[Frontiers in Bioscience 15, 151-165, January 1, 2010]

Growth factors in tumor microenvironment

Xuejing Zhang, Daotai Nie, Subhas Chakrabarty

SimmonCooper Cancer Institute, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Epidermal Growth Factor and Receptor in Tumor Microenvironment
3.1. Epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor
3.2. Tumor hypoxia and translational up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor
3.2.1. The hypoxic tumor microenvironment triggers the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor
3.2.2. The role of epidermal growth factor receptor in hypoxia-mediated tumor progression
3.3. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor in the Pathogenesis of Metastasis
3.3.1. The direct role of epidermal growth factor receptor in stimulating osteoclast
3.3.2. Epidermal growth factor receptor in mesenchymal stem cell-mediated osteoclast differentiation
3.4. EGFR signaling regulated by tumor microenvironment
4. Fibroblast Growth Factor amd Receptor in Tumor Microenvironment
4.1. Fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor
4.2. Fibroblast growth factor-mediated stromal-epithelial cross-talk in prostate tumors
4.3. Role of fibroblast growth factor in angiogenesis
4.3.1. Angiogenic synergism between fibroblast growth factor-2 and platelet derived growth factor-BB
4.3.2. Angiogenic synergism between fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor
4.3.3. Clinical anti- angiogenesis target
5. Platelet-Derived Growth Factor and Receptor in Tumor Microenvironment
5.1. Platelet-derived growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor
5.2. Role of platelet-derived growth factorin pancreatic tumor stroma
5.3. Role of platelet-derived growth factor in cervical carcinoma
5.4. Platelet-derived growth factorin tumor cell induced 'stromal resistance
6. Perspective
7. Acknowledgment
8. References

1. ABSTRACT

Tumor microenvironment plays a critical role in tumor initiation and progression. Components in the microenvironment can modulate the growth of tumor cells, their ability to progress and metastasize. A major venue of communication between tumor cells and their microenvironment is through polypeptide growth factors and receptors for these growth factors. This article discusses three major classes of growth-stimulatory polypeptide growth factors and receptors for these growth factors. It also discusses how deregulation of these growth factors or their receptors can drive malignant transformation and progression.

2. INTRODUCTION

The microenvironment is the environment at the cellular level in which cells interact with each other and with the extracellular matrix (ECM). This interaction is critical in regulating normal epithelial cell growth and differentiation. Extracellular signals play a critical role in tightly regulating the growth and differentiation programs of epithelial cells. Defects in such signalings may circumvent the normal pathway of epithelial differentiation and propels the cells in the direction of malignant transformation. The focus here is on epithelial cells because the overwhelming majority of cancer incidence is of epithelial origin. The microenvironment is extremely complex and consists of components of the ECM, connective tissue stromal cells, and polypeptide growth factors. The ECM itself is composed of complex components of proteoglycans. Major components of the ECM include families of fibronectins, laminins and collgagens. The ECM also consists of other less studied glycoaminoglycans and we do not understand the functional role of these molecules in the microenvironment.

In this microenvironment, epithelial cells not only interact with each other, but also interact with mesenchymal cells and the ECM. These interactions are quite specific. Cell-cell interactions are mediated by specific cell-cell adhesion molecules (1) while cell-matrix interactions are mediated by specific integrin receptors for each of the major components of the ECM (2). It has long been recognized that changes in the microenvironment accompany the transformation process (3). This is often indicated by increased fibroblast proliferation and extensive ECM remodeling in areas where cancer cells are found (4). The tumor stroma in many aspects resembles the processes of wound healing and inflammatory response (5).

The microenvironment is rich in polypeptide growth factors (PGF) and PGFs mediate their action through specific cell-surface receptors. A PGF binds to its cell-surface receptor and initiates intracellular signal cascades that lead to the modulation of gene expression (6). Different PGFs target different cell types. In epithelia, the end-result of PGF action is to exert growth and differentiation control. Both mesenchymal and epithelial cells contribute to the production of PGFs into the microenvironment. Therefore, abnormal production or abnormal cellular responses to PGFs are underly malignant transformation. For example, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) function is frequently deregulated in epithelial tumors, and EGFR signaling has been shown to play an important role both in cancer progression and in epithelial to mesenchymal transition (7). In mammary epithelial cells, constitutively active insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR) induces cells to undergo epithelial to mesenchymal transition which is associated with a dramatical increase in migration and invasion (8). Moreover, it is believed that tumor epithelial cells and stromal components communicate through the production of growth factors and cytokines (9). For example, tumor cells often release platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), for which stromal cells, notably fibroblasts, myofibroblasts and macrophages, possess receptors; the stromal cells reciprocate by releasing insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), which benefits the growth and survival of nearby cancer cells (10). Similarly, neoplastic cells within melanomas release PDGF, which elicits IGF-2 production from nearby stromal fibroblasts; this IGF-2 helps to maintain the viability of the melanoma cells (11).

This article reviews three major classes of PGF families in the microenvironment and their cell-surface receptors. We will discusss how these ligand/receptor systems contribute to malignant transformation and progression. These PGFs are the epidermal growth factors, fibroblast growth factors and the platelet-derived growth factors. This article is by no means a comprehensive review of all PGFs in the microenviroement but rather focuses on the the major growth-stimulatory classes of PGF. An important family of PGF, the transforming growth factor B, which can serve as both a tumor suppressor and promoter is discussed elsewhere in this review series.

3. EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR AND EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR IN TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT

3.1. Epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) belongs to the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases which includes four members: EGFR, ErbB-2, ErbB-3, and ErbB-4 (12). All these trans-membrane proteins have an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single hydrophobic transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase-containing domain which is activated after binding with peptide growth factors of the EGF-family of proteins (13), such as EGF, transforming growth factor-a (TGF-a), amphiregulin, heparin-biding EGF, B-cellulin and epiregulin. It is well recognized that the EGFR signaling pathways mediate a wide range of cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival upon ligand-binding activation. Moreover, amplified expression of EGFR or its ligands, or both, are found in a majority of human carcinomas (14). EGF-like growth factors can be produced either by the same cells that express EGFRs in an autocrine secretion fashion or by the surrounding cells (including stromal cells) in a paracrine secretion fashion (15). (Figure 1)

Tumor progression is a complex process that involves interaction of tumor cells with surrounding non-transformed cells and EGFR is expressed in almost all types of stromal cells (12). Therefore, sustained activation of the EGFR signaling in non-malignant cells in the tumor microenvironment might influence the behavior of transformed cells and can play an important role in tumor progression. There is evidence to suggest that overexpression of EGFR protein can be triggered by either gene mutation or by tumor hypoxia which is one of the common features in the tumor microenvironment (16, 17). Meanwhile, the EGFR system is believed to be involved in tumor metastases as well as angiogenesis which are two important phenomena that promote tumor progression (3, 18). Furthermore, a type of small leucine-rich proteoglycan which resides in the tumor microenvironment is capable of downregulating EGFR activity therefore inhibiting both primary tumor growth and metastatic spreading (19).

3.2. Tumor hypoxia and up-regulation of EGFR

It is widely accepted that overexpression of the EGF receptor and amplification of its signal is a common feature in a variety of human cancers including renal, breast, glioma, ovarian, non-small-cell lung, prostate, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers (13). On the other hand, the mechanism underling the amplification of EGFR expression remains poorly understood in human carcinomas. The amplification of the EGFR gene and receptor-activating mutations observed in a few cancers such as glioblastoma multiforme and non-small-cell lung cancer might provide one explanation for the abnormal expression level of EGFR (20, 21). However, these oncogenic phenomena are not common in other tumor types which indicate that the widespread overexpression of EGFR in human cancer might be under the regulation of a more common physiological event in tumors instead of gene amplification and mutations. Among those universal properties of the pathophysiologic tumor microenvironment, hypoxia is the result of the imbalance between the rate of cancer cell proliferation and the ability of the existing vasculature to supply oxygen as a solid tumor grows (22). Importantly, tumor hypoxia, like EGFR expression, is predictive of tumor progression and poor clinical outcome. The correlation between the two has been reported in many studies (17, 23).

3.2.1. The hypoxic tumor microenvironment triggers the expression of EGFR

By using a 3D multicellular tumor spheroid model to mimic the tumor microenvironment (24), Franovic and colleagues have demonstrated that the up-regulation of EGFR protein (but not mRNA) in human cancer cell lines is induced by the hypoxic tumor microenvironment (17). Moreover, they pointed out that tumor hypoxia was not only required but sufficient to up-regulate EGFR protein expression in hypoxic cancer cells. Their findings reveal an important link between tumor hypoxia and up-regulation of the EGFR in the bulk of human cancers that do not display genetic alterations of the receptor. Wang and colleagues performed oligonucleotide microarray analysis to identify the genes associated with the motile phenotype induced by hypoxia in lung adenocarcinoma cells and they found that the expression of EGFR gene was induced more than 5-fold by hypoxia (25). Meanwhile, the immunohistochemical analyses of primary lung adenocarcinomas confirmed the induction of EGFR located in tumor cells in the vicinity of necrotic areas, a histological indicator of tumor hypoxia (26). Overall, these findings proposed an alternative working model by suggesting that tumor hypoxia may represent the common denominator for the aberrant EGFR expression observed in solid tumors.

3.2.2. The role of EGFR in hypoxia-mediated tumor progression

There is now increased evidence showing that hypoxia increases the motility of cancer cells via several pathways thus facilitating the metastasis of cancer cells. In the Wang and colleagues' study, they showed that hypoxia inhibited cell-cell adhesion and increased migratory ability in lung adenocarcinoma cells (25). In addition, the increased motility was blocked by an inhibitor of EGFR. Thus, these authors have demonstrated the importance of the EGFR pathway in the induction of motility of cancer cells in a hypoxic tumor environment.

3.3. Role of EGFR in the Pathogenesis of Metastasis

The metastatic potential of tumor cells is believed to be regulated by interactions between tumor cells and their surrounding environment (ECM and stromal cells) (27). The development of metastasis is complex, requiring multiple distinct steps to successfully establish a tumor at a secondary site (28). For dissemination and metastasis to occur, tumor cells must invade the tissue surrounding the primary tumor, intravasate into the lymphatic system or blood supply system, extravasate from the vascular system into a secondary organ and initiate angiogenesis in order to enable proliferation at that site (29). (Figure 2)

Tissue architecture, integrity and function is intimately connected with cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions. The metastatic process involves multiple changes at the molecular level that disrupt and modify these interactions (30, 31). These include tissue remodeling through the action of proteinases, such as metalloproteinases (MMPs), apoptotic machinery, as well as chemokines, growth factors and signaling molecules, all of which act together to control processes such as proliferation, survival migration and invasion. Tumor stroma may also facilitate the spread of metastatic cells, as stromal cells derived from lymph nodes can increase the proliferation of tumor cells through the release of an insulin-like growth factor and epidermal growth factor (32).

Sasaki and colleagues have shown that activation of TGF-a-EGFR signaling in colon cancer cells can create a microenvironment that is conducive for metastasis (33). Pu and colleagues have demonstrated that the migration of breast cancer cells directed by an electric field requires ErbB-signaling (34). Wei and colleagues' work showed that Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma lymph node metastases generally have a high level of EGFR expression in cell membranes similar to that in primary tumors (35). Extensive work has also been done to show that EGFR signaling regulates the ability of bone marrow stromal cells to produce osteoclastogenic factors (specialized progeny of hemopoietic precursors committed to the monocyte/macrophage lineage that, upon certain stimuli, fuse by giving rise to mature bone resorbing cells) (36) and to sustain osteoclast activation (37).

3.3.1. The direct role of EGFR in stimulating osteoclast

Cancer cells are able to synthesize many growth factors and cytokines that lead to the activation of osteoclasts (36). Parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrP) is believed to be the main mediator of breast cancer-induced bone resorption (38). Zhu and colleagues have reported that EGF-like ligands strongly stimulate osteoclast formation in co-culture of osteoblastic cells with bone marrow macrophages, the precursors for osteoclasts, by regulating the expression of osteoprotegerin, a cytokine which can inhibit the production of osteoclasts, and monocyte chemotatic protein-1 in osteoblastic cells (39). Because co-culture of osteoblastic cells with bone metastatic breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells had similar effects on the expression of osteoprotegerin and monocyte chemotatic protein-1 in the osteoblastic cells, and those effects could be partially abolished by EGFR inhibitor, the authors concluded that EGF-like ligands, similar to PTHrP secreted by tumors cells, may contribute to osteolytic lesions in bone metastases.

3.3.2. EGFR in mesenchymal stem cells mediated osteoclast differentiation

However, most osteotropic factors do not directly stimulate osteoclast, but rather act indirectly by binding to accessory cells of the bone marrow microenvironment, such as specialized endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) (40). Since expression of EGF has been demonstrated to occur in osteoclasts (41), it is conceivable that paracrine circuits involving EGFR and its ligands are operating between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. More recently, the functional role of EGFR signaling in MSC has been investigated. Krampera and colleagues reported that activation of EGFR by heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor increased cell proliferation and prevented adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation in human bone marrow-derived MSC (42). The ability of conditioned medium from gefitinib-treated MSC-like cells to sustain the differentiation of pre-osteoclasts was significantly reduced as compared with untreated cells reported by Normanno and colleagues (40). These results have demonstrated that the EGFR regulates the ability of MSC to induce osteoclast differentiation. Normanno group's findings were confirmed by Angelucci and colleagues who demonstrated that treatment with gefitinib significantly reduced the ability of conditioned medium from prostate cancer cells to induce expression of receptor activator for nuclear factor κB ligand in osteoblasts (43). In this regard, it is well established that EGFR and several of its ligands are expressed by prostate cancer cell lines and human primary prostatic carcinomas (44).

3.4. EGFR signaling regulated by tumor microenvironment

Epidermal growth factor receptors can be directly bound by a small leucine-rich porteoglycan (45), decorin, which is primarily synthesized by fibroblasts and myofibroblasts typically located within the tumor microenvironment (46) and affects the biology of different types of cancer by downregulating the activity of several receptors involved in cell growth and survival. Decorin binds to and modulates the signaling of epidermal growth factor receptor and other members of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases (47). After binding, the receptor dimerizes and is subsequently internalized and degraded in the lysosomes. (Figure 3) From a physiological point of view, it is relevant to note that decorin can compete with EGF, the EGFR natural ligand, for receptor binding (48). Decorin inhibits tumor cell proliferation by evoking a signaling cascade that is different than the one evoked by EGF, possibly by inducing a different EGFR conformation and selectively activating phosphotyrosines in the receptor autophosphorylation domain (49).

Decorin induces apoptosis in a squamous cell carcinoma model via activation of caspase-3 and this effect is dependent on the ability to phosphorylate the EGFR (50). Caspase-3 can cleave the intracellular domain of the EGFR, an additional mechanism by which decorin could downregulate the receptor activity. Decorin also suppresses the activity of ErbB2 and ErbB4 receptors via degradation (26). This effect is most likely achieved indirectly by binding to the EGFR and affecting EGFR/ErbB2 and EGFR/ErbB4 heterodimerization equilibrium.

4. FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR AND RECEPTOR IN TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT

4.1. Fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor

The Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling complex comprises one of the twenty-two signaling polypeptides defined by homology, one of a large number of combinatorial splice variants from four genes that encode an FGF receptor (FGFR) transmembrane tyrosine kinase and one or more of a host of poorly characterized, but FGF- and FGFR-specific, structural motifs within heparan sulfate (51). Specificity in FGF signaling lies in the combination of FGFR kinase isotypes, the heparan sulfate that combines with it, and the type of activating FGF polypeptide (52). In addition to endocrine signaling, in which the signal originates outside the tissue expressing the receptor, two types of intra-tissue signaling have been described in reference to the origin of signal, i.e., autocrine and paracrine signaling. FGFs display a broad spectrum of biological function including neurotrophic activity, angiogenic activity, lymphangiogenic effect, stimulation of stem cell differentiation, osteogenesis, tumor cell migration and invasion, and mediating stromal-epithelial cell cross-talk (53). Chesi and colleagues found that FGFR3, when overexpressed in multiple myeloma, may be not only oncogenic when stimulated by FGF ligands in the bone morrow microenvironment but is also a target for activating mutations that enable FGFR3 to play a ras-like role in tumor progression (54). Nomura and colleagues have shown that stromal FGF10 induces migration and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells through interaction with FGFR2, resulting in a poor prognosis (52).

4.2. Fibroblast growth factor-mediated stromal-epithelial cross talk in prostate tumors

Reciprocal communication between stromal and epithelial compartments underlies normal development and homeostasis in the adult prostate gland (55). The emergence of autonomous epithelial cells independent of microenvironmental restraints imposed by prostate stroma or distal sites of metastasis is a hallmark of malignant carcinoma (56, 57). In the prostate and several other parenchymal organs with distinct epithelial and stromal compartments, expression of FGF7 and FGF10 is limited to stromal cells (58). A specific FGFR complex of heparan sulfate and splice variant FGFR2IIIb that recognizes FGF7 and FGF10 is expressed only in epithelial cells (59). Stromal to epithelial cell signaling via FGF7/FGF10 and FGFR2IIIb has a net effect of promoting epithelial cell homeostasis that includes growth but limits population growth overall by feedback inhibition mechanisms and induction of differentiation (60).

To study the changes in mutual communication mediated by FGF signaling system between stromal and epithelial cells during malignant progression, Wu and colleagues used a rare rat prostate adenocarcinosarcoma (Dunning R3327PAP) in which stromal and epithelial compartments have evolved as a single mutually interdependent nonmalignant transplantable unit (53). By performing clonal analysis of stromal cells derived from the Dunning R3327PAP adenocarcinosarcoma, and characterizing them according to cytoskeletal markers and expression of signaling polypeptides and receptor isotypes within the FGF family, they found two distinct subtypes. One had an undifferentiated fibroblast-like character, whereas the other exhibited smooth muscle cell-like properties. The two morphological subtypes exhibited distinct expression patterns with respect to FGF7, FGF10, FGFR1, FGFR2IIIc, and FGFR3. Their study suggested a specific epithelial to stromal cell part of a two-way stromal-epithelial cell dialogue in premalignant slow-growing differentiated tumors of which the disruption may contribute to the progression of epithelial cells to malignancy (61).

Jin and colleagues found FGF9 was expressed significantly only in epithelial cells and that it binds only to FGFR3 that is present only at functionally significant levels in stromal cells in a two-compartment transplantable prostate tumor model in which survival of stromal cells in vivo depends on epithelial cells (61). Their data indicated that the FGF9/FGFR3 pair completes a two-way paracrine communication circuit between prostate epithelium and stroma that may be important for intercompartmental homeostasis in normal nonmalignant two-compartment tumors and subject to subversion during progression to malignancy. (Figure 4)

4.3. Role of fibroblast growth factor in angiogenesis

Tumor angiogenesis, a process of new vasculature formation, is appreciated to be an integral part of solid tumor development (62). The supply of new blood vessels in tumors not only fosters autonomous tumor growth but also helps remove accumulated waste and ameliorate burdensome metabolism. Several experimental evidences point to different classes of FGF receptors has been identified (63). In a fast growing malignant tissue, tumor blood vessels are exposed to multiple growth factors and cytokines (64). Although the role of individual factors and their signaling pathways in regulating tumor neovascularization is relatively well studied, recent research has focused on characterization of interactions among multiple membrane-bound receptors. This focus has lead to the establishment of a paradigm that, instead of transmitting signals across the membrane individually, each membrane-anchored receptor usually associates and coordinates with other adjacent membrane-bound receptors to synergistically induce an array of intracellular signaling cascades (65).

4.3.1. Angiogenic synergism between fibroblast growth factor-2 and platelet derived growth factor-BB

Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) is a frequently expressed non-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) angiogenic factor in tumors. For example, high levels of FGF-2 are often present in patients with highly vascularized and advanced cancers (56). Additionally, activated endothelial cells in growing blood vessels are also important sources for platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and a malignant transition of tumor cells could lead to active secretion of FGF-2 from tumor cells (62, 66). Thus, FGF-2 and PDGF-BB are often co-expressed in the same tumor tissue (67). As endothelial cells usually express an undetectable level of PDGF receptors (PDGFRs), angiogenic synergy between PDGF-BB and FGF-2 suggests that FGF-2 might modulate the PDGF signaling system in endothelial cells. Indeed, high levels of both PDGFR-a and PDGFR-B are only detected in FGF-2-induced angiogenic vessels, but not in VEGF- or PDGF-BB-induced microvessels (67), suggesting that FGF-2 upregulates PDGFR expression in endothelial cells. Also, the FGF-2-induced signaling pathways activate the promoter activity of both PDGFR-a and PDGFR-B in capillary endothelial cells (68). In agreement with increased levels of PDGFR mRNAs, Cao's group further confirmed that the protein levels of PDGFRs are also dramatically upregulated in endothelial cells. Notably, the FGF-2-pretreated endothelial cells become highly responsive to PDGF-BB-induced motility. Interestingly, PDGF-BB is also able to induce FGFR-1promoter activity in vascular smooth muscle cells, which become more sensitive to FGF-2 stimulation (67). (Figure 5) Another possible mechanism could be that tumor-derived PDGF-BB disassociates mural cells from the tumor vessels, which become more accessible and sensitive to FGF-2 stimulation. However, if this is one of the mechanisms, PDGF-BB and VEGF would also produce a synergistic effect on angiogenesis. Obviously, a combination of PDGF-BB and VEGF lacks a synergistic activity (69). Thus, the angiogenic synergism between FGF-2 and PDGF-BB involves specifically reciprocal interplay between their receptor signaling systems in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells.

4.3.2. Angiogenic synergism between fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor

Indraccolo and colleagues suggested that short-term treatment with antiogenic factors FGF-2 or VEGF, either given as recombinant factors or delivered by retroviral vectors, accelerated tumor growth (70). Wei and colleagues showed that FGF-2 and/or VEGF induced angiogenesis can be mediated by a proto-oncoprotein c-Abl, a family member of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (69). Once endothelial cells are stimulated with FGF-2, the cooperation of membrane-anchored receptors between integrin avB3 and FGFR leads to the "out-side in" signaling activation. Then c-Abl disassociates from Src (a family of proto-oncogenic tyrosine kinase) that is connected to integrin avB3 and increases in association with activated focal adhesion kinase (FAK), resulting in downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation. In addition, c-Abl may directly regulate reorganization of cytoskeleton actin to facilitate cell motility. VEGF engages similar but c-Abl-independent angiogenic machinery in which Src acts as an upstream effector of focal adhesion kinase (69). (Figure 6)

4.3.3. Clinical anti- angiogenesis target

Since angiogenesis plays a key role in tumor growth and metastasis, the identification of anti-angiogenic drugs and of angiogenesis-related targets may have significant implications for the development of anti-neoplastic therapies. The teleost zebrafish represent a promising alternative model in cancer research (71). Using this model, Nicoli and colleague developed a zebrafish yolk membrane (ZFYM) angiogenesis assay based on the injection of human recombinant FGF2 in the perivitelline space in the proximity of developing subintestinal vein vessels. Injected rFGF2 induced a rapid and potent angiogenic response reflected in the ectopic growth of newly formed blood vessels. FGF2 antagonist long-pentraxin 3 inhibits the angiogenic activity of rFGF2 when added to fish water or when co-injected with the growth factor, respectively (65). The fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 inhibitor is a novel anti-myeloma agent, which is deregulated as a result of the t (4;14) chromosomal translocation that occurs in approximately 15% of multiple myeloma patients. A highly specific anti-FGF-R3-neutralizing antibody PRO-001, for example, can induce apoptosis in primary t(4;14) multiple myeloma samples (72).

5. PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR AND RECEPTOR IN TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT

5.1. Platelet-derived growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a potent mitogen and chemoattractant for mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts, and plays a critical role in wound healing and tumor development. The PDGF family consists of four members, all of which act as a homo or hetero dimmer PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, PDGF-CC, and PDGF-DD, which exert their action via binding to two receptor tyrosine kinases, PDGF a-receptors (PDGFR-a) and B-receptors (PDGFR-B) (73). The PDGFR-a binds all isoforms except PDGF-DD, whereas the PDGFR-B only binds PDGF-BB and PDGF-DD with high affinity (74). PDGFR-a plays an important role during early embryonic development and organogenesis. PDGFR-B is widely expressed by mesenchymal cells and is found up-regulated in the granulation tissue during wound healing and chronic inflammation.

It is widely accepted that tumor cells strongly depend on a reactive stroma, with activated stromal cells playing an important role in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis (75). Carcinoma-associated or phenotypically altered stromal cells have been demonstrated to promote tumorigenic conversion of preneoplastic cells. In contrast, normal stromal cells were shown to inhibit the growth of carcinoma cells (76). Although growth factors are known to tightly control this complex interplay, the molecular mechanisms underlying these regulatory interactions between the stromal and tumor compartment remains poorly understood. PDGF stimulates tumor growth and progression by affecting tumor and stromal cells (73). With the immortalized human skin keratinocyte cell line HaCat, Lederle and colleague identified fibroblasts as PDGF target cells that are essential for mediating transient angiogenesis and persistent epithelial hyperproliferation based on the fact that in HaCaT/PDGF-B transplants in vivo, the initially enhanced VEGF protein expression by stromal fibroblasts was subsequently reduced coinciding with enhanced pericyte recruitment (77). (Figure 7)

5.2. Role of Platelet-derived growth factor in pancreatic tumor stroma

The predominant mesenchymal cells within the pancreatic cancer stroma is believed to be the stellate cell (78), which is also found in the liver. Most investigators agree that stellate cells are similar to myofibroblasts found in other tumor stroma including breast and prostate cancer (79). The stellate cells play an important role in the microenvironment by mediating fibrosis, facilitating growth and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells (80). Conditioned media from pancreatic cancer cell lines stimulate pancreatic stellate cell activation; this effect is abrogated when PDGF activity is blocked by the use of neutralizing antibodies (81). In other studies, PDGF has been shown to increase pancreatic stellate cell activation and production of ECM proteins (77). Thus, PDGF is likely an important mediator of pancreatic tumor-stromal cell interaction.

Marya and colleagues have suggested that overexpression of PDGF-BB in colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer cells can result in an increased pericyte coverage of endothelial cells in vivo, rendering the tumor vasculature more resistant to antiangiogenic therapy (82). Pericytes regulate vascular function, including vessel diameter (and thus blood flow) and vascular permeability as well as provide mechanical support and stability to the vessel wall and maintain endothelial cell survival through direct cell-cell contact and paracrine circuits (66, 83). When they stably transfected the cDNA for the PDGF-B into HT-29 human colorectal cancer and FG human pancreatic cancer cells and injected them into mice, an increase in pericyte coverage of endothelial cells in the PDGF-BB-overexpressing tumors together with an inhibition of tumor growth were observed (82). Therefore, increasing the pericyte content of the tumor microenvironment inhibits the growth of angiogenesis-dependent tumors under the regulation of PDGF signaling.

5.3. Role of Platelet-derived growth factor in cervical carcinoma

The stromal compartment is prominent in cervical carcinoma, and recent studies have identified numerous changes in the gene expression pattern of stromal cells in malignant cervical tissue compared to nonmalignant tissue (84, 85). By using a genetically engineered mouse model of cervical carcinogenesis, Pietras and colleagues investigated on PDGFR signaling in cancer-associated fibroblasts and pericytes (86). They found that a pharmacological blockade of PDGF receptor signaling with the clinically approved kinase inhibitor imatinib slowed progression of premalignant lesions. Their subsequent studies indicated that PDGF ligands expressed by cancerous epithelia evidently stimulated PDGFR-expressing stroma to up-regulate FGFs, promoting angiogenesis and epithelial proliferation (86).

5.4. Platelet-derived growth factor in tumor cell induced 'stromal resistance'

It is widely accept that stromal cells, particularly fibroblasts, support invasive cancer cells of the surrounding tissue for access to the vascular system via paracrine mechanisms (87). Werth and colleagues have provided a novel theory about tumor cells induced 'stromal resistance' (protect the microenvironment from oxidative damage) by PDGF regulated pathway (88). They added the supernatant of cultured skin-derived tumor cells to fibroblasts and found the fibroblasts were protected from hydrogen peroxide-mediated cell toxicity. The platelet-derived growth factor secreted from the cancer cells was identified as a trigger of this protection in fibroblasts via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway.

6. PERSPECTIVE

An important venue of communication and interaction between epithelia and the microenvironment is through polypeptide growth factors and cell-surface receptors for these growth factors. This venue of communication is an important mechanism in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of epithelial cells and in maintaining the integrity of epithelia. It is well accepted that disruption of growth and differentiation control mechanisms underlies malignant transformation and progression. In this article, we discussed three major classes of growth stimulatory factors and emphasized on how deregulated expression or function of these ligand/receptor systems can drive malignant transformation. An understanding of growth and differentiation control mechanisms has significant bearing on the chemoprevention and therapeutic intervention of malignant diseases. Agents that can restore normal growth control to malignant cells and restore cell-cell and cell-matrix communication have chemopreventive potential. The retinoids and the relatively new compounds such as the rexinoids and resveratrol exemplify these. Recently, the IGF-1 axis has emerged as a chemopreventive target. The rationale being most cancer cells utilize this axis to sustain proliferation and because IGF-1 is not of physiologic significance in an adult, the development of strategies to down modulate the production of IGF-1 could prevent or delay the carcinogenesis process. In the therapeutic arena, the use of small molecules to block a specific growth factor pathway has led to improvement in therapeutic outcome. This is exemplified by the use of Gefitinib and Erlotinib to disrupt the function of EGF receptor tyrosine kinases in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Her2/Neu (a member of the EGF receptor family), is now routinely used in the clinic as a prognostic indicator and therapeutic target in breast cancer patients. Thus, continued advancement and development in this research topic may lead to the the development new chemopreventive, prognostic or therapeutic targets in malignant diseases.

7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to express my gratitude to all those who gave me the opportunity to write this article. I wish to thank Dr. Subhas Chakrabarty for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. I would also like to give my thanks to Dr. Nie and Dr. Watabe for their support and valuable hints.

8. REFERENCES

1. Lunt, S. J., Chaudary, N., and Hill, R. P. The tumor microenvironment and metastatic disease. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2008.

No DOI found

2. Bhowmick, N. A., Neilson, E. G., and Moses, H. L. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature, 432: 332-337, 2004.
doi:10.1038/nature03096

PMid:15549095

3. Coussens, L. M. and Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature, 420: 860-867, 2002.
doi:10.1038/nature01322

PMid:12490959

4. Barr, S., Thomson, S., Buck, E., Russo, S., Petti, F., Sujka-Kwok, I., Eyzaguirre, A., Rosenfeld-Franklin, M., Gibson, N. W., Miglarese, M., Epstein, D., Iwata, K. K., and Haley, J. D. Bypassing cellular EGF receptor dependence through epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transitions. Clin Exp Metastasis, 25: 685-693, 2008.
doi:10.1007/s10585-007-9121-7

PMCid:2471394

5. Kim, H. J., Litzenburger, B. C., Cui, X., Delgado, D. A., Grabiner, B. C., Lin, X., Lewis, M. T., Gottardis, M. M., Wong, T. W., Attar, R. M., Carboni, J. M., and Lee, A. V. Constitutively active type I insulin-like growth factor receptor causes transformation and xenograft growth of immortalized mammary epithelial cells and is accompanied by an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition mediated by NF-kappaB and snail. Mol Cell Biol, 27: 3165-3175, 2007.
doi:10.1128/MCB.01315-06

PMid:17296734    PMCid:1899918

6. Elenbaas, B. and Weinberg, R. A. Heterotypic signaling between epithelial tumor cells and fibroblasts in carcinoma formation. Exp Cell Res, 264: 169-184, 2001.
doi:10.1006/excr.2000.5133

PMid:11237532

7. Frasca, F., Pandini, G., Sciacca, L., Pezzino, V., Squatrito, S., Belfiore, A., and Vigneri, R. The role of insulin receptors and IGF-I receptors in cancer and other diseases. Arch Physiol Biochem, 114: 23-37, 2008.
doi:10.1080/13813450801969715

PMid:18465356

8. Peretz, S., Kim, C., Rockwell, S., Baserga, R., and Glazer, P. M. IGF1 receptor expression protects against microenvironmental stress found in the solid tumor. Radiat Res, 158: 174-180, 2002.
doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158(0174:IREPAM)2.0.CO;2

PMid:12105987

9. Normanno, N. and Gullick, W. J. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bone metastases: different mechanisms of action for a novel therapeutic application? Endocr Relat Cancer, 13: 3-6, 2006.
doi:10.1677/erc.1.01185

PMid:16601275

10. Olayioye, M. A., Neve, R. M., Lane, H. A., and Hynes, N. E. The ErbB signaling network: receptor heterodimerization in development and cancer. Embo J, 19: 3159-3167, 2000.
doi:10.1093/emboj/19.13.3159

PMid:10880430    PMCid:313958

11. Baselga, J. and Arteaga, C. L. Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. J Clin Oncol, 23: 2445-2459, 2005.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.11.890

PMid:15753456

12. Yarden, Y. The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer. signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Eur J Cancer, 37 Suppl 4: S3-8, 2001.
doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00230-1

PMid:11342194

13. Normanno, N., De Luca, A., Bianco, C., Strizzi, L., Mancino, M., Maiello, M. R., Carotenuto, A., De Feo, G., Caponigro, F., and Salomon, D. S. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene, 366: 2-16, 2006.
doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.018

PMid:16377102

14. Franovic, A., Gunaratnam, L., Smith, K., Robert, I., Patten, D., and Lee, S. Translational up-regulation of the EGFR by tumor hypoxia provides a nonmutational explanation for its overexpression in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104: 13092-13097, 2007.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0702387104

15. Chan, D. A. and Giaccia, A. J. Hypoxia, gene expression, and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 26: 333-339, 2007.
doi:10.1007/s10555-007-9063-1

PMid:17458506

16. Goldoni, S. and Iozzo, R. V. Tumor microenvironment: Modulation by decorin and related molecules harboring leucine-rich tandem motifs. Int J Cancer, 123: 2473-2479, 2008.
doi:10.1002/ijc.23930

17. Morinaga, R., Okamoto, I., Fujita, Y., Arao, T., Sekijima, M., Nishio, K., Ito, H., Fukuoka, M., Kadota, J. I., and Nakagawa, K. Association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations with EGFR amplification in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci, 2008.

No DOI found

18. Jeon, Y. K., Sung, S. W., Chung, J. H., Park, W. S., Seo, J. W., Kim, C. W., and Chung, D. H. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number and protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 54: 387-398, 2006.
doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.015

PMid:17011067

19. Vaupel, P. The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression. Oncologist, 9 Suppl 5: 10-17, 2004.
doi:10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-10

PMid:15591418

20. Swinson, D. E. and O'Byrne, K. J. Interactions between hypoxia and epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer, 7: 250-256, 2006.
doi:10.3816/CLC.2006.n.002

PMid:16512978

21. Lieubeau-Teillet, B., Rak, J., Jothy, S., Iliopoulos, O., Kaelin, W., and Kerbel, R. S. von Hippel-Lindau gene-mediated growth suppression and induction of differentiation in renal cell carcinoma cells grown as multicellular tumor spheroids. Cancer Res, 58: 4957-4962, 1998.

No DOI found

22. Wang, T., Niki, T., Goto, A., Ota, S., Morikawa, T., Nakamura, Y., Ohara, E., Ishikawa, S., Aburatani, H., Nakajima, J., and Fukayama, M. Hypoxia increases the motility of lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 via activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. Cancer Sci, 98: 506-511, 2007.
doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00428.x

PMid:17425591

23. Harris, A. L. Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer, 2: 38-47, 2002.
doi:10.1038/nrc704

PMid:11902584

24. Rofstad, E. K. Microenvironment-induced cancer metastasis. Int J Radiat Biol, 76: 589-605, 2000.
doi:10.1080/095530000138259

PMid:10866281

25. Subarsky, P. and Hill, R. P. The hypoxic tumour microenvironment and metastatic progression. Clin Exp Metastasis, 20: 237-250, 2003.
doi:10.1023/A:1022939318102

PMid:12741682

26. Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell, 100: 57-70, 2000.
doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9

PMid:10647931

27. Woodhouse, E. C., Chuaqui, R. F., and Liotta, L. A. General mechanisms of metastasis. Cancer, 80: 1529-1537, 1997.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1529::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-F

PMid:9362419

28. LeBedis, C., Chen, K., Fallavollita, L., Boutros, T., and Brodt, P. Peripheral lymph node stromal cells can promote growth and tumorigenicity of breast carcinoma cells through the release of IGF-I and EGF. Int J Cancer, 100: 2-8, 2002.
doi:10.1002/ijc.10481

29. Sasaki, T., Nakamura, T., Rebhun, R. B., Cheng, H., Hale, K. S., Tsan, R. Z., Fidler, I. J., and Langley, R. R. Modification of the primary tumor microenvironment by transforming growth factor alpha-epidermal growth factor receptor signaling promotes metastasis in an orthotopic colon cancer model. Am J Pathol, 173: 205-216, 2008.
doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.071147

PMid:18583324    PMCid:2438298

30. Pu, J., McCaig, C. D., Cao, L., Zhao, Z., Segall, J. E., and Zhao, M. EGF receptor signalling is essential for electric-field-directed migration of breast cancer cells. J Cell Sci, 120: 3395-3403, 2007.
doi:10.1242/jcs.002774

PMid:17881501

31. Wei, Q., Chen, L., Sheng, L., Nordgren, H., Wester, K., and Carlsson, J. EGFR, HER2 and HER3 expression in esophageal primary tumours and corresponding metastases. Int J Oncol, 31: 493-499, 2007.

No DOI found

32. De Luca, A., Carotenuto, A., Rachiglio, A., Gallo, M., Maiello, M. R., Aldinucci, D., Pinto, A., and Normanno, N. The role of the EGFR signaling in tumor microenvironment. J Cell Physiol, 214: 559-567, 2008.
doi:10.1002/jcp.21260

PMid:17894407

33. Yi, T., Lee, H. L., Cha, J. H., Ko, S. I., Kim, H. J., Shin, H. I., Woo, K. M., Ryoo, H. M., Kim, G. S., and Baek, J. H. Epidermal growth factor receptor regulates osteoclast differentiation and survival through cross-talking with RANK signaling. J Cell Physiol, 217: 409-422, 2008.
doi:10.1002/jcp.21511

PMid:18543257

34. Bruzzaniti, A. and Baron, R. Molecular regulation of osteoclast activity. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 7: 123-139, 2006.
doi:10.1007/s11154-006-9009-x

35. Zhu, J., Jia, X., Xiao, G., Kang, Y., Partridge, N. C., and Qin, L. EGF-like ligands stimulate osteoclastogenesis by regulating expression of osteoclast regulatory factors by osteoblasts: implications for osteolytic bone metastases. J Biol Chem, 282: 26656-26664, 2007.
doi:10.1074/jbc.M705064200

PMid:17636266

36. Normanno, N., De Luca, A., Aldinucci, D., Maiello, M. R., Mancino, M., D'Antonio, A., De Filippi, R., and Pinto, A. Gefitinib inhibits the ability of human bone marrow stromal cells to induce osteoclast differentiation: implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of bone metastasis. Endocr Relat Cancer, 12: 471-482, 2005.
doi:10.1677/erc.1.00956

PMid:15947117

37. Symons, A. L. Reduced growth hormone receptor immunoreactivity in osteoclasts adjacent to the erupting molar in the incisor-absent (osteopetrotic) rat. Eur J Oral Sci, 111: 503-509, 2003.
doi:10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00075.x

PMid:14632687

38. Krampera, M., Pasini, A., Rigo, A., Scupoli, M. T., Tecchio, C., Malpeli, G., Scarpa, A., Dazzi, F., Pizzolo, G., and Vinante, F. HB-EGF/HER-1 signaling in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: inducing cell expansion and reversibly preventing multilineage differentiation. Blood, 106: 59-66, 2005.
doi:10.1182/blood-2004-09-3645

PMid:15755902

39. Angelucci, A., Festuccia, C., Gravina, G. L., Muzi, P., Bonghi, L., Vicentini, C., and Bologna, M. Osteopontin enhances the cell proliferation induced by the epidermal growth factor in human prostate cancer cells. Prostate, 59: 157-166, 2004.
doi:10.1002/pros.20008

PMid:15042616

40. Hobisch, A., Fiechtl, M., Sandahl-Sorensen, B., Godoy-Tundidor, S., Artner-Dworzak, E., Ramoner, R., Bartsch, G., and Culig, Z. Prostate cancer cells generated during intermittent androgen ablation acquire a growth advantage and exhibit changes in epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Prostate, 59: 401-408, 2004.
doi:10.1002/pros.10372

PMid:15065088

41. Mahtouk, K., Jourdan, M., De Vos, J., Hertogh, C., Fiol, G., Jourdan, E., Rossi, J. F., and Klein, B. An inhibitor of the EGF receptor family blocks myeloma cell growth factor activity of HB-EGF and potentiates dexamethasone or anti-IL-6 antibody-induced apoptosis. Blood, 103: 1829-1837, 2004.
doi:10.1182/blood-2003-05-1510

PMid:14576062    PMCid:2386161

42. Hocking, A. M., Shinomura, T., and McQuillan, D. J. Leucine-rich repeat glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix. Matrix Biol, 17: 1-19, 1998.
doi:10.1016/S0945-053X(98)90121-4

PMid:9628249

43. Ruhland, C., Schonherr, E., Robenek, H., Hansen, U., Iozzo, R. V., Bruckner, P., and Seidler, D. G. The glycosaminoglycan chain of decorin plays an important role in collagen fibril formation at the early stages of fibrillogenesis. Febs J, 274: 4246-4255, 2007.
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05951.x

PMid:17651433

44. Santra, M., Eichstetter, I., and Iozzo, R. V. An anti-oncogenic role for decorin. Down-regulation of ErbB2 leads to growth suppression and cytodifferentiation of mammary carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem, 275: 35153-35161, 2000.
doi:10.1074/jbc.M006821200

PMid:10942781

45. Reed, C. C., Waterhouse, A., Kirby, S., Kay, P., Owens, R. T., McQuillan, D. J., and Iozzo, R. V. Decorin prevents metastatic spreading of breast cancer. Oncogene, 24: 1104-1110, 2005.
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208329

PMid:15690056

46. Zhu, J. X., Goldoni, S., Bix, G., Owens, R. T., McQuillan, D. J., Reed, C. C., and Iozzo, R. V. Decorin evokes protracted internalization and degradation of the epidermal growth factor receptor via caveolar endocytosis. J Biol Chem, 280: 32468-32479, 2005.
doi:10.1074/jbc.M503833200

PMid:15994311

47. Seidler, D. G., Goldoni, S., Agnew, C., Cardi, C., Thakur, M. L., Owens, R. T., McQuillan, D. J., and Iozzo, R. V. Decorin protein core inhibits in vivo cancer growth and metabolism by hindering epidermal growth factor receptor function and triggering apoptosis via caspase-3 activation. J Biol Chem, 281: 26408-26418, 2006.
doi:10.1074/jbc.M602853200

PMid:16835231

48. Kan, M., Uematsu, F., Wu, X., and Wang, F. Directional specificity of prostate stromal to epithelial cell communication via FGF7/FGFR2 is set by cell- and FGFR2 isoform-specific heparan sulfate. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 37: 575-577, 2001.
doi:10.1290/1071-2690(2001)037<0575:DSOPST>2.0.CO;2

49. Nomura, S., Yoshitomi, H., Takano, S., Shida, T., Kobayashi, S., Ohtsuka, M., Kimura, F., Shimizu, H., Yoshidome, H., Kato, A., and Miyazaki, M. FGF10/FGFR2 signal induces cell migration and invasion in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer, 99: 305-313, 2008.
doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604473

PMid:18594526

50. Smith, K., Fox, S. B., Whitehouse, R., Taylor, M., Greenall, M., Clarke, J., and Harris, A. L. Upregulation of basic fibroblast growth factor in breast carcinoma and its relationship to vascular density, oestrogen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor and survival. Ann Oncol, 10: 707-713, 1999.
doi:10.1023/A:1008303614441

PMid:10442194

51. Wu, X., Jin, C., Wang, F., Yu, C., and McKeehan, W. L. Stromal cell heterogeneity in fibroblast growth factor-mediated stromal-epithelial cell cross-talk in premalignant prostate tumors. Cancer Res, 63: 4936-4944, 2003.

No DOI found

52. Chesi, M., Brents, L. A., Ely, S. A., Bais, C., Robbiani, D. F., Mesri, E. A., Kuehl, W. M., and Bergsagel, P. L. Activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 is an oncogene that contributes to tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Blood, 97: 729-736, 2001.
doi:10.1182/blood.V97.3.729

PMid:11157491

53. Tennant, T. R., Kim, H., Sokoloff, M., and Rinker-Schaeffer, C. W. The Dunning model. Prostate, 43: 295-302, 2000.
doi:10.1002/1097-0045(20000601)43:4<295::AID-PROS9>3.0.CO;2-W

PMid:10861749

54. Kwabi-Addo, B., Ozen, M., and Ittmann, M. The role of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer, 11: 709-724, 2004.
doi:10.1677/erc.1.00535

PMid:15613447

55. Matrisian, L. M., Cunha, G. R., and Mohla, S. Epithelial-stromal interactions and tumor progression: meeting summary and future directions. Cancer Res, 61: 3844-3846, 2001.

No DOI found

56. Yan, G., Fukabori, Y., McBride, G., Nikolaropolous, S., and McKeehan, W. L. Exon switching and activation of stromal and embryonic fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-FGF receptor genes in prostate epithelial cells accompany stromal independence and malignancy. Mol Cell Biol, 13: 4513-4522, 1993.

No DOI found

57. Cao, R., Brakenhielm, E., Pawliuk, R., Wariaro, D., Post, M. J., Wahlberg, E., Leboulch, P., and Cao, Y. Angiogenic synergism, vascular stability and improvement of hind-limb ischemia by a combination of PDGF-BB and FGF-2. Nat Med, 9: 604-613, 2003.
doi:10.1038/nm848

PMid:12669032

58. Uematsu, F., Jang, J. H., Kan, M., Wang, F., Luo, Y., and McKeehan, W. L. Evidence that the intracellular domain of FGF receptor 2IIIb affects contact of the ectodomain with two FGF7 ligands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 283: 791-797, 2001.
doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4850

PMid:11350054

59. Jin, C., Wang, F., Wu, X., Yu, C., Luo, Y., and McKeehan, W. L. Directionally specific paracrine communication mediated by epithelial FGF9 to stromal FGFR3 in two-compartment premalignant prostate tumors. Cancer Res, 64: 4555-4562, 2004.
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3752

PMid:15231666

60. Carmeliet, P. and Jain, R. K. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature, 407: 249-257, 2000.
doi:10.1038/35025220

PMid:11001068

61. Weis, S. M., Lindquist, J. N., Barnes, L. A., Lutu-Fuga, K. M., Cui, J., Wood, M. R., and Cheresh, D. A. Cooperation between VEGF and beta3 integrin during cardiac vascular development. Blood, 109: 1962-1970, 2007.
doi:10.1182/blood-2005-10-038893

PMid:17062734    PMCid:1801042

62. Nicoli, S., De Sena, G., and Presta, M. Fibroblast Growth Factor 2-induced angiogenesis in zebrafish: the zebrafish yolk membrane (ZFYM) angiogenesis assay. J Cell Mol Med, 2008.

63. Gerhardt, H. and Betsholtz, C. Endothelial-pericyte interactions in angiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res, 314: 15-23, 2003.
doi:10.1007/s00441-003-0745-x

PMid:12883993

64. Cao, Y., Cao, R., and Hedlund, E. M. R Regulation of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis by FGF and PDGF signaling pathways. J Mol Med, 86: 785-789, 2008.
doi:10.1007/s00109-008-0337-z

PMid:18392794

65. Nissen, L. J., Cao, R., Hedlund, E. M., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Wetterskog, D., Funa, K., Brakenhielm, E., and Cao, Y. Angiogenic factors FGF2 and PDGF-BB synergistically promote murine tumor neovascularization and metastasis. J Clin Invest, 117: 2766-2777, 2007.
doi:10.1172/JCI32479

PMid:17909625    PMCid:1994630

66. Yan, W., Bentley, B., and Shao, R. Distinct angiogenic mediators are required for basic fibroblast growth factor- and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis: the role of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase c-Abl in tumor angiogenesis. Mol Biol Cell, 19: 2278-2288, 2008.
doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-10-1068

PMid:18353972    PMCid:2366879

67. Indraccolo, S., Stievano, L., Minuzzo, S., Tosello, V., Esposito, G., Piovan, E., Zamarchi, R., Chieco-Bianchi, L., and Amadori, A. Interruption of tumor dormancy by a transient angiogenic burst within the tumor microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103: 4216-4221, 2006.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0506200103

68. Nicoli, S. and Presta, M. The zebrafish/tumor xenograft angiogenesis assay. Nat Protoc, 2: 2918-2923, 2007.
doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.412

PMid:18007628

69. Mitsiades, C. S., Hayden, P. J., Anderson, K. C., and Richardson, P. G. From the bench to the bedside: emerging new treatments in multiple myeloma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 20: 797-816, 2007.
doi:10.1016/j.beha.2007.09.008

70. Betsholtz, C., Karlsson, L., and Lindahl, P. Developmental roles of platelet-derived growth factors. Bioessays, 23: 494-507, 2001.
doi:10.1002/bies.1069

PMid:11385629

71. Heldin, C. H., Eriksson, U., and Ostman, A. New members of the platelet-derived growth factor family of mitogens. Arch Biochem Biophys, 398: 284-290, 2002.
doi:10.1006/abbi.2001.2707

PMid:11831861

72. Bissell, M. J., Radisky, D. C., Rizki, A., Weaver, V. M., and Petersen, O. W. The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation, 70: 537-546, 2002.
doi:10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.700907.x

PMid:12492495

73. Krtolica, A., Parrinello, S., Lockett, S., Desprez, P. Y., and Campisi, J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: a link between cancer and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98: 12072-12077, 2001.
doi:10.1073/pnas.211053698

74. Lederle, W., Stark, H. J., Skobe, M., Fusenig, N. E., and Mueller, M. M. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB controls epithelial tumor phenotype by differential growth factor regulation in stromal cells. Am J Pathol, 169: 1767-1783, 2006.
doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.060120

PMid:17071599    PMCid:1780216

75. Apte, M. V., Park, S., Phillips, P. A., Santucci, N., Goldstein, D., Kumar, R. K., Ramm, G. A., Buchler, M., Friess, H., McCarroll, J. A., Keogh, G., Merrett, N., Pirola, R., and Wilson, J. S. Desmoplastic reaction in pancreatic cancer: role of pancreatic stellate cells. Pancreas, 29: 179-187, 2004.
doi:10.1097/00006676-200410000-00002

PMid:15367883

76. Farrow, B., Albo, D., and Berger, D. H. The role of the tumor microenvironment in the progression of pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res, 149: 319-328, 2008.
doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.757

PMid:18639248

77. Sangai, T., Ishii, G., Kodama, K., Miyamoto, S., Aoyagi, Y., Ito, T., Magae, J., Sasaki, H., Nagashima, T., Miyazaki, M., and Ochiai, A. Effect of differences in cancer cells and tumor growth sites on recruiting bone marrow-derived endothelial cells and myofibroblasts in cancer-induced stroma. Int J Cancer, 115: 885-892, 2005.
doi:10.1002/ijc.20969

78. Bachem, M. G., Schunemann, M., Ramadani, M., Siech, M., Beger, H., Buck, A., Zhou, S., Schmid-Kotsas, A., and Adler, G. Pancreatic carcinoma cells induce fibrosis by stimulating proliferation and matrix synthesis of stellate cells. Gastroenterology, 128: 907-921, 2005.
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.036

PMid:15825074

79. McCarty, M. F., Somcio, R. J., Stoeltzing, O., Wey, J., Fan, F., Liu, W., Bucana, C., and Ellis, L. M. Overexpression of PDGF-BB decreases colorectal and pancreatic cancer growth by increasing tumor pericyte content. J Clin Invest, 117: 2114-2122, 2007.
doi:10.1172/JCI31334

PMid:17641778    PMCid:1913488

80. Sims, D. E. Diversity within pericytes. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 27: 842-846, 2000.
doi:10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03343.x

PMid:11022980

81. Chen, Y., Miller, C., Mosher, R., Zhao, X., Deeds, J., Morrissey, M., Bryant, B., Yang, D., Meyer, R., Cronin, F., Gostout, B. S., Smith-McCune, K., and Schlegel, R. Identification of cervical cancer markers by cDNA and tissue microarrays. Cancer Res, 63: 1927-1935, 2003.

No DOI found

82. Gius, D., Funk, M. C., Chuang, E. Y., Feng, S., Huettner, P. C., Nguyen, L., Bradbury, C. M., Mishra, M., Gao, S., Buttin, B. M., Cohn, D. E., Powell, M. A., Horowitz, N. S., Whitcomb, B. P., and Rader, J. S. Profiling microdissected epithelium and stroma to model genomic signatures for cervical carcinogenesis accommodating for covariates. Cancer Res, 67: 7113-7123, 2007.
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0260

PMid:17671178

83. Pietras, K., Pahler, J., Bergers, G., and Hanahan, D. Functions of paracrine PDGF signaling in the proangiogenic tumor stroma revealed by pharmacological targeting. PLoS Med, 5: e19, 2008.
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050019

PMid:18232728    PMCid:2214790

84. Lee, T. J., Sartor, O., Luftig, R. B., and Koochekpour, S. Saposin C promotes survival and prevents apoptosis via PI3K/Akt-dependent pathway in prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer, 3: 31, 2004.
doi:10.1186/1476-4598-3-31

PMid:15548330    PMCid:535542

85. Werth, C., Stuhlmann, D., Cat, B., Steinbrenner, H., Alili, L., Sies, H., and Brenneisen, P. Stromal resistance of fibroblasts against oxidative damage: involvement of tumor cell-secreted platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activation. Carcinogenesis, 29: 404-410, 2008.
doi:10.1093/carcin/bgm296

Abbreviations: PGF, polypeptide growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; PDGF, platelet derived growth factor; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; MMPs, metalloproteinases; PTHrP, Parathyroid hormone related protein; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; AR, androgen receptor; EC, endothelial cell

Key Words: Tumor microenvironment, growth factor, EGFR, FGF, PDGF, Review

Send correspondence to: Subhas Chakrabarty, Department of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine and SimmonsCooper Cancer Institute, Springfield, IL 62702, USA, Tel: 217-545-9729, Fax: 217-545-9729, E-mail:schakrabarty@siumed.edu