[Frontiers in Bioscience 15, 854-871, June 1, 2010]

Genetic modification of ex-vivo expanded stem cells for clinical application

Reeva Aggarwal, Vincent J Pompili, Hiranmoy Das

Cardiovascular Stem Cell Research Laboratory, The Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. HSC regulation and microenvironment
3.1. Niche cells
3.2. Niche signaling
3.3. Niche adhesion molecules
3.4. Chemical regulation of niche 4. Hematopoietic stem cell Expansion
4.1. Factors regulating ex-vivo expansion
4.1.1. Interleukin-3
4.1.2. Interleukin-6
4.1.3. Thrombopoietin
4.1.4. Fetal liver tyrosine kinase-3 ligand
4.1.5. Stem cell Factor
4.1.6. Signaling molecules
5. Genetic modification of Stem Cells
5.1. Viral methods
5.1.1. Retroviruses
5.1.2. Lentiviruses
5.1.3. Adeno-associated viruses
5.2. Non-viral methods
5.2.1. Calcium phosphate
5.2.2. Lipofection
5.2.3. Electroporation
5.2.4. Nucleofection
6. Stem cell therapy for ischemic diseases
6.1. Role of pro-angiogenic factors
6.1.1. Vascular endothelial growth factor
6.1.2. Platelet derived growth factor
6.1.3. Fibroblast growth factor-2
6.1.4. Placental growth factor
6.1.5. Hepatocyte growth factor
7. Conclusions and future directions
8. Acknowledgements
9. References

1. ABSTRACT

Stem cell therapy is currently considered as an important regime for repairing, replacing or enhancing the biological functions of the damaged tissues. Among adult stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are commonly used for cure of hematological disorders. However, the number of HSCs obtained from sources like bone marrow, peripheral or umbilical cord blood is not sufficient for routine clinical application. Thus, ex-vivo expansion of HSCs becomes critically important. Ex-vivo culture and expansion of stem cells are challenging, as stem cells differentiate in culture rather than self-renew. Lack of clarity about the factors responsible for quiescence and differentiation of HSCs, investigators struggled to optimize conditions for ex vivo expansion. As we understand better, various strategies can be incorporated to mimic in vivo conditions for successful expansion of stem cells. However, characterization and biological functionality should also be tested for expanded stem cells prior to clinical application. To treat ischemia by enhancing therapeutic angiogenesis and neo-vascularization, the role of genetic modification of HSCs with pro-angiogenic factors is the focus of this review.

2. INTRODUCTION

Stem cells can be defined as cells, which possess the capability of self-renewal and are able to produce a terminally differentiated cell of at least one lineage (1). Stem cells are broadly categorized into embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells, and these cells originate from the embryonic tissues de-novo. Embryonic stem cells are derived from inner mass cells of the blastocyst of embryo and are capable of forming all germ layer of the embryo except the extra-embryonic organs such as placenta (2). However, adult stem cells are found in adult tissue and are capable of forming cells of specific lineage only.

Stem cells are characterized as totipotent, pluripotent and multipotent according to their developmental potential. Totipotent stem cells have the ability to form all cell lineages of an organism, although only zygote and the first cleavage blastomeres retain that ability. Next in the hierarchy are pluripotent stem cells such as embryonic stem cells that have the ability to form all cell lineages of the body. Coming down the hierarchy are the multipotent stem cells, which retain the ability to form multiple cell types of one lineage, such as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and is our interest of discussion in the current review.

There is another class of stem cells called induced pluripotent cells (iPS), which are generated by reprogramming of the somatic cells by induction of genes (eg. adult mouse or human fibroblasts cells), as a result, induced cells transformed into pluripotent stem cells (3, 4). This induced pluripotency required viral vector-mediated integration procedures of genes such as Klf4, c-Myc, Oct3/4, Sox-2 to re-program the somatic cells towards ES-like functionality and phenotype. However, long-term effects and clinical applicability of these iPS cells are yet to be defined. Teratomas (cancerous growth) generated by the implantation of iPS cells are a proof of their pluripotency or an overexpression of the putative oncogenes such as c-Myc and Klf-4.As using viral vectors reprograms iPS cells, in vivo effects of viral vectors are yet to be determined. Viral transduction procedure poses more complications and is potentially bio-hazardous as discussed later in this review (5). However, recently non-viral methods were employed to generate iPS cells. Plasmids instead of the lentivirus or retroviruses were used to generate viral-free iPS cells which had the expression level of the genes similar to the ES cells and also gave rise to adult chimeric mice (6). However, the long-term biological efficacy and safety of iPS cells are under critical investigation and yet to be proven for therapeutic use. Therefore, further investigations are required to prove iPS cells as a "bio-safe" for the therapeutic purposes.

The current review provides an overview of the stem cells focusing on regulation of HSC in vivo, to provide a better understanding for successful ex-vivo expansion without the induction of terminal differentiation. The review also outlines some of the technological advances used to genetically modify HSCs for their effective use in pre-clinical studies, especially in the context of ischemic diseases.

3. HSC REGULATION AND MICROENVIRONMENT

Stem cells are maintained in a specialized microenvironment called niche. Niche is specialized anatomic location composed of supporting cells and extra-cellular matrices that regulate the basic functions of stem cells and maintain homeostasis (7, 8). Microenvironment saves the stem cell population from depletion and regulates uncontrolled malignant proliferation (9). Such spatiotemporal relationship is maintained lifelong in various organs of the body including bone marrow niche where HSC resides. Bone marrow niche has unique cellular composition, which is intrinsically linked with the HSC cell cycling and functioning. Of those, osteoblasts, the bone lining cells (10); stromal cells such as vascular endothelial cells, extra-cellular matrix proteins, high mineral content and low oxygen content were shown to participate in regulation of stem cell micro-environment (11) (Figure 1).

3.1. Niche cells

Osteoblast and vascular endothelial cells play major role in regulation of the HSC niche. Based on the anatomical considerations, trabecular bone fragments are embedded in stromal rich reticular tissues that form the endo-osteal or osteoblastic niche (12). Fenestrated sinusoidal endothelial cells and perivascular space forms the vascular niche (13). Several reports suggested an osteoblast (0B) mediated regulation of HSCs. Concomitant increase in the number of trabecular osteoblast (OB) cells caused an significant increase in the Lin- Sca-1+c-Kit+ subpopulation of HSCs in the transgenic mice, whose OB cells constitutively expressed PPR (parathyroid hormone receptor). Parathyroid hormone is known to activate the osteoblast cell activity. Primitive HSCs were also increased and superior engraftment in the irradiated recipients was observed. However, more mature colony forming unit cells were not increased indicating that the effect was more pronounced on early primitive HSCs (14). Endo-osteal sites have been identified as the sites for quiescent stem cell localization (15). Interestingly, ablation of osteoblast cells in vivo caused re-location of HSCs to sites outside bone marrow such as liver and spleen indicating an intricate link between HSCs and osteoblasts (16).

Multiple reports showed that cytokines secreted from osteoblasts regulate the stem cell function and viability. Among the cytokines, interleukin 3 and 6 (IL-3 and -6), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), macrophage stimulating factor (M-CSF), osteoprotegrin (OPG), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal derived factor (SDF), receptor activator of NF-B ligand (RANK-L) and many others were indicated to play an important roles (10, 17-20). G-CSF plays a significant role for maintenance and differentiation of HSC towards the hematopoietic lineage (21), while osteoprotegrin showed inhibitory effects on the HSC function and proliferation (20). Also, it was suggested that osteoblasts secrete soluble factors that were not detected in absence of HSCs, thus may play a major role in quiescence of HSCs (22).

Vascular endothelial cells also provided regulatory cues for HSC fate. About two-third of the HSCs were found localized to sinusoids in bone marrow and spleen (23). The reticular cells around the sinusoids secreted high levels of SDF-1, chemokine required for HSC maintenance and homing (24) interacting with SDF-1 receptor called CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) expressed on HSCs (25). HSCs were consistently found in contact with vascular endothelial cells and SDF-1 was implicated in regulation in the above-discussed niche (26). Cumulative contributions to HSC fate from lesser-studied bone marrow cells such as MSCs, osteoclast, adipocytes, megakarocytes was also suspected (26, 27).

3.2. Niche signaling

Stem cells renewal is broadly dependent on the signaling pathways regulated via Notch, Wnt and other factors. Notch signaling was reported to be a gatekeeper that maintains the undifferentiated state of HSC and inhibits commitment to any lineage (28). Hematological malignancies demonstrated the importance of Notch signaling in the HSC niche. Notch signaling was responsible for increasing the number of stem cells (29). This signaling involves receptors-Notch 1, 2, 3 and 4 whose ligands belong to either Jagged or Delta family of ligands. Notch ligand, Jagged-1 is expressed on bone marrow stromal and osteoblastic cells (30, 31). Activated Notch cytoplasmic domain was detected in the HSCs and increased Notch ligands were detected on osteoblastic cells (14). Wnt signaling was also shown to play a significant role in HSC self-renewal. Inhibition of Wnt signaling reduced the numbers of primitive HSC and their viability in vitro and decreased their expansion in vivo (32, 33). Wnt signaling is interdependent on Notch signaling as inhibition of Notch signaling disrupted the ability of Wnt signaling to maintain HSCs in undifferentiated state (28). Previous report showed that Wnt signaling caused an increase in immature colony forming cells in human and mouse progenitors alike (32).

Along with the osteoblasts, other cells such as stromal cells were also implicated to cause Notch signaling and maintain HSC population. HSC expansion is also regulated via bone morphogenetic protein receptor (BMPR1A) signaling mediated through osteoblastic cells (15). Quiescent HSC state, maintained by activation of p21 signaling, and in its absence increased stem cell cycling lead to stem cell exhaustion in irradiated p21 deficient mice (34).

3.3. Niche adhesion molecules

Survival of the HSCs was shown to depend on the expression and its engagement with the osteoblast cells through integrin family called very late antigens (VLA-4 and VLA-5) (10). Stem cell receptor tyrosine kinase (Tie-2) and its ligand angiopoietin (Ang1) also contributed to the expansion of the long-term HSCs and were found to promote tight adhesion of HSC to their niche (35). Increase in the osteoblastic population caused simultaneous augmentation of the long-term HSCs and interaction through Tie-2 / Ang1, crucial for maintenance of quiescence of HSCs (35). Ang-1 was shown to express on osteocalcin producing cells (marker for mature osteoblast) and the expression level was much higher than the HSC, confirming that Ang-1 was mainly produced by osteoblasts. Furthermore, it was shown that most of the side-population HSCs (SP-HSCs) expressed Tie-2 receptor and Tie-2 expressing cells adhered to the Ang-1 expressing cells confirming that HSC niche was strongly regulated by osteoblastic interactions (35).

3.4. Chemical regulation of niche

Emerging studies reveal that extremely high concentrations of calcium (40 mmol/L) in endo-osteal sites play a crucial role in HSC functions. HSCs were found to express calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) (36) and responded to extra-cellular ionic calcium concentrations. Preferential localization of the HSCs was found to be dictated via the CaR signaling during mammalian ontogeny. As hematopoiesis shifts from fetal liver to bone marrow and continues to occur throughout the post-natal life, HSCs migrate and home to the bone marrow niche. CaR-/- HSCs were shown to have defects in the ability to adhere to collagen I, an extra-cellular matrix protein of bone secreted by osteobalsts. CaR knockout studies also revealed that circulating HSCs home to bone marrow but failed to lodge to their endo-osteal niche (11) and as a result reduced number of cells were found in the bone marrow.

Partial pressure of oxygen also showed a significant role in maintenance of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Endo-osteum has the lowest partial pressure of oxygen as it is located distal to bone vasculature (37) and has highest number of osteoblasts compared to other locations of the bone marrow. Thus, maintenance of the primitiveness of HSCs could be related to interplay between these factors. Low oxygen culture for HSCs was shown to maintain the multi-lineage engraftment potential, when transplanted into an irradiated mouse (38). Another report showed that oxygen pressure is crucial for HSCs survival, when umbilical cord blood derived HSCs (UCB-HSCs) were cultured in the oxygen concentrations, relevant to the bone marrow microenvironment, failed to survive, however, when supplemented with bone marrow relevant cytokines and adhesion molecules, they survived. These findings were explained by stating the fact that UCB microenvironment is fundamentally different from the bone marrow, because osteoblasts are absent and partial oxygen pressure is higher (5%) in UCB (39). It was also found that survival signals were activated via AKT phosphorylation downstream to the VLA-4 and VCAM-1 interactions (40) in low oxygen pressures, only when proteins and cytokines were supplemented. Thus, low oxygen pressure in bone marrow may compensate for paracrine effects of the surrounding cells.

However clinically, cord blood derived stem cells have been shown to be more safe for allogenic transplantation in the patients with the hematopoietic diseases than those derived from bone marrow and peripheral blood. Also, since UCB derived HSC allows for greater HLA disparity thus having a higher chance of getting a donor for minority population.

4. HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL EXPANSION

HSCs can be harvested from multiple sources, such as bone marrow, peripheral blood or from the umbilical cord blood. Recently, human umbilical cord blood was implicated to be a potential source for variety of stem cells such as hematopoietic stem cells, unrestricted somatic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitors (41, 42). Previously, umbilical cord blood was discarded after the delivery of fetus and placenta but recently it has been collected and used as a source of progenitor cells (43). The fetal blood, including umbilical cord or placental blood obtained after the birth, was also shown to be a significant source of haematopoietic stem cells (44) and can be used as an alternative source to bone marrow for clinical transplantations (45). Clinically, use of cord blood is advantageous as it is easy to harvest, harmless to donor, ethical with negligible viral or bacterial contamination, ontogentically primitive and can be stored in cord blood bank for years. UCB transplantation was associated with reduced risk of developing graft versus host disease (46). All the above reasons made researchers to be interested in the cord blood for isolation of stem cells, and expansion as well as genetic modification.

4.1. Factors regulating ex-vivo expansion

Self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation of HSCs are tightly regulated in-vivo by variety of autocrine and paracrine signaling. Ex-vivo expansion of the stem cell strategies mimicked the in-vivo environment by use of cocktail of growth factors, cytokines, biomaterials that simulate extra-cellular matrix, feeder stromal layers but with limited success. Delicate balance of self-renewal versus commitment towards differentiation has been the major challenge of ex-vivo expansion (Figure 1). Use of feeder layer for expansion is disadvantageous because of its lesser-defined chemical nature. Also, purity of the HSCs for transplantations after the co-culture was always the cause of concern as it altered the engraftment kinetics in-vivo. Cocktail of cytokines and growth factors was preferred because of their defined chemical nature, however, this method required critical optimization. Genetic manipulation of HSCs was proposed based on the genes that promote self-renewal but risk of transformation affecting their therapeutic potential is suspected. Also, it is difficult to get sufficient number of HSCs from a single cord for any adult patients (47, 48). So, two or more cord bloods were combined for a single recipient, but the failure of engraftment and high rates of mortality was a cause of concern (49). Therefore, ex-vivo expansion of nucleated cells from cord blood is under critical investigation by researchers since years. In-vitro simulation of stem cell niche was performed to better understand the role of these cytokines in expansion and preservation of function. Although yield of HSCs from bone marrow sources are 10 times higher than that of cord blood, but their ex-vivo expansion is significantly lower than cord blood HSCs (50). For ex-vivo expansion purpose, we used freshly isolated cord blood-derived stem cells and incubated on a poly-ether sulfone (PES) nanofiber with serum-free media containing TPO, flt-3, IL3, LDL, SCF and found a significant expansion of stem cells retaining their phenotype (51-53).

4.1.1 Interleukin-3

IL-3 was one of the earliest cytokines implicated in self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation of primitive and mature hematopoietic stem cells (54). IL-3 receptors were found to be present on HSC, B and T cells and myeloid cells (55). The effect of IL-3 on adult HSCs remains controversial. IL-3 was shown to increase (56) and decrease (30) (57) the expansion and/or self-renewal capacity of adult HSCs. Contradictory effects of IL-3 were most likely influenced by its concentration, the presence/absence of other cytokines, serum, culture conditions and tested cell populations. Comparison of the role of IL-3 and IL-11 along with the other cytokines such as Flt3, megakaryocyte developmental factor and c-kit ligand showed that IL-3 and IL-11 both promote efficient self-renewal and proliferation of murine Lin- Sca+ kit+ (LSK) cells with sustained long-term repopulating stability (56). Negative effects of IL-3 and positive effects of IL-11 on self-renewal and the engraftment capacity of adult HSCs were also reported (58).

4.1.2. Interleukin-6

IL6 was used for expansion of the murine HSCs in culture. Since IL6 receptor is not expressed by human HSC, investigators employed a strategy where they supplemented the stem cell media with soluble IL6 receptor (sIL6R) and IL6 along with Flt3L, TPO and stem cell factor (SCF) for the expansion (59). The interaction was mediated through gp130 expressed on the HSCs crucial for ex-vivo HSC expansion. Based on these observations, fusion protein for sIL6R/IL6 was synthesized and supplemented in the stem cell media for expansion of UCB derived HSC (60) and peripheral blood progenitors (61).

4.1.3. Thrombopoietin

Thrombopoietin (TPO), a glycoprotein hormone, plays a crucial role in maintenance of quiescent-HSCs in bone marrow and produced by bone marrow stroma and its receptor, c-mpl is expressed on HSCs (62). However, TPO is not essential for embryogenesis and development. TPO knockout mouse showed a reduced capacity of engraftment of HSCs (63). Report also indicated that combination of TPO with Flt3/Flk2 ligand could support the expansion of HSC derived from UCB (64). Small molecule agonist for the TPO receptor, c-mpl was shown to be more efficient in increasing the numbers of the primitive HSCs and SRC (SCID repopulating cells)(65).

4.1.4. Fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3 ligand

The FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase (FLT3) was selectively expressed on HSCs and binding of its ligand (FL) induced HSC proliferation (66). Mobilization of HSCs to peripheral blood was reported in the presence of FL in combination of G-CSF and superior engraftment potential was observed after transplantation in murine models of myeloablation (67). FL was shown to be an effective cytokine that increased the number of long-term repopulating cells in cultures of CD34+ human bone marrow cells (68).

4.1.5. Stem cell factor

Stem cell factor (SCF) plays a central role in the regulation of the early hematopoiesis. SCF is extensively studied in ex-vivo expansion experiments as its receptor; c-kit was show to be expressed by hematopoietic cells (69). Also, it was found to exhibit synergistic effects in number of hematopoietic growth factors and was used in treatment of broad spectrum of hemtopoietic diseases (69, 70). None of the above-mentioned cytokines were able to promote expansion of Lin-1Sca +1c-kit+1 HSCs alone, however, combination such as SCF, FL and IL-11 enhanced the production of progenitors and nucleated cells (71).

4.1.6. Signaling molecules

Another possibility of expanding the HSC population is via supplementation and activation of signaling molecules and genes involved in self-renewal of HSCs and enhancing differentiation-inhibitory effects during hematopoiesis (72). Understanding the functions of genes such as HOX-B4, Wnt, Notch signaling molecules and cell cycling genes such as p18, p21 are crucial to achieve successful engraftment in host after ex-vivo expansion of HSC (73-75). Homeobox genes were identified as critical factors for the regulation of early development of hematopoiesis. HOX-B4 gene promoted expansion of HSCs in-vivo and in-vitro and was able to retain HSCs differentiation ability into normal lymphoid and myeloid cells (76, 77). Soluble Sonic-hedgehog showed increased self-renewal of human HSCs, however, expansion was relatively modest (78). Notch signaling preserved the stem cell nature of HSC and signaling was mediated through transmembrane receptors and ligands. Notch signaling was shown to inhibit stem cell differentiation and maintained the self-renewal ability (79) in HSC niche. Notch ligand (Jagged 1) was shown to be presented by osteoblasts and augmented the numbers of the immature HSCs. Soluble Notch ligand (Delta-1) pre-coated-culture plates were used for ex-vivo expansion (80) and showed 4.5 fold expansion of SRC's (most immature HSCs) (81) and 240-fold increase in nucleated cells over a period of 3-4 weeks. Long-term in vivo myeloid and lymphoid repopulating capacity of the expanded cells was observed (53-67%) (80) by transplantation in the NOG mice (NOD/SCID mice with IL-2 receptor common gamma chain-knockout), known to accept transplanted HSCs and their differentiation into T-cell lineage (82).

So, the importance of ex vivo expansion of stem cells is critical, as it will provide sufficient number of stem cells for genetic modification, which can be used for therapy not only in hematopoietic disorders but also in degenerative disease such as ischemic diseases, neurological disorders or in autoimmune dysfunctions (Figure 2).

5. GENETIC MODIFICATION OF STEM CELLS

Since stem cells can differentiate into various lineages, they offer a great deal of potential for the treatment in regenerative medicine. Genetically modifying stem cells is an attractive approach, where combinations of stem cell and gene therapy act-in-synergy for effectively reverting the disease state. Several methods have been employed to genetically modify stem cells but with variable efficiencies. Procedure of transfection for genetic modification of cells could be of two different types i.e. transient or stable transfection. The transient transfection resulted in high levels of expression of the introduced gene but only for few weeks. However, stable transfection had lower level of expression, than the transient but lasts for longer period of time. Methods employed to introduce foreign DNA into the stem cells include both viral and non-viral-mediated gene delivery system.

5.1. Viral methods

Viruses are infectious agents that cause variety of diseases in human. Viral genome consists of either RNA or DNA enveloped by a protein coat. Viruses replicate in living cell only and utilize and overtake the host cellular machinery. These infectious agents transfer genetic material from one cell to another. This important property makes them clinically important vector for introducing a normal copy of gene into host cells via the mechanism called transduction or transfection. The viral methods of transduction employ variety of viruses as carrier of the candidate genomic sequence as described below.

5.1.1. Retroviruses

Retroviruses are RNA viruses and are the most common mode of stable transfection. Retroviruses carry an enzyme called reverse transcriptase capable of synthesizing cDNA from its RNA genome. The resultant cDNA is single stranded and is replicated as double stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome. Viral genome has an important property of being linear but randomly integrated into the host genome (chromosomal DNA). This feature has been exploited to transduce the hematopoietic stem cells for therapeutic purposes in various experimental procedures and clinical trials, but with limited success (83). Retroviruses are restricted with respect to the size of the transgene as they are able to carry only 9-10 kb (84) compare to non-viral method (electroporation) where 50-100 kb plasmids can be transferred. Low transduction efficiencies of only 10-40% are currently possible with the existing generation of retroviruses (85, 86). However, higher transduction efficiencies of retroviruses could be achieved by concentrating the vector to high titer or by packaging the retrovirus in a heterologous envelope with broad host spectrum. Autologous CD34+ cells were mobilized from the bone marrow and transfected with the multi-drug resistance gene (MDR-1) via retroviral transduction in presence of recombinant fibronectin CH-296 with a median efficiency range of 13 to 24% and engraftment kinetics were not adversely affected. Though promising results were observed in clinical therapies, potential risks were reported. It was reported that in X-SCID gene therapy (83) patients developed leukemia due to insertional mutagenesis caused by retroviral-mediated transfection (87). Other disadvantages would be due to the fusion of the transgene product with the cellular products thus causing some toxic side effects. Loss of homing of HSCs after transfection, variation in copy number of the virus in each cell or the side effects of the regimens used for engraftment procedures in patients was also reported (88). Evidence indicated that the onco-retroviral integration occurs preferably in the genes that are being actively transcribed in HSCs (89), and some preferred transcription start sites of the HSC genes (90), this can potentially affect the functionality of the HSC upon transplantation (91, 92). Also, retroviruses were limited to transduction to the cycling cells compare to the quiescent cells (93), thus posing more restrictions on the choice of cells for transduction along with the above-mentioned limitations.

5.1.2. Lentiviruses

Lentiviruses belong to the group of retroviruses that are known to cause slow and progressive fatal disease in livestock animals. Lentiviruses are being constantly modified due to their ability to transduce non-proliferating cells, thus making gene therapy possible in larger spectrum of tissue and cell targets. HSCs mostly existed in mostly G0/ G1 and were rarely found in G2, S or M phase of the cell cycle (94, 95). Although the possibility to transduce CD34+ HSCs from hUCB is high but transfection efficiency increases if these cells are found in proliferative phase (G2, S or M) (96). It was reported that G0/G1 HSC engraft better than those cycling in G2/S/M2 phase (97). Thus the lentiviral-mediated transfection is advantageous for the HSC (98), however, transduction efficiencies was low (98) compare to the non-viral methods (53, 99).

5.1.3. Adeno-associated viruses

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are DNA viruses have linear single stranded genome (100). It is the smallest virus know, that infects human cells and has been found to be non-malignant and possess some anti-tumorigenic properties (101, 102). Adeno-associated virus requires helper virus co-infection for efficient replication but in absence of these viruses it has been found to have specific insertion site in human chromosome 19 (102, 103). Variable expression levels of surface receptor limit the transduction of the CD34+ HSC with the AAV2 vectors. It also impaired the ability of the pro-viral genome integration in the host genome due to lack of second strand of DNA and transcriptionally active genome. Varied results regarding the AAV2-mediated transduction have been reported. Transient expression of genes in human CD34+ cells was observed because of inefficient viral genome integration, while others reported successful transduction of primitive human HSCs that presented with successful engraftment in primary and secondary host (104). These studies strongly suggest that there is need for protocol optimization to enhance the transfection efficiencies, and a self-inactivating vector also needs to be introduced without compromising the normal functioning of the HSCs.

Further work needed to be done to generate bio-safe vector design that would ensure higher transfection efficiencies. Thus, there is a strong need to develop safer and more reliable techniques for efficient transfer of genes into stem cells.

5.2. Non-viral methods

Non- viral methods of transfection consist of chemical and physical methods. Many parameters influence the transfection efficiency, including cell type (primary versus transformed cell lines), culture conditions, vector types and choice of the transfection technology. Numbers of different transfection technologies are currently available to the researchers and each of them has their own merits and demerits. Among them, calcium phosphate method, electroporation and liposome mediated transfection and are commonly used and discussed here.

5.2.1. Calcium phosphate

The principle of this method is to mix DNA in a phosphate buffer with calcium chloride to form a precipitate, which adheres to the cell membrane and is endocytosed into the cytosol. This method is suitable for stable transfection; however, variability of DNA transfer and low expression is a common disadvantage. Optimization of protocols is needed and little variations in pH, concentration of DNA, calcium concentrations and phosphate ions, serum and temperature seems to control the precipitate size (i.e. size of DNA-calcium phosphate complexes) and transfection efficiencies (105, 106).

5.2.2. Lipofection

This technique employs lipid based cationic reagents for transfection purposes. Cationic lipids interact electrostatically with negatively charged DNA thus forming a lipid-DNA complex. Since, this complex is lipophillic, it can easily pass through the hydrophobic cell membrane (107). However, their mechanisms of cell endocytosis and cellular trafficking are not clearly understood (108). Lipid-based reagents, such as FuGene, lipofectamine and oligofectamine are being extensively employed for transfection of transformed cell lines as well as primary cells with variable efficiencies. Cationic lipids are easy to prepare and offer negligible toxicity and immunogenicity issues compare to viral vectors (109).

5.2.3. Electroporation

This method involves transient formation of pores on the cell membrane via high-voltage pulses and enables the transfer of the exogenous target DNA to cytoplasm of the recipient cells. This technique proved to be highly useful for efficient transfection; however, mortality rate is high with this procedure. Recently it was shown that increasing the number of cells would decrease the cell mortality (110). Electroporation is best for suspension cells rather than adherent cells. The electroporation technique was used for transient transfection of any cell types (111).

All the above-described methods deliver the DNA into the cytosol, however, their entry into nucleus becomes indispensable for the transfected DNA expression. These methods delay the expression of transfected DNA, as DNA needs to cross the nuclear membrane barrier. Experiments have shown that transfected plasmid DNA is not transported efficiently into the nucleus of quiescent cells (112). During mitosis, the nuclear membrane disintegrates, allowing transfected DNA to enter and access the nuclear transcription machinery. Also, different stages of cell cycle affect the transfection efficiency, confirming that G1 phase cells has poor expression of the cytosolic transfected DNA, compared to actively cycling cell (112). Thus, DNA arrives within the nucleus only when nuclear barrier disintegrates and requires nuclear pore complex to import and is hard to transduce DNA in non-cycling cells (113).

5.2.4. Nucleofection

As earlier discussed, only actively dividing cells were transduced efficiently, a newer transfection technique, modified version of electroporation called nucleoporation or nucleofection was introduced (Lonza Group Ltd) (114). Nucleofection employs cell-specific electrical parameters and nucleofector solution to deliver genetic material, including DNA, small interfering RNA (siRNA) and oligonucleotides directly to the nucleus. HSCs are well-known quiescent cells and were found to be difficult for gene transfection using above-mentioned techniques.

Our laboratory regularly uses nucleoporation to transduce genes to HSCs with high efficiencies (53, 99). Other cell types such as bone marrow derived stem cells, endothelial cells, keratinocytes are also successfully transduced with this technology (114-116). This experimental procedure offers several advantages such as short sample preparation time; pulsing the cell solution and plating the nucleofected cells take less than 30 minutes to accomplish. Highly significant transduction efficiency overcomes the disadvantage of high mortality rate (117). Direct delivery of nucleic acids to the nucleus, reduces the delay between transfection and expression and cell division is not required. Limited restrictions includes high cost and mortality rate, however, optimization of conditions can control the mortality rate (117).

6. STEM CELL THERAPY FOR ISCHEMIC DISEASES

Ischemia is a disease state generated by restriction in blood supply due to factors present with in the blood vessel, which results to damage or dysfunction of tissue. Since, oxygen is mainly bound to hemoglobin in red blood cells, insufficient blood supply causes tissue to become hypoxic, or, if no oxygen is supplied at all, anoxic. However, complete cessation of oxygenation in tissues for more than 20 minutes typically results in irreversible damage. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an example of such diseased state, which develops due to occlusion caused by systemic arthrosclerosis (fat and cholesterol deposition) especially, in arteries of iliac femoral system leading to terminal clinical condition known as critical limb ischemia (118). This leads to eventual loss of functional cells, daily life activities with possibility of amputation of affected limbs despite the current advances in endovascular surgery and interventional radiology. Overall, more than 12% of the population is affected by PAD, and men and women were equally affected (119). Formation of new blood vessels or development of collateral vessels from the pre-existing blood vessels is critical for the recovery of the ischemia and is termed as angiogenesis. At cellular levels, the cells of the hypoxic tissue typically undergo oxidative stress and produce hypoxia-inducible factor (120)-1, which increases production of many genes that regulates and alters the cellular gene expression, angiogenesis, change in metabolic switch and apoptosis (121). The molecules in hypoxic or ischemia-induced response include vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and fibroblast growth factors (FGF). At preclinical levels the role of these pro-angiogenic factors are tested in the murine models of hind limb ischemia (53, 122). The treatment for the PAD depends on the restoration of blood flow through therapeutic angiogenesis and vasculogenesis.

6.1. Role of pro-angiogenic factors in ischemia therapy

Angiogenesis is induced by a combination of various soluble factors such as growth factors and cytokines, which may be produced by inflammation or tumor. The invasion of endothelial cells into the perivascular tissue and degradation of the basement membrane are important to start the angiogenesis process. Elongation of the new vessel is achieved by the proliferation of endothelial cells and stabilized by synthesis of extra-cellular matrix including the basement membrane and integration of pericytes. All blood vessels in the body are made up of two major cell types- endothelial cells towards the lumen of the vessel and smooth muscle cells regulating contraction and relaxation of the vessel. During embryogenesis, three major events, responsible for the generation of the blood vessels occur (123-125) i.e. vasculogenesis (blood vessel formation from the precursor cells), angiogenesis (blood vessel formation from pre-existing vessels and vascular endothelial cells), and vascular remodeling. Vasculogenesis was considered to occur only in pre-natal life; however, the postnatal neo-vascularization was also demonstrated in murine model of hind limb ischemia. In adult humans, the endothelial progenitor cell (126) plays an important role for the neo-vascularization. Endothelial progenitor cell express surface epitopes, such as VEGFR-2, CXCR-4, CD34 and CD133 and are derived from bone marrow, peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood (127, 128). In an event of ischemic condition, bone marrow derived EPCs home to the ischemic region and stimulate the resident endothelial cells in the vasculature to mediate vascular repair (129). Critical molecules that regulate function of vascular endothelial cells, and play role in therapeutic angiogenesis are reviewed below (Figure 3).

6.1.1. Vascular endothelial growth factor

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is responsible for the endothelial cell growth and was also identified as vascular permeability factor (130, 131). VEGF in humans have different isoforms, major subtypes comprise of 121, 138, 165 and 189 amino acids. VEGF 165 is the strongest signal transducer among the VEGF family, since it has a very strong affinity to VEGF-R called Flt-1 and binds to other VEGF-receptor called KDR (VEGFR-2). VEGF was shown to be upregulated by physiological conditions such as hypoxia, hormonal induction, tumor promoters, inflammation and by several other growth factors. HIF-1α is the major regulator of the VEGF expression under different oxygen concentrations (132). Knockout mice for VEGF, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 were found embryonic lethal (133). VEGF caused ischemia-induced mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells (126) in mice (122) and humans (134). VEGF was also shown to be the mediator of vasculogenesis in both human and murine models of limb ischemia (134). VEGF acts on the smooth muscle cells (135). It mediates their chemotaxis and migration to the hypoxic area, as smooth muscle cells are required for remodeling of vessels (136). Circulating monocytes and other leukocytes release growth factors essential for vascular growth, and VEGF has chemotactic effects on these cells (137, 138) offering possible cure for ischemia related disorders. VEGF-B is known to cause its effects through VEGFR-1, which causes endothelial cell differentiation by stimulating nitric oxide (NO) release via endothelial NO synthase and Akt pathways (139).

6.1.2. Platelet derived growth factor

Similar to VEGF family of growth factors, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) family consists of highly conserved growth factor domain, called PDGF/VEGF homology domain. The PDGF family consists of two classical members (PDGF-A and PDGF-B), (140) and two newly discovered novel PGDF's called PDGF-C and PDGF-D (141, 142). These receptors are expressed by myeloid hematopoietic cells, platelets (143), VSMC, pericytes and endothelial cells (144). PDGF-B exerts angiogenic effects via PDGFR-B receptor signaling (18, 19). PDGF molecules exist as homodimers or heterodimers and have different receptor affinities (PDGFRα and PDGFRβ). These receptors belong to the tyrosine kinase receptor family and cause cellular alteration in metabolism, proliferation and migration. PDGF in the vascular system is important for recruitment of pericytes to maintain the vessel integrity (145). Deletion of PDGF-B resulted in a phenotype manifested by loss of pericytes in the blood vessel and subsequent hemorrhage and its targeted inactivation caused embryonic lethality (25). Synergism of VEGF and PDGF-B stimulated the revascularization of the ischemic hind limb by promoting vessel growth and maturation (26-29). Effects of PDGF-C were seen in endothelial cells and were shown to cause angiogenesis in ischemic heart (30). PDGF-C stimulated branching in pre-existing blood vessels, SMC growth (15, 30, 31) and caused release of VEGF (32).

6.1.3. Fibroblast growth factor-2

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 molecule exists in different isoforms with molecular weight ranging from 18-25 kd (146, 147). FGF-2 interacts with specific cell surface receptor, which share a common feature including a conserved cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain, transmembrane domain and an extra-cellular ligand-binding domain (148). Fibroblast growth factor has pleiotropic effects on various cells and organs. It mediates differentiation and regulates the normal functioning and tissue repair of various organs (149, 150). FGF-2 induced differentiation of endothelial cells and hematopoietic cells in vitro (151) and was found to be a potent angiogenic molecule both in vitro and in vivo (152). FGF-2 was found to stimulate the growth of the small blood vessels in embryonic tissue. Marked synergistic effects of the FGF-2 and PDGF-B was observed on neo-vascularization when transplanted in mouse corneas (153), however, the mechanism of the synergism is not known. Studies of the synergistic effects of the FGF-2 with VEGF-B also showed increased development of collateral blood vessels and improved the recovery of calf-blood pressure in the hind limb ischemia model (154).

6.1.4. Placental growth factor

Placenta growth factor (PIGF), VEGF homologue has been shown to play an important role in angiogenesis via its receptor VEGFR-1 present on endothelial cells (155). Impaired collateral growth or arteriogenesis was observed in mice lacking either PIGF or VEGFR-1 and restoration of angiogenesis was observed via exogenous gene delivery in ischemic limb (155, 156). PIGF was shown to play an important role in angiogenesis through inflammatory macrophage or monocytes mediated mechanism or by enhancement in EPC recruitment (157). Induction of PIGF expression was stimulated by FGF-2 gene in murine hind-limb ischemia model and was regulated via VEGF/PKC-MEK and NF-κB signaling pathway (158).

6.1.5. Hepatocyte growth factor

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) or scatter factor (SF) is a large multi-domain protein, initially identified as the mitogen for the hepatocytes (159) but recently found to be potent mitogen for the endothelial cells (160). HGF induced VEGF production via endothelial cells and surrounding vascular smooth muscle cells (161). VEGF and HGF were shown to act in synergy, caused regulation of endothelial cell cycle (162) and angiogenesis in a paracrine manner (163). However, HGF could also act independent of the VEGF, via direct activation of Akt ad Erks (164). It was also shown that the vascular levels of the HGF decreased in the ischemic conditions, however, with the delivery of the rHGF via gene therapy induced therapeutic angiogenesis in the hind limb ischemia model (165). Moreover, intravenous delivery of the HGF caused collateral formation of the blood vessels in the hind limb ischemic model (165).

The contribution of each of the above angiogenic factors was studied in various hind-limb ischemic models and was translated into clinical trials with limited success. Our recent work showed that ex-vivo expanded HSCs transduced with bicistronic vector expressing VEGF and PDGF genes, administered via intra-ventricular injection into the hind limb ischemia model, augmented vasculogenesis resulting in restoration of blood flow (Figure 2).

7. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Stem cell therapies are currently being developed for clinical applications in the field of regenerative medicine and HSCs are already the gold standard for the hematological disorders. Ex-vivo expansion is challenging, as delicate balance exists between self-renewal versus commitment, requires the use of specific concentration and combination of cytokines for expansion of biologically functional HSC population. Techniques employing viral proteins and viral vectors need more critical evaluation as viruses present potential risk of transformation. Newer bio-safe strategies for successful ex-vivo expansion such as tissue engineering, use of 3D nanofiber with the chemical modifications, cocktail of cytokines of defined biological effects need to be established before offering stem cell transplantation as a curative alternative to other available treatments. Paracrine effects of the transplanted stem cells influence the microenvironment of the host tissue towards functional regeneration of damaged organ. Ex-vivo expansion and genetic modification of stem cells provides promising results in the preclinical studies. However, before its induction to the routine clinical application, more validation is necessary, specially evaluating long-term effects.

8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants, K01 AR054114 (NIAMS), SBIR R44 HL092706-01 (NHLBI), Third Frontier Projects, Ohio Technology, BRCP Grant and The Ohio State University start-up fund for stem cell research.

9. REFERENCES

1. J. Price and B. P. Williams: Neural stem cells. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 11(5), 564-7 (2001)
doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00250-6

2. J. A. Thomson, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, S. S. Shapiro, M. A. Waknitz, J. J. Swiergiel, V. S. Marshall and J. M. Jones: Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282(5391), 1145-7 (1998)
doi:10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
PMid:9804556

3. K. Takahashi, K. Tanabe, M. Ohnuki, M. Narita, T. Ichisaka, K. Tomoda and S. Yamanaka: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131(5), 861-72 (2007)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
PMid:18035408

4. K. Takahashi and S. Yamanaka: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126(4), 663-76 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
PMid:16904174

5. M. Wernig, A. Meissner, J. P. Cassady and R. Jaenisch: c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell, 2(1), 10-2 (2008)
doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.12.001
PMid:18371415

6. K. Okita, M. Nakagawa, H. Hyenjong, T. Ichisaka and S. Yamanaka: Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science, 322(5903), 949-53 (2008)
doi:10.1126/science.1164270
PMid:18845712

7. R. Schofield: The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells, 4(1-2), 7-25 (1978)
PMid:747780

8. A. Spradling, D. Drummond-Barbosa and T. Kai: Stem cells find their niche. Nature, 414(6859), 98-104 (2001)
doi:10.1038/35102160
PMid:11689954

9. D. T. Scadden: The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature, 441(7097), 1075-9 (2006)
doi:10.1038/nature04957
PMid:16810242

10. R. S. Taichman: Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood, 105(7), 2631-9 (2005)
doi:10.1182/blood-2004-06-2480
PMid:15585658

11. G. B. Adams and D. T. Scadden: The hematopoietic stem cell in its place. Nat Immunol, 7(4), 333-7 (2006)
doi:10.1038/ni1331
PMid:16550195

12. A. Can: Haematopoietic stem cells niches: interrelations between structure and function. Transfus Apher Sci, 38(3), 261-8 (2008)
doi:10.1016/j.transci.2008.04.006
PMid:18486554

13. S. Rafii, F. Shapiro, R. Pettengell, B. Ferris, R. L. Nachman, M. A. Moore and A. S. Asch: Human bone marrow microvascular endothelial cells support long-term proliferation and differentiation of myeloid and megakaryocytic progenitors. Blood, 86(9), 3353-63 (1995)
PMid:7579438

14. L. M. Calvi, G. B. Adams, K. W. Weibrecht, J. M. Weber, D. P. Olson, M. C. Knight, R. P. Martin, E. Schipani, P. Divieti, F. R. Bringhurst, L. A. Milner, H. M. Kronenberg and D. T. Scadden: Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature, 425(6960), 841-6 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nature02040
PMid:14574413

15. J. Zhang, C. Niu, L. Ye, H. Huang, X. He, W. G. Tong, J. Ross, J. Haug, T. Johnson, J. Q. Feng, S. Harris, L. M. Wiedemann, Y. Mishina and L. Li: Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature, 425(6960), 836-41 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nature02041
PMid:14574412

16. D. Visnjic, Z. Kalajzic, D. W. Rowe, V. Katavic, J. Lorenzo and H. L. Aguila: Hematopoiesis is severely altered in mice with an induced osteoblast deficiency. Blood, 103(9), 3258-64 (2004)
doi:10.1182/blood-2003-11-4011
PMid:14726388

17. R. S. Taichman and S. G. Emerson: The role of osteoblasts in the hematopoietic microenvironment. Stem Cells, 16(1), 7-15 (1998)
doi:10.1002/stem.160007
PMid:9474743

18. T. Ponomaryov, A. Peled, I. Petit, R. S. Taichman, L. Habler, J. Sandbank, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, A. Magerus, A. Caruz, N. Fujii, A. Nagler, M. Lahav, M. Szyper-Kravitz, D. Zipori and T. Lapidot: Induction of the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 following DNA damage improves human stem cell function. J Clin Invest, 106(11), 1331-9 (2000)
doi:10.1172/JCI10329
PMid:11104786    PMCid:381461

19. L. C. Hofbauer, S. Khosla, C. R. Dunstan, D. L. Lacey, W. J. Boyle and B. L. Riggs: The roles of osteoprotegerin and osteoprotegerin ligand in the paracrine regulation of bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res, 15(1), 2-12 (2000)
doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.2
PMid:10646108

20. S. Stier, Y. Ko, R. Forkert, C. Lutz, T. Neuhaus, E. Grunewald, T. Cheng, D. Dombkowski, L. M. Calvi, S. R. Rittling and D. T. Scadden: Osteopontin is a hematopoietic stem cell niche component that negatively regulates stem cell pool size. J Exp Med, 201(11), 1781-91 (2005)
doi:10.1084/jem.20041992
PMid:15928197    PMCid:2213260

21. R. S. Taichman, M. J. Reilly and S. G. Emerson: Human osteoblasts support human hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro bone marrow cultures. Blood, 87(2), 518-24 (1996)
PMid:8555473

22. R. S. Taichman, M. J. Reilly and L. S. Matthews: Human osteoblast-like cells and osteosarcoma cell lines synthesize macrophage inhibitory protein 1alpha in response to interleukin 1beta and tumour necrosis factor alpha stimulation in vitro. Br J Haematol, 108(2), 275-83 (2000)
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01873.x
PMid:10691855

23. M. J. Kiel, O. H. Yilmaz, T. Iwashita, C. Terhorst and S. J. Morrison: SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell, 121(7), 1109-21 (2005)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.026
PMid:15989959

24. T. Sugiyama, H. Kohara, M. Noda and T. Nagasawa: Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity, 25(6), 977-88 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.016
PMid:17174120

25. A. Peled, I. Petit, O. Kollet, M. Magid, T. Ponomaryov, T. Byk, A. Nagler, H. Ben-Hur, A. Many, L. Shultz, O. Lider, R. Alon, D. Zipori and T. Lapidot: Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4. Science, 283(5403), 845-8 (1999)
doi:10.1126/science.283.5403.845
PMid:9933168

26. O. Kollet, A. Dar, S. Shivtiel, A. Kalinkovich, K. Lapid, Y. Sztainberg, M. Tesio, R. M. Samstein, P. Goichberg, A. Spiegel, A. Elson and T. Lapidot: Osteoclasts degrade endosteal components and promote mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Nat Med, 12(6), 657-64 (2006)
doi:10.1038/nm1417
PMid:16715089

27. S. K. Nilsson, H. M. Johnston and J. A. Coverdale: Spatial localization of transplanted hemopoietic stem cells: inferences for the localization of stem cell niches. Blood, 97(8), 2293-9 (2001)
doi:10.1182/blood.V97.8.2293
PMid:11290590

28. A. W. Duncan, F. M. Rattis, L. N. DiMascio, K. L. Congdon, G. Pazianos, C. Zhao, K. Yoon, J. M. Cook, K. Willert, N. Gaiano and T. Reya: Integration of Notch and Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nat Immunol, 6(3), 314-22 (2005)
doi:10.1038/ni1164
PMid:15665828

29. L. W. Ellisen, J. Bird, D. C. West, A. L. Soreng, T. C. Reynolds, S. D. Smith and J. Sklar: TAN-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell, 66(4), 649-61 (1991)
doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90111-B

30. R. M. Pereira, A. M. Delany, D. Durant and E. Canalis: Cortisol regulates the expression of Notch in osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem, 85(2), 252-8 (2002)
doi:10.1002/jcb.10125
PMid:11948681

31. J. M. Weber, S. R. Forsythe, C. A. Christianson, B. J. Frisch, B. J. Gigliotti, C. T. Jordan, L. A. Milner, M. L. Guzman and L. M. Calvi: Parathyroid hormone stimulates expression of the Notch ligand Jagged1 in osteoblastic cells. Bone, 39(3), 485-93 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.03.002
PMid:16647886

32. T. Reya, A. W. Duncan, L. Ailles, J. Domen, D. C. Scherer, K. Willert, L. Hintz, R. Nusse and I. L. Weissman: A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature, 423(6938), 409-14 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nature01593
PMid:12717450

33. K. Willert, J. D. Brown, E. Danenberg, A. W. Duncan, I. L. Weissman, T. Reya, J. R. Yates, 3rd and R. Nusse: Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature, 423(6938), 448-52 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nature01611
PMid:12717451

34. T. Cheng, N. Rodrigues, H. Shen, Y. Yang, D. Dombkowski, M. Sykes and D. T. Scadden: Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1. Science, 287(5459), 1804-8 (2000)
doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1804
PMid:10710306

35. F. Arai, A. Hirao, M. Ohmura, H. Sato, S. Matsuoka, K. Takubo, K. Ito, G. Y. Koh and T. Suda: Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell, 118(2), 149-61 (2004)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.004
PMid:15260986

36. M. G. House, L. Kohlmeier, N. Chattopadhyay, O. Kifor, T. Yamaguchi, M. S. Leboff, J. Glowacki and E. M. Brown: Expression of an extracellular calcium-sensing receptor in human and mouse bone marrow cells. J Bone Miner Res, 12(12), 1959-70 (1997)
doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.12.1959
PMid:9421228

37. E. S. Antoniou, S. Sund, E. N. Homsi, L. F. Challenger and P. Rameshwar: A theoretical simulation of hematopoietic stem cells during oxygen fluctuations: prediction of bone marrow responses during hemorrhagic shock. Shock, 22(5), 415-22 (2004)
doi:10.1097/01.shk.0000142185.88094.88
PMid:15489633

38. G. H. Danet, Y. Pan, J. L. Luongo, D. A. Bonnet and M. C. Simon: Expansion of human SCID-repopulating cells under hypoxic conditions. J Clin Invest, 112(1), 126-35 (2003)
doi:10.1172/JCI200317669
PMid:12840067    PMCid:162287

doi:10.1172/JCI17669
PMid:12840067    PMCid:162287

39. D. J. Ceradini, A. R. Kulkarni, M. J. Callaghan, O. M. Tepper, N. Bastidas, M. E. Kleinman, J. M. Capla, R. D. Galiano, J. P. Levine and G. C. Gurtner: Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med, 10(8), 858-64 (2004)
doi:10.1038/nm1075
PMid:15235597

40. M. A. Dao, M. H. Creer, J. A. Nolta and C. M. Verfaillie: Biology of umbilical cord blood progenitors in bone marrow niches. Blood, 110(1), 74-81 (2007)
doi:10.1182/blood-2006-08-034447
PMid:17371947    PMCid:1896129

41. O. K. Lee, T. K. Kuo, W. M. Chen, K. D. Lee, S. L. Hsieh and T. H. Chen: Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood, 103(5), 1669-75 (2004)
doi:10.1182/blood-2003-05-1670
PMid:14576065

42. J. M. Melero-Martin, Z. A. Khan, A. Picard, X. Wu, S. Paruchuri and J. Bischoff: In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Blood, 109(11), 4761-8 (2007)
doi:10.1182/blood-2006-12-062471
PMid:17327403

43. P. Rubinstein, R. E. Rosenfield, J. W. Adamson and C. E. Stevens: Stored placental blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Blood, 81(7), 1679-90 (1993)
PMid:8096404

44. H. E. Broxmeyer and S. Vadhan-Raj: Preclinical and clinical studies with the hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors and related interleukins. Immunol Res, 8(3), 185-201 (1989)
doi:10.1007/BF02918144
PMid:2664033

45. J. F. Apperley: Umbilical cord blood progenitor cell transplantation. The International Conference Workshop on Cord Blood Transplantation, Indianapolis, November 1993. Bone Marrow Transplant, 14(2), 187-96 (1994)

46. F. Locatelli, V. Rocha, C. Chastang, W. Arcese, G. Michel, M. Abecasis, C. Messina, J. Ortega, I. Badell-Serra, E. Plouvier, G. Souillet, J. P. Jouet, R. Pasquini, E. Ferreira, F. Garnier and E. Gluckman: Factors associated with outcome after cord blood transplantation in children with acute leukemia. Eurocord-Cord Blood Transplant Group. Blood, 93(11), 3662-71 (1999)
PMid:10339472

47. J. N. Barker, D. J. Weisdorf, T. E. DeFor, B. R. Blazar, J. S. Miller and J. E. Wagner: Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood, 102(5), 1915-9 (2003)
doi:10.1182/blood-2002-11-3337
PMid:12738676

48. M. De Lima, L. S. St John, E. D. Wieder, M. S. Lee, J. McMannis, S. Karandish, S. Giralt, M. Beran, D. Couriel, M. Korbling, S. Bibawi, R. Champlin and K. V. Komanduri: Double-chimaerism after transplantation of two human leucocyte antigen mismatched, unrelated cord blood units. Br J Haematol, 119(3), 773-6 (2002)
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03893.x
PMid:12437658

49. L. Lekakis, S. Giralt, D. Couriel, E. J. Shpall, C. Hosing, I. F. Khouri, P. Anderlini, M. Korbling, T. Martin, R. E. Champlin and M. de Lima: Phase II study of unrelated cord blood transplantation for adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant, 38(6), 421-6 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705467
PMid:16892072

50. F. Mazurier, M. Doedens, O. I. Gan and J. E. Dick: Characterization of cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 996, 67-71 (2003)
doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03234.x
PMid:12799284

51. Y. Li, T. Ma, D. A. Kniss, S. T. Yang and L. C. Lasky: Human cord cell hematopoiesis in three-dimensional nonwoven fibrous matrices: in vitro simulation of the marrow microenvironment. J Hematother Stem Cell Res, 10(3), 355-68 (2001)
doi:10.1089/152581601750288966
PMid:11454311

52. T. Okamoto, M. Takagi, T. Soma, H. Ogawa, M. Kawakami, M. Mukubo, K. Kubo, R. Sato, K. Toma and T. Yoshida: Effect of heparin addition on expansion of cord blood hematopoietic progenitor cells in three-dimensional coculture with stromal cells in nonwoven fabrics. J Artif Organs, 7(4), 194-202 (2004)
doi:10.1007/s10047-004-0272-x
PMid:15739052

53. H. Das, N. Abdulhameed, M. Joseph, R. Sakthivel, H. Q. Mao and V. J. Pompili: Ex vivo nanofiber expansion and genetic modification of human cord blood-derived progenitor/stem cells enhances vasculogenesis. Cell Transplant, 18(3), 305-18 (2009)
doi:10.3727/096368909788534870
PMid:19558779    PMCid:2749501

54. J. N. Ihle, J. Keller, S. Oroszlan, L. E. Henderson, T. D. Copeland, F. Fitch, M. B. Prystowsky, E. Goldwasser, J. W. Schrader, E. Palaszynski, M. Dy and B. Lebel: Biologic properties of homogeneous interleukin 3. I. Demonstration of WEHI-3 growth factor activity, mast cell growth factor activity, p cell-stimulating factor activity, colony-stimulating factor activity, and histamine-producing cell-stimulating factor activity. J Immunol, 131(1), 282-7 (1983)
PMid:6190911

55. Y. Morikawa, K. Tohya, T. Hara, T. Kitamura and A. Miyajima: Expression of IL-3 receptor in testis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 226(1), 107-12 (1996)
doi:10.1006/bbrc.1996.1318
PMid:8806599

56. D. Bryder and S. E. Jacobsen: Interleukin-3 supports expansion of long-term multilineage repopulating activity after multiple stem cell divisions in vitro. Blood, 96(5), 1748-55 (2000)
PMid:10961873

57. Y. Yonemura, H. Ku, F. Hirayama, L. M. Souza and M. Ogawa: Interleukin 3 or interleukin 1 abrogates the reconstituting ability of hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 93(9), 4040-4 (1996)
doi:10.1073/pnas.93.9.4040

58. S. O. Peters, E. L. Kittler, H. S. Ramshaw and P. J. Quesenberry: Ex vivo expansion of murine marrow cells with interleukin-3 (IL-3), IL-6, IL-11, and stem cell factor leads to impaired engraftment in irradiated hosts. Blood, 87(1), 30-7 (1996)
PMid:8547656

59. T. Ueda, K. Tsuji, H. Yoshino, Y. Ebihara, H. Yagasaki, H. Hisakawa, T. Mitsui, A. Manabe, R. Tanaka, K. Kobayashi, M. Ito, K. Yasukawa and T. Nakahata: Expansion of human NOD/SCID-repopulating cells by stem cell factor, Flk2/Flt3 ligand, thrombopoietin, IL-6, and soluble IL-6 receptor. J Clin Invest, 105(7), 1013-21 (2000)
doi:10.1172/JCI8583
PMid:10749580    PMCid:377479

60. O. Kollet, R. Aviram, J. Chebath, H. ben-Hur, A. Nagler, L. Shultz, M. Revel and T. Lapidot: The soluble interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor/IL-6 fusion protein enhances in vitro maintenance and proliferation of human CD34(+)CD38(-/low) cells capable of repopulating severe combined immunodeficiency mice. Blood, 94(3), 923-31 (1999)
PMid:10419883

61. T. Kimura, J. Wang, H. Minamiguchi, H. Fujiki, S. Harada, K. Okuda, H. Kaneko, S. Yokota, K. Yasukawa, T. Abe and Y. Sonoda: Signal through gp130 activated by soluble interleukin (IL)-6 receptor (R) and IL-6 or IL-6R/IL-6 fusion protein enhances ex vivo expansion of human peripheral blood-derived hematopoietic progenitors. Stem Cells, 18(6), 444-52 (2000)
doi:10.1634/stemcells.18-6-444
PMid:11072033

62. H. Yoshihara, F. Arai, K. Hosokawa, T. Hagiwara, K. Takubo, Y. Nakamura, Y. Gomei, H. Iwasaki, S. Matsuoka, K. Miyamoto, H. Miyazaki, T. Takahashi and T. Suda: Thrombopoietin/MPL signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and interaction with the osteoblastic niche. Cell Stem Cell, 1(6), 685-97 (2007)
doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.020
PMid:18371409

63. N. Fox, G. Priestley, T. Papayannopoulou and K. Kaushansky: Thrombopoietin expands hematopoietic stem cells after transplantation. J Clin Invest, 110(3), 389-94 (2002)
doi:10.1172/JCI15430
PMid:12163458    PMCid:151089

doi:10.1172/JCI200215430
PMid:12163458    PMCid:151089

64. W. Piacibello, F. Sanavio, L. Garetto, A. Severino, D. Bergandi, J. Ferrario, F. Fagioli, M. Berger and M. Aglietta: Extensive amplification and self-renewal of human primitive hematopoietic stem cells from cord blood. Blood, 89(8), 2644-53 (1997)
PMid:9108381

65. T. Nishino, K. Miyaji, N. Ishiwata, K. Arai, M. Yui, Y. Asai, H. Nakauchi and A. Iwama: Ex vivo expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells by a small-molecule agonist of c-MPL. Exp Hematol, 37(11), 1364-1377 e4 (2009)

66. W. Matthews, C. T. Jordan, G. W. Wiegand, D. Pardoll and I. R. Lemischka: A receptor tyrosine kinase specific to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell-enriched populations. Cell, 65(7), 1143-52 (1991)
doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90010-V

67. G. Molineux, C. McCrea, X. Q. Yan, P. Kerzic and I. McNiece: Flt-3 ligand synergizes with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase neutrophil numbers and to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells with long-term repopulating potential. Blood, 89(11), 3998-4004 (1997)
PMid:9166838

68. A. L. Petzer, P. W. Zandstra, J. M. Piret and C. J. Eaves: Differential cytokine effects on primitive (CD34+CD38-) human hematopoietic cells: novel responses to Flt3-ligand and thrombopoietin. J Exp Med, 183(6), 2551-8 (1996)
doi:10.1084/jem.183.6.2551
PMid:8676076

69. S. J. Galli, K. M. Zsebo and E. N. Geissler: The kit ligand, stem cell factor. Adv Immunol, 55, 1-96 (1994)
doi:10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60508-8

70. D. E. Williams, P. de Vries, A. E. Namen, M. B. Widmer and S. D. Lyman: The Steel factor. Dev Biol, 151(2), 368-76 (1992)
doi:10.1016/0012-1606(92)90176-H

71. Y. Yonemura, H. Ku, S. D. Lyman and M. Ogawa: In vitro expansion of hematopoietic progenitors and maintenance of stem cells: comparison between FLT3/FLK-2 ligand and KIT ligand. Blood, 89(6), 1915-21 (1997)
PMid:9058711

72. A. V. Molofsky, R. Pardal and S. J. Morrison: Diverse mechanisms regulate stem cell self-renewal. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 16(6), 700-7 (2004)
doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.004
PMid:15530784

73. T. Suzuki and S. Chiba: Notch signaling in hematopoietic stem cells. Int J Hematol, 82(4), 285-94 (2005)
doi:10.1532/IJH97.05115
PMid:16298816

74. C. Buske and R. K. Humphries: Homeobox genes in leukemogenesis. Int J Hematol, 71(4), 301-8 (2000)
PMid:10905048

75. M. Kleber and L. Sommer: Wnt signaling and the regulation of stem cell function. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 16(6), 681-7 (2004)
doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.08.006
PMid:15530781

76. G. Sauvageau, U. Thorsteinsdottir, C. J. Eaves, H. J. Lawrence, C. Largman, P. M. Lansdorp and R. K. Humphries: Overexpression of HOXB4 in hematopoietic cells causes the selective expansion of more primitive populations in vitro and in vivo. Genes Dev, 9(14), 1753-65 (1995)
doi:10.1101/gad.9.14.1753

77. U. Thorsteinsdottir, G. Sauvageau and R. K. Humphries: Enhanced in vivo regenerative potential of HOXB4-transduced hematopoietic stem cells with regulation of their pool size. Blood, 94(8), 2605-12 (1999)
PMid:10515864

78. G. Bhardwaj, B. Murdoch, D. Wu, D. P. Baker, K. P. Williams, K. Chadwick, L. E. Ling, F. N. Karanu and M. Bhatia: Sonic hedgehog induces the proliferation of primitive human hematopoietic cells via BMP regulation. Nat Immunol, 2(2), 172-80 (2001)
doi:10.1038/84282
PMid:11175816

79. D. Henrique, E. Hirsinger, J. Adam, I. Le Roux, O. Pourquie, D. Ish-Horowicz and J. Lewis: Maintenance of neuroepithelial progenitor cells by Delta-Notch signalling in the embryonic chick retina. Curr Biol, 7(9), 661-70 (1997)
doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00293-4

80. T. Suzuki, Y. Yokoyama, K. Kumano, M. Takanashi, S. Kozuma, T. Takato, T. Nakahata, M. Nishikawa, S. Sakano, M. Kurokawa, S. Ogawa and S. Chiba: Highly efficient ex vivo expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells using Delta1-Fc chimeric protein. Stem Cells, 24(11), 2456-65 (2006)
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0258
PMid:16857897

81. T. Heike and T. Nakahata: Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells by cytokines. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1592(3), 313-21 (2002) doi:S0167488902003245 (pii)

82. M. Ito, H. Hiramatsu, K. Kobayashi, K. Suzue, M. Kawahata, K. Hioki, Y. Ueyama, Y. Koyanagi, K. Sugamura, K. Tsuji, T. Heike and T. Nakahata: NOD/SCID/gamma(c)(null) mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. Blood, 100(9), 3175-82 (2002)
doi:10.1182/blood-2001-12-0207
PMid:12384415

83. M. Cavazzana-Calvo, S. Hacein-Bey, G. de Saint Basile, F. Gross, E. Yvon, P. Nusbaum, F. Selz, C. Hue, S. Certain, J. L. Casanova, P. Bousso, F. L. Deist and A. Fischer: Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science, 288(5466), 669-72 (2000)
doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.669
PMid:10784449

84. W. S. Hu and V. K. Pathak: Design of retroviral vectors and helper cells for gene therapy. Pharmacol Rev, 52(4), 493-511 (2000)
PMid:11121508

85. C. C. Fraser, C. J. Eaves, S. J. Szilvassy and R. K. Humphries: Expansion in vitro of retrovirally marked totipotent hematopoietic stem cells. Blood, 76(6), 1071-6 (1990)
PMid:2400803

86. A. Cassel, M. Cottler-Fox, S. Doren and C. E. Dunbar: Retroviral-mediated gene transfer into CD34-enriched human peripheral blood stem cells. Exp Hematol, 21(4), 585-91 (1993)
PMid:7681785

87. E. Check: A tragic setback. Nature, 420(6912), 116-8 (2002)
doi:10.1038/420116a
PMid:12432357

88. C. Baum, J. Dullmann, Z. Li, B. Fehse, J. Meyer, D. A. Williams and C. von Kalle: Side effects of retroviral gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells. Blood, 101(6), 2099-114 (2003)
doi:10.1182/blood-2002-07-2314
PMid:12511419

89. W. Wagner, S. Laufs, J. Blake, C. Schwager, X. Wu, J. W. Zeller, A. D. Ho and S. Fruehauf: Retroviral integration sites correlate with expressed genes in hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells, 23(8), 1050-8 (2005)
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0006
PMid:16140869

90. X. Wu, Y. Li, B. Crise and S. M. Burgess: Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science, 300(5626), 1749-51 (2003)
doi:10.1126/science.1083413
PMid:12805549

91. S. Laufs, B. Gentner, K. Z. Nagy, A. Jauch, A. Benner, S. Naundorf, K. Kuehlcke, B. Schiedlmeier, A. D. Ho, W. J. Zeller and S. Fruehauf: Retroviral vector integration occurs in preferred genomic targets of human bone marrow-repopulating cells. Blood, 101(6), 2191-8 (2003)
doi:10.1182/blood-2002-02-0627
PMid:12424203

92. R. S. Mitchell, B. F. Beitzel, A. R. Schroder, P. Shinn, H. Chen, C. C. Berry, J. R. Ecker and F. D. Bushman: Retroviral DNA integration: ASLV, HIV, and MLV show distinct target site preferences. PLoS Biol, 2(8), E234 (2004)
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020234
PMid:15314653    PMCid:509299

93. C. Dorrell, O. I. Gan, D. S. Pereira, R. G. Hawley and J. E. Dick: Expansion of human cord blood CD34(+)CD38(-) cells in ex vivo culture during retroviral transduction without a corresponding increase in SCID repopulating cell (SRC) frequency: dissociation of SRC phenotype and function. Blood, 95(1), 102-10 (2000)
PMid:10607692

94. S. H. Cheshier, S. J. Morrison, X. Liao and I. L. Weissman: In vivo proliferation and cell cycle kinetics of long-term self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96(6), 3120-5 (1999)
doi:10.1073/pnas.96.6.3120

95. A. Gothot, J. C. van der Loo, D. W. Clapp and E. F. Srour: Cell cycle-related changes in repopulating capacity of human mobilized peripheral blood CD34(+) cells in non-obese diabetic/severe combined immune-deficient mice. Blood, 92(8), 2641-9 (1998)
PMid:9763545

96. R. E. Sutton, M. J. Reitsma, N. Uchida and P. O. Brown: Transduction of human progenitor hematopoietic stem cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1-based vectors is cell cycle dependent. J Virol, 73(5), 3649-60 (1999)
PMid:10196257    PMCid:104140

97. H. Glimm, I. H. Oh and C. J. Eaves: Human hematopoietic stem cells stimulated to proliferate in vitro lose engraftment potential during their S/G(2)/M transit and do not reenter G(0). Blood, 96(13), 4185-93 (2000)
PMid:11110690

98. N. B. Woods, C. Fahlman, H. Mikkola, I. Hamaguchi, K. Olsson, R. Zufferey, S. E. Jacobsen, D. Trono and S. Karlsson: Lentiviral gene transfer into primary and secondary NOD/SCID repopulating cells. Blood, 96(12), 3725-33 (2000)
PMid:11090053

99. H. Das, J. C. George, M. Joseph, M. Das, N. Abdulhameed, A. Blitz, M. Khan, R. Sakthivel, H. Q. Mao, B. D. Hoit, P. Kuppusamy and V. J. Pompili: Stem cell therapy with overexpressed VEGF and PDGF genes improves cardiac function in a rat infarct model. PLoS One, 4(10), e7325 (2009)
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007325
PMid:19809493    PMCid:2752797

100. A. Srivastava, E. W. Lusby and K. I. Berns: Nucleotide sequence and organization of the adeno-associated virus 2 genome. J Virol, 45(2), 555-64 (1983)
PMid:6300419    PMCid:256449

101. C. Li, D. E. Bowles, T. van Dyke and R. J. Samulski: Adeno-associated virus vectors: potential applications for cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther, 12(12), 913-25 (2005)
doi:10.1038/sj.cgt.7700876
PMid:15962012    PMCid:1361306

102. R. J. Samulski, X. Zhu, X. Xiao, J. D. Brook, D. E. Housman, N. Epstein and L. A. Hunter: Targeted integration of adeno-associated virus (AAV) into human chromosome 19. EMBO J, 10(12), 3941-50 (1991)
PMid:1657596    PMCid:453134

103. R. M. Kotin, M. Siniscalco, R. J. Samulski, X. D. Zhu, L. Hunter, C. A. Laughlin, S. McLaughlin, N. Muzyczka, M. Rocchi and K. I. Berns: Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 87(6), 2211-5 (1990)
doi:10.1073/pnas.87.6.2211

104. L. Santat, H. Paz, C. Wong, L. Li, J. Macer, S. Forman, K. K. Wong and S. Chatterjee: Recombinant AAV2 transduction of primitive human hematopoietic stem cells capable of serial engraftment in immune-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102(31), 11053-8 (2005)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0502902102
PMid:16043711    PMCid:1182430

105. C. Chen and H. Okayama: High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol, 7(8), 2745-52 (1987)
PMid:3670292    PMCid:367891

106. K. M. Kjer and A. M. Fallon: Efficient transfection of mosquito cells is influenced by the temperature at which DNA-calcium phosphate coprecipitates are prepared. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol, 16(3), 189-200 (1991)
doi:10.1002/arch.940160305
PMid:1799674

107. E. T. Schenborn and J. Oler: Liposome-mediated transfection of mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol, 130, 155-64 (2000)
PMid:10589429

108. K. Ewert, H. M. Evans, A. Ahmad, N. L. Slack, A. J. Lin, A. Martin-Herranz and C. R. Safinya: Lipoplex structures and their distinct cellular pathways. Adv Genet, 53, 119-55 (2005)
doi:10.1016/S0065-2660(05)53005-0

109. X. Gao and L. Huang: Cationic liposome-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther, 2(10), 710-22 (1995)
PMid:8750010

110. C. Chen, S. W. Smye, M. P. Robinson and J. A. Evans: Membrane electroporation theories: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput, 44(1-2), 5-14 (2006) doi:10.1007/s11517-005-0020-2
doi:10.1007/s11517-005-0020-2
PMid:16929916

111. U. Lakshmipathy, B. Pelacho, K. Sudo, J. L. Linehan, E. Coucouvanis, D. S. Kaufman and C. M. Verfaillie: Efficient transfection of embryonic and adult stem cells. Stem Cells, 22(4), 531-43 (2004)
doi:10.1634/stemcells.22-4-531
PMid:15277699

112. M. Wilke, E. Fortunati, M. van den Broek, A. T. Hoogeveen and B. J. Scholte: Efficacy of a peptide-based gene delivery system depends on mitotic activity. Gene Ther, 3(12), 1133-42 (1996)
PMid:8986440

113. M. Brisson, W. C. Tseng, C. Almonte, S. Watkins and L. Huang: Subcellular trafficking of the cytoplasmic expression system. Hum Gene Ther, 10(16), 2601-13 (1999)
doi:10.1089/10430349950016645
PMid:10566888

114. J. H. Distler, A. Jungel, M. Kurowska-Stolarska, B. A. Michel, R. E. Gay, S. Gay and O. Distler: Nucleofection: a new, highly efficient transfection method for primary human keratinocytes*. Exp Dermatol, 14(4), 315-20 (2005)
doi:10.1111/j.0906-6705.2005.00276.x
PMid:15810891

115. M. Aluigi, M. Fogli, A. Curti, A. Isidori, E. Gruppioni, C. Chiodoni, M. P. Colombo, P. Versura, A. D'Errico-Grigioni, E. Ferri, M. Baccarani and R. M. Lemoli: Nucleofection is an efficient nonviral transfection technique for human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells, 24(2), 454-61 (2006)
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0198
PMid:16099993

116. C. Thiel and M. Nix: Efficient transfection of primary cells relevant for cardiovascular research by nucleofection. Methods Mol Med, 129, 255-66 (2006)
PMid:17085816

117. S. Y. Han, W. Gai, M. Yancovitz, I. Osman, C. J. Di Como and D. Polsky: Nucleofection is a highly effective gene transfer technique for human melanoma cell lines. Exp Dermatol, 17(5), 405-11 (2008)
doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00687.x
PMid:18312380

118. K. J. Stewart, W. R. Hiatt, J. G. Regensteiner and A. T. Hirsch: Exercise training for claudication. N Engl J Med, 347(24), 1941-51 (2002)
doi:10.1056/NEJMra021135
PMid:12477945

119. A. B. Newman, L. Shemanski, T. A. Manolio, M. Cushman, M. Mittelmark, J. F. Polak, N. R. Powe and D. Siscovick: Ankle-arm index as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The Cardiovascular Health Study Group. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 19(3), 538-45 (1999)
PMid:10073955

120. O. Rosnet, C. Schiff, M. J. Pebusque, S. Marchetto, C. Tonnelle, Y. Toiron, F. Birg and D. Birnbaum: Human FLT3/FLK2 gene: cDNA cloning and expression in hematopoietic cells. Blood, 82(4), 1110-9 (1993)
PMid:8394751

121. S. K. Bae, J. H. Baek, Y. M. Lee, O. H. Lee and K. W. Kim: Hypoxia-induced apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells: a possible involvement of the 6-TG-sensitive protein kinase(s)-dependent signaling pathway. Cancer Lett, 126(1), 97-104 (1998)
doi:10.1016/S0304-3835(97)00538-7

122. T. Asahara, T. Takahashi, H. Masuda, C. Kalka, D. Chen, H. Iwaguro, Y. Inai, M. Silver and J. M. Isner: VEGF contributes to postnatal neovascularization by mobilizing bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J, 18(14), 3964-72 (1999)
doi:10.1093/emboj/18.14.3964
PMid:10406801    PMCid:1171472

123. J. M. Isner, A. Pieczek, R. Schainfeld, R. Blair, L. Haley, T. Asahara, K. Rosenfield, S. Razvi, K. Walsh and J. F. Symes: Clinical evidence of angiogenesis after arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 in patient with ischaemic limb. Lancet, 348(9024), 370-4 (1996)
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03361-2

124. J. M. Isner, K. Walsh, J. Symes, A. Pieczek, S. Takeshita, J. Lowry, S. Rossow, K. Rosenfield, L. Weir, E. Brogi and et al.: Arterial gene therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis in patients with peripheral artery disease. Circulation, 91(11), 2687-92 (1995)
PMid:7538919

125. W. Risau, H. Drexler, V. Mironov, A. Smits, A. Siegbahn, K. Funa and C. H. Heldin: Platelet-derived growth factor is angiogenic in vivo. Growth Factors, 7(4), 261-6 (1992)
doi:10.3109/08977199209046408
PMid:1284870

126. D. B. Kaufman, G. W. Iii, D. S. Bruce, C. P. Johnson, A. O. Gaber, D. E. Sutherland, R. M. Merion, S. A. Gruber, E. Schweitzer, J. P. Leone, C. L. Marsh, E. Alfrey, W. Concepcion, M. D. Stegall, J. A. Schulak, P. F. Gores, E. Benedetti, C. Smith, A. K. Henning, F. Kuehnel, S. King and W. E. Fitzsimmons: Prospective, randomized, multi-center trial of antibody induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant, 3(7), 855-64 (2003)
doi:10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00160.x
PMid:12814477

127. P. Rustemeyer, W. Wittkowski, B. Greve and M. Stehling: Flow-cytometric identification, enumeration, purification, and expansion of CD133+ and VEGF-R2+ endothelial progenitor cells from peripheral blood. J Immunoassay Immunochem, 28(1), 13-23 (2007)
doi:10.1080/15321810601025549
PMid:17236393

128. S. S. Khan, M. A. Solomon and J. P. McCoy, Jr.: Detection of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells by flow cytometry. Cytometry B Clin Cytom, 64(1), 1-8 (2005)
doi:10.1002/cyto.b.20040
PMid:15668988

129. T. Asahara, T. Murohara, A. Sullivan, M. Silver, R. van der Zee, T. Li, B. Witzenbichler, G. Schatteman and J. M. Isner: Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science, 275(5302), 964-7 (1997)
doi:10.1126/science.275.5302.964
PMid:9020076

130. D. R. Senger, S. J. Galli, A. M. Dvorak, C. A. Perruzzi, V. S. Harvey and H. F. Dvorak: Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid. Science, 219(4587), 983-5 (1983)
doi:10.1126/science.6823562
PMid:6823562

131. D. W. Leung, G. Cachianes, W. J. Kuang, D. V. Goeddel and N. Ferrara: Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science, 246(4935), 1306-9 (1989)
doi:10.1126/science.2479986
PMid:2479986

132. S. C. Shih and K. P. Claffey: Regulation of human vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA stability in hypoxia by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L. J Biol Chem, 274(3), 1359-65 (1999)
doi:10.1074/jbc.274.3.1359
PMid:9880507

133. G. Neufeld, T. Cohen, S. Gengrinovitch and Z. Poltorak: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J, 13(1), 9-22 (1999)
PMid:9872925

134. C. Kalka, H. Masuda, T. Takahashi, W. M. Kalka-Moll, M. Silver, M. Kearney, T. Li, J. M. Isner and T. Asahara: Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97(7), 3422-7 (2000)
doi:10.1073/pnas.070046397
PMid:10725398

135. C. L. Grosskreutz, B. Anand-Apte, C. Duplaa, T. P. Quinn, B. I. Terman, B. Zetter and P. A. D'Amore: Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced migration of vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Microvasc Res, 58(2), 128-36 (1999)
doi:10.1006/mvre.1999.2171
PMid:10458928

136. W. Schaper and W. D. Ito: Molecular mechanisms of coronary collateral vessel growth. Circ Res, 79(5), 911-9 (1996)
PMid:8888683

137. M. Arras, W. D. Ito, D. Scholz, B. Winkler, J. Schaper and W. Schaper: Monocyte activation in angiogenesis and collateral growth in the rabbit hindlimb. J Clin Invest, 101(1), 40-50 (1998)
doi:10.1172/JCI119877
PMid:9421464    PMCid:508538

138. T. Couffinhal, M. Silver, M. Kearney, A. Sullivan, B. Witzenbichler, M. Magner, B. Annex, K. Peters and J. M. Isner: Impaired collateral vessel development associated with reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in ApoE-/- mice. Circulation, 99(24), 3188-98 (1999)
PMid:10377084

139. J. S. Silvestre, R. Tamarat, T. G. Ebrahimian, A. Le-Roux, M. Clergue, F. Emmanuel, M. Duriez, B. Schwartz, D. Branellec and B. I. Levy: Vascular endothelial growth factor-B promotes in vivo angiogenesis. Circ Res, 93(2), 114-23 (2003)
doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000081594.21764.44
PMid:12805240

140. T. F. Deuel, J. S. Huang, R. T. Proffitt, J. U. Baenziger, D. Chang and B. B. Kennedy: Human platelet-derived growth factor. Purification and resolution into two active protein fractions. J Biol Chem, 256(17), 8896-9 (1981)
PMid:7263691

141. X. Li, A. Ponten, K. Aase, L. Karlsson, A. Abramsson, M. Uutela, G. Backstrom, M. Hellstrom, H. Bostrom, H. Li, P. Soriano, C. Betsholtz, C. H. Heldin, K. Alitalo, A. Ostman and U. Eriksson: PDGF-C is a new protease-activated ligand for the PDGF alpha-receptor. Nat Cell Biol, 2(5), 302-9 (2000)
doi:10.1038/35010579
PMid:10806482

142. W. J. LaRochelle, M. Jeffers, W. F. McDonald, R. A. Chillakuru, N. A. Giese, N. A. Lokker, C. Sullivan, F. L. Boldog, M. Yang, C. Vernet, C. E. Burgess, E. Fernandes, L. L. Deegler, B. Rittman, J. Shimkets, R. A. Shimkets, J. M. Rothberg and H. S. Lichenstein: PDGF-D, a new protease-activated growth factor. Nat Cell Biol, 3(5), 517-21 (2001)
doi:10.1038/35074593
PMid:11331882

143. F. S. Vassbotn, O. K. Havnen, C. H. Heldin and H. Holmsen: Negative feedback regulation of human platelets via autocrine activation of the platelet-derived growth factor alpha-receptor. J Biol Chem, 269(19), 13874-9 (1994)
PMid:8188664

144. P. Lindahl, B. R. Johansson, P. Leveen and C. Betsholtz: Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice. Science, 277(5323), 242-5 (1997)
doi:10.1126/science.277.5323.242
PMid:9211853

145. J. R. Crosby, R. A. Seifert, P. Soriano and D. F. Bowen-Pope: Chimaeric analysis reveals role of Pdgf receptors in all muscle lineages. Nat Genet, 18(4), 385-8 (1998)
doi:10.1038/ng0498-385
PMid:9537425

146. C. Basilico and D. Moscatelli: The FGF family of growth factors and oncogenes. Adv Cancer Res, 59, 115-65 (1992)
doi:10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60305-X

147. M. Miyamoto, K. Naruo, C. Seko, S. Matsumoto, T. Kondo and T. Kurokawa: Molecular cloning of a novel cytokine cDNA encoding the ninth member of the fibroblast growth factor family, which has a unique secretion property. Mol Cell Biol, 13(7), 4251-9 (1993)
PMid:8321227    PMCid:359975

148. M. Jaye, J. Schlessinger and C. A. Dionne: Fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases: molecular analysis and signal transduction. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1135(2), 185-99 (1992)
doi:10.1016/0167-4889(92)90136-Y

149. A. Logan, S. A. Frautschy and A. Baird: Basic fibroblast growth factor and central nervous system injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 638, 474-6 (1991)
doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb49073.x
PMid:1785823

150. J. W. McAvoy, C. G. Chamberlain, R. U. de Iongh, N. A. Richardson and F. J. Lovicu: The role of fibroblast growth factor in eye lens development. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 638, 256-74 (1991)
doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb49036.x
PMid:1723855

151. I. Flamme and W. Risau: Induction of vasculogenesis and hematopoiesis in vitro. Development, 116(2), 435-9 (1992)
PMid:1286617

152. S. M. Schwartz and L. Liaw: Growth control and morphogenesis in the development and pathology of arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 21 Suppl 1, S31-49 (1993)
doi:10.1097/00005344-199301000-00007
PMid:7681130

153. R. Cao, E. Brakenhielm, R. Pawliuk, D. Wariaro, M. J. Post, E. Wahlberg, P. Leboulch and Y. Cao: Angiogenic synergism, vascular stability and improvement of hind-limb ischemia by a combination of PDGF-BB and FGF-2. Nat Med, 9(5), 604-13 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nm848
PMid:12669032

154. R. Wafai, E. M. Tudor, J. A. Angus and C. E. Wright: Vascular effects of FGF-2 and VEGF-B in rabbits with bilateral hind limb ischemia. J Vasc Res, 46(1), 45-54 (2009)
doi:10.1159/000139132
PMid:18552506

155. P. Carmeliet, L. Moons, A. Luttun, V. Vincenti, V. Compernolle, M. De Mol, Y. Wu, F. Bono, L. Devy, H. Beck, D. Scholz, T. Acker, T. DiPalma, M. Dewerchin, A. Noel, I. Stalmans, A. Barra, S. Blacher, T. Vandendriessche, A. Ponten, U. Eriksson, K. H. Plate, J. M. Foidart, W. Schaper, D. S. Charnock-Jones, D. J. Hicklin, J. M. Herbert, D. Collen and M. G. Persico: Synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor contributes to angiogenesis and plasma extravasation in pathological conditions. Nat Med, 7(5), 575-83 (2001)
doi:10.1038/87904
PMid:11329059

156. M. Autiero, J. Waltenberger, D. Communi, A. Kranz, L. Moons, D. Lambrechts, J. Kroll, S. Plaisance, M. De Mol, F. Bono, S. Kliche, G. Fellbrich, K. Ballmer-Hofer, D. Maglione, U. Mayr-Beyrle, M. Dewerchin, S. Dombrowski, D. Stanimirovic, P. Van Hummelen, C. Dehio, D. J. Hicklin, G. Persico, J. M. Herbert, M. Shibuya, D. Collen, E. M. Conway and P. Carmeliet: Role of PlGF in the intra- and intermolecular cross talk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1. Nat Med, 9(7), 936-43 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nm884
PMid:12796773

157. B. Li, E. E. Sharpe, A. B. Maupin, A. A. Teleron, A. L. Pyle, P. Carmeliet and P. P. Young: VEGF and PlGF promote adult vasculogenesis by enhancing EPC recruitment and vessel formation at the site of tumor neovascularization. FASEB J, 20(9), 1495-7 (2006)
doi:10.1096/fj.05-5137fje
PMid:16754748

158. T. Fujii, Y. Yonemitsu, M. Onimaru, M. Inoue, M. Hasegawa, H. Kuwano and K. Sueishi: VEGF function for upregulation of endogenous PlGF expression during FGF-2-mediated therapeutic angiogenesis. Atherosclerosis, 200(1), 51-7 (2008)
doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.012
PMid:18258238

159. T. Nakamura, H. Teramoto and A. Ichihara: Purification and characterization of a growth factor from rat platelets for mature parenchymal hepatocytes in primary cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 83(17), 6489-93 (1986)
doi:10.1073/pnas.83.17.6489

160. F. Bussolino, M. F. Di Renzo, M. Ziche, E. Bocchietto, M. Olivero, L. Naldini, G. Gaudino, L. Tamagnone, A. Coffer and P. M. Comoglio: Hepatocyte growth factor is a potent angiogenic factor which stimulates endothelial cell motility and growth. J Cell Biol, 119(3), 629-41 (1992)
doi:10.1083/jcb.119.3.629
PMid:1383237

161. E. Van Belle, B. Witzenbichler, D. Chen, M. Silver, L. Chang, R. Schwall and J. M. Isner: Potentiated angiogenic effect of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor via induction of vascular endothelial growth factor: the case for paracrine amplification of angiogenesis. Circulation, 97(4), 381-90 (1998)
PMid:9468212

162. M. E. Gerritsen, J. E. Tomlinson, C. Zlot, M. Ziman and S. Hwang: Using gene expression profiling to identify the molecular basis of the synergistic actions of hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol, 140(4), 595-610 (2003)
doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705494
PMid:14504135    PMCid:1574080

163. X. Xin, S. Yang, G. Ingle, C. Zlot, L. Rangell, J. Kowalski, R. Schwall, N. Ferrara and M. E. Gerritsen: Hepatocyte growth factor enhances vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Am J Pathol, 158(3), 1111-20 (2001)
PMid:11238059    PMCid:1850376

164. S. Sengupta, E. Gherardi, L. A. Sellers, J. M. Wood, R. Sasisekharan and T. P. Fan: Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor can induce angiogenesis independently of vascular endothelial growth factor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 23(1), 69-75 (2003)
doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000048701.86621.D0

165. R. Morishita, S. Nakamura, S. Hayashi, Y. Taniyama, A. Moriguchi, T. Nagano, M. Taiji, H. Noguchi, S. Takeshita, K. Matsumoto, T. Nakamura, J. Higaki and T. Ogihara: Therapeutic angiogenesis induced by human recombinant hepatocyte growth factor in rabbit hind limb ischemia model as cytokine supplement therapy. Hypertension, 33(6), 1379-84 (1999)
PMid:10373220

Key Words: Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Niche, Genetic Modification, Virus, Transduction, Non-Viral, Ex-Vivo, Expansion, Ischemia, Pro-Angiogenic Factors, Neo-vascularization, Review

Send correspondence to: Hiranmoy Das, Cardiovascular Stem Cell Research Laboratories, The Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center, 460 W. 12th Avenue, BRT 382, Columbus, Ohio 43210, Tel: 614-688-8711, Fax: 614-293-5614, E-mail:hiranmoy.das@osumc.edu