. Boulares & M. E. Smulson: Transient poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of nuclear proteins and role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the early stages of apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 273, 13703-12(1998)
doi:10.1074/jbc.273.22.13703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.22.13703
296. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., D. S. Rosenthal, S. Iyer, H. Boulares & M. E. Smulson: Involvement of PARP and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in the early stages of apoptosis and DNA replication. Mol Cell Biochem, 193, 137-48(1999)
doi:10.1023/A:1006988832729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006988832729
297. Yoon, Y. S., J. W. Kim, K. W. Kang, Y. S. Kim, K. H. Choi & C. O. Joe: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histone H1 correlates with internucleosomal DNA fragmentation during apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 271, 9129-34(1996)
doi:10.1074/jbc.271.15.9129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.15.9129
298. Ivana Scovassi, A. & M. Diederich: Modulation of poly(ADP-ribosylation) in apoptotic cells. Biochem Pharmacol, 68, 1041-7(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2004.04.023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2004.04.023
299. Scovassi, A. I., M. Denegri, M. Donzelli, L. Rossi, R. Bernardi, A. Mandarino, I. Frouin & C. Negri: Poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis in cells undergoing apoptosis: an attempt to face death before PARP degradation. Eur J Histochem, 42, 251-8(1998)
 
300. Soldani, C. & A. I. Scovassi: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 cleavage during apoptosis: an update. Apoptosis, 7, 321-8(2002)
doi:10.1023/A:1016119328968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016119328968
301. Ha, H. C. & S. H. Snyder: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in the nervous system. Neurobiol Dis, 7, 225-39(2000)
doi:10.1006/nbdi.2000.0324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nbdi.2000.0324
302. Herceg, Z. & Z. Q. Wang: Functions of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in DNA repair, genomic integrity and cell death. Mutat Res, 477, 97-110(2001)
doi:10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00111-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00111-7
303. Le Rhun, Y., J. B. Kirkland & G. M. Shah: Cellular responses to DNA damage in the absence of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 245, 1-10(1998)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1998.8257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.8257
304. Pieper, A. A., A. Verma, J. Zhang & S. H. Snyder: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, nitric oxide and cell death. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 20, 171-81(1999)
doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01292-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01292-4
305. Kuhnle, S., P. Nicotera, A. Wendel & M. Leist: Prevention of endotoxin-induced lethality, but not of liver apoptosis in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-deficient mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 263, 433-8(1999)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.1393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.1393
306. Leist, M., B. Single, G. Kunstle, C. Volbracht, H. Hentze & P. Nicotera: Apoptosis in the absence of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 233, 518-22(1997)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.6491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.6491
307. Los, M., M. Mozoluk, D. Ferrari, A. Stepczynska, C. Stroh, A. Renz, Z. Herceg, Z. Q. Wang & K. Schulze-Osthoff: Activation and caspase-mediated inhibition of PARP: a molecular switch between fibroblast necrosis and apoptosis in death receptor signaling. Mol Biol Cell, 13, 978-88(2002)
doi:10.1091/mbc.01-05-0272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-05-0272
308. Petrilli, V., Z. Herceg, P. O. Hassa, N. S. Patel, R. Di Paola, U. Cortes, L. Dugo, H. M. Filipe, C. Thiemermann, M. O. Hottiger, S. Cuzzocrea & Z. Q. Wang: Noncleavable poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 regulates the inflammation response in mice. J Clin Invest, 114, 1072-81(2004)
doi:10.1172/JCI200421854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI200421854
309. Boulares, A. H., A. J. Zoltoski, F. J. Contreras, A. G. Yakovlev, K. Yoshihara & M. E. Smulson: Regulation of DNAS1L3 endonuclease activity by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation during etoposide-induced apoptosis. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 cleavage in endonuclease activation. J Biol Chem, 277, 372-8(2002)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M107738200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M107738200
310. Darby, M. K., B. Schmitt, J. Jongstra-Bilen & H. P. Vosberg: Inhibition of calf thymus type II DNA topoisomerase by poly(ADP-ribosylation). Embo J, 4, 2129-34(1985)
 
311. Krupitza, G. & P. Cerutti: ADP-ribosylation of ADPR-transferase and topoisomerase I in intact mouse epidermal cells JB6. Biochemistry, 28, 2034-40(1989)
doi:10.1021/bi00431a011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00431a011
doi:10.1021/bi00435a063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00435a063
312. Scovassi, A. I., C. Mariani, M. Negroni, C. Negri & U. Bertazzoni: ADP-ribosylation of nonhistone proteins in HeLa cells: modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Exp Cell Res, 206, 177-81(1993)
doi:10.1006/excr.1993.1135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.1993.1135
313. Yakovlev, A. G., G. Wang, B. A. Stoica, H. A. Boulares, A. Y. Spoonde, K. Yoshihara & M. E. Smulson: A role of the Ca2+/Mg2+-dependent endonuclease in apoptosis and its inhibition by Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. J Biol Chem, 275, 21302-8(2000)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M001087200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001087200
314. Wachsman, J. T.: The beneficial effects of dietary restriction: reduced oxidative damage and enhanced apoptosis. Mutat Res, 350, 25-34(1996)
doi:10.1016/0027-5107(95)00087-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(95)00087-9
315. Benchoua, A., C. Couriaud, C. Guegan, L. Tartier, P. Couvert, G. Friocourt, J. Chelly, J. Menissier-de Murcia & B. Onteniente: Active caspase-8 translocates into the nucleus of apoptotic cells to inactivate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2. J Biol Chem, 277, 34217-22(2002)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M203941200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M203941200
316. Germain, M., E. B. Affar, D. D'Amours, V. M. Dixit, G. S. Salvesen & G. G. Poirier: Cleavage of automodified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase during apoptosis. Evidence for involvement of caspase-7. J Biol Chem, 274, 28379-84(1999)
doi:10.1074/jbc.274.40.28379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.40.28379
317. Gu, Y., C. Sarnecki, R. A. Aldape, D. J. Livingston & M. S. Su: Cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme and its homologs TX and Nedd-2. J Biol Chem, 270, 18715-8(1995)
doi:10.1074/jbc.270.32.18715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.32.18715
318. Lazebnik, Y. A., S. H. Kaufmann, S. Desnoyers, G. G. Poirier & W. C. Earnshaw: Cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by a proteinase with properties like ICE. Nature, 371, 346-7(1994)
doi:10.1038/371346a0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/371346a0
319. Lippke, J. A., Y. Gu, C. Sarnecki, P. R. Caron & M. S. Su: Identification and characterization of CPP32/Mch2 homolog 1, a novel cysteine protease similar to CPP32. J Biol Chem, 271, 1825-8(1996)
doi:10.1074/jbc.271.4.1825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.4.1825
320. Tewari, M., L. T. Quan, K. O'Rourke, S. Desnoyers, Z. Zeng, D. R. Beidler, G. G. Poirier, G. S. Salvesen & V. M. Dixit: Yama/CPP32 beta, a mammalian homolog of CED-3, is a CrmA-inhibitable protease that cleaves the death substrate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Cell, 81, 801-9(1995)
doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90541-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90541-3
321. D'Amours, D., F. R. Sallmann, V. M. Dixit & G. G. Poirier: Gain-of-function of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 upon cleavage by apoptotic proteases: implications for apoptosis. J Cell Sci, 114, 3771-8(2001)
 
322. Kim, J. W., J. Won, S. Sohn & C. O. Joe: DNA-binding activity of the N-terminal cleavage product of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is required for UV mediated apoptosis. J Cell Sci, 113 (Pt 6), 955-61(2000)
 
323. Kupper, J. H., G. de Murcia & A. Burkle: Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by overexpressing the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase DNA-binding domain in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem, 265, 18721-4(1990)
 
324. Schreiber, V., D. Hunting, C. Trucco, B. Gowans, D. Grunwald, G. De Murcia & J. M. De Murcia: A dominant-negative mutant of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase affects cell recovery, apoptosis, and sister chromatid exchange following DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 92, 4753-7(1995)
doi:10.1073/pnas.92.11.4753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.11.4753
325. Kupper, J. H., M. Muller & A. Burkle: Trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation potentiates carcinogen induced gene amplification in SV40-transformed Chinese hamster cells. Cancer Res, 56, 2715-7(1996)
 
326. Kupper, J. H., M. Muller, M. K. Jacobson, J. Tatsumi-Miyajima, D. L. Coyle, E. L. Jacobson & A. Burkle: trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation sensitizes cells against gamma-irradiation and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine but does not limit DNA replication of a polyomavirus replicon. Mol Cell Biol, 15, 3154-63(1995)
 
327. Kupper, J. H., L. van Gool & A. Burkle: Molecular genetic systems to study the role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in the cellular response to DNA damage. Biochimie, 77, 450-5(1995)
doi:10.1016/0300-9084(96)88159-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9084(96)88159-4
328. Molinete, M., W. Vermeulen, A. Burkle, J. Menissier-de Murcia, J. H. Kupper, J. H. Hoeijmakers & G. de Murcia: Overproduction of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase DNA-binding domain blocks alkylation-induced DNA repair synthesis in mammalian cells. Embo J, 12, 2109-17(1993)
 
329. Tatsumi-Miyajima, J., J. H. Kupper, H. Takebe & A. Burkle: Trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation potentiates alkylation-induced shuttle-vector mutagenesis in Chinese hamster cells. Mol Cell Biochem, 193, 31-5(1999)
doi:10.1023/A:1006935404987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006935404987
330. Herceg, Z. & Z. Q. Wang: Failure of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage by caspases leads to induction of necrosis and enhanced apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol, 19, 5124-33(1999)
 
331. Rosenthal, D. S., C. M. Simbulan-Rosenthal, W. F. Liu, A. Velena, D. Anderson, B. Benton, Z. Q. Wang, W. Smith, R. Ray & M. E. Smulson: PARP determines the mode of cell death in skin fibroblasts, but not keratinocytes, exposed to sulfur mustard. J Invest Dermatol, 117, 1566-73(2001)
doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01578.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01578.x
332. Aubin, R., A. Frechette, G. de Murcia, F. Malouin, A. Lord, P. Mandel & G. G. Poirier: Nucleosomal poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: properties and relaxation of the chromatin structure. Princess Takamatsu Symp, 13, 83-91(1983)
 
333. Aubin, R. J., A. Frechette, G. de Murcia, P. Mandel, A. Lord, G. Grondin & G. G. Poirier: Correlation between endogenous nucleosomal hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histone H1 and the induction of chromatin relaxation. Embo J, 2, 1685-93(1983)
 
334. Frechette, A., A. Huletsky, R. J. Aubin, G. de Murcia, P. Mandel, A. Lord, G. Grondin & G. G. Poirier: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin: kinetics of relaxation and its effect on chromatin solubility. Can J Biochem Cell Biol, 63, 764-73(1985)
 
335. Poirier, G. G., G. de Murcia, J. Jongstra-Bilen, C. Niedergang & P. Mandel: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of polynucleosomes causes relaxation of chromatin structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 79, 3423-7(1982)
doi:10.1073/pnas.79.11.3423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.11.3423
336. de Murcia, G., A. Huletsky, D. Lamarre, A. Gaudreau, J. Pouyet, M. Daune & G. G. Poirier: Modulation of chromatin superstructure induced by poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis and degradation. J Biol Chem, 261, 7011-7(1986)
 
337. de Murcia, G., A. Huletsky & G. G. Poirier: Modulation of chromatin structure by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Biochem Cell Biol, 66, 626-35(1988)
 
338. Huletsky, A., G. de Murcia, S. Muller, M. Hengartner, L. Menard, D. Lamarre & G. G. Poirier: The effect of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on native and H1-depleted chromatin. A role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on core nucleosome structure. J Biol Chem, 264, 8878-86(1989)
 
339. Niedergang, C. P., G. de Murcia, M. E. Ittel, J. Pouyet & P. Mandel: Time course of polynucleosome relaxation and ADP-ribosylation. Correlation between relaxation and histone H1 hyper-ADP-ribosylation. Eur J Biochem, 146, 185-91(1985)
doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08637.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08637.x
340. Stone, P. R., W. S. Lorimer, 3rd, J. Ranchalis, M. Danley & W. R. Kidwell: Effect of DNA on poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase and the degradation of histone H1-poly (ADP-ribose) complex from HeLa cell nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res, 5, 173-84(1978)
doi:10.1093/nar/5.1.173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/5.1.173
341. Aarts, M. M. & M. Tymianski: TRPMs and neuronal cell death. Pflugers Arch, 451, 243-9(2005)
doi:10.1007/s00424-005-1439-x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-005-1439-x
342. Eisfeld, J. & A. Luckhoff: Trpm2. Handb Exp Pharmacol237-52(2007)
 
343. McNulty, S. & E. Fonfria: The role of TRPM channels in cell death. Pflugers Arch, 451, 235-42(2005)
doi:10.1007/s00424-005-1440-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-005-1440-4
344. Hara, Y., M. Wakamori, M. Ishii, E. Maeno, M. Nishida, T. Yoshida, H. Yamada, S. Shimizu, E. Mori, J. Kudoh, N. Shimizu, H. Kurose, Y. Okada, K. Imoto & Y. Mori: LTRPC2 Ca2+-permeable channel activated by changes in redox status confers susceptibility to cell death. Mol Cell, 9, 163-73(2002)
doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00438-5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00438-5
345. Zhang, W., X. Chu, Q. Tong, J. Y. Cheung, K. Conrad, K. Masker & B. A. Miller: A novel TRPM2 isoform inhibits calcium influx and susceptibility to cell death. J Biol Chem, 278, 16222-9(2003)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M300298200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300298200
346. Inamura, K., Y. Sano, S. Mochizuki, H. Yokoi, A. Miyake, K. Nozawa, C. Kitada, H. Matsushime & K. Furuichi: Response to ADP-ribose by activation of TRPM2 in the CRI-G1 insulinoma cell line. J Membr Biol, 191, 201-7(2003)
doi:10.1007/s00232-002-1057-x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00232-002-1057-x
347. Kraft, R., C. Grimm, K. Grosse, A. Hoffmann, S. Sauerbruch, H. Kettenmann, G. Schultz & C. Harteneck: Hydrogen peroxide and ADP-ribose induce TRPM2-mediated calcium influx and cation currents in microglia. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 286, C129-37(2004)
doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00331.2003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00331.2003
348. Perraud, A. L., A. Fleig, C. A. Dunn, L. A. Bagley, P. Launay, C. Schmitz, A. J. Stokes, Q. Zhu, M. J. Bessman, R. Penner, J. P. Kinet & A. M. Scharenberg: ADP-ribose gating of the calcium-permeable LTRPC2 channel revealed by Nudix motif homology. Nature, 411, 595-9(2001)
doi:10.1038/35079100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35079100
349. Perraud, A. L., C. L. Takanishi, B. Shen, S. Kang, M. K. Smith, C. Schmitz, H. M. Knowles, D. Ferraris, W. Li, J. Zhang, B. L. Stoddard & A. M. Scharenberg: Accumulation of free ADP-ribose from mitochondria mediates oxidative stress-induced gating of TRPM2 cation channels. J Biol Chem, 280, 6138-48(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M411446200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M411446200
350. Kuhn, F. J., I. Heiner & A. Luckhoff: TRPM2: a calcium influx pathway regulated by oxidative stress and the novel second messenger ADP-ribose. Pflugers Arch, 451, 212-9(2005)
doi:10.1007/s00424-005-1446-y
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-005-1446-y
351. Fonfria, E., I. C. Marshall, C. D. Benham, I. Boyfield, J. D. Brown, K. Hill, J. P. Hughes, S. D. Skaper & S. McNulty: TRPM2 channel opening in response to oxidative stress is dependent on activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Br J Pharmacol, 143, 186-92(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705914
352. Miller, B. A.: Inhibition of TRPM2 function by PARP inhibitors protects cells from oxidative stress-induced death. Br J Pharmacol, 143, 515-6(2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705923
353. Yang, K. T., W. L. Chang, P. C. Yang, C. L. Chien, M. S. Lai, M. J. Su & M. L. Wu: Activation of the transient receptor potential M2 channel and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is involved in oxidative stress-induced cardiomyocyte death. Cell Death Differ, 13, 1815-26(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401813
354. Kun, E.: Covalent modification of proteins by metabolites of NAD+. Methods Enzymol, 66, 168-76(1980)
doi:10.1016/0076-6879(80)66457-X
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(80)66457-X
355. Kun, E., A. C. Chang, M. L. Sharma, A. M. Ferro & D. Nitecki: Covalent modification of proteins by metabolites of NAD+. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 73, 3131-5(1976)
doi:10.1073/pnas.73.9.3131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.9.3131
356. Cervantes-Laurean, D., E. L. Jacobson & M. K. Jacobson: Glycation and glycoxidation of histones by ADP-ribose. J Biol Chem, 271, 10461-9(1996)
doi:10.1074/jbc.271.18.10461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.18.10461
357. Cervantes-Laurean, D., D. E. Minter, E. L. Jacobson & M. K. Jacobson: Protein glycation by ADP-ribose: studies of model conjugates. Biochemistry, 32, 1528-34(1993)
doi:10.1021/bi00057a017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00057a017
358. Jacobson, E. L., D. Cervantes-Laurean & M. K. Jacobson: Glycation of proteins by ADP-ribose. Mol Cell Biochem, 138, 207-12(1994)
doi:10.1007/BF00928463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00928463
359. Jacobson, E. L., D. Cervantes-Laurean & M. K. Jacobson: ADP-ribose in glycation and glycoxidation reactions. Adv Exp Med Biol, 419, 371-9(1997)
 
360. Wondrak, G. T., S. Varadarajan, D. A. Butterfield & M. K. Jacobson: Formation of a protein-bound pyrazinium free radical cation during glycation of histone H1. Free Radic Biol Med, 29, 557-67(2000)
doi:10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00406-8
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00406-8
361. Sakurai, T. & S. Tsuchiya: Glycation of H1-histone. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo), 36, 2716-9(1988)
 
362. Yu, H. N., E. K. Song, S. M. Yoo, Y. R. Lee, M. K. Han, C. Y. Yim, J. Y. Kwak & J. S. Kim: Activation of NUDT5, an ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, by nitric oxide-mediated ADP-ribosylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 354, 764-8(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.055
363. Berlett, B. S. & E. R. Stadtman: Protein oxidation in aging, disease, and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem, 272, 20313-6(1997)
doi:10.1074/jbc.272.33.20313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.33.20313
364. Gugliucci, A. & M. Bendayan: Histones from diabetic rats contain increased levels of advanced glycation end products. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 212, 56-62(1995)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.1935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1995.1935
365. Gugliucci, A. & M. Bendayan: Reaction of advanced glycation endproducts with renal tissue from normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: an ultrastructural study using colloidal gold cytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem, 43, 591-600(1995)
 
366. Medina, L. & R. S. Haltiwanger: Calf thymus high mobility group proteins are nonenzymatically glycated but not significantly glycosylated. Glycobiology, 8, 191-8(1998)
doi:10.1093/glycob/8.2.191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/glycob/8.2.191
367. Mullarkey, C. J., D. Edelstein & M. Brownlee: Free radical generation by early glycation products: a mechanism for accelerated atherogenesis in diabetes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 173, 932-9(1990)
doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80875-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80875-7
368. Guranowski, A.: Specific and nonspecific enzymes involved in the catabolism of mononucleoside and dinucleoside polyphosphates. Pharmacol Ther, 87, 117-39(2000)
doi:10.1016/S0163-7258(00)00046-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7258(00)00046-2
369. McLennan, A. G.: The Nudix hydrolase superfamily. Cell Mol Life Sci, 63, 123-43(2006)
doi:10.1007/s00018-005-5386-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5386-7
370. McLennan, A. G., J. L. Cartwright & L. Gasmi: The human NUDT family of nucleotide hydrolases. Enzymes of diverse substrate specificity. Adv Exp Med Biol, 486, 115-8(2000)
 
371. Mildvan, A. S., Z. Xia, H. F. Azurmendi, V. Saraswat, P. M. Legler, M. A. Massiah, S. B. Gabelli, M. A. Bianchet, L. W. Kang & L. M. Amzel: Structures and mechanisms of Nudix hydrolases. Arch Biochem Biophys, 433, 129-43(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.017
372. Malanga, M., J. M. Pleschke, H. E. Kleczkowska & F. R. Althaus: Poly(ADP-ribose) binds to specific domains of p53 and alters its DNA binding functions. J Biol Chem, 273, 11839-43(1998)
doi:10.1074/jbc.273.19.11839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.19.11839
373. Mandir, A. S., C. M. Simbulan-Rosenthal, M. F. Poitras, J. R. Lumpkin, V. L. Dawson, M. E. Smulson & T. M. Dawson: A novel in vivo post-translational modification of p53 by PARP-1 in MPTP-induced parkinsonism. J Neurochem, 83, 186-92(2002)
doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01144.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01144.x
374. Mendoza-Alvarez, H. & R. Alvarez-Gonzalez: Regulation of p53 sequence-specific DNA-binding by covalent poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. J Biol Chem, 276, 36425-30(2001)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M105215200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M105215200
375. Kanai, M., K. Hanashiro, S. H. Kim, S. Hanai, A. H. Boulares, M. Miwa & K. Fukasawa: Inhibition of Crm1-p53 interaction and nuclear export of p53 by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Nat Cell Biol, 9, 1175-83(2007)
doi:10.1038/ncb1638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1638
376. Pleschke, J. M., H. E. Kleczkowska, M. Strohm & F. R. Althaus: Poly(ADP-ribose) binds to specific domains in DNA damage checkpoint proteins. J Biol Chem, 275, 40974-80(2000)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M006520200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006520200
377. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., D. S. Rosenthal, R. B. Luo, R. Samara, M. Jung, A. Dritschilo, A. Spoonde & M. E. Smulson: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of p53 in vitro and in vivo modulates binding to its DNA consensus sequence. Neoplasia, 3, 179-88(2001)
doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900155
378. Agarwal, M. L., A. Agarwal, W. R. Taylor, Z. Q. Wang, E. F. Wagner & G. R. Stark: Defective induction but normal activation and function of p53 in mouse cells lacking poly-ADP-ribose polymerase. Oncogene, 15, 1035-41(1997)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1201274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1201274
379. Schmid, G., Z. Q. Wang & J. Wesierska-Gadek: Compensatory expression of p73 in PARP-deficient mouse fibroblasts as response to a reduced level of regularly spliced wild-type p53 protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 255, 399-405(1999)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.0191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0191
380. Wesierska-Gadek, J. & G. Schmid: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 regulates the stability of the wild-type p53 protein. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 6, 117-40(2001)
 
381. Wesierska-Gadek, J., Z. Q. Wang & G. Schmid: Reduced stability of regularly spliced but not alternatively spliced p53 protein in PARP-deficient mouse fibroblasts. Cancer Res, 59, 28-34(1999)
 
382. Munoz-Gamez, J. A., D. Martin-Oliva, R. Aguilar-Quesada, A. Canuelo, M. I. Nunez, M. T. Valenzuela, J. M. Ruiz de Almodovar, G. De Murcia & F. J. Oliver: PARP inhibition sensitizes p53-deficient breast cancer cells to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis. Biochem J, 386, 119-25(2005)
doi:10.1042/BJ20040776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20040776
383. Vaziri, H., M. D. West, R. C. Allsopp, T. S. Davison, Y. S. Wu, C. H. Arrowsmith, G. G. Poirier & S. Benchimol: ATM-dependent telomere loss in aging human diploid fibroblasts and DNA damage lead to the post-translational activation of p53 protein involving poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Embo J, 16, 6018-33(1997)
doi:10.1093/emboj/16.19.6018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.19.6018
384. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., B. R. Haddad, D. S. Rosenthal, Z. Weaver, A. Coleman, R. Luo, H. M. Young, Z. Q. Wang, T. Ried & M. E. Smulson: Chromosomal aberrations in PARP(-/-) mice: genome stabilization in immortalized cells by reintroduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96, 13191-6(1999)
doi:10.1073/pnas.96.23.13191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13191
385. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., D. S. Rosenthal, R. Luo, J. H. Li, J. Zhang & M. E. Smulson: Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity is insufficient to induce tetraploidy. Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 841-9(2001)
doi:10.1093/nar/29.3.841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.3.841
386. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., D. H. Ly, D. S. Rosenthal, G. Konopka, R. Luo, Z. Q. Wang, P. G. Schultz & M. E. Smulson: Misregulation of gene expression in primary fibroblasts lacking poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97, 11274-9(2000)
doi:10.1073/pnas.200285797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200285797
387. Valenzuela, M. T., R. Guerrero, M. I. Nunez, J. M. Ruiz De Almodovar, M. Sarker, G. de Murcia & F. J. Oliver: PARP-1 modifies the effectiveness of p53-mediated DNA damage response. Oncogene, 21, 1108-16(2002)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205169
388. Hassa, P. O., C. Buerki, C. Lombardi, R. Imhof & M. O. Hottiger: Transcriptional coactivation of nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent gene expression by p300 is regulated by poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase-1. J Biol Chem, 278, 45145-53(2003)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M307957200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307957200
389. Hassa, P. O., M. Covic, S. Hasan, R. Imhof & M. O. Hottiger: The enzymatic and DNA binding activity of PARP-1 are not required for NF-kappa B coactivator function. J Biol Chem, 276, 45588-97(2001)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M106528200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M106528200
390. Hassa, P. O., S. S. Haenni, C. Buerki, N. I. Meier, W. S. Lane, H. Owen, M. Gersbach, R. Imhof & M. O. Hottiger: Acetylation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by p300/CREB-binding protein regulates coactivation of NF-kappaB-dependent transcription. J Biol Chem, 280, 40450-64(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M507553200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M507553200
391. Dutta, J., Y. Fan, N. Gupta, G. Fan & C. Gelinas: Current insights into the regulation of programmed cell death by NF-kappaB. Oncogene, 25, 6800-16(2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209938
392. Kucharczak, J., M. J. Simmons, Y. Fan & C. Gelinas: To be, or not to be: NF-kappaB is the answer--role of Rel/NF-kappaB in the regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene, 22, 8961-82(2003)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207230
393. Hassa, P. O. & M. O. Hottiger: A role of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in NF-kappaB transcriptional activation. Biol Chem, 380, 953-9(1999)
doi:10.1515/BC.1999.118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/BC.1999.118
394. Xu, Y., S. O. Kim, Y. Li & J. Han: Autophagy contributes to caspase-independent macrophage cell death. J Biol Chem, 281, 19179-87(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M513377200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513377200
395. Yu, L., A. Alva, H. Su, P. Dutt, E. Freundt, S. Welsh, E. H. Baehrecke & M. J. Lenardo: Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science, 304, 1500-2(2004)
doi:10.1126/science.1096645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1096645
396. Halappanavar, S. S. & G. M. Shah: Defective control of mitotic and post-mitotic checkpoints in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(-/-) fibroblasts after mitotic spindle disruption. Cell Cycle, 3, 335-42(2004)
 
397. Walen, K. H.: Human diploid fibroblast cells in senescence; cycling through polyploidy to mitotic cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 42, 216-24(2006)
doi:10.1290/0603019.1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1290/0603019.1
398. Walen, K. H.: Origin of diplochromosomal polyploidy in near-senescent fibroblast cultures: Heterochromatin, telomeres and chromosomal instability (CIN). Cell Biol Int(2007)
 
399. Rajaraman, R., M. M. Rajaraman, S. R. Rajaraman & D. L. Guernsey: Neosis--a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer. Cell Biol Int, 29, 1084-97(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003
400. Sundaram, M., D. L. Guernsey, M. M. Rajaraman & R. Rajaraman: Neosis: a novel type of cell division in cancer. Cancer Biol Ther, 3, 207-18(2004)
 
01. Masutani, M., T. Nozaki, E. Nishiyama, T. Shimokawa, Y. Tachi, H. Suzuki, H. Nakagama, K. Wakabayashi & T. Sugimura: Function of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in response to DNA damage: gene-disruption study in mice. Mol Cell Biochem, 193, 149-52(1999)
doi:10.1023/A:1006941016799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941016799
402. Wang, Z. Q., L. Stingl, C. Morrison, M. Jantsch, M. Los, K. Schulze-Osthoff & E. F. Wagner: PARP is important for genomic stability but dispensable in apoptosis. Genes Dev, 11, 2347-58(1997)
 
403. Paris, F., Z. Fuks, A. Kang, P. Capodieci, G. Juan, D. Ehleiter, A. Haimovitz-Friedman, C. Cordon-Cardo & R. Kolesnick: Endothelial apoptosis as the primary lesion initiating intestinal radiation damage in mice. Science, 293, 293-7(2001)
doi:10.1126/science.1060191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1060191
404. Pena, L. A., Z. Fuks & R. N. Kolesnick: Radiation-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells in the murine central nervous system: protection by fibroblast growth factor and sphingomyelinase deficiency. Cancer Res, 60, 321-7(2000)
 
405. Potten, C. S.: A comprehensive study of the radiobiological response of the murine (BDF1) small intestine. Int J Radiat Biol, 58, 925-73(1990)
doi:10.1080/09553009014552281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553009014552281
406. Potten, C. S., G. Owen & S. A. Roberts: The temporal and spatial changes in cell proliferation within the irradiated crypts of the murine small intestine. Int J Radiat Biol, 57, 185-99(1990)
doi:10.1080/09553009014550431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553009014550431
407. Booth, D. & C. S. Potten: Protection against mucosal injury by growth factors and cytokines. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr16-20(2001)
 
408. Folkman, J.: Is tissue mass regulated by vascular endothelial cells? Prostate as the first evidence. Endocrinology, 139, 441-2(1998)
doi:10.1210/en.139.2.441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.139.2.441
409. Jones, M. K., M. Tomikawa, B. Mohajer & A. S. Tarnawski: Gastrointestinal mucosal regeneration: role of growth factors. Front Biosci, 4, D303-9(1999)
 
410. MacNaughton, W. K.: Review article: new insights into the pathogenesis of radiation-induced intestinal dysfunction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 14, 523-8(2000)
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00745.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00745.x
411. Ogura, T., H. Nyunoya, M. Takahashi-Masutani, M. Miwa, T. Sugimura & H. Esumi: Characterization of a putative promoter region of the human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene: structural similarity to that of the DNA polymerase beta gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 167, 701-10(1990)
doi:10.1016/0006-291X(90)92082-B
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(90)92082-B
412. Ogura, T., N. Takenouchi, M. Yamaguchi, A. Matsukage, T. Sugimura & H. Esumi: Striking similarity of the distribution patterns of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and DNA polymerase beta among various mouse organs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 172, 377-84(1990)
doi:10.1016/0006-291X(90)90683-E
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(90)90683-E
413. Kun, E., E. Kirsten, P. I. Bauer & C. P. Ordahl: Quantitative correlation between cellular proliferation and nuclear poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1). Int J Mol Med, 17, 293-300(2006)
 
414. Rajesh, M., P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Batkai, G. Godlewski, G. Hasko, L. Liaudet & P. Pacher: Pharmacological inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibits angiogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 350, 352-7(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.049
415. Rajesh, M., P. Mukhopadhyay, G. Godlewski, S. Batkai, G. Hasko, L. Liaudet & P. Pacher: Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibition decreases angiogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 350, 1056-62(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.160
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.049
416. Tentori, L., P. M. Lacal, A. Muzi, A. S. Dorio, C. Leonetti, M. Scarsella, F. Ruffini, W. Xu, W. Min, A. Stoppacciaro, C. Colarossi, Z. Q. Wang, J. Zhang & G. Graziani: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition or PARP-1 gene deletion reduces angiogenesis. Eur J Cancer, 43, 2124-2133(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.010
417. Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M., D. S. Rosenthal, R. Luo, R. Samara, L. A. Espinoza, P. O. Hassa, M. O. Hottiger & M. E. Smulson: PARP-1 binds E2F-1 independently of its DNA binding and catalytic domains, and acts as a novel coactivator of E2F-1-mediated transcription during re-entry of quiescent cells into S phase. Oncogene, 22, 8460-71(2003)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206897
418. Martin-Oliva, D., R. Aguilar-Quesada, F. O'Valle, J. A. Munoz-Gamez, R. Martinez-Romero, R. Garcia Del Moral, J. M. Ruiz de Almodovar, R. Villuendas, M. A. Piris & F. J. Oliver: Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase modulates tumor-related gene expression, including hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activation, during skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res, 66, 5744-56(2006)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3050
419. Sartorius, C. A., G. S. Takimoto, J. K. Richer, L. Tung & K. B. Horwitz: Association of the Ku autoantigen/DNA-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase with the DNA binding domain of progesterone receptors. J Mol Endocrinol, 24, 165-82(2000)
doi:10.1677/jme.0.0240165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/jme.0.0240165
420. Wang, X., L. Liu, C. Montagna, T. Ried & C. X. Deng: Haploinsufficiency of Parp1 accelerates Brca1-associated centrosome amplification, telomere shortening, genetic instability, apoptosis, and embryonic lethality. Cell Death Differ, 14, 924-31(2007)
 
421. Idogawa, M., M. Masutani, M. Shitashige, K. Honda, T. Tokino, Y. Shinomura, K. Imai, S. Hirohashi & T. Yamada: Ku70 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 competitively regulate beta-catenin and T-cell factor-4-mediated gene transactivation: possible linkage of DNA damage recognition and Wnt signaling. Cancer Res, 67, 911-8(2007)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2360
422. Idogawa, M., T. Yamada, K. Honda, S. Sato, K. Imai & S. Hirohashi: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is a component of the oncogenic T-cell factor-4/beta-catenin complex. Gastroenterology, 128, 1919-36(2005)
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.007
423. Jeyakumar, M., X. F. Liu, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst & M. K. Bagchi: Phosphorylation of thyroid hormone receptor-associated nuclear receptor corepressor holocomplex by the DNA-dependent protein kinase enhances its histone deacetylase activity. J Biol Chem, 282, 9312-22(2007)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M609009200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609009200
424. Yin, H. & J. Glass: In prostate cancer cells the interaction of C/EBPalpha with Ku70, Ku80, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 increases sensitivity to DNA damage. J Biol Chem, 281, 11496-505(2006)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M511138200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M511138200
425. Henrie, M. S., A. Kurimasa, S. Burma, J. Menissier-de Murcia, G. de Murcia, G. C. Li & D. J. Chen: Lethality in PARP-1/Ku80 double mutant mice reveals physiological synergy during early embryogenesis. DNA Repair (Amst), 2, 151-8(2003)
doi:10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00199-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00199-4
426. Tong, W. M., U. Cortes, M. P. Hande, H. Ohgaki, L. R. Cavalli, P. M. Lansdorp, B. R. Haddad & Z. Q. Wang: Synergistic role of Ku80 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in suppressing chromosomal aberrations and liver cancer formation. Cancer Res, 62, 6990-6(2002)
 
427. Diaz-Hernandez, J. I., S. Moncada, J. P. Bolanos & A. Almeida: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 protects neurons against apoptosis induced by oxidative stress. Cell Death Differ, 14, 1211-21(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402117
428. Deschenes, F., L. Massip, C. Garand & M. Lebel: In vivo misregulation of genes involved in apoptosis, development and oxidative stress in mice lacking both functional Werner syndrome protein and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Hum Mol Genet, 14, 3293-308(2005)
doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi362
429. Vanderauwera, S., M. De Block, N. Van de Steene, B. van de Cotte, M. Metzlaff & F. Van Breusegem: Silencing of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in plants alters abiotic stress signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 15150-5(2007)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0706668104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706668104
430. Mrsulja, B. B., Y. Ueki & W. D. Lust: Regional metabolite profiles in early stages of global ischemia in the gerbil. Metab Brain Dis, 1, 205-20(1986)
doi:10.1007/BF01001782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01001782
431. Hardie, D. G.: Roles of the AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinase family in the response to cellular stress. Biochem Soc Symp, 64, 13-27(1999)
 
432. Hardie, D. G., S. A. Hawley & J. W. Scott: AMP-activated protein kinase--development of the energy sensor concept. J Physiol, 574, 7-15(2006)
doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108944
433. Towler, M. C. & D. G. Hardie: AMP-activated protein kinase in metabolic control and insulin signaling. Circ Res, 100, 328-41(2007)
doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000256090.42690.05
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000256090.42690.05
434. Carvajal, K., E. Zarrinpashneh, O. Szarszoi, F. Joubert, Y. Athea, P. Mateo, B. Gillet, S. Vaulont, B. Viollet, X. Bigard, L. Bertrand, R. Ventura-Clapier & J. A. Hoerter: Dual cardiac contractile effects of the alpha2-AMPK deletion in low-flow ischemia and reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 292, H3136-47(2007)
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00683.2006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00683.2006
435. Zarrinpashneh, E., K. Carjaval, C. Beauloye, A. Ginion, P. Mateo, A. C. Pouleur, S. Horman, S. Vaulont, J. Hoerter, B. Viollet, L. Hue, J. L. Vanoverschelde & L. Bertrand: Role of the alpha2-isoform of AMP-activated protein kinase in the metabolic response of the heart to no-flow ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 291, H2875-83(2006)
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01032.2005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01032.2005
436. Matsui, Y., H. Takagi, X. Qu, M. Abdellatif, H. Sakoda, T. Asano, B. Levine & J. Sadoshima: Distinct roles of autophagy in the heart during ischemia and reperfusion: roles of AMP-activated protein kinase and Beclin 1 in mediating autophagy. Circ Res, 100, 914-22(2007)
doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000261924.76669.36
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000261924.76669.36
437. Russell, R. R., 3rd, J. Li, D. L. Coven, M. Pypaert, C. Zechner, M. Palmeri, F. J. Giordano, J. Mu, M. J. Birnbaum & L. H. Young: AMP-activated protein kinase mediates ischemic glucose uptake and prevents postischemic cardiac dysfunction, apoptosis, and injury. J Clin Invest, 114, 495-503(2004)
doi:10.1172/JCI200419297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI200419297
438. Terai, K., Y. Hiramoto, M. Masaki, S. Sugiyama, T. Kuroda, M. Hori, I. Kawase & H. Hirota: AMP-activated protein kinase protects cardiomyocytes against hypoxic injury through attenuation of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Cell Biol, 25, 9554-75(2005)
doi:10.1128/MCB.25.21.9554-9575.2005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.21.9554-9575.2005
439. Walker, J. W., H. B. Jijon & K. L. Madsen: AMP-activated protein kinase is a positive regulator of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 342, 336-41(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.145
440. Brundege, J. M., L. Diao, W. R. Proctor & T. V. Dunwiddie: The role of cyclic AMP as a precursor of extracellular adenosine in the rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology, 36, 1201-10(1997)
doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00102-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00102-0
441. Schmitt, E., C. Paquet, M. Beauchemin & R. Bertrand: DNA-damage response network at the crossroads of cell-cycle checkpoints, cellular senescence and apoptosis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 8, 377-97(2007)
doi:10.1631/jzus.2007.B0377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0377
442. Miller, D. S. & S. B. Horowitz: Intracellular compartmentalization of adenosine triphosphate. J Biol Chem, 261, 13911-5(1986)
 
443. Kim, M. Y., S. Mauro, N. Gevry, J. T. Lis & W. L. Kraus: NAD+-dependent modulation of chromatin structure and transcription by nucleosome binding properties of PARP-1. Cell, 119, 803-14(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.002
444. Bauer, P. I., E. Kenesi, J. Mendeleyev & E. Kun: The influence of ATP on poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism. Int J Mol Med, 16, 321-4(2005)
 
445. Miyoshi, N., H. Oubrahim, P. B. Chock & E. R. Stadtman: Age-dependent cell death and the role of ATP in hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis and necrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 1727-31(2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0510346103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510346103
446. Niemczyk, E., A. Majczak, A. Hallmann, J. Kedzior, M. Wozniak & T. Wakabayashi: A possible involvement of plasma membrane NAD(P)H oxidase in the switch mechanism of the cell death mode from apoptosis to necrosis in menadione-induced cell injury. Acta Biochim Pol, 51, 1015-22(2004)
 
447. Sancho, P., C. Fernandez, V. J. Yuste, D. Amran, A. M. Ramos, E. de Blas, S. A. Susin & P. Aller: Regulation of apoptosis/necrosis execution in cadmium-treated human promonocytic cells under different forms of oxidative stress. Apoptosis, 11, 673-86(2006)
doi:10.1007/s10495-006-5879-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-5879-3
448. Wochna, A., E. Niemczyk, C. Kurono, M. Masaoka, J. Kedzior, E. Slominska, M. Lipinski & T. Wakabayashi: A possible role of oxidative stress in the switch mechanism of the cell death mode from apoptosis to necrosis--studies on rho0 cells. Mitochondrion, 7, 119-24(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.mito.2006.11.005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2006.11.005
449. Cruthirds, D. L., H. Saba & L. A. MacMillan-Crow: Overexpression of manganese superoxide dismutase protects against ATP depletion-mediated cell death of proximal tubule cells. Arch Biochem Biophys, 437, 96-105(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.abb.2005.02.023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.02.023
450. Maejima, Y., S. Adachi, K. Morikawa, H. Ito & M. Isobe: Nitric oxide inhibits myocardial apoptosis by preventing caspase-3 activity via S-nitrosylation. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 38, 163-74(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.10.012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.10.012
1. Zhou, P., L. Qian & C. Iadecola: Nitric oxide inhibits caspase activation and apoptotic morphology but does not rescue neuronal death. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 25, 348-57(2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600036
452. Affar el, B., R. G. Shah, A. K. Dallaire, V. Castonguay & G. M. Shah: Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in rapid intracellular acidification induced by alkylating DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 245-50(2002)
doi:10.1073/pnas.012460399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012460399
453. Aikin, R., L. Rosenberg, S. Paraskevas & D. Maysinger: Inhibition of caspase-mediated PARP-1 cleavage results in increased necrosis in isolated islets of Langerhans. J Mol Med, 82, 389-97(2004)
doi:10.1007/s00109-004-0540-5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00109-004-0540-5
454. Horton, J. K., D. F. Stefanick & S. H. Wilson: Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity in regulating Chk1-dependent apoptotic cell death. DNA Repair (Amst), 4, 1111-20(2005)
doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.05.011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.05.011
455. Prabhakaran, K., L. Li, J. L. Borowitz & G. E. Isom: Caspase inhibition switches the mode of cell death induced by cyanide by enhancing reactive oxygen species generation and PARP-1 activation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 195, 194-202(2004)
doi:10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.012
456. Hagberg, H., M. A. Wilson, H. Matsushita, C. Zhu, M. Lange, M. Gustavsson, M. F. Poitras, T. M. Dawson, V. L. Dawson, F. Northington & M. V. Johnston: PARP-1 gene disruption in mice preferentially protects males from perinatal brain injury. J Neurochem, 90, 1068-75(2004)
doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02547.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02547.x
457. McCullough, L. D., Z. Zeng, K. K. Blizzard, I. Debchoudhury & P. D. Hurn: Ischemic nitric oxide and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in cerebral ischemia: male toxicity, female protection. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 25, 502-12(2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600059
458. Szabo, C., P. Pacher & R. A. Swanson: Novel modulators of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 27, 626-30(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.tips.2006.10.003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2006.10.003
459. Sawada, H., M. Ibi, T. Kihara, K. Honda, T. Nakamizo, R. Kanki, M. Nakanishi, N. Sakka, A. Akaike & S. Shimohama: Estradiol protects dopaminergic neurons in a MPP+Parkinson's disease model. Neuropharmacology, 42, 1056-64(2002)
doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00049-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00049-7
460. Wright, L. L. & A. J. Smolen: The role of neuron death in the development of the gender difference in the number of neurons in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Int J Dev Neurosci, 5, 305-11(1987)
doi:10.1016/0736-5748(87)90005-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0736-5748(87)90005-0
461. Zhang, L., B. Li, W. Zhao, Y. H. Chang, W. Ma, M. Dragan, J. L. Barker, Q. Hu & D. R. Rubinow: Sex-related differences in MAPKs activation in rat astrocytes: effects of estrogen on cell death. Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 103, 1-11(2002)
 
462. Mabley, J. G., E. M. Horvath, K. G. Murthy, Z. Zsengeller, A. Vaslin, R. Benko, M. Kollai & C. Szabo: Gender differences in the endotoxin-induced inflammatory and vascular responses: potential role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 315, 812-20(2005)
doi:10.1124/jpet.105.090480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.105.090480
463. Du, L., H. Bayir, Y. Lai, X. Zhang, P. M. Kochanek, S. C. Watkins, S. H. Graham & R. S. Clark: Innate gender-based proclivity in response to cytotoxicity and programmed cell death pathway. J Biol Chem, 279, 38563-70(2004)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M405461200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405461200
464. Di Lisa, F. & M. Ziegler: Pathophysiological relevance of mitochondria in NAD(+) metabolism. FEBS Lett, 492, 4-8(2001)
doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02198-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02198-6
465. Ziegler, M.: New functions of a long-known molecule. Emerging roles of NAD in cellular signaling. Eur J Biochem, 267, 1550-64(2000)
doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01187.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01187.x
466. Haigis, M. C. & L. P. Guarente: Mammalian sirtuins--emerging roles in physiology, aging, and calorie restriction. Genes Dev, 20, 2913-21(2006)
doi:10.1101/gad.1467506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1467506
467. Cheng, H. L., R. Mostoslavsky, S. Saito, J. P. Manis, Y. Gu, P. Patel, R. Bronson, E. Appella, F. W. Alt & K. F. Chua: Developmental defects and p53 hyperacetylation in Sir2 homolog (SIRT1)-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 10794-9(2003)
doi:10.1073/pnas.1934713100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934713100
468. Luo, J., A. Y. Nikolaev, S. Imai, D. Chen, F. Su, A. Shiloh, L. Guarente & W. Gu: Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell, 107, 137-48(2001)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00524-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00524-4
469. Vaziri, H., S. K. Dessain, E. Ng Eaton, S. I. Imai, R. A. Frye, T. K. Pandita, L. Guarente & R. A. Weinberg: hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell, 107, 149-59(2001)
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00527-X
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00527-X
470. Cohen, H. Y., S. Lavu, K. J. Bitterman, B. Hekking, T. A. Imahiyerobo, C. Miller, R. Frye, H. Ploegh, B. M. Kessler & D. A. Sinclair: Acetylation of the C terminus of Ku70 by CBP and PCAF controls Bax-mediated apoptosis. Mol Cell, 13, 627-38(2004)
doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00094-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00094-2
471. Cohen, H. Y., C. Miller, K. J. Bitterman, N. R. Wall, B. Hekking, B. Kessler, K. T. Howitz, M. Gorospe, R. de Cabo & D. A. Sinclair: Calorie restriction promotes mammalian cell survival by inducing the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science, 305, 390-2(2004)
doi:10.1126/science.1099196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1099196
472. Kolthur-Seetharam, U., F. Dantzer, M. W. McBurney, G. de Murcia & P. Sassone-Corsi: Control of AIF-mediated cell death by the functional interplay of SIRT1 and PARP-1 in response to DNA damage. Cell Cycle, 5, 873-7(2006)
 
473. Pillai, J. B., M. Gupta, S. B. Rajamohan, R. Lang, J. Raman & M. P. Gupta: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-deficient mice are protected from angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 291, H1545-53(2006)
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01124.2005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01124.2005
474. Pillai, J. B., A. Isbatan, S. Imai & M. P. Gupta: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-dependent cardiac myocyte cell death during heart failure is mediated by NAD+ depletion and reduced Sir2alpha deacetylase activity. J Biol Chem, 280, 43121-30(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M506162200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M506162200
475. Han, M. K., Y. S. Cho, Y. S. Kim, C. Y. Yim & U. H. Kim: Interaction of two classes of ADP-ribose transfer reactions in immune signaling. J Biol Chem, 275, 20799-805(2000)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M001189200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001189200
476. Barbosa, M. T., S. M. Soares, C. M. Novak, D. Sinclair, J. A. Levine, P. Aksoy & E. N. Chini: The enzyme CD38 (a NAD glycohydrolase, EC 3.2.2.5) is necessary for the development of diet-induced obesity. Faseb J(2007)
 
477. Aksoy, P., C. Escande, T. A. White, M. Thompson, S. Soares, J. C. Benech & E. N. Chini: Regulation of SIRT 1 mediated NAD dependent deacetylation: a novel role for the multifunctional enzyme CD38. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 349, 353-9(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.066
478. Aksoy, P., T. A. White, M. Thompson & E. N. Chini: Regulation of intracellular levels of NAD: a novel role for CD38. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 345, 1386-92(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.042
479. Young, G. S., E. Choleris, F. E. Lund & J. B. Kirkland: Decreased cADPR and increased NAD+ in the Cd38-/- mouse. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 346, 188-92(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.100
480. Khoo, K. M., M. K. Han, J. B. Park, S. W. Chae, U. H. Kim, H. C. Lee, B. H. Bay & C. F. Chang: Localization of the cyclic ADP-ribose-dependent calcium signaling pathway in hepatocyte nucleus. J Biol Chem, 275, 24807-17(2000)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M908231199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M908231199
481. Trubiani, O., S. Guarnieri, E. Eleuterio, F. Di Giuseppe, M. Orciani, S. Angelucci & R. Di Primio: Insights into nuclear localization and dynamic association of CD38 in Raji and K562 cells. J Cell Biochem(2007)
 
482. Walter, L. & G. Hajnoczky: Mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum: the lethal interorganelle cross-talk. J Bioenerg Biomembr, 37, 191-206(2005)
doi:10.1007/s10863-005-6600-x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10863-005-6600-x
483. Kim, R., M. Emi & K. Tanabe: Caspase-dependent and -independent cell death pathways after DNA damage (Review). Oncol Rep, 14, 595-9(2005)
 
484. Harwood, S. M., M. M. Yaqoob & D. A. Allen: Caspase and calpain function in cell death: bridging the gap between apoptosis and necrosis. Ann Clin Biochem, 42, 415-31(2005)
doi:10.1258/000456305774538238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/000456305774538238
485. Le Bras, M., I. Rouy & C. Brenner: The modulation of inter-organelle cross-talk to control apoptosis. Med Chem, 2, 1-12(2006)
doi:10.2174/157340606775197787
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340606775197787
486. Berger, F., C. Lau, M. Dahlmann & M. Ziegler: Subcellular compartmentation and differential catalytic properties of the three human nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase isoforms. J Biol Chem, 280, 36334-41(2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M508660200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M508660200
487. Berger, F., C. Lau & M. Ziegler: Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 activity by the phosphorylation state of the nuclear NAD biosynthetic enzyme NMN adenylyl transferase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 3765-70(2007)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0609211104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609211104
488. Schweiger, M., K. Hennig, F. Lerner, M. Niere, M. Hirsch-Kauffmann, T. Specht, C. Weise, S. L. Oei & M. Ziegler: Characterization of recombinant human nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyl transferase (NMNAT), a nuclear enzyme essential for NAD synthesis. FEBS Lett, 492, 95-100(2001)
doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02180-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02180-9
489. Tarze, A., A. Deniaud, M. Le Bras, E. Maillier, D. Molle, N. Larochette, N. Zamzami, G. Jan, G. Kroemer & C. Brenner: GAPDH, a novel regulator of the pro-apoptotic mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. Oncogene, 26, 2606-20(2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210074
490. Pacher, P. & C. Szabo: Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activation in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications: endothelial dysfunction, as a common underlying theme. Antioxid Redox Signal, 7, 1568-80(2005)
doi:10.1089/ars.2005.7.1568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2005.7.1568
491. Du, X., T. Matsumura, D. Edelstein, L. Rossetti, Z. Zsengeller, C. Szabo & M. Brownlee: Inhibition of GAPDH activity by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activates three major pathways of hyperglycemic damage in endothelial cells. J Clin Invest, 112, 1049-57(2003)
doi:10.1172/JCI200318127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI200318127
492. Colell, A., J. E. Ricci, S. Tait, S. Milasta, U. Maurer, L. Bouchier-Hayes, P. Fitzgerald, A. Guio-Carrion, N. J. Waterhouse, C. W. Li, B. Mari, P. Barbry, D. D. Newmeyer, H. M. Beere & D. R. Green: GAPDH and autophagy preserve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in the absence of caspase activation. Cell, 129, 983-97(2007)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.045
493. Bell, D. A., B. Morrison & P. VandenBygaart: Immunogenic DNA-related factors. Nucleosomes spontaneously released from normal murine lymphoid cells stimulate proliferation and immunoglobulin synthesis of normal mouse lymphocytes. J Clin Invest, 85, 1487-96(1990)
 
494. Brown, O. A., Y. E. Sosa & R. G. Goya: Histones as extracellular messengers: effects on growth hormone secretion. Cell Biol Int, 21, 787-92(1997)
doi:10.1006/cbir.1998.0203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cbir.1998.0203
495. Ruscetti, T., B. E. Lehnert, J. Halbrook, H. Le Trong, M. F. Hoekstra, D. J. Chen & S. R. Peterson: Stimulation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. J Biol Chem, 273, 14461-7(1998)
doi:10.1074/jbc.273.23.14461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.23.14461
496. Monaco, L., U. Kolthur-Seetharam, R. Loury, J. M. Murcia, G. de Murcia & P. Sassone-Corsi: Inhibition of Aurora-B kinase activity by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102, 14244-8(2005)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0506252102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506252102
497. Biroccio, A., A. Rizzo, R. Elli, C. E. Koering, A. Belleville, B. Benassi, C. Leonetti, M. F. Stevens, M. D'Incalci, G. Zupi & E. Gilson: TRF2 inhibition triggers apoptosis and reduces tumourigenicity of human melanoma cells. Eur J Cancer, 42, 1881-8(2006)
doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.03.010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.03.010
498. Dantzer, F., M. J. Giraud-Panis, I. Jaco, J. C. Ame, I. Schultz, M. Blasco, C. E. Koering, E. Gilson, J. Menissier-de Murcia, G. de Murcia & V. Schreiber: Functional interaction between poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase 2 (PARP-2) and TRF2: PARP activity negatively regulates TRF2. Mol Cell Biol, 24, 1595-607(2004)
doi:10.1128/MCB.24.4.1595-1607.2004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.4.1595-1607.2004
499. Elser M. et al., PARP1 promotes tumor cell survival by co-activating HIF-1-dependent gene expression. Mol Cancer Res, 2008. In press
 

Key Words: PARP, PARG, poly-ADP-ribose, NAD, SIR2, Metabolism, Inflammation, Programmed Cell Death, Necrosis, Apoptosis, Autophagy, Senescence, Survival Factor, Neosis, Stem Cells

Send correspondence to: Paul O. Hassa, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Gene Expression Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany, Tel: 00496221387-8442, Fax: 00496221387-518, E-mail: hassa@embl.de