[Frontiers in Bioscience 14, 1891-1901, January 1, 2009]

Cognitive and limbic effects of deep brain stimulation in preclinical studies

Yasin Temel1,3, Sonny Tan1,3, Rinske Vlamings1,3, Thibaut Sesia1,3, Lee Wei Lim1,3, Sylvie Lardeux2, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle1,3, Christelle Baunez2

1Departments of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS UMR6155 Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France, 3European Graduate School of Neuroscience (EURON), Maastricht, The Netherlands

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Historical considerations
4. Deep brain stimulation in animal models of movement disorders
4.1. Models of Parkinson's disease
4.2. Models of Huntington's disease
5. Deep brain stimulation in animal models of psychiatric disorders
5.1. Models of obsessive-compulsive disorder
5.2. Models of depression
5.3. Models of anxiety disorders
6. Discussion
7. Perspective
8. Acknowledgements
9. References

1. ABSTRACT

The use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to control severely disabling neurological and psychiatric conditions is an exciting and fast emerging area of neuroscience. Deep brain stimulation has generally the same clinical effects as a lesion with respect to the improvement of clinical disability, but has more advantages such as its adjustability and reversibility. To this day, fundamental knowledge regarding the application of electrical currents to deep brain structures is far from complete. Despite improving key symptoms in movement disorders, DBS can be associated with the occurrence of a variety of changes in cognitive and limbic functions both in humans and animals. Furthermore, in psychiatric disorders, DBS is primarily used to evoke cognitive and limbic changes to reduce the psychiatric disability. Preclinical DBS experiments have been carried out to investigate the mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of DBS for at least three (interrelated) reasons: to increase our scientific knowledge, to optimize/refine the technology, or to prevent/reduce side-effects. In this review, we will discuss the limbic and cognitive effects of DBS in preclinical studies.

2. INTRODUCTION

The use of stimulation electrodes implanted in the brain to control severely disabling neurological and psychiatric conditions is an exciting and fast emerging area of neuroscience (1) As an example, DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has become the surgical therapy of choice for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), and to date more than 30,000 PD patients worldwide have benefited from this procedure (2, 3) The relief of movement disability by stimulation of the STN is predictable as this nucleus is a critical part of the basal ganglia motor circuitry that is dysfunctional in PD patients (4, 5) However, the side-effects observed in PD patients with STN DBS (6) have also allowed us to highlight some of the non-motor functions of the STN that have originally been demonstrated by STN lesions in rats (7, 8) In PD, which is histopathologically characterized by selective, chronic and progressive nigrostriatal degeneration, the STN displays a continuous abnormal "bursting" mode of activity whereas in physiological conditions it exhibits more or less a regular pattern of discharge with intervals of burst activity (9-11) This so-called STN hyperactivity, reflecting the increase in firing rate, has been implicated in increasing the activity of basal ganglia output nuclei, and consequently, excessive inhibition of their targets (4, 12) This mechanism is held responsible for at least part of the cardinal PD symptoms such as hypokinesia and rigidity (13) In order to surgically "silence" the hyperactive STN, DBS has been applied since the past decade.

DBS has generally the same clinical effects as a lesion with respect to the improvement of clinical disability, but has more advantages such as its adjustability and reversibility (14, 15) Nevertheless, the cellular effects of DBS and lesions are different: a lesion destroys and DBS modulates the (electro)physiological activity of neuronal elements (9, 16-18) To this day, fundamental knowledge regarding the application of electrical currents to deep brain structures is far from complete. A number of possible mechanisms have, however, been proposed such as depolarization block (9, 19) and silencing of target nuclei by stimulation of GABAergic afferents (20) Nevertheless, the similarity in clinical outcomes between DBS and lesion have led to the proposition that DBS inhibits the target neurons stimulated. Recordings made in the stimulated nucleus show inhibition or decreased activity during and after the stimulus train (21-23)

Despite improving key motor symptoms in movement disorders, DBS can be associated with the occurrence of a variety of changes in cognitive and limbic function both in humans and animals (6, 24-27) Furthermore, in psychiatric disorders, DBS is primarily used to evoke cognitive and limbic changes to reduce the psychiatric disability. In this review, we will discuss the limbic and cognitive effects of DBS in preclinical studies. The clinical effects are discussed in another article within this issue. First, we will summarize the effects of DBS in animal models of movement disorders, and in the second part, the effects of DBS in animal models of psychiatric disorders will be outlined.

3. HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Applying electrical current to the brain is nowadays very much in the public eye, but is actually an old technique. One of the first experiments, in which electrical current was delivered to the brain, was reported by Gustav Fritsch and Eduard Hitzig already in 1870 (published in german in Arch. f. Anat., Physiol. und wissenschaftl. Mediz., Leipzig, 37, 1870, 300-32) They applied electrical current to various cortical regions in dogs. They found that stimulation of some brain areas caused muscle contractions whereas others caused eye movements. They provided the first evidence for a finer localization of function in the cortex, and introduced a totally new paradigm for exploring the brain. Numerous other scientists have used the technique of brain stimulation in the next century. Here, we will mention two other relevant scientists. Firstly, MacLean and Ploog (1962) were the first to use electrical stimulation through implanted electrodes in the non-human primate to investigate the brain control of erection. In their pioneering experiments, they mapped the proerectile regions of the brain in great detail (28) Secondly, Jose Delgado and associates performed a set of experiments showing they were able to stop and activate aggressive and defensive behaviour acutely in animals (29-31) Animals, primarily non-human primates, were implanted with a stimulating electrode which could be activated by a remote-controller (radio-control) One of Delgado's more publicly known experiments is the study in which they implanted electrodes into the brain of a bull and set it loose in the arena to charge a matador. The matador (Delgado himself) had a remote controller and just before the bull attacked him, he activated the electrode and the bull stopped immediately. These historical considerations show that brain stimulation has a long and highly fascinating past.

The technique currently known as DBS is the refined version of the old technique as discussed above and was introduced in 1987 by Benabid and co-workers for the treatment of parkinsonian patients (32) In this review, we will primarily focus on this new technique and its application in preclinical experiments. Preclinical DBS-experiments have been carried out to investigate the mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of DBS for at least three (interrelated) reasons: to increase our scientific knowledge, to optimize/refine the technology, or to prevent/reduce side-effects. Only few studies have been carried out in non-human primates and were focused on motor behaviour (33, 34) All studies on the cognitive and limbic effects of DBS have been performed in rodents so far. Some of the studies were carried out also on intact animals to provide more information regarding the involvement of the STN in behavioural functions

4. DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN ANIMAL MODELS OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS

4.1. Models of Parkinson's disease

The first study in a freely moving rat (intact and model of PD) on the effects of unilateral DBS was published in 2003. Darbaky and colleagues performed unilateral STN stimulations in control rats and in rats with unilateral nigral injections of 6-OHDA (35) Using platinium bipolar electrodes, they set the stimulation parameters at a frequency of 130 Hz and a pulse width of 60 μs. The amplitude of the stimulation (50 �A) was set just below the dyskinesia-inducing threshold. They first showed that STN DBS had a beneficial effect on basic motor deficits induced by either haloperidol treatment or unilateral 6-OHDA nigral depletion. Indeed, STN DBS decreased haloperidol-induced catalepsy and also reduced apomorphine-induced circling behaviour in DA-depleted rats.

Reaction time (RT) performance is frequently used in animal models to evaluate cognitive and motor performance (36) This task is based on operant conditioning and is very suitable to use in DBS experiments, since the subject can be tested repeatedly while cognitive and motor performance are evaluated simultaneously. There are various forms of RT tasks generally divided into simple RT (SRT) and choice/complex RT (CRT) tasks.Darbaky and co-workers tested the effects of STN DBS in rats trained to perform a CRT task, in which the rats were required to sustain a nose-poke in a central hole and wait for a light presented either at the left or right side-hole before responding by making a nose-poke in the illuminated hole. The effects of STN DBS were not as strong as on basic motor tests. STN DBS, indeed, had beneficial effects, only in those animals that were able to perform the task after the unilateral 6-OHDA lesion, by slightly improving their neglect towards the contralateral side of the lesion. In those animals not able to perform the task after the dopaminergic lesion, the STN DBS had no "awakening" effect and was unable to help them perform the task. The authors suggested that STN DBS was beneficial in alleviating the motor deficit, but unable to help improving the performance when a cognitive load was required.

Temel and associates reported the effects of bilateral STN DBS in rats (37) Before this study was performed, the authors faced the problem of correct stimulation settings to perform STN DBS in their rat models. They observed a substantial amount of histological damage when applying previously published stimulation parameters in anesthetized rats and found out that this was due to the difference in polarity which was responsible for the occurrence of histological damage (38) The stimulation parameters were therefore adjusted to prevent histological damage in their rat models

In their next study, DBS was applied to the STN of non-depleted rats with various stimulation parameters during a CRT task (37) Results showed a significant linear decrease in premature responding with decreasing amplitudes and high frequencies only. It was suggested that a decrease in premature responding could be attributed to a stimulation-dependent increased activation of pre-motor cortical areas associated with the 'motor readiness potential' resulting in modulated cognitive performance. The same group conducted a second study in which bilateral STN DBS was applied in bilateral striatal 6-OHDA depleted rats again during a CRT task (Figure 1) (Figure 2) (39) Stimulations were performed at 130 Hz (frequency) and 60 m s (pulse width) because these parameters were shown to be effective in the previous study (37) In addition, varying amplitudes of 1, 3, 30 and 150 m A were applied. Bilateral STN DBS with an amplitude of 3 m A significantly decreased 6-OHDA-induced deficit in premature responding. Stimulation with an amplitude of 30 m A reversed the lesion-induced motor deficits. These data showed that bilateral STN DBS could acutely and separately influence the 6-OHDA-induced motor- and cognitive deficits. The authors attributed these findings to unique physiological properties of the basal ganglia-thalamocortical motor and associative circuits, responsible for specific motor and cognitive performances.

Very recently, Baunez and co-workers reported the effects of bilateral STN DBS in the five-choice serial reaction time task. This task is particularly adapted to assess divided and sustained attention (40) In this task, the rats were trained to wait and detect a brief light presented at one of five possible locations and had then to make a nose-poke in the illuminated hole. Bilateral STN lesion effects had been characterized in this task and revealed multiple and independent deficits, suggestive of attentional deficits, disinhibition and perseverative problems as well as motivational exacerbation (8) A further study characterized the effects of bilateral 6-OHDA striatal lesion expressed mainly by a slight attentional deficit and perseverative behaviour in addition to motor impairment. Most of the cognitive impairments induced by this dopaminergic depletion were not alleviated by a bilateral STN lesion (41) Bilateral STN DBS applied at similar parameters to those used in a previous study (35) induced comparable deficits to those observed after STN lesions in intact rats ( (attentional deficit, perseverative behaviour, as well as increased perseverations towards the magazine, this latter being suggestive of motivational exacerbation), although some of these deficits were only transient under DBS (27) Interestingly, when DBS was applied in 6-OHDA lesioned rats, it did not impair their performance further, but did not alleviate the deficits induced by the DA lesion either. The most relevant effect observed after STN DBS in both intact and parkinsonian rats was the increased perseverations towards the food magazine, suggestive of increased motivation for the food reward (Figure 3) (27)

4.2. Models of Huntington's disease

In a different model of a movement disorder, a transgenic rat model (tgHD) of Huntington's disease (HD), Temel and associates studied the effects of globus pallidus (GP, equivalent of the globus pallidus externus in primates) DBS on cognitive and motor symptoms. This rat model has recently been generated and carries a truncated huntingtin cDNA fragment with 51 CAG repeats (42) Before performing DBS, the authors first tested the tgHD (homozygotic and heterozygotic) rats behaviourally in a CRT task and open field task at an age of 15 and 20 months (43) Their results showed that tgHD rats exhibit an age-, and genotype-dependent deterioration of the psychomotor performance and choreiform symptoms, closely mimicking the clinical time course changes of psychomotor symptoms of HD patients. In a second study, the same group evaluated the histopathological characteristics of tgHD rats. They found that tgHD rats show adult-onset neuron loss in striatum and frontal cortical layer V, exhibiting enlarged ventricles, striatal atrophy and pycnotic pyramidal cells in frontal cortical layer V. No alterations in mean total numbers of striatal neurons were found in six-month-old animals. With these two studies, the authors demonstrated that tgHD rats share adult-onset cardinal features of the human HD neuropathology and show progressive cognitive and motor symptoms similar to human HD. After these two model-validation studies, the authors implanted tgHD rats with stimulating electrodes at the level of the GP (Figure 4) (44) Rats were evaluated in a CRT and an open field task. Stimulation of the GP clearly reduced the number of premature responses. Premature responding is thought to reflect the inability to inhibit unwanted responses (6) and is a key feature of cognitive dysfunction in HD (45) DBS with medium amplitude (30 �A) decreased premature responses most effectively, while DBS with the higher amplitude (150 �A) significantly reduced the choreiform movements in the tgHD rats (Figure 5) (44).

5. DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN ANIMAL MODELS OF PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS

5.1. Animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Van Kuyck and colleagues used a rodent model for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and evaluated the effects of DBS of the nucleus accumbens in a freely moving animal (46) Rats that received 8-OH-DPAT, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT = serotonin) 1A agonist, showed a reduction of spontaneous alternation behaviour in the T-maze. According to the authors, this behaviour models the compulsive and repetitive behaviour of patients suffering from OCD. Both 5-HT lesions and DBS (5 Hz and 100 �A) significantly reduced spontaneous alternation behaviour, which reflects an increase in compulsive behaviour. In this study 5 Hz was used as stimulation frequency. High frequency stimulation was not evaluated. In a study with humans, high frequency stimulation of the nucleus accumbens was effective in reducing OCD symptoms (47) These results clearly show that the nucleus accumbens is involved in compulsive behaviour. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the therapeutic value of the nucleus accumbens as a target for DBS in animal models of OCD. More emphasis on the effects of different stimulation paradigms is needed.

5.2. Animal models of depression

The forced swim task (FST) is a well-validated animal model of depression that is sensitive to changes in 5-HT (48) In this animal model of depression, Temel and co-workers showed that DBS of the STN in rats worsened the depressive symptoms (49) The FST task has originally been developed by Porsolt and colleagues (50) and later modified by Detke and Lucki (51) This test is based on exposure to a learned inescapable stressor, and the measurement of immobility that is thought to reflect a failure of persistence in escape-directed behaviour, also referred as behavioural despair (48, 50, 52) The duration of immobility has been shown to correlate significantly with the antidepressant effect of antidepressant drugs: the lower the duration of immobility, the greater the antidepressant effect of the drug. Temel and co-workers showed that bilateral DBS of the STN (130 Hz, 60 �s, 150 �A) caused a striking increase in immobility and a decrease in climbing time of stimulated rats compared to non-stimulated controls, thereby indicative of the induction of behavioural 'despair. This effect was present both in normal and parkinsonian (6-OHDA model) animals. Importantly, the effects of DBS of the STN stimulation in the FST were completely prevented by a prior course of treatment with the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, citalopram, at a dose (10 mg/kg s.c., once daily for 14 days) that by itself had no significant effect in non-stimulated controls (Figure 6) (49) To exclude any motor effect of STN DBS that may confound the results of the FST, the authors demonstrated that in an open field paradigm, DBS of the STN had no effect on motor activity. In contrast, we found that DBS of the STN (using the same stimulation parameters) reversed motor-time deficits in parkinsonian lesions in agreement with previous results (39) These data show that STN DBS in rats causes an acute induction of depression-like behaviour. This link between the STN and 5-HT system supports the existence of a novel 'motor-limbic interface' that may contribute to mood disturbances in basal ganglia disease.

Besides the abovementioned study in which the authors induced depression by DBS, the authors are not aware of a published preclinical study in which DBS reduced the depressive symptoms.

5.3. Animal models of panic disorder

Electrical stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray (PAG) is a well-known animal model for panic disorder (53) It has been demonstrated that electrical stimulation of this area in rats leads to "escape behavior" characterized by running, jumping, and galloping (54) To date, experiments involving PAG stimulation were designed to evoke rather than to inhibit the panic-like behaviour. Stimulation paradigms used in these studies were relatively simple and stimulation frequencies were usually in the range of low frequency. In a recent study, Lim and co-workers addressed the question whether DBS (brain stimulation paradigm using state of art technology) at high frequencies of the PAG could inhibit panic-like behaviour (55) In addition, in the same study they investigated the effect of different stimulation frequencies on escape behaviour. All animals were subjected to the stimulation parameters at: pulse width (100 �s), frequency (1- 300 Hz) and amplitude (1- 650 �A) Their results showed that stimulation with any stimulation frequency between 1 and 300 Hz induced escape behaviour. Furthermore, they also noticed the effect of post-stimulation in which the stimulated animals displayed intense fear or immobility after the animals were placed back to the same open field arena of stimulation. It is noteworthy, that this type of behaviour, the unconditioned fear or anxiety generated by the dorsal lateral PAG stimulation has been considered for future research development in psychopharmacological challenge of anti-panic and anti-anxiety drugs.

6. DISCUSSION

In this review we have summarized the cognitive and limbic effects of DBS in preclinical reports. These reports can be divided into studies focusing on models of movement disorders and psychiatric disorders. With respect to movement disorders, experiments have shown that STN DBS in parkinsonian and in intact rats have profound effects on cognitive and motivational parameters, while improving parkinsonian motor deficits (27, 35, 37, 39)

The involvement of the STN in non-motor functions was already demonstrated by Baunez and associates (7, 8) before STN DBS was performed on such a large scale in PD patients. Due to the profound effects of STN DBS on cognitive and limbic functions, clinicians should evaluate each individual PD patient carefully before considering them for STN DBS. On the other hand, these results suggest that STN DBS might also be a target for cognitive and limbic disorders. For instance, it has been shown that STN DBS increased perseverative visits to the food magazine. This effect, interpreted as an increased motivation for the food reward, is in line with the effects described after STN lesions on motivation for food (56, 57) Interestingly, it has been shown that STN lesions increase motivation for food, but decrease motivation for cocaine (57) Taking into account the fact that STN DBS mostly mimics the behavioural effects of STN lesions, it is thus tempting to suggest that STN DBS could be an interesting surgical therapeutic tool for the treatment of cocaine addiction.

In the transgenic rat model of HD, DBS is currently being evaluated as a treatment option. HD is characterized by progressive deterioration in cognitive and motor functions (58) Cognitive symptoms often precede the choreiform movement disorder (59) Although the movement disorder can be treated pharmacologically to some extent, no effective therapies are available to treat the cognitive symptoms (58) Therefore, it is usually the cognitive dysfunction that determines the quality of life of the HD patient. In the pilot studies presented in this review, the authors have shown that DBS of the GP has the potential to improve cognitive and motor symptoms of transgenic HD rats. Currently, experiments are carried out to further evaluate the value of DBS in animal models of HD.

In the field of psychiatric disorders such as OCD, depression and anxiety, DBS is being evaluated as a possible tool to treat refractory patients. However, before DBS can be applied to new indications, preclinical studies are required to test its potential effects. There are only few preclinical studies published in this area, but the expectation is that the number of studies will increase over time substantially. Nevertheless, these few published reports are promising and supports the usefulness of DBS in psychiatric disorders.

7. PERSPECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation in freely moving animals is a recently developed technology and is extremely suitable to investigate clinically driven research questions in the field of neuromodulation, which is a fast-emerging and exciting field of neuroscience. So far, the most commonly targeted structure in preclinical experiments is the STN. Results show that STN DBS can have profound effects on cognitive and limbic functions, and suggest that the STN is not only a target for movement disorders but also for psychiatric conditions. Particularly, the applicability of STN DBS in drug addiction is currently under investigation.

In other areas, the usefulness of DBS as a therapy is currently being evaluated in several animal models of neurodegenerative disorders such as HD and psychiatric disorders such as OCD. These experiments are extremely important both scientifically, to increase our understanding of brain function and dysfunction, and ethically, since these experiments offer researchers the possibility to evaluate this therapy in preclinical conditions before applying to humans.

8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The deep brain stimulation program of Yasin Temel and colleagues received support from the Dutch Medical Research Council (ZonMw and NWO), the Dutch Brain Foundation (Hersenstichting Nederland), and the Prinses Beatrix Foundation. The STN deep brain stimulation program run by Christelle Baunez and colleagues was supported by the CNRS, the 5th PCRDT of the European community (QLK6-1999-02173) and the Association France Parkinson.

9. REFERENCES

1. Wichmann, T. & M. R. Delong: Deep brain stimulation for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuron, 52, 197-204(2006)

doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.022

2. Deuschl, G., C. Schade-Brittinger, P. Krack, J. Volkmann, H. Schafer, K. Botzel, C. Daniels, A. Deutschlander, U. Dillmann, W. Eisner, D. Gruber, W. Hamel, J. Herzog, R. Hilker, S. Klebe, M. Kloss, J. Koy, M. Krause, A. Kupsch, D. Lorenz, S. Lorenzl, H. M. Mehdorn, J. R. Moringlane, W. Oertel, M. O. Pinsker, H. Reichmann, A. Reuss, G. H. Schneider, A. Schnitzler, U. Steude, V. Sturm, L. Timmermann, V. Tronnier, T. Trottenberg, L. Wojtecki, E. Wolf, W. Poewe & J. Voges: A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med, 355, 896-908(2006)

doi:10.1056/NEJMoa060281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060281

3. Benabid, A. L., S. Chabardes & E. Seigneuret: Deep-brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: long-term efficacy and safety - What happened this year? Curr Opin Neurol, 18, 623-630(2005)

doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000186839.53807.93
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000186839.53807.93

4. Bevan, M. D., P. J. Magill, D. Terman, J. P. Bolam & C. J. Wilson: Move to the rhythm: oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus-external globus pallidus network. Trends Neurosci, 25, 525-31(2002)

doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02235-X
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02235-X

5. Lozano, A. M., J. Dostrovsky, R. Chen & P. Ashby: Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: disrupting the disruption. Lancet Neurol, 1, 225-31(2002)

doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00101-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00101-1

6. Temel, Y., A. Blokland, H. W. Steinbusch & V. Visser-Vandewalle: The functional role of the subthalamic nucleus in cognitive and limbic circuits. Prog Neurobiol, 76, 393-413(2005)

doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.09.005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.09.005

7. Baunez, C., A. Nieoullon & M. Amalric: In a rat model of parkinsonism, lesions of the subthalamic nucleus reverse increases of reaction time but induce a dramatic premature responding deficit. J Neurosci, 15, 6531-41(1995)

 

8. Baunez, C. & T. W. Robbins: Bilateral lesions of the subthalamic nucleus induce multiple deficits in an attentional task in rats. Eur J Neurosci, 9, 2086-99(1997)

doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01376.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01376.x

9. Dostrovsky, J. O. & A. M. Lozano: Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord, 17 Suppl 3, S63-8(2002)

doi:10.1002/mds.10143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.10143

10. Urbain, N., N. Rentero, D. Gervasoni, B. Renaud & G. Chouvet: The switch of subthalamic neurons from an irregular to a bursting pattern does not solely depend on their GABAergic inputs in the anesthetic-free rat. J Neurosci, 22, 8665-75(2002)

 

11. Magill, P., J. Bolam & M. Bevan: Relationship of activity in the subthalamic nucleus-globus pallidus network to cortical electroencephalogram. J Neurosci, 20, 820-333(2000)

 

12. Liu, X., H. L. Ford-Dunn, G. N. Hayward, D. Nandi, R. C. Miall, T. Z. Aziz & J. F. Stein: The oscillatory activity in the Parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus investigated using the macro-electrodes for deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol, 113, 1667-72(2002)

doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00256-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00256-0

13. Benazzouz, A. & M. Hallett: Mechanism of action of deep brain stimulation. Neurology, 55, S13-6(2000)

 

14. Temel, Y., L. Ackermans, H. Celik, G. H. Spincemaille, C. Van Der Linden, G. H. Walenkamp, T. Van De Kar & V. Visser-Vandewalle: Management of hardware infections following deep brain stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 146, 355-61(2004)

doi:10.1007/s00701-004-0219-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-004-0219-2

15. Benabid, A. L.: Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 13, 696-706(2003)

doi:10.1016/j.conb.2003.11.001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2003.11.001

16. Grill, W. M. & C. McIntyre: Extracellular excitation of central neurons: implications for the mechanism of deep brain stimulation. Thalamus & Related Systems, 1, 269-277(2001)

 

17. Grill, W. M., A. N. Snyder & S. Miocinovic: Deep brain stimulation creates an informational lesion of the stimulated nucleus. Neuroreport, 15, 1137-40(2004)

doi:10.1097/00001756-200405190-00011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200405190-00011

18. McIntyre, C. C., W. M. Grill, D. L. Sherman & N. V. Thakor: Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. J Neurophysiol, 91, 1457-69(2004)

doi:10.1152/jn.00989.2003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00989.2003

19. Beurrier, C., B. Bioulac, J. Audin & C. Hammond: High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons. J Neurophysiol, 85, 1351-6(2001)

 

20. Moser, A., A. Gieselberg, B. Ro, C. Keller & F. Qadri: Deep brain stimulation: response to neuronal high frequency stimulation is mediated through GABA(A) receptor activation in rats. Neurosci Lett, 341, 57-60(2003)

doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00133-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00133-2

21. Benazzouz, A., C. H. Tai, W. Meissner, B. Bioulac, E. Bezard & C. Gross: High-frequency stimulation of both zona incerta and subthalamic nucleus induces a similar normalization of basal ganglia metabolic activity in experimental parkinsonism. Faseb J, 18, 528-30(2004)

 

22. Tai, C. H., T. Boraud, E. Bezard, B. Bioulac, C. Gross & A. Benazzouz: Electrophysiological and metabolic evidence that high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus bridles neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra reticulata. Faseb J, 17, 1820-30(2003)

doi:10.1096/fj.03-0163com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.03-0163com

23. Filali, M., W. D. Hutchison, V. N. Palter, A. M. Lozano & J. O. Dostrovsky: Stimulation-induced inhibition of neuronal firing in human subthalamic nucleus. Exp Brain Res, 156, 274-81(2004)

doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1784-y
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1784-y

24. Temel, Y., A. Kessels, S. Tan, A. Topdag, P. Boon & V. Visser-Vandewalle: Behavioural changes after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 12, 265-72(2006)

doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.01.004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.01.004

25. Bejjani, B. P., P. Damier, I. Arnulf, L. Thivard, A. M. Bonnet, D. Dormont, P. Cornu, B. Pidoux, Y. Samson & Y. Agid: Transient acute depression induced by high-frequency deep-brain stimulation. N Engl J Med, 340, 1476-80(1999)

doi:10.1056/NEJM199905133401905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199905133401905

26. Piasecki, S. D. & J. W. Jefferson: Psychiatric complications of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. J Clin Psychiatry, 65, 845-9(2004)

 

27. Baunez, C., A. Christakou, Y. Chudasama, C. Forni & T. W. Robbins: Bilateral high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on attentional performance: transient deleterious effects and enhanced motivation in both intact and parkinsonian rats. Eur J Neurosci, 25, 1187-94(2007)

doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05373.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05373.x

28. MacLean, P. D. & D. W. Ploog: Cerebral presentation of penile erection. J Neurophysiol, 25, 29-55(1962)

 

29. Delgado, J. M.: Free Behavior and Brain Stimulation. Int Rev Neurobiol, 6, 349-449(1964)

 

30. Delgado, J. M.: Sequential Behavior Induced Repeatedly by Stimulation of the Red Nucleus in Free Monkeys. Science, 148, 1361-3(1965)

doi:10.1126/science.148.3675.1361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3675.1361

31. Delgado, J. M.: Aggression and defense under cerebral radio control. UCLA Forum Med Sci, 7, 171-93(1967)

 

32. Benabid, A. L., P. Pollak, A. Louveau, S. Henry & J. de Rougemont: Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease. Appl Neurophysiol, 50, 344-6(1987)

doi:10.1159/000100803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000100803

33. Benazzouz, A., C. Gross, J. Feger, T. Boraud & B. Bioulac: Reversal of rigidity and improvement in motor performance by subthalamic high-frequency stimulation in MPTP-treated monkeys. Eur J Neurosci, 5, 382-9.(1993)

doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00505.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00505.x

34. Beurrier, C., E. Bezard, B. Bioulac & C. Gross: Subthalamic stimulation elicits hemiballismus in normal monkey. Neuroreport, 8, 1625-9(1997)

doi:10.1097/00001756-199705060-00014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199705060-00014

35. Darbaky, Y., C. Forni, M. Amalric & C. Baunez: High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus has beneficial antiparkinsonian effects on motor functions in rats, but less efficiency in a choice reaction time task. Eur J Neurosci, 18, 951-6(2003)

doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02803.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02803.x

36. Blokland, A.: Reaction time responding in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 22, 847-64(1998)

doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00013-X
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00013-X

37. Desbonnet, L., Y. Temel, V. Visser-Vandewalle, A. Blokland, V. Hornikx & H. W. Steinbusch: Premature responding following bilateral stimulation of the rat subthalamic nucleus is amplitude and frequency dependent. Brain Res, 1008, 198-204(2004)

doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.02.032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2004.02.032

38. Temel, Y., V. Visser-Vandewalle, M. van der Wolf, G. H. Spincemaille, L. Desbonnet, G. Hoogland & H. W. Steinbusch: Monopolar versus bipolar high frequency stimulation in the rat subthalamic nucleus: differences in histological damage. Neurosci Lett, 367, 92-6(2004)

doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.087

39. Temel, Y., V. Visser-Vandewalle, B. Aendekerk, B. Rutten, S. Tan, B. Scholtissen, C. Schmitz, A. Blokland & H. W. Steinbusch: Acute and separate modulation of motor and cognitive performance in parkinsonian rats by bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Exp Neurol, 193, 43-52(2005)

doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.12.025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.12.025

40. Robbins, T. W.: The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 163, 362-80(2002)

doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1154-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-002-1154-7

41. Baunez, C. & T. W. Robbins: Effects of dopamine depletion of the dorsal striatum and further interaction with subthalamic nucleus lesions in an attentional task in the rat. Neuroscience, 92, 1343-56(1999)

doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00065-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00065-2

42. von Horsten, S., I. Schmitt, H. P. Nguyen, C. Holzmann, T. Schmidt, T. Walther, M. Bader, R. Pabst, P. Kobbe, J. Krotova, D. Stiller, A. Kask, A. Vaarmann, S. Rathke-Hartlieb, J. B. Schulz, U. Grasshoff, I. Bauer, A. M. Vieira-Saecker, M. Paul, L. Jones, K. S. Lindenberg, B. Landwehrmeyer, A. Bauer, X. J. Li & O. Riess: Transgenic rat model of Huntington's disease. Hum Mol Genet, 12, 617-24(2003)

doi:10.1093/hmg/12.6.617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/12.6.617

43. Cao, C., Y. Temel, A. Blokland, H. Ozen, H. W. Steinbusch, R. Vlamings, H. P. Nguyen, S. von Horsten, C. Schmitz & V. Visser-Vandewalle: Progressive deterioration of reaction time performance and choreiform symptoms in a new Huntington's disease transgenic ratmodel. Behav Brain Res, 170, 257-61(2006)

doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.028

44. Temel, Y., C. Cao, R. Vlamings, A. Blokland, H. Ozen, H. W. Steinbusch, K. A. Michelsen, S. von Horsten, C. Schmitz & V. Visser-Vandewalle: Motor and cognitive improvement by deep brain stimulation in a transgenic rat model of Huntington's disease. Neurosci Lett, 406, 138-41(2006)

doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.036

45. Aron, A. R., L. Watkins, B. J. Sahakian, S. Monsell, R. A. Barker & T. W. Robbins: Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function. J Cogn Neurosci, 15, 629-42(2003)

doi:10.1162/jocn.2003.15.5.629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2003.15.5.629

46. van Kuyck, K., C. Casteels, P. Vermaelen, G. Bormans, B. Nuttin & K. Van Laere: Motor- and food-related metabolic cerebral changes in the activity-based rat model for anorexia nervosa: a voxel-based microPET study. Neuroimage, 35, 214-21(2007)

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.009

47. Okun, M. S., G. Mann, K. D. Foote, N. A. Shapira, D. Bowers, U. Springer, W. Knight, P. Martin & W. K. Goodman: Deep brain stimulation in the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens region: responses observed during active and sham programming. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 78, 310-4(2007)

doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.095315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.095315

48. Cryan, J. F., A. Markou & I. Lucki: Assessing antidepressant activity in rodents: recent developments and future needs. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 23, 238-45(2002)

doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(02)02017-5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(02)02017-5

49. Temel, Y., L. J. Boothman, A. Blokland, P. J. Magill, H. W. Steinbusch, V. Visser-Vandewalle & T. Sharp: Inhibition of 5-HT neuron activity and induction of depressive-like behavior by high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 17087-92(2007)

doi:10.1073/pnas.0704144104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704144104

50. Porsolt, R. D., M. Le Pichon & M. Jalfre: Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Nature, 266, 730-2(1977)

doi:10.1038/266730a0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/266730a0

51. Detke, M. J. & I. Lucki: Detection of serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants in the rat forced swimming test: the effects of water depth. Behav Brain Res, 73, 43-6(1996)

doi:10.1016/0166-4328(96)00067-8
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(96)00067-8

52. Cryan, J. F., O. F. O'Leary, S. H. Jin, J. C. Friedland, M. Ouyang, B. R. Hirsch, M. E. Page, A. Dalvi, S. A. Thomas & I. Lucki: Norepinephrine-deficient mice lack responses to antidepressant drugs, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 8186-91(2004)

doi:10.1073/pnas.0401080101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401080101

53. Mongeau, R. & C. A. Marsden: Effect of central and peripheral administrations of cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide on panic-like reactions induced by stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal grey area in the rat. Biol Psychiatry, 42, 335-44(1997)

doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00407-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00407-6

54. Bandler, R., A. Depaulis & M. Vergnes: Identification of midbrain neurones mediating defensive behaviour in the rat by microinjections of excitatory amino acids. Behav Brain Res, 15, 107-19(1985)

doi:10.1016/0166-4328(85)90058-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(85)90058-0

55. Lee Wei, L., Y. Temel, R. Hameleers, T. Sesia, R. Vlamings, K. Schruers, H. W. Steinbusch, A. Blokland, E. Griez & V. Visser-Vandewalle: Escape behavior induced by electrical deep brain stimulation of the periaqueductal gray & ventromedial hypothalamus. British Neurosci. Assoc. Abstr.,P64.02 (abstract)(2007)

 

56. Baunez, C., M. Amalric & T. W. Robbins: Enhanced food-related motivation after bilateral lesions of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci, 22, 562-8(2002)

 

57. Baunez, C., C. Dias, M. Cador & M. Amalric: The subthalamic nucleus exerts opposite control on cocaine and 'natural' rewards. Nat Neurosci, 8, 484-9(2005)

 

58. Gardian, G. & L. Vecsei: Huntington's disease: pathomechanism and therapeutic perspectives. J Neural Transm, 111, 1485-94(2004)

doi:10.1007/s00702-004-0201-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-004-0201-4

59. Kirkwood, S. C., E. Siemers, M. E. Hodes, P. M. Conneally, J. C. Christian & T. Foroud: Subtle changes among presymptomatic carriers of the Huntington's disease gene. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 69, 773-9(2000)

doi:10.1136/jnnp.69.6.773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.69.6.773

Abbreviations: DBS: deep brain stimulation, STN: subthalamic nucleus, PD: Parkinson's disease, RT: reaction time, SRT: simple reaction time, CRT: complex reaction time, tgHD: transgenic Huntington's disease, HD: Huntington's disease, GP: globus pallidus, OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder, 5-HT: 5-hydroxytryptamine, FST: Forced swim task, PAG: periaqueductal gray

Key Words: Animal models, Subthalamic nucleus, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Deep brain stimulation, Neurological, Psychiatric, Panic, Depression, Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Nucleus Accumbens, Basal Ganglia, Serotonin, Forced Swim Task, Review

Send correspondence to: Y. Temel, Department of Neurosurgery, University hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands, Tel: 0031-43-3876052, Fax: 0031-43-3876038, E-mail:y.temel@np.unimaas.nl