[Frontiers in Bioscience 14, 1857-1879, January 1, 2009]

Neuropsychology of deep brain stimulation in neurology and psychiatry

Alexander I. Troster

Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine at Chapel Hill, 3114 Bioinformatics Building (CB 7025),Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7025, U.S.A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3.Content and Purpose of Neuropsychological Evaluation for DBS
4. Parkinson's Disease
4.1. Thalamic Stimulation
4.2. Pallidal Stimulation
4.3. Subthalamic Stimulation
5. Essential tremor
6. Dystonia
7. Epilepsy
8. Multiple Sclerosis
9. Depression 10. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 11. Tourette's Syndrome 12. Persistent Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States 13. Other Conditions 14. Conclusions 15. References

1. ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) experienced resurgence in the 1990s when limitations in pharmacotherapy and ablative surgery for movement disorders (including neuropsychological deficits) were appreciated. Subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease has received the most empirical attention and may entail cognitive and psychiatric adverse events in approximately 10% of patients. This article reviews the cognitive alterations after thalamic, pallidal, and subthalamic DBS for movement disorders (including, Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia) and the possible etiology and mechanisms underlying neurobehavioral changes. Initial studies of neurobehavioral outcomes of DBS for emerging indications such as epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorder, depression, Tourette's syndrome, and persistent vegetative or minimally conscious state are also reviewed. DBS for currently accepted indications appears safe from a cognitive standpoint in that the procedure is associated with typically transient, mild, and circumscribed cognitive alterations (most commonly in verbal fluency), and improved mood state and quality of life. A minority of patients experience more widespread, persistent, or serious cognitive and psychiatric sequelae, although research to date has failed to identify reliable risk factors for such adverse events.