[Frontiers in Bioscience 14, 958-972, January 1, 2009]

The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor: an enigmatic seven transmembrane receptor

Enzo R. Porrello1, 2, Lea M.D. Delbridge2, Walter G. Thomas1

1 Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Baker Heart Research Institute, Prahran, Victoria 3004, Australia, 2 Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. AT2 receptor physiology: what does the AT2 receptor do?
3.1. AT2 receptor expression and tissue distribution
3.2. Developmental regulation: AT2 involvement in differentiation and apoptosis
3.3. Vascular responsiveness: AT2 dilator and constrictor actions
3.4. Cardiac fibrosis: AT2 proliferative and anti-proliferative actions
3.5. Myocardial hypertrophy: AT2 pro-growth and anti-growth actions
4. AT2 Receptor signalling: the ongoing search for g protein-coupled signals
4.1. G Protein-coupling
4.2. NO-cGMP
4.3. Activation of phosphatases and dephosphorylation of MAPKs
5. Novel AT2 interacting proteins: screening for new AT2 targets
5.1. ErbB3
5.2. ATIP/ATBP50
5.3. PLZF
6. Signalling without angiotensin II: is the AT2 receptor constitutively active?
7. AT2 receptor dimerization: fact or fantasy?
8. Perspective
9. Acknowledgements
10. References

1. ABSTRACT

Angiotensin II (AngII) interacts with two receptor subtypes, AT1 and AT2, belonging to the seven transmembrane receptor superfamily. Pharmacological investigations initially suggested that AT2 receptors antagonize AT1 effects. Data from AT2 receptor transgenic and knock-out mice have not been entirely consistent with this interpretation. At the cellular level, a clear mechanistic model of AT2 transduction and signalling has yet to emerge. The AT2 receptor displays the hallmark motifs and signature residues of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), but fails to demonstrate most of the classic features of GPCR signalling. In recent years, unbiased screens for AT2-interacting proteins have identified novel partner proteins involved in AT2 signalling, providing new insight into the mechanisms of AT2 action. A growing body of evidence suggests that the AT2 receptor is constitutively active (i.e. signals without AngII). This review critically evaluates controversies surrounding physiological functions and signalling mechanisms of the AT2 receptor, primarily in a cardiovascular context. Recent advances in the field are highlighted and findings challenging the concept that the AT2 receptor is a conventional angiotensin receptor are considered.

2. INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin II (AngII) is an important cardiovascular hormone and mediates acute physiological responses including vasoconstriction, adrenal aldosterone release and thirst behaviour. AngII is also important in regulating longer-term responses, including growth and remodelling effects in cardiac, renal and vascular tissue (1).

AngII is known to interact with at least two distinct receptor subtypes, designated AT1 and AT2, both of which belong to the superfamily of seven transmembrane receptors. The two receptors share little homology (~34% amino acid sequence identity) (2, 3) and exhibit little resemblance in relation to signalling mechanisms (1). Although both receptors were cloned over 15 years ago (2, 4) and significant advances in the understanding of AT1 receptor signalling have been made, the AT2 receptor remains an enigma. Most of the classic actions of AngII are still ascribed to the AT1 receptor. Transgenic and knock-out approaches in the mouse were anticipated to provide definitive answers to many questions regarding the physiological functions of the AT2 receptor. However, analyses of these transgenic and knock-out phenotypes have been controversial and have not consistently provided physiological explanation. At the cellular level, a clear mechanistic model of AT2 transduction and signalling has yet to emerge. Despite intensive investigation, the AT2 receptor remains one of the least understood components of the renin-angiotensin system.

This review critically evaluates controversies surrounding the physiological function and signalling mechanisms of the AT2 receptor, primarily in a cardiovascular context. Recent advances in the identification of novel AT2 receptor interacting proteins and unconventional ligand-independent signalling are highlighted and findings which challenge the concept that the AT2 receptor is a conventional angiotensin receptor are considered.

3. AT2 RECEPTOR PHYSIOLOGY: WHAT DOES THE AT2 RECEPTOR DO?

Most of the known physiological functions of AngII have been classically ascribed to the AT1 receptor. With the development of specific compounds which interfered with AngII at its binding sites (5, 6) and the subsequent cloning of the AT2 receptor (2), the concept of AngII receptor heterogeneity emerged. The most widely studied AT2 receptor antagonists are PD123177 and PD123319. PD123319 has a high affinity for the AT2 receptor (Ki ~ 12nM), but a low affinity for the AT1 receptor (Ki > 100uM) and is approximately 10,000-fold more selective for AT2 receptors than AT1 receptors (7). CGP42112 is a highly selective AT2 receptor agonist at high concentrations (7). PD123319 and CGP42112 have been used in a large number of studies to deduce a physiological role for the AT2 receptor. With initial reports of AT2-mediated vasodilator, natriuretic, antigrowth, antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects (1), the notion of the AT2 receptor antagonizing AT1 gained momentum. However, data from AT2 receptor transgenic and knock-out mice are sometimes contradictory and raise questions regarding this classic 'yin-yang' paradigm. In this section, the unique tissue distribution of the AT2 receptor is reviewed, controversies surrounding the role of the AT2 receptor in the cardiovascular system are highlighted, and findings from pharmacological and genetic gain- and loss-of-function studies are compared.

3.1. AT2 receptor expression and tissue distribution

The density of angiotensin receptors is developmentally regulated. The AT1 receptor is expressed in most adult tissues including the heart, blood vessels, brain and kidney. In contrast, AT2 receptor expression is largely restricted to embryonic, foetal and neonatal tissues, where it is the dominant subtype (8, 9). Experimental studies indicate that the AT2 receptor retains a capacity for regulation in the adult - a finding which suggests a potential role for this receptor in human cardiovascular disease. In rodent models AT2 receptor expression is up-regulated in heart failure (10, 11), and is up- and down-regulated in a temporally-dependent manner post-infarction (12, 13). Surprisingly, little is known about the expression and function of AT2 receptors in humans. Myocardial AT2 receptors are up-regulated 3.5-fold in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, but of particular interest is the finding that 41% of the angiotensin binding sites in the non-failing human heart are of the AT2 subtype (14). Other studies in humans have also shown that the AT2 receptor can constitute between 50-70% of angiotensin binding sites in the adult myocardium (15). This situation is in marked contrast to the adult rodent, where it has been suggested that AT2 receptors are expressed in only about 10% of adult cardiomyocytes (11, 16). Nevertheless, animal studies have shown that AT1 receptor blockade can increase AT2 expression levels and circulating AngII levels, creating the potential for increased AngII action at the unblocked AT2 sites. Targeting AT2 receptors may therefore be a viable combination therapy in patients treated with AT1 receptor blockers, which are currently used to treat hypertension and heart failure.

3.2. Developmental regulation: AT2 involvement in differentiation and apoptosis

The abundant and ubiquitous expression of AT2 receptors in the foetus indicates a role for this receptor in tissue development and differentiation. It is therefore surprising that few studies have examined the role of AT2 receptors during early development and tissue differentiation. This is possibly due to the absence of any obvious cardiovascular developmental defects in AT2 knock-out and transgenic mice. However, AT2 null mice do have a high incidence of urological abnormalities (17). Polymorphisms in intron 1 of the AT2 gene (A-1332G) occur with higher frequency in human patients with congenital urinary tract abnormalities (18), suggesting that the AT2 receptor may play an important role in the development of the urinary tract.

Pharmacological blockade of the AT2 receptor with PD123319 from E16 to E21 significantly decreases DNA synthesis in the developing aorta (19). Moreover, AT2 null mice have reduced levels of the vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation markers calponin and caldesmon at 2 and 4 weeks after birth (20). These data strongly suggest that the AT2 receptor is involved in vascular smooth muscle differentiation and vasculogenesis.

AT2 receptor stimulation induces neurite outgrowth and regulates neurofilaments in neural cell lines (21). Pro-apoptotic effects have also been ascribed to the AT2 receptor, but these studies have predominantly been limited to cell lines of neuronal origin (22, 23). The pro-apoptotic effects of the AT2 receptor appear to be largely restricted to in vitro studies and are not applicable to all cell types. For instance, in vivo studies utilising AT2 knock-out mice have failed to demonstrate an important role for the AT2 receptor in mediating cardiomyocyte apoptosis (24). AT2 knock-out mice display an increase in neuronal cell number in certain brain structures associated with learning and memory (25) and have central neurological abnormalities (26, 27). However, it is still unclear whether the increase in cell number in AT2 knock-out mice is due to increased neuronal proliferation or a suppression of apoptosis. The role of the AT2 receptor in regulating more subtle aspects of embryogenesis and tissue differentiation has not been explored in detail.

3.3. Vascular responsiveness: AT2 dilator and constrictor actions

AngII has long been known to be a potent vasoconstrictor and an important mediator in the genesis of hypertension. AT1 receptor antagonism has proven to be an efficacious therapy for the treatment of hypertension (28). Numerous lines of evidence support the notion that the AT2 receptor causes vasodilatation in a number of isolated arteries and exerts depressor effects that oppose the actions of AT1 in vivo (reviewed in (29)). However, the physiological effects of AT2 receptor signalling in the vasculature are complex and can be disparate (i.e. vasoconstriction vs. vasodilatation) depending on the context.

Studies employing the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 have demonstrated that the AT2 receptor exerts vasodilator effects in a range of isolated rodent arteries (reviewed in (29)), as well as in human coronary microarteries (30). The AT2 agonist CGP42112 has also been used to confirm the AT2 vasodilator effects, which are often only seen in the presence of concomitant AT1 receptor blockade (31, 32).

In 1995, two independent groups generated AT2 null mice by targeted gene deletion (26, 27). Under basal conditions, blood pressure was found to be either unchanged (26) or increased (27) in these AT2 null mice (Refer to Table 1). The pressor responses to AngII also differ between these AT2 null lines. Ichiki et al reported that the pressor response to AngII was greater in AT2 null mice than their controls, consistent with a depressor effect of the AT2 receptor. Hein et al could not verify this observation in an independent study. The discrepancies between these AT2 knock-out animals are difficult to reconcile, and have been unsatisfactorily ascribed to genetic differences in the background strains (C57BL/6 vs. FVB/N) and to methodological differences in the AngII administration protocols used. Targeted over-expression of AT2 receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells of transgenic mice causes vasodilatation, supporting the contention that the AT2 receptor exerts depressor effects in vivo (33).

More recently, reports that the AT2 receptor mediates vasoconstriction in mesenteric resistance arteries of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats (SHR) and senescent rats have provided an additional challenge in understanding the role of this receptor in vascular regulation. You et al demonstrated that AngII stimulation in the presence of an AT1 receptor antagonist induced a vasoconstriction in untreated SHR resistance arteries (34). Intriguingly, non-selective antihypertensive treatment for 4 weeks restored the vasodilator function in SHR resistance arteries, which was attributed to an up-regulation of the AT2 receptor. However, as the ability of PD123319 to reverse the vasodilator effects was not tested in this study, a causative link between the AT2 up-regulation and restoration of vasodilator function in the SHR was not conclusively demonstrated. Pinaud et al recently reported that the AT2 receptor mediates a different response in the resistance arteries of old and young rats, with the AT2 receptor inducing vasodilator effects in young rats and vasoconstrictive effects in old rats (35). Interestingly, this study also reported an up-regulation of AT2 receptor expression in vascular smooth muscle cells with the aging process. Because AT1 receptor antagonists are most often prescribed in elderly and hypertensive patients, resolving the apparently conflicting roles of the AT2 receptor in these contexts should be a focus for future studies.

3.4. Cardiac fibrosis: AT2 proliferative and antiproliferative actions

The AT1 receptor induces mitogenic effects in many tissues and cell types. In contrast, the AT2 receptor is often reported to exert an anti-proliferative effect which opposes the AT1.

Stoll et al (1995) were the first to demonstrate the involvement of the AT2 receptor subtype in the control of cell proliferation. In 1995, they reported that the AT2 receptor offset the growth promoting effects induced by AT1 receptor activation in coronary endothelial cells (36). This observation was subsequently confirmed by reports of AT2-mediated anti-proliferative effects in macro- and micro-vascular endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, neuronal cells, pheochromacytoma cells, and fibroblasts (reviewed in (11)).

The inhibitory effects of the AT2 receptor on cellular proliferation received particular attention because of the potential clinical ramifications for the treatment of proliferative pathologies including cardiac fibrosis. AngII is mitogenic in rat cardiac fibroblasts (37), which produce extracellular matrix proteins including collagen. An increase in the extracellular matrix proteins and fibronectin is found in conditions of load-induced cardiac hypertrophy (38). The finding that AT1-mediated proliferative effects of AngII in cultured neonatal fibroblasts were apparent only when the AT2 receptor was blocked, suggested that the ability of AngII to induce fibroblast proliferation may critically depend on the activation status of the AT2 receptor. Furthermore, this finding suggested that the ability of AngII to induce cellular proliferation in a given tissue may depend on the relative AT1/AT2 receptor ratio (39). In vivo, PD123319 increases cardiac and renal fibrosis, supporting the notion that the AT2 receptor is anti-fibrotic (10, 40). However, there are also conflicting reports that chronic PD123319 administration reduces collagen content in the thoracic aorta in a model of AngII-induced hypertension in rats (41). Findings from studies of AT2 knock-out and transgenic mice have been ambiguous in evaluating the physiological role of the AT2 receptor in fibrosis. While Wu et al demonstrated that myocardial perivascular fibrosis is increased in AT2 null mice (42), Inagami's group showed that the AT2 receptor was essential for cardiac interstitial fibrosis induced by AngII infusion in a different AT2 knock-out strain (43) (see Table 1). Again, the inconsistent findings obtained using the different AT2 knock-out models renders interpretation problematic. With respect to fibrosis these differences may relate to the different fibrotic indices used and/or may reflect underlying differences in AT2 involvement in matrix deposition at perivascular and interstitial sites.

Even more perplexing are results obtained from AT2 cardiac-specific transgenic mice. Kurisu et al reported that over-expression of the AT2 receptor in the heart under the control of the cardiac-specific alpha-MHC promoter significantly inhibited AngII-induced increases in perivascular fibrosis (44). Yan et al created an AT2 transgenic mouse in which the AT2 receptor was over-expressed under the control of the ventricle-specific MLC2v promoter. Intriguingly, these mice display an increase in interstitial collagen (45). The relevance of these studies with respect to the specific role of the AT2 receptor in fibroblast proliferation is unclear, as the AT2 receptor was presumably over-expressed exclusively in cardiomyocytes in both models and the effects on fibrosis are likely to be secondary physiological adaptations to the hypertrophic phenotype, which also differs between the two strains (see below).

3.5. Myocardial hypertrophy: AT2 pro-growth and anti-growth actions

The trophic actions of AngII are well described, including a role in cardiac growth, which is a major predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Experimental studies have extensively characterised AngII as an important cardiotrophic factor in vitro and in vivo (46, 47). AngII directly promotes protein synthesis and cell growth in cultured embryonic chick myocytes (48) and in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (49), and these effects are mediated by the AT1 receptor subtype (49). The synthesis rate of both DNA and protein significantly increases in neonatal cardiomyocytes in the presence of the selective AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319, suggesting that this effect is dependent on the cellular AT1/AT2 receptor ratio (39). However, these interpretations are based on in vitro findings where endogenous receptor expression is extremely low (50). Experiments involving adenoviral manipulation of AT2 receptor expression in cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes have demonstrated that this receptor can mediate myocyte hypertrophy independently of AngII (51), suggesting that the AT2 receptor per se is pro-hypertrophic.

In vivo experiments involving AT2 receptor manipulation have also produced conflicting results. In some contexts AT2 knockout prevents the induction of hypertrophy (43, 52), whereas over-expression may or may not produce hypertrophy (45, 53). While neither of the AT2 knock-out mice displayed defects in heart size under basal conditions (26, 27), an antigrowth role for the AT2 receptor is not supported by findings obtained using the Inagami AT2 null mice. The hypertrophic response to pressure overload is completely suppressed in these mice, suggesting the AT2 receptor plays an obligatory role in the hypertrophic process (52). Further supporting this interpretation is the finding that AngII infusion does not lead to cardiac hypertrophy in this model (43). The AT2 receptor may thus be essential for pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy, directly challenging the view that this receptor exerts AT1 antagonistic actions.

Transgenic mice over-expressing the AT2 receptor under the control of alpha-MHC in cardiomyocytes have similar heart weight to body weight ratios to their wild-type controls at baseline (53, 54) and develop the same degree of hypertrophy (compared to their respective controls) following AngII infusion (24). In contrast, over-expression of the AT2 receptor under the control of the ventricle-specific MLC2v promoter in mice causes a dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure at maturity (45). Nakayama and colleagues went on to show that ventricular myocytes from MLC2v-AT2TG mice have an impaired inotropic response to AngII, which was Ca2+-dependent and was associated with reduced activity of the Na+/H+ exchanger (55). On the basis of these results, Yan et al concluded that the AT2 receptor mediates pro-growth effects on the myocardium and noted that the alpha-MHC-AT2TG mouse model may have been confounded by atrial transgene expression and the subsequent modification of cardiac chronotropic properties (45). However, it should be noted that cardiac hypertrophy was only evident under basal conditions in the line of MLC2v-AT2TG mice with the highest level of AT2 receptor expression (18 copies of transgene) (45). MLC2v-AT2TG mice with a lower level of AT2 receptor over-expression (9 copies of transgene, 706 fmol/mg protein vs 884 fmol/mg protein) did not display any signs of cardiac hypertrophy or heart failure under basal conditions at 18 weeks of age (45). Furthermore, a recent study by Yan et al, whereby MLC2v-AT2TG mice were subjected to pressure overload by aortic banding, demonstrated that the AT2 receptor significantly reduced left ventricular myocyte diameter, left ventricular systolic pressure, and collagen compared to aortic banded non-transgenic controls (56). This study utilized MLC2v-AT2TG mice expressing a low level of AT2 receptor (9 copies) at a young age (4-5 weeks) when cardiac hypertrophy is not evident under basal conditions (45); unfortunately, non-banded AT2 transgenic mice were not used as controls in this study (56). It is also unclear whether the line of MLC2v-AT2TG mice with a higher level of AT2 expression, which display signs of overt heart failure at 18 weeks of age, respond similarly to pressure overload.

At present, a consensus with regard to the physiological role of the AT2 receptor remains elusive. While it can be concluded that the localization, expression levels and physiological context all appear to be critical determinants of AT2 receptor function in vivo, further work is required to characterize the functions of this enigmatic receptor.

4. AT2 RECEPTOR SIGNALLING: THE ONGOING SEARCH FOR G PROTEIN-COUPLED SIGNALS

Given the variety and variability of functions which have been attributed to the AT2 receptor, it is not surprising that the AT2 signalling pathway (s) have been difficult to elucidate. Since the molecular cloning of both angiotensin receptors in the early '90s, AT2 receptor signalling has been the subject of great controversy. Despite fifteen years and over 2100 publications since the cloning of the AT2 receptor, resolution regarding the signalling mechanisms involved has not yet been achieved. Although the AT2 receptor displays all of the classic motifs and signature residues of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), it fails to demonstrate most of the classic features of GPCR activation and signalling (see Figure 1).

4.1. G Protein-coupling

Before the AT2 receptor was cloned and identified as a member of the GPCR superfamily, it was generally thought not to be G protein-coupled (57). This view was based on studies which failed to demonstrate AT2 receptor-induced modulation of cytosolic Ca2+ or cyclic AMP, which argued against coupling to Gs and Gi-dependent signalling pathways (1). Furthermore, stimulation of the AT2 receptor did not result in an increase in the binding of (35S)GTPgammaS, and agonist binding did not induce receptor internalization - both classic features of GPCRs (57, 58). Subsequent studies in which the cloned rat AT2 receptor was stably over-expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells verified many of the early findings and failed to show any effect of AngII stimulation on cAMP levels, cGMP levels, arachidonic acid release, or phosphotyrosine phosphatase activity (59).

Despite the initial identification of structural features and motifs in the AT2 receptor, qualifying it as a member of the GPCR superfamily, it took several years before the first report demonstrating direct AT2 coupling to the G proteins Gialpha2 and Gialpha3 (60). Only a few studies have subsequently demonstrated AT2 receptor coupling to Gi and have directly linked downstream signals to activation of this class of G protein. Hayashida et al reported that the intracellular third loop (ICL3) of the AT2 receptor is an important determinant for its coupling to Galpha-i (61). ICL3 was subsequently shown to be involved in AT2-induced apoptotic responses in the neuronal lineage PC12W cells (62) and has been implicated in AT2-mediated inhibition of IP3 generation in Xenopus oocytes (63). More recent studies have implicated the involvement of Gi in AT2 receptor-dependent increases in nitric oxide synthase expression (64) and in AT2-mediated inhibition of proximal tubule Na+-ATPase by the angiotensin peptide fragment Ang1-7 (65). However, a definitive demonstration that Gi coupling is necessary for AT2 function has not yet been possible, although such an experiment might be feasible using Gi knock-out cell lines (66). It also remains unclear whether ICL3 is important for coupling of the full-length AT2 receptor to Gi. The initial identification of an interaction between Gi and ICL3 of the AT2 receptor reported by Hayashida et al employed a synthetic ICL3 peptide fragment (61). Whether mutations in ICL3 are sufficient to uncouple the full-length AT2 receptor from Gi has not yet been determined.

Notably, several groups have reported that AT2-mediated activation of the intracellular protein tyrosine phosphatase SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) is pertussis toxin-insensitive, which does not support an involvement of Galpha-i (67, 68). Feng et al also demonstrated that the AT2 receptor-mediated activation of SHP-1 is associated with a Gbeta-gamma-independent constitutive association of the receptor with Galpha-s (68). The limited availability of data and discrepant findings in relation to establishing G protein-coupling with AT2 receptor signalling presents a major research challenge and constrains the development of a full understanding of AT2 signalling mechanisms.

4.2. NO-cGMP

Nitric oxide (NO) increases the catalytic activity of soluble guanylyl cyclases, which in turn generates cGMP (69). Initial studies investigating cGMP involvement in AT2 signalling were inconclusive. While a number of in vitro findings suggested that AngII reduced absolute and/or basal cGMP levels via the AT2 receptor in neuronal cells (70-73), other contradictory evidence did not support AT2 coupling to cGMP (58, 74-76). In 1996, Siragy and Carey published a landmark study, which demonstrated that renal AT2 activation in vivo increased cGMP generation (77). The discrepancies between the initial in vitro studies in neuronal cell lines and the later in vivo link made between AT2 activation and increased cGMP production in the kidney have not been resolved. However, the findings reported by Siragy and Carey represented an important milestone in the field, with subsequent studies predominantly focussing on AT2-mediated NO-cGMP signalling in cardiovascular tissues in vivo.

Further evidence for an involvement of NO-cGMP in AT2-mediated cardiovascular effects emerged from studies by Liu et al, demonstrating that the beneficial therapeutic effects of AT1 receptor blockade involved kinin stimulation and cGMP production (78). Gohlke et al also showed that cGMP levels were increased in the rat aorta following AT2 receptor stimulation (79). Subsequent studies in gene targeted mice confirmed these initial observations. Siragy et al noted that AT2 knock-out mice had low basal levels of cGMP in renal interstitial fluid compared to wild type (80). Correspondingly, AT2 transgenic mice have elevated levels of cGMP in the aorta (33). A modest reduction in eNOS expression has also been reported in the myocardium of AT2 knock-out mice (81). However, it is unclear whether this slight reduction in eNOS expression in the heart of AT2 knock-out mice is localized to cardiomyocytes or the coronary vasculature.

In this context, studies of AT2 transgenic and knock-out mice implicating bradykinin in the AT2-mediated increases in cGMP production are of particular interest. Tsutsumi et al elegantly showed that the AT2 receptor stimulates bradykinin production in vascular smooth muscle cells and AT2-mediated increases in cGMP could be blocked with the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant (33). The authors subsequently concluded that the AT2 receptor stimulates the production of bradykinin, which in turn promotes the production of NO/cGMP in a paracrine manner. Importantly, AT2-mediated vasodilatation of human coronary microarteries also appears to be mediated by bradykinin and NO (30). The complexity of the proposed mechanism for AT2-dependent NO/cGMP production, and in particular the involvement of paracrine signalling mechanisms, might explain some of the inconsistencies in the initial pharmacological studies, which were predominantly restricted to cell lines of neuronal origin.

More recently, clues to the mechanism of AT2-mediated increases in NO have emerged. AT2 receptor activation by AngII induces phosphorylation of eNOS via a PKA-mediated signalling pathway (suggestive of Gs-cAMP signalling), which leads to sustained activation of eNOS in the thoracic aorta of mice with abdominal aortic banding (82). Interestingly, bradykinin can induce PKA-dependent phosphorylation of eNOS and the data from the study by Yayama and colleagues are consistent with the model of AT2-mediated stimulation of bradykinin release and downstream activation of NO/cGMP signalling. Furthermore, recent evidence for a functional heterodimerization of AT2 and bradykinin (B2) receptors is provided by confocal fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies (FRET) in PC12W cells, which suggest that the AT2 and B2 receptors physically associate with each other (83). While the possibility that AT2-dependent increases in NO production are mediated by a functional heterodimerization with bradykinin B2 receptors is intriguing, more detailed studies employing receptor mutagenesis in heterologous expression systems are required to elucidate the structural determinants and specificity of the AT2-B2 interaction.

4.3. Activation of phosphatases and dephosphorylation of MAPKs

AT2 receptor coupling to the activation of protein phosphatases was one of the first identified signals generated by AT2 receptor stimulation. Since the first report of an involvement of a vanadate-sensitive tyrosine phosphatase in AT2 signalling (84), AT2-mediated activation of phosphatases has emerged as a key mechanism accounting for the anti-growth and apoptotic effects of the AT2 receptor (22, 85).

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling plays a key role in cellular proliferation. A number of studies have demonstrated that extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are desphosphorylated following activation of the AT2 receptor (22, 67, 86-88). This finding has been corroborated by studies in AT2 knock-out mice, which display elevated levels of ERK1/2 at baseline and in response to serum (86). AT2-mediated dephosphorylation of ERK1/2 appears to involve three phosphatases: SHP-1, mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1), and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) (22, 67, 88).

AT2 receptor gain-of-function studies have provided a somewhat more controversial view with respect to coupling to phosphatase signalling. Nakajima et al used in vivo gene transfer of the AT2 receptor in balloon-injured carotid arteries to demonstrate that the AT2 receptor attenuated neointimal formation and inhibited AngII-induced MAPK activity in a PD123319-sensitive manner (19). Similarly, studies in vascular-targeted AT2 transgenic mice provided convincing evidence that AT2 receptor activation is linked with an up-regulation of SHP-1, as early as 1 min after stimulation with AngII (89). In contrast, adenovirus-mediated over-expression and stimulation of the human AT2 receptor in porcine cardiac fibroblasts did not modulate proliferation and actually inhibited protein tyrosine phosphatases (90). D'Amore et al recently showed that adenovirus-mediated over-expression of AT2 receptors in neonatal cardiomyocytes increased growth in a constitutive and ERK1/2-independent manner (51).

Conflicting reports with respect to the role of phosphatase signalling in AT2-mediated pro-apoptotic effects also exist. While AT2-induced apoptosis in PC12W cells is AngII-dependent and mediated by dephosphorylation of Bcl-2 by MKP-1 (22), Miura and Karnik found that apoptosis is a constitutive function of the AT2 receptor (i.e. does not require AngII) and involves activation of p38 MAPK (91). These contradictions only serve to further highlight the context-specific nature of the AT2 receptor and may point to a particular sensitivity of this GPCR to over-expression.

5. NOVEL AT2 INTERACTING PROTEINS: SCREENING FOR NEW AT2 TARGETS

The unconventional signalling pathways and enigmatic nature of the AT2 receptor have prompted the search for new AT2 targets. In recent years, a number of studies have employed yeast two-hybrid screening to identify novel proteins that interact with the C-terminus of the AT2 receptor. These interacting proteins, which include ErbB3, ATIP/ATBP50, and PLZF, appear to be important for AT2 receptor signalling, trafficking and function (see Figure 2).

5.1. ErbB3

The AT2 receptor negatively cross-talks with receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin receptors (85, 92, 93). Trans-inactivation of RTKs by the AT2 receptor involves rapid activation of tyrosine phosphatases and inhibition of auto-phosphorylation of the RTK (85, 93), an early step required for receptor activation. However, AT2-mediated trans-inactivation of the insulin receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells does not involve protein dephosphorylation or the G proteins Gi/Go (85), suggesting that other mechanisms are also involved. One intriguing possibility is that AT2-mediated trans-inactivation of RTKs involves a direct physical interaction between the two receptors. Using a yeast two-hybrid protein interaction assay with the C-terminus of the AT2 receptor as bait, Knowle et al identified the ErbB3 EGF receptor as an AT2 interacting partner (94). In subsequent studies using mutated and chimeric AT2 receptors, Knowle et al showed that replacing ICL3 of the AT2 receptor with that of AT1 abolishes the interaction between AT2 and ErbB3 (94, 95). ICL3 plays an important role in AT2-mediated inhibitory effects on cell proliferation (ie. activation of apoptosis) and appears to be an important determinant of AT2 coupling to Gi/Go (see Section 4.1), as well as SHP-1 activation (68). Therefore, ICL3 appears to be an integral regulator of AT2 signalling and function, and the involvement of AT2 interactions with ErbB3 in ICL3-dependent AT2 signalling warrants further investigation. Furthermore, the possibility that the AT2 receptor also physically interacts with other RTKs and that this represents a general model for AT2-mediated trans-inactivation of RTKs is enticing and should be an area of future study.

5.2. ATIP/ATBP50

Recently, two independent groups identified ATIP/ATBP50 as a novel AT2 interacting protein through yeast 2-hybrid screening of the C-terminus of the AT2 receptor (96, 97). Nouet et al were the first to report the interaction of a novel protein termed ATIP1 (AT2 interacting protein) with the C-terminal tail of the AT2 receptor (96). ATIP1 belongs to a family of at least four members (ATIP1-4) that all possess the same domain required for interaction with the AT2 receptor. Ectopic expression of ATIP in Chinese hamster ovary cells leads to a significant inhibition of insulin, basic fibroblast growth factor and epidermal growth factor-induced ERK1/2 activation and DNA synthesis, in a similar manner to AT2 receptor activation alone (96). Interestingly, the ATIP-mediated repression of ERK activity requires AT2 receptor expression, but not extracellular activation by AngII (96). More recently, Li et al showed that the AT2 receptor induced neural differentiation by increasing expression of methane methylsulfonate-sensitive 2 (MMS2), which plays an important role in the ubiquitin proteasome system and DNA repair (98). siRNA-mediated knock-down of ATIP significantly inhibits AngII-dependent increases in MMS2 mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, AT2 receptor stimulation induces translocation of ATIP to the nucleus and promotes the formation of an ATIP/SHP-1 complex, which could provide a mechanism for the AT2-mediated transcriptional activation of MMS2 and downstream induction of neural differentiation (98). MMS2 expression is increased following permanent cerebral artery occlusion in wild-type, but not AT2 knock-out mice, consistent with a protective role for the AT2 receptor in brain injury (99).

ATIP appears to play an important role in the trafficking of the AT2 receptor to the plasma membrane. siRNA-mediated knock-down of the AT2 receptor binding protein of 50kDa (ATBP50, which is identical to ATIP), reduces cell surface expression of the AT2 receptor and suppresses its anti-proliferative effect (97). However, it is still unclear whether ATIP/ATBP50 is involved in the transport of other GPCRs from the Golgi to the plasma membrane and this protein may prove to be an important generic regulator of GPCR cell surface expression. Studies of ATIP knock-out mice are required to identify physiological roles for this protein, which likely has a function extending beyond a specific involvement in AT2 receptor trafficking and signalling.

5.3. PLZF

Yeast 2-hybrid studies with the AT2 receptor C-terminal tail as bait have also revealed an interaction with a transcription factor, promyelocytic zinc finger protein (PLZF), which is highly expressed in the heart (100). Following AngII stimulation, PLZF is activated, translocated from the cytosol to the plasma membrane and then drives AT2 and PLZF to internalize. Whereas AT2 accumulates in the perinuclear region, PLZF localizes to the nucleus where it binds to a consensus sequence for the PI3K p85 alpha regulatory subunit gene, increases p85 alpha transcription and enhances p70S6 kinase activity (which is essential for protein synthesis) (100). Furthermore, AT2 interaction with Gi appears to be involved in the interaction with PLZF and translocation of PLZF to the nucleus (100).

In prior studies, Senbonmatsu et al also showed that AT2 knock-out mice fail to undergo a hypertrophic response to pressure overload following aortic banding (52). This phenotype was seen in association with a failure of AT2 null hearts to up-regulate p70S6 kinase following pressure overload (52). Following the identification of PLZF as an important AT2 interacting protein, Senbonmatsu et al went on to show that AT2 null hearts fail to up-regulate p85 alpha expression in response to AngII infusion, even though PLZF levels are not different under basal conditions between wild type and AT2 null hearts (100). These data strongly suggest that the AT2 receptor is important for the induction of cardiac hypertrophy.

Understanding how the AT2 receptor suppresses cellular growth in some contexts by an apparent antagonism of insulin signalling, yet appears to be capable of enhancing one of the major components of the insulin signalling pathway (p85 alpha) in the heart to promote cellular growth is a major challenge. More detailed studies in primary cardiomyocyte cultures are required to fully characterize the upstream signalling pathways that lead to PLZF translocation following AT2 receptor activation. The finding that AT2 accumulates in the perinuclear region following dissociation from PLZF is also particularly interesting, given that prior studies indicated that AT2 does not normally internalize (59, 101). Furthermore, validation of PLZF involvement in AT2 receptor signalling and function in independent studies and resolution of the conflicting data from different AT2 knock-out mouse models must be resolved (see Section 3.5 and Table 1) if coupling to PLZF is to emerge as an important piece in the AT2 puzzle.

6. SIGNALLING WITHOUT ANGIOTENSIN II: IS THE AT2 RECEPTOR CONSTITUTIVELY ACTIVE?

As alluded to above, several lines of evidence suggest that the AT2 receptor is constitutively active (i.e. functions in the absence of its ligand). Unlike the AT1 receptor, which is in a constrained conformation and is activated when bound to AngII, the AT2 receptor displays ligand pharmacology that is consistent with it being in a 'relaxed', constitutively active conformation (102). While side-chain modifications of AngII are detrimental to AT1 receptor binding affinity, the same modifications are well tolerated by the AT2 receptor (102). The AT2 receptor induces apoptosis in the absence of AngII stimulation, and this effect is not modulated by PD123319 (91). Similarly, in neonatal cardiomyocytes, adenoviral-mediated AT2 receptor expression induces myocyte growth, and this effect is not modulated by AngII, PD123319 or CGP42112 (51). Gene expression profiling studies of human coronary artery endothelial cells have shown that subsequent to lentiviral delivery of the AT2 receptor a large number (5224) of genes are regulated in an AT2 receptor ligand-independent manner (103). In contrast, much fewer genes (1235) were differentially expressed in response to the AT2 receptor-specific ligand CGP42112. This finding suggests that expression of the AT2 receptor per se may be a major determinant of function and that many cellular effects of AT2 expression are not contingent on ligand interaction with this receptor.

The detailed mechanisms underpinning constitutive activation of the AT2 receptor are not well understood. Homo-oligomerization of AT2 receptors, which is mediated by disulfide bonding between Cys35 in one AT2 receptor and Cys290 in its dimerization partner, appears to be important for the constitutive induction of apoptosis in Chinese hamster ovary cells (104). However, the mechanisms which drive homo-oligomerization and constitutive activity of AT2 receptors remain poorly defined. Furthermore, whether receptor dimerization and/or constitutive activity are simply a nuance of receptor over-expression needs to be determined. Nevertheless, mounting in vitro evidence for a constitutively active AT2 receptor must prompt a reconsideration of the assumptions about AT2 receptor pharmacology and physiology, which are largely based on pharmacological studies employing selective AT2 receptor agonists and antagonists. The possibility that up-regulation of a constitutively active GPCR under pathological conditions allows the renin-angiotensin system to escape regulatory control from its ligand is tantalizing, and may open up new strategies for the treatment of hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy.

7. AT2 RECEPTOR DIMERIZATION: FACT OR FANTASY?

GPCRs were traditionally thought to act as monomers, but recent evidence suggests that GPCRs may form dimers and higher-order oligomers as part of their normal trafficking and transduction function (105). Angiotensin receptor dimerization has received particular attention because of the potential for developing new cardiovascular therapeutics. In a landmark study, AbdAlla et al reported that intracellular factor XIIIA transglutaminase crosslinks AT1 receptor homodimers on monocytes at the onset of atherosclerosis (106). AbdAlla et al also demonstrated that AT1 receptors heterodimerize with the bradykinin B2 receptor in patients with preeclampsia and contribute to AngII hypersensitivity (107). In 2001, the same group detected AT1 and AT2 receptor heterodimers on cells ectopically expressing AngII receptors, as well as in foetal fibroblasts and in myometrial biopsies (108). The AT2 receptor was found to antagonize AT1 signalling by direct association (108). Collectively, these studies by Quitterer's group were the first to provide evidence for AngII receptor dimerization in vitro and in vivo, and highlighted the potential clinical significance of GPCR dimers.

However, before AT2/AT1 receptor heterodimerization is accepted as an important regulatory aspect of AngII signalling and function, the initial important observation that AT1 and AT2 receptors heterodimerize awaits confirmation. The use of more sophisticated approaches such as bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), which depends on energy transfer between bioluminescent donor and fluorescent acceptor proteins to identify intermolecular interactions, have the potential to resolve this issue in the future. Finally, further studies are required to determine whether AT2 heterodimers are regulated by AngII and how dimerization affects the pharmacology, signalling and internalization of the AT1 receptor.

8. PERSPECTIVE

The AT2 receptor has been an enigma since it was cloned in the early 90's and remains possibly the most controversial element of the renin-angiotensin system. As highlighted in a review by Steckelings and colleagues, perhaps one reason for the difficulty in understanding the role of the AT2 receptor is that it does not appear to be a conventionally 'active' receptor which evokes a specific response (11). The AT2 receptor is unconventional and its actions do not appear to involve most of the classic GPCR signalling pathways, and in many instances do not even require binding of the ligand AngII. While pharmacological studies have been informative, the data are not entirely consistent with genetic gain and loss of function studies, suggesting that the AT2 receptor may indeed have AngII-independent actions.

To resolve the outstanding questions relating to AT2 function, new studies focussing on the relevance of AT2 ligand-independent pathways in vivo are required. These studies should reveal novel aspects of AT2 receptor biology, previously unappreciated, which may explain the anomalies observed between different experimental models. More sophisticated studies employing unbiased approaches to identify AT2 targets (e.g. microarrays, siRNA libraries, yeast 2-hybrid) will likely identify new intermediates in AT2 signalling and will bring insight to understanding the AT2 receptor enigma.

9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ERP is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and a Wenkart Foundation postgraduate grant. Support from the National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia (WGT and LMDD) and the Australian Research Council (LMDD) is acknowledged.

10. REFERENCES

1. M. de Gasparo, K.J. Catt, T. Inagami, J.W. Wright, and T. Unger. International union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev 52 (3), 415-72 (2000)
2. M. Mukoyama, M. Nakajima, M. Horiuchi, H. Sasamura, R.E. Pratt, and V.J. Dzau. Expression cloning of type 2 angiotensin II receptor reveals a unique class of seven-transmembrane receptors. J Biol Chem 268 (33), 24539-42 (1993)
3. T. Ichiki, C.L. Herold, Y. Kambayashi, S. Bardhan, and T. Inagami. Cloning of the cDNA and the genomic DNA of the mouse angiotensin II type 2 receptor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1189 (2), 247-50 (1994)
doi:10.1016/0005-2736(94)90072-8
4. K. Sasaki, Y. Yamano, S. Bardhan, N. Iwai, J.J. Murray, M. Hasegawa, Y. Matsuda, and T. Inagami. Cloning and expression of a complementary DNA encoding a bovine adrenal angiotensin II type-1 receptor. Nature 351 (6323), 230-3 (1991)
doi:10.1038/351230a0
5. C.J. Blankley, J.C. Hodges, S.R. Klutchko, R.J. Himmelsbach, A. Chucholowski, C.J. Connolly, S.J. Neergaard, M.S. Van Nieuwenhze, A. Sebastian, J. Quin, 3rd, and et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a novel series of non-peptide angiotensin II receptor binding inhibitors specific for the AT2 subtype. J Med Chem 34 (11), 3248-60 (1991)
doi:10.1021/jm00115a014
6. J.V. Duncia, D.J. Carini, A.T. Chiu, A.L. Johnson, W.A. Price, P.C. Wong, R.R. Wexler, and P.B. Timmermans. The discovery of DuP 753, a potent, orally active nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Med Res Rev 12 (2), 149-91 (1992)
doi:10.1002/med.2610120203
7. D. Macari, S. Bottari, S. Whitebread, M. De Gasparo, and N. Levens. Renal actions of the selective angiotensin AT2 receptor ligands CGP 42112B and PD 123319 in the sodium-depleted rat. Eur J Pharmacol 249 (1), 85-93 (1993)
doi:10.1016/0014-2999(93)90665-5
8. N.R. Bastien, G.M. Ciuffo, J.M. Saavedra, and C. Lambert. Angiotensin II receptor expression in the conduction system and arterial duct of neonatal and adult rat hearts. Regul Pept 63 (1), 9-16 (1996)
doi:10.1016/0167-0115(96)00012-2
9. J. Suzuki, H. Matsubara, M. Urakami, and M. Inada. Rat angiotensin II (type 1A) receptor mRNA regulation and subtype expression in myocardial growth and hypertrophy. Circ Res 73 (3), 439-47 (1993)
10. N. Ohkubo, H. Matsubara, Y. Nozawa, Y. Mori, S. Murasawa, K. Kijima, K. Maruyama, H. Masaki, Y. Tsutumi, Y. Shibazaki, T. Iwasaka, and M. Inada. Angiotensin type 2 receptors are reexpressed by cardiac fibroblasts from failing myopathic hamster hearts and inhibit cell growth and fibrillar collagen metabolism. Circulation 96 (11), 3954-62 (1997)
11. U.M. Steckelings, E. Kaschina, and T. Unger. The AT2 receptor--a matter of love and hate. Peptides 26 (8), 1401-9 (2005)
doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2005.03.010
12. C.J. Lax, A.A. Domenighetti, J.M. Pavia, R. Di Nicolantonio, C.L. Curl, M.J. Morris, and L.M. Delbridge. Transitory reduction in angiotensin AT2 receptor expression levels in postinfarct remodelling in rat myocardium. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 31 (8), 512-7 (2004)
doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04034.x
13. Y. Nio, H. Matsubara, S. Murasawa, M. Kanasaki, and M. Inada. Regulation of gene transcription of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 95 (1), 46-54 (1995)
doi:10.1172/JCI117675
14. Y. Tsutsumi, H. Matsubara, N. Ohkubo, Y. Mori, Y. Nozawa, S. Murasawa, K. Kijima, K. Maruyama, H. Masaki, Y. Moriguchi, Y. Shibasaki, H. Kamihata, M. Inada, and T. Iwasaka. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor is upregulated in human heart with interstitial fibrosis, and cardiac fibroblasts are the major cell type for its expression. Circ Res 83 (10), 1035-46 (1998)
15. V. Regitz-Zagrosek, N. Friedel, A. Heymann, P. Bauer, M. Neuss, A. Rolfs, C. Steffen, A. Hildebrandt, R. Hetzer, and E. Fleck. Regulation, chamber localization, and subtype distribution of angiotensin II receptors in human hearts. Circulation 91 (5), 1461-71 (1995)
16. S. Busche, S. Gallinat, R.M. Bohle, A. Reinecke, J. Seebeck, F. Franke, L. Fink, M. Zhu, C. Sumners, and T. Unger. Expression of angiotensin AT (1) and AT (2) receptors in adult rat cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction. A single-cell reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction study. Am J Pathol 157 (2), 605-11 (2000)
17. H. Nishimura, E. Yerkes, M. Schulman, A. Fogo, V. Kon, B.M.L. Hogan, W.I. Brock, T. Inagami, and I. Ichikawa. The angiotensin type 2 receptor null mutant mice: a model of the diverse spectrum of congenital urinary tract anomalies in humans (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 8, 397A (1997)
18. K. Hohenfellner, T.E. Hunley, C. Schloemer, W. Brenner, E. Yerkes, F. Zepp, J.W. Brock, 3rd, and V. Kon. Angiotensin type 2 receptor is important in the normal development of the ureter. Pediatr Nephrol 13 (3), 187-91 (1999)
doi:10.1007/s004670050589
19. M. Nakajima, H.G. Hutchinson, M. Fujinaga, W. Hayashida, R. Morishita, L. Zhang, M. Horiuchi, R.E. Pratt, and V.J. Dzau. The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor antagonizes the growth effects of the AT1 receptor: gain-of-function study using gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92 (23), 10663-7 (1995)
doi:10.1073/pnas.92.23.10663
20. H. Yamada, M. Akishita, M. Ito, K. Tamura, L. Daviet, J.Y. Lehtonen, V.J. Dzau, and M. Horiuchi. AT2 receptor and vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in vascular development. Hypertension 33 (6), 1414-9 (1999)
21. L. Laflamme, M. Gasparo, J.M. Gallo, M.D. Payet, and N. Gallo-Payet. Angiotensin II induction of neurite outgrowth by AT2 receptors in NG108-15 cells. Effect counteracted by the AT1 receptors. J Biol Chem 271 (37), 22729-35 (1996)
doi:10.1074/jbc.271.37.22729
22. M. Horiuchi, W. Hayashida, T. Kambe, T. Yamada, and V.J. Dzau. Angiotensin type 2 receptor dephosphorylates Bcl-2 by activating mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 and induces apoptosis. J Biol Chem 272 (30), 19022-6 (1997)
doi:10.1074/jbc.272.30.19022
23. T. Yamada, M. Horiuchi, and V.J. Dzau. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93 (1), 156-60 (1996)
doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.156
24. H. Sugino, R. Ozono, S. Kurisu, H. Matsuura, M. Ishida, T. Oshima, M. Kambe, Y. Teranishi, H. Masaki, and H. Matsubara. Apoptosis is not increased in myocardium overexpressing type 2 angiotensin II receptor in transgenic mice. Hypertension 37 (6), 1394-8 (2001)
25. O. von Bohlen und Halbach, T. Walther, M. Bader, and D. Albrecht. Genetic deletion of angiotensin AT2 receptor leads to increased cell numbers in different brain structures of mice. Regul Pept 99 (2-3), 209-16 (2001)
doi:10.1016/S0167-0115(01)00258-0
26. L. Hein, G.S. Barsh, R.E. Pratt, V.J. Dzau, and B.K. Kobilka. Behavioural and cardiovascular effects of disrupting the angiotensin II type-2 receptor in mice. Nature 377 (6551), 744-7 (1995)
doi:10.1038/377744a0
27. T. Ichiki, P.A. Labosky, C. Shiota, S. Okuyama, Y. Imagawa, A. Fogo, F. Niimura, I. Ichikawa, B.L. Hogan, and T. Inagami. Effects on blood pressure and exploratory behaviour of mice lacking angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Nature 377 (6551), 748-50 (1995)
doi:10.1038/377748a0
28. D.B. Matchar, D.C. McCrory, L.A. Orlando, M.R. Patel, U.D. Patel, M.B. Patwardhan, B. Powers, G.P. Samsa, and R.N. Gray. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 148 (1), 16-29 (2008)
29. R.E. Widdop, E.S. Jones, R.E. Hannan, and T.A. Gaspari. Angiotensin AT2 receptors: cardiovascular hope or hype? Br J Pharmacol 140 (5), 809-24 (2003)
doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705448
30. W.W. Batenburg, I.M. Garrelds, C.C. Bernasconi, L. Juillerat-Jeanneret, J.P. van Kats, P.R. Saxena, and A.H. Danser. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated vasodilation in human coronary microarteries. Circulation 109 (19), 2296-301 (2004)
doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000128696.12245.57
31. M.N. Barber, D.B. Sampey, and R.E. Widdop. AT (2) receptor stimulation enhances antihypertensive effect of AT (1) receptor antagonist in hypertensive rats. Hypertension 34 (5), 1112-6 (1999)
32. R.M. Carey, N.L. Howell, X.H. Jin, and H.M. Siragy. Angiotensin type 2 receptor-mediated hypotension in angiotensin type-1 receptor-blocked rats. Hypertension 38 (6), 1272-7 (2001)
doi:10.1161/hy1201.096576
33. Y. Tsutsumi, H. Matsubara, H. Masaki, H. Kurihara, S. Murasawa, S. Takai, M. Miyazaki, Y. Nozawa, R. Ozono, K. Nakagawa, T. Miwa, N. Kawada, Y. Mori, Y. Shibasaki, Y. Tanaka, S. Fujiyama, Y. Koyama, A. Fujiyama, H. Takahashi, and T. Iwasaka. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression activates the vascular kinin system and causes vasodilation. J Clin Invest 104 (7), 925-35 (1999)
doi:10.1172/JCI7886
34. D. You, L. Loufrani, C. Baron, B.I. Levy, R.E. Widdop, and D. Henrion. High blood pressure reduction reverses angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated vasoconstriction into vasodilation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation 111 (8), 1006-11 (2005)
doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000156503.62815.48
35. F. Pinaud, A. Bocquet, O. Dumont, K. Retailleau, C. Baufreton, R. Andriantsitohaina, L. Loufrani, and D. Henrion. Paradoxical role of angiotensin II type 2 receptors in resistance arteries of old rats. Hypertension 50 (1), 96-102 (2007)
doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.085035
36. M. Stoll, U.M. Steckelings, M. Paul, S.P. Bottari, R. Metzger, and T. Unger. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 95 (2), 651-7 (1995)
doi:10.1172/JCI117710
37. W. Schorb, G.W. Booz, D.E. Dostal, K.M. Conrad, K.C. Chang, and K.M. Baker. Angiotensin II is mitogenic in neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts. Circ Res 72 (6), 1245-54 (1993)
38. D.C. Crawford, A.V. Chobanian, and P. Brecher. Angiotensin II induces fibronectin expression associated with cardiac fibrosis in the rat. Circ Res 74 (4), 727-39 (1994)
39. C.A. van Kesteren, H.A. van Heugten, J.M. Lamers, P.R. Saxena, M.A. Schalekamp, and A.H. Danser. Angiotensin II-mediated growth and antigrowth effects in cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol 29 (8), 2147-57 (1997)
doi:10.1006/jmcc.1997.0448
40. J.J. Morrissey and S. Klahr. Effect of AT2 receptor blockade on the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis. Am J Physiol 276 (1 Pt 2), F39-45 (1999)
41. B.I. Levy, J. Benessiano, D. Henrion, L. Caputo, C. Heymes, M. Duriez, P. Poitevin, and J.L. Samuel. Chronic blockade of AT2-subtype receptors prevents the effect of angiotensin II on the rat vascular structure. J Clin Invest 98 (2), 418-25 (1996)
doi:10.1172/JCI118807
42. L. Wu, M. Iwai, H. Nakagami, R. Chen, J. Suzuki, M. Akishita, M. de Gasparo, and M. Horiuchi. Effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on cardiac remodeling in angiotensin II type 2 receptor null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22 (1), 49-54 (2002)
doi:10.1161/hq0102.102277
43. S. Ichihara, T. Senbonmatsu, E. Price, Jr., T. Ichiki, F.A. Gaffney, and T. Inagami. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor is essential for left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis in chronic angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Circulation 104 (3), 346-51 (2001)
44. S. Kurisu, R. Ozono, T. Oshima, M. Kambe, T. Ishida, H. Sugino, H. Matsuura, K. Chayama, Y. Teranishi, O. Iba, K. Amano, and H. Matsubara. Cardiac angiotensin II type 2 receptor activates the kinin/NO system and inhibits fibrosis. Hypertension 41 (1), 99-107 (2003)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000050101.90932.14
45. X. Yan, R.L. Price, M. Nakayama, K. Ito, A.J. Schuldt, W.J. Manning, A. Sanbe, T.K. Borg, J. Robbins, and B.H. Lorell. Ventricular-specific expression of angiotensin II type 2 receptors causes dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure in transgenic mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285 (5), H2179-87 (2003)
46. W.C. De Mello and A.H. Danser. Angiotensin II and the heart : on the intracrine renin-angiotensin system. Hypertension 35 (6), 1183-8 (2000)
47. A.A. Domenighetti, Q. Wang, M. Egger, S.M. Richards, T. Pedrazzini, and L.M. Delbridge. Angiotensin II-mediated phenotypic cardiomyocyte remodeling leads to age-dependent cardiac dysfunction and failure. Hypertension 46 (2), 426-32 (2005)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000173069.53699.d9
48. K.M. Baker and J.F. Aceto. Angiotensin II stimulation of protein synthesis and cell growth in chick heart cells. Am J Physiol 259 (2 Pt 2), H610-8 (1990)
49. J. Sadoshima and S. Izumo. Molecular characterization of angiotensin II--induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes and hyperplasia of cardiac fibroblasts. Critical role of the AT1 receptor subtype. Circ Res 73 (3), 413-23 (1993)
50. W.G. Thomas, Y. Brandenburger, D.J. Autelitano, T. Pham, H. Qian, and R.D. Hannan. Adenoviral-directed expression of the type 1A angiotensin receptor promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Circ Res 90 (2), 135-42 (2002)
doi:10.1161/hh0202.104109

51. A. D'Amore, M.J. Black, and W.G. Thomas. The angiotensin II type 2 receptor causes constitutive growth of cardiomyocytes and does not antagonize angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated hypertrophy. Hypertension 46 (6), 1347-54 (2005)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000193504.51489.cf
52. T. Senbonmatsu, S. Ichihara, E. Price, Jr., F.A. Gaffney, and T. Inagami. Evidence for angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated cardiac myocyte enlargement during in vivo pressure overload. J Clin Invest 106 (3), R25-9 (2000)
doi:10.1172/JCI10037
53. Z. Yang, C.M. Bove, B.A. French, F.H. Epstein, S.S. Berr, J.M. DiMaria, J.J. Gibson, R.M. Carey, and C.M. Kramer. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression preserves left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation 106 (1), 106-11 (2002)
doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000020014.14176.6D
54. H. Masaki, T. Kurihara, A. Yamaki, N. Inomata, Y. Nozawa, Y. Mori, S. Murasawa, K. Kizima, K. Maruyama, M. Horiuchi, V.J. Dzau, H. Takahashi, T. Iwasaka, M. Inada, and H. Matsubara. Cardiac-specific overexpression of angiotensin II AT2 receptor causes attenuated response to AT1 receptor-mediated pressor and chronotropic effects. J Clin Invest 101 (3), 527-35 (1998)
doi:10.1172/JCI1885
55. M. Nakayama, X. Yan, R.L. Price, T.K. Borg, K. Ito, A. Sanbe, J. Robbins, and B.H. Lorell. Chronic ventricular myocyte-specific overexpression of angiotensin II type 2 receptor results in intrinsic myocyte contractile dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288 (1), H317-27 (2005)
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00957.2003
56. X. Yan, A.J. Schuldt, R.L. Price, I. Amende, F.F. Liu, K. Okoshi, K.K. Ho, A.J. Pope, T.K. Borg, B.H. Lorell, and J.P. Morgan. Pressure Overload-induced Hypertrophy in Transgenic Mice Selectively Overexpressing AT2 Receptors in Ventricular Myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2008)
57. S.P. Bottari, V. Taylor, I.N. King, Y. Bogdal, S. Whitebread, and M. de Gasparo. Angiotensin II AT2 receptors do not interact with guanine nucleotide binding proteins. Eur J Pharmacol 207 (2), 157-63 (1991)
doi:10.1016/0922-4106(91)90091-U
58. D.T. Dudley, S.E. Hubbell, and R.M. Summerfelt. Characterization of angiotensin II (AT2) binding sites in R3T3 cells. Mol Pharmacol 40 (3), 360-7 (1991)
59. M. Mukoyama, M. Horiuchi, M. Nakajima, R.E. Pratt, and V.J. Dzau. Characterization of a rat type 2 angiotensin II receptor stably expressed in 293 cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 112 (1), 61-8 (1995)
doi:10.1016/0303-7207(95)03586-V
60. J. Zhang and R.E. Pratt. The AT2 receptor selectively associates with Gialpha2 and Gialpha3 in the rat fetus. J Biol Chem 271 (25), 15026-33 (1996)
doi:10.1074/jbc.271.25.15026
61. W. Hayashida, M. Horiuchi, and V.J. Dzau. Intracellular third loop domain of angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Role in mediating signal transduction and cellular function. J Biol Chem 271 (36), 21985-92 (1996)
doi:10.1074/jbc.271.36.21985
62. J.Y. Lehtonen, L. Daviet, C. Nahmias, M. Horiuchi, and V.J. Dzau. Analysis of functional domains of angiotensin II type 2 receptor involved in apoptosis. Mol Endocrinol 13 (7), 1051-60 (1999)
doi:10.1210/me.13.7.1051
63. V. Kumar, D. Knowle, N. Gavini, and L. Pulakat. Identification of the region of AT2 receptor needed for inhibition of the AT1 receptor-mediated inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate generation. FEBS Lett 532 (3), 379-86 (2002)
doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03713-4
64. J. Li, X. Zhao, X. Li, K.M. Lerea, and S.C. Olson. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-dependent increases in nitric oxide synthase expression in the pulmonary endothelium is mediated via a G alpha i3/Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292 (6), C2185-96 (2007)
doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00204.2006
65. S. Lara Lda, F. Cavalcante, F. Axelband, A.M. De Souza, A.G. Lopes, and C. Caruso-Neves. Involvement of the Gi/o/cGMP/PKG pathway in the AT2-mediated inhibition of outer cortex proximal tubule Na+-ATPase by Ang- (1-7). Biochem J 395 (1), 183-90 (2006)
doi:10.1042/BJ20051455
66. X. Yang, L. Taylor, and P. Polgar. Effect of the G-protein, G alpha (i2), and G alpha (i3) subunit knockdown on bradykinin-induced signal transduction in rat-1 cells. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun 1 (3), 227-36 (1999)
doi:10.1006/mcbr.1999.0136
67. K. Bedecs, N. Elbaz, M. Sutren, M. Masson, C. Susini, A.D. Strosberg, and C. Nahmias. Angiotensin II type 2 receptors mediate inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and functional activation of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase. Biochem J 325 (Pt 2), 449-54 (1997)
68. Y.H. Feng, Y. Sun, and J.G. Douglas. Gbeta gamma -independent constitutive association of Galpha s with SHP-1 and angiotensin II receptor AT2 is essential in AT2-mediated ITIM-independent activation of SHP-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 (19), 12049-54 (2002)
doi:10.1073/pnas.192404199
69. N. Toda, K. Ayajiki, and T. Okamura. Interaction of endothelial nitric oxide and angiotensin in the circulation. Pharmacol Rev 59 (1), 54-87 (2007)
doi:10.1124/pr.59.1.2
70. S.P. Bottari, N. Obermuller, Y. Bogdal, K.R. Zahs, and C.F. Deschepper. Characterization and distribution of angiotensin II binding sites in fetal and neonatal astrocytes from different rat brain regions. Brain Res 585 (1-2), 372-6 (1992)
doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)91239-B
71. V. Brechler, P.W. Jones, N.R. Levens, M. de Gasparo, and S.P. Bottari. Agonistic and antagonistic properties of angiotensin analogs at the AT2 receptor in PC12W cells. Regul Pept 44 (2), 207-13 (1993)
doi:10.1016/0167-0115(93)90244-3
72. C. Sumners and L.M. Myers. Angiotensin II decreases cGMP levels in neuronal cultures from rat brain. Am J Physiol 260 (1 Pt 1), C79-87 (1991)
73. C. Sumners, W. Tang, B. Zelezna, and M.K. Raizada. Angiotensin II receptor subtypes are coupled with distinct signal-transduction mechanisms in neurons and astrocytes from rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88 (17), 7567-71 (1991)
doi:10.1073/pnas.88.17.7567
74. Y. Kambayashi, S. Bardhan, K. Takahashi, S. Tsuzuki, H. Inui, T. Hamakubo, and T. Inagami. Molecular cloning of a novel angiotensin II receptor isoform involved in phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibition. J Biol Chem 268 (33), 24543-6 (1993)
75. K.H. Leung, W.A. Roscoe, R.D. Smith, P.B. Timmermans, and A.T. Chiu. Characterization of biochemical responses of angiotensin II (AT2) binding sites in the rat pheochromocytoma PC12W cells. Eur J Pharmacol 227 (1), 63-70 (1992)
doi:10.1016/0922-4106(92)90143-J
76. M.L. Webb, E.C. Liu, R.B. Cohen, A. Hedberg, E.A. Bogosian, H. Monshizadegan, C. Molloy, R. Serafino, S. Moreland, T.J. Murphy, and et al. Molecular characterization of angiotensin II type II receptors in rat pheochromocytoma cells. Peptides 13 (3), 499-508 (1992)
doi:10.1016/0196-9781(92)90081-D
77. H.M. Siragy and R.M. Carey. The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate and AT1 receptor-mediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats. J Clin Invest 97 (8), 1978-82 (1996)
doi:10.1172/JCI118630
78. Y.H. Liu, X.P. Yang, V.G. Sharov, O. Nass, H.N. Sabbah, E. Peterson, and O.A. Carretero. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure. Role of kinins and angiotensin II type 2 receptors. J Clin Invest 99 (8), 1926-35 (1997)
doi:10.1172/JCI119360
79. P. Gohlke, C. Pees, and T. Unger. AT2 receptor stimulation increases aortic cyclic GMP in SHRSP by a kinin-dependent mechanism. Hypertension 31 (1 Pt 2), 349-55 (1998)
80. H.M. Siragy, T. Inagami, T. Ichiki, and R.M. Carey. Sustained hypersensitivity to angiotensin II and its mechanism in mice lacking the subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96 (11), 6506-10 (1999)
doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.6506
81. O. Ritter, K. Schuh, M. Brede, N. Rothlein, N. Burkard, L. Hein, and L. Neyses. AT2 receptor activation regulates myocardial eNOS expression via the calcineurin-NF-AT pathway. Faseb J 17 (2), 283-5 (2003)

82. K. Yayama, H. Hiyoshi, D. Imazu, and H. Okamoto. Angiotensin II stimulates endothelial NO synthase phosphorylation in thoracic aorta of mice with abdominal aortic banding via type 2 receptor. Hypertension 48 (5), 958-64 (2006)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000244108.30909.27
83. P.M. Abadir, A. Periasamy, R.M. Carey, and H.M. Siragy. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-bradykinin B2 receptor functional heterodimerization. Hypertension 48 (2), 316-22 (2006)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000228997.88162.a8
84. S.P. Bottari, I.N. King, S. Reichlin, I. Dahlstroem, N. Lydon, and M. de Gasparo. The angiotensin AT2 receptor stimulates protein tyrosine phosphatase activity and mediates inhibition of particulate guanylate cyclase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 183 (1), 206-11 (1992)
doi:10.1016/0006-291X(92)91629-5
85. N. Elbaz, K. Bedecs, M. Masson, M. Sutren, A.D. Strosberg, and C. Nahmias. Functional trans-inactivation of insulin receptor kinase by growth-inhibitory angiotensin II AT2 receptor. Mol Endocrinol 14 (6), 795-804 (2000)
doi:10.1210/me.14.6.795
86. M. Akishita, M. Ito, J.Y. Lehtonen, L. Daviet, V.J. Dzau, and M. Horiuchi. Expression of the AT2 receptor developmentally programs extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity and influences fetal vascular growth. J Clin Invest 103 (1), 63-71 (1999)
doi:10.1172/JCI5182
87. T.A. Fischer, K. Singh, D.S. O'Hara, D.M. Kaye, and R.A. Kelly. Role of AT1 and AT2 receptors in regulation of MAPKs and MKP-1 by ANG II in adult cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol 275 (3 Pt 2), H906-16 (1998)
88. X.C. Huang, E.M. Richards, and C. Sumners. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated stimulation of protein phosphatase 2A in rat hypothalamic/brainstem neuronal cocultures. J Neurochem 65 (5), 2131-7 (1995)
89. H. Matsubara, Y. Shibasaki, M. Okigaki, Y. Mori, H. Masaki, A. Kosaki, Y. Tsutsumi, Y. Uchiyama, S. Fujiyama, A. Nose, O. Iba, E. Tateishi, T. Hasegawa, M. Horiuchi, C. Nahmias, and T. Iwasaka. Effect of angiotensin II type 2 receptor on tyrosine kinase Pyk2 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase via SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase activity: evidence from vascular-targeted transgenic mice of AT2 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282 (5), 1085-91 (2001)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4695
90. C. Warnecke, D. Kaup, U. Marienfeld, W. Poller, C. Yankah, M. Grafe, E. Fleck, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression and stimulation of the human angiotensin II type 2 receptor in porcine cardiac fibroblasts does not modulate proliferation, collagen I mRNA expression and ERK1/ERK2 activity, but inhibits protein tyrosine phosphatases. J Mol Med 79 (9), 510-21 (2001)
doi:10.1007/s001090100243
91. S. Miura and S.S. Karnik. Ligand-independent signals from angiotensin II type 2 receptor induce apoptosis. Embo J 19 (15), 4026-35 (2000)
doi:10.1093/emboj/19.15.4026
92. P. De Paolis, A. Porcellini, C. Savoia, A. Lombardi, B. Gigante, G. Frati, S. Rubattu, B. Musumeci, and M. Volpe. Functional cross-talk between angiotensin II and epidermal growth factor receptors in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. J Hypertens 20 (4), 693-9 (2002)
doi:10.1097/00004872-200204000-00027
93. Y. Shibasaki, H. Matsubara, Y. Nozawa, Y. Mori, H. Masaki, A. Kosaki, Y. Tsutsumi, Y. Uchiyama, S. Fujiyama, A. Nose, O. Iba, E. Tateishi, T. Hasegawa, M. Horiuchi, C. Nahmias, and T. Iwasaka. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation by increasing association of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase. Hypertension 38 (3), 367-72 (2001)
94. D. Knowle, S. Ahmed, and L. Pulakat. Identification of an interaction between the angiotensin II receptor sub-type AT2 and the ErbB3 receptor, a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Regul Pept 87 (1-3), 73-82 (2000)
doi:10.1016/S0167-0115(99)00111-1
95. L. Pulakat, A. Gray, J. Johnson, D. Knowle, V. Burns, and N. Gavini. Role of C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the AT2 receptor in ligand binding and signaling. FEBS Lett 524 (1-3), 73-8 (2002)
doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03005-3
96. S. Nouet, N. Amzallag, J.M. Li, S. Louis, I. Seitz, T.X. Cui, A.M. Alleaume, M. Di Benedetto, C. Boden, M. Masson, A.D. Strosberg, M. Horiuchi, P.O. Couraud, and C. Nahmias. Trans-inactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases by novel angiotensin II AT2 receptor-interacting protein, ATIP. J Biol Chem 279 (28), 28989-97 (2004)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M403880200
97. C.J. Wruck, H. Funke-Kaiser, T. Pufe, H. Kusserow, M. Menk, J.H. Schefe, M.L. Kruse, M. Stoll, and T. Unger. Regulation of transport of the angiotensin AT2 receptor by a novel membrane-associated Golgi protein. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25 (1), 57-64 (2005)
98. J.M. Li, M. Mogi, K. Tsukuda, H. Tomochika, J. Iwanami, L.J. Min, C. Nahmias, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi. Angiotensin II-induced neural differentiation via angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor-MMS2 cascade involving interaction between AT2 receptor-interacting protein and Src homology 2 domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1. Mol Endocrinol 21 (2), 499-511 (2007)
doi:10.1210/me.2006-0005
99. M. Mogi, J.M. Li, J. Iwanami, L.J. Min, K. Tsukuda, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi. Angiotensin II type-2 receptor stimulation prevents neural damage by transcriptional activation of methyl methanesulfonate sensitive 2. Hypertension 48 (1), 141-8 (2006)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000229648.67883.f9
100. T. Senbonmatsu, T. Saito, E.J. Landon, O. Watanabe, E. Price, Jr., R.L. Roberts, H. Imboden, T.G. Fitzgerald, F.A. Gaffney, and T. Inagami. A novel angiotensin II type 2 receptor signaling pathway: possible role in cardiac hypertrophy. Embo J 22 (24), 6471-82 (2003)
doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg637
101. G. Turu, L. Szidonya, Z. Gaborik, L. Buday, A. Spat, A.J. Clark, and L. Hunyady. Differential beta-arrestin binding of AT1 and AT2 angiotensin receptors. FEBS Lett 580 (1), 41-5 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.044
102. S. Miura and S.S. Karnik. Angiotensin II type 1 and type 2 receptors bind angiotensin II through different types of epitope recognition. J Hypertens 17 (3), 397-404 (1999)
doi:10.1097/00004872-199917030-00013
103. B.L. Falcon, S.J. Veerasingham, C. Sumners, and M.K. Raizada. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated gene expression profiling in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Hypertension 45 (4), 692-7 (2005)
doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000154254.89733.29
104. S. Miura, S.S. Karnik, and K. Saku. Constitutively active homo-oligomeric angiotensin II type 2 receptor induces cell signaling independent of receptor conformation and ligand stimulation. J Biol Chem 280 (18), 18237-44 (2005)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M500639200
105. S.C. Prinster, C. Hague, and R.A. Hall. Heterodimerization of g protein-coupled receptors: specificity and functional significance. Pharmacol Rev 57 (3), 289-98 (2005)
doi:10.1124/pr.57.3.1
106. S. AbdAlla, H. Lother, A. Langer, Y. el Faramawy, and U. Quitterer. Factor XIIIA transglutaminase crosslinks AT1 receptor dimers of monocytes at the onset of atherosclerosis. Cell 119 (3), 343-54 (2004)
107. S. AbdAlla, H. Lother, A. el Massiery, and U. Quitterer. Increased AT (1) receptor heterodimers in preeclampsia mediate enhanced angiotensin II responsiveness. Nat Med 7 (9), 1003-9 (2001)
doi:10.1038/nm0901-1003
108. S. AbdAlla, H. Lother, A.M. Abdel-tawab, and U. Quitterer. The angiotensin II AT2 receptor is an AT1 receptor antagonist. J Biol Chem 276 (43), 39721-6 (2001)

Abbreviations: AngII: angiotensin II, GPCR: G protein-coupled receptor, SHR: Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat, alpha-MHC: alpha myosin heavy chain, MLC2v: myosin light chain 2v, HEK293: human embryonic kidney 293, cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate, cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate, ICL3: intracellular third loop, SHP-1: SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 1, NO: nitric oxide, eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase, MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase, ERK1/2: extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2, MKP-1: mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 1, PP2A: protein phosphatase 2A, RTK: receptor tyrosine kinase, FGF: fibroblast growth factor, EGF: epidermal growth factor, ATIP: AT2-interacting protein, MMS2: methane methylsulfonate-sensitive 2, PLZF: promyelocytic zinc finger protein.

Key Words: Angiotensin II type 2 Receptor, AT2 Receptor, Angiotensin II, G Protein-Coupled Receptor, GPCR, Signalling, Constitutive Activity, Review

Send correspondence to: Enzo R. Porrello, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia, Tel: 61-3 8344 5821, Fax: 61-3 8344 5897, E-mail:e.porrello@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au