[Frontiers in Bioscience E4, 2289-2301, January 1, 2012]

Modulation of normal and malignant plasma cells function by toll-like receptors

Gaetan Jego1,2, David Chiron3, Kevin Berthenet1,2, Catherine Pellat-Deceunynck3

1INSERM, U866, 7 Boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, 21033 Dijon, France, 2University of Burgundy, Dijon, France , 3INSERM, U896, Nantes, France

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Plasma cells are effectors of humoral responses
3.1. Plasma cell differentiation is a multistep process
3.2. Rescuing immature plasma cells from apoptosis in cellular niches
4. Multiple myeloma : a malignant plasmacytosis
5. TLR expression in normal and multiple myeloma plasma cells
6. Could multiple myeloma plasma cells encounter TLR ligands?
7. Function of TLR in normal plasma cells
8. Function of TLR in multiple myeloma cells
8.1. TLR on multiple myeloma cells as protumoral receptors.
8.2. TLR on multiple myeloma cells as therapeutics targets.
9.Conclusion
10. Acknowledgements
11. References

1. ABSTRACT

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are well known activators of immune responses, but their involvement in the plasma cell (PC) differentiation process remains mostly unknown. This review is focused on the expression and function of TLRs on normal PCs and their malignant counterpart, Multiple Myeloma cells. We report studies that suggest a role for TLR ligands as adjuvants of the humoral immune response through the survival of newly generated immature PCs. On the contrary, TLRs do not seem to be involved in the long-term maintenance of PCs in the bone marrow. Multiple Myeloma cells express a broad range of TLRs, and show heterogeneous responses to different ligands. These double-edged-sword effects are presented and discussed in the context of tumor progression, and as putative therapeutic targets.

2. INTRODUCTION

Vertebrates are frequently attacked by multiple infectious agents throughout their life. To counteract this danger, evolution has selected a panel of receptors that recognize these agents and alert the immune system. Among these receptors, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a major role (1). TLRs are type-I transmembrane proteins bearing a cytoplasm Toll/IL-1R homology domain (TIR). They recognize highly conserved specific structures from pathogens (bacteria and viruses) that are named pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). So far, 10 and 13 TLRs have been identified in humans and mice respectively. For each TLR, one or several corresponding ligands have been identified, except for TLR10, which is not functional in the mouse. Each TLR has a different specificity in terms of PAMP recognition (2-7). In addition to responding to PAMPs, TLRs also respond to endogenous molecules, which are mostly produced during cellular stress or death as heat shock proteins, products of extracellular matrix degradation, and endogenous RNA or DNA (8-10). They are named danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP). The engagement of TLRs by their ligands induces various signalling pathways (11). TLRs first dimerize and recruit several TIR-domain-containing adaptor molecules: MYD88, TIRAP, TRIF, and TRAM. MyD88 is used by all of the TLRs except for TLR3, whereas TRIF is used only by TLR3 and TLR4. Activated signaling pathways involve NF-kB, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and PI3k/Akt that lead to cell activation, maturation, type I interferon and inflammatory cytokine production.

Murine and human B cells express several TLRs whose level of expression and responsiveness varies depending on the B-cell subsets (12, 13). In vitro, TLR activation of B cells results in the activation, proliferation and differentiation into immunoglobulin-secreting plasma-cells (PCs) (12). Memory B cells have a greater capacity to proliferate and differentiate into PCs after TLR stimulation than do naïve B cells. This has been supported by a study showing that polyclonal activation of human memory B cells through TLRs is essential for the maintenance of serological memory (14). Other in vivo experiments support the notion that TLRs are adjuvants that accelerate antibody responses, but are not essential for long-tem humoral responses (15-17). Altogether, these studies shed light on the importance of TLRs in the initial steps of B cell activation. However, B cell differentiation into immature PCs and then matured long-lived PCs is a multistep process that could be influenced by many cytokines and cell-cell interactions (18). A growing body of literature suggests that PAMPs could also target PCs on their way toward terminal differentiation, and their malignant counterpart that is Multiple Myeloma (MM). The scope of this review is therefore to provide an overview of the literature addressing TLR expression and function in PCs from normal and malignant origin.

3. PLASMA CELLS ARE EFFECTORS OF HUMORAL RESPONSES

3.1. Plasma cell differentiation is a multistep process

Protective humoral immunity is provided by PCs through their production of antibodies (19, 20). PCs arise by two different routes: one occurring inside the germinal center of secondary lymphoid organs, and one occurring outside the follicle. Several parameters influence the decision to follow one route or the other, including the nature of B cells that are activated (naïve versus memory), the nature of the antigen, and the affinity of the B cell receptor (BCR) for the antigen. For example, in the absence of T cell signaling, memory B cells are the only cells to differentiate into PC upon TLR activation. PCs arising from the germinal center route are generally considered immature and are precursors of long-lived PCs that are able to migrate within the bone marrow and produce a high amount of highly specific antibody. On the contrary, PCs of extrafollicular origin are short-lived, as most of them do not migrate to the bone marrow and these produce only a small amount of antibody. The immature PCs exit the lymphoid organs into the peripheral blood and continue to differentiate into fully mature PCs upon recruitment into an appropriate site of survival (mucosal tissues, bone-marrow or inflamed tissues) (21-23). The differentiation of B cells into immature PCs and then into fully mature antibody secreting cells involves profound molecular changes. Several transcription factors that negatively feed back onto each other are involved in this process (Pax5, Blimp-1, XBP-1 for example) (24, 25). Profound morphological and phenotypical changes also occur during this differentiation. Immature PCs are also called plasmablasts, as they are proliferating cells with low Ig secreting capacities. They are detected in the blood six to eight days after an antigenic challenge. They are also found in secondary lymphoid organs, such as tonsils, but probably at a later stage of maturation (26). Thanks to the study of reactive plasmacytoses that are expansions of plasmablasts retaining the capacity to differentiate into mature PCs, the phenotype of these circulating immature cells has been characterised (CD19+, CD45++, HLA-DR++, CD38++, CD138-). This phenotype switches to CD19+/-, CD45+, HLA-DR+/-, CD38+++, CD138+ upon differentiation into mature PCs (27). Of note, tonsillar plasmablasts have a low expression of CD138. Plasmablasts are short-lived but can be transiently rescued from apoptosis by IL-6, IFN-alpha or plasmacytoid dendritic cells (28, 29).

3.2. Rescuing immature plasma cells from apoptosis in cellular niches

Although long-lived PCs are responsible for sustaining serological memory, they represent a minor fraction of cells within the bone marrow in humans and mice (0.1 to 1% of bone marrow cells) (30). Interestingly this pool of PC is quite constant over a lifespan, despite infections that each potentially generates 104 to 105 new cells (31). The size of the PC population must therefore be tightly regulated. One hypothesis is that newly generated PCs must compete with previously formed PC to access and occupy a limited number of survival environmental niches (32-34). In other words, following infection or vaccination, newly generated PCs are prone to die if they do not find an appropriate niche. At the same time, existing PCs from previous infections are displaced from the bone marrow by these new PCs, circulate in the blood where survival factors are limited, and eventually die. Evidently, this replacement would not result in the eradication of older PCs but would probably affect a minor portion of the PC pool as the repertoire of antigen specificity is maintained over years (20).

What is meant by "long-lived" with regards to PCs? Recent studies have tried to evaluate the duration of the humoral response after the first antigen encounter. It has been shown that long-lived antibody responses after diphtheria and tetanus toxin vaccination can last from ten to twenty years, whereas a response against a live viral infection could last much longer (35, 36). Furthermore, an earlier study estimated the half-live of virus-specific PC in mice as 172 days in the spleen and 94 days in the bone marrow. Both half-lives are quite long compared with the lifespan of the mouse itself (37).

Many soluble factors and cell-cell interactions constitute the bone marrow niche. Stromal cells play an initial role through stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR4, as PCs express CXCR4 and are attracted by SDF-1 (38). Furthermore, CXCR4 deficient mice have a marked decrease in the bone marrow homing of PCs (39). In addition to bone marrow stromal cells, osteoclasts support the survival of PCs from immature to mature stages in vitro (40). Recently, neutrophils have been shown to co-localize with PCs in the bone marrow niche, and strongly support PC survival through the production of IL-6 and APRIL (41). This last report confirms that members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family such as BAFF, APRIL, TACI and BCMA, seem to be involved in the maintenance of long-lived PCs (42, 43). Regardless of the cell to cell interactions, or the cytokine cocktail present in the niche, signalling probably converges on the same target gene, i.e, prdm-1, the gene encoding Blimp-1 (B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1). Blimp-1 is instrumental in the survival of PCs in the bone marrow, as conditional deletion of prdm-1 induces a disappearance of long-lived PC from the bone marrow (44). Of note, besides the many cytokines found in the bone marrow, LPS and CpG-ODNs are also able to induce Blimp-1 expression in vitro (45).

PCs therefore appear as a heterogeneous population when characterized over the differentiation process, from their site of origin in secondary lymphoid organs to their site of long-term survival. They depend on microenvironmental niches for their survival and final differentiation. It could therefore be hypothesized that TLR signaling could aid these "PCs-to be" during the course of the infection.

4. MULTIPLE MYELOMA : A MALIGNANT PLASMACYTOSIS

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a fatal plasma cell malignancy that is characterized by excess monoclonal bone marrow plasma cells (PC), osteolytic bone lesions, renal failure and immunodeficiency (46, 47). Malignant PCs secrete monoclonal immunoglobulin (IgG and IgA). In the USA, MM is the second most frequent blood malignancy after non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The disease accounts for about 1 % of all neoplastic diseases and 10% of all hematological malignancies.

In recent years, considerable advances in the genetic and phenotypic characterization of MM have been made (48-51). MM appears as a heterogeneous disease in terms of phenotype, genotype, growth factors and drug responses. The cellular origin of MM PCs is still a matter of debate (52) but the disease always emerges from a state of medullar plasmacytosis often seen in the elderly population, characterized by the presence of serum monoclonal IgG or IgA with no sign of organ failure or bone resorption (53). This premalignant state is known as Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS). Numerous kariotic and genetic abnormalities are seen in MM PCs at an early state of disease progression (54). MM is associated with translocations of the heavy chain immunoglobulin gene (14q32) with different oncogenic partners that could be CCND1 (t (11;14)), CCND3 (t (6;14)), MAF (t (14;16)), FGFR3 (t (4;14)) or MAFB t (14;20)). A partial or complete loss of chromosome 13 can also be observed in MM (55).

Thanks to array comparative genomic hybridization, the genetic heterogeneity of MM patients has been classified into 7 groups (56). CD-1 and CD-2 groups are characterized by overexpression of cyclin D1 and D3. The MS and the MAF groups have an overexpression of FGFR3 or MAF respectively. The HY group represents 50% of patients with a hyperdiploid profile. The LB group has a low level of osteolytic lesions and, finally, the PR group is characterized by overexpression of genes associated with proliferation. Secondary late onset translocations and gene mutations can be implicated in the progression from MGUS to overt MM such as MYC (57), NRAS, KRAS and FGFR3 mutations (58).

The bone marrow microenvironnement of MM PC constitutes a cellular niche as it has an essential role in the development, maintenance and progression of the disease (59). Direct interactions between MM cells and bone marrow stromal cells or extracellular matrix proteins promote and sustain MM growth factor secretion together with cell survival signaling pathways. Among many other bone marrow cytokines, IL-6, IGF1, and members of the TNF superfamily such as BAFF and APRIL play a major role (60, 61). In addition to soluble factors, receptors involved in the adherence of MM to the bone marrow niche such as integrins, cadherins, selectins, syndecans also play a major role in the medullar niche (62).

5. TLR EXPRESSION AND SIGNALING IN NORMAL AND MM PLASMA-CELLS

Tonsillar PCs express all TLR (except 10) at levels comparable to tonsillar naïve and memory B cells (63). This expression does not seem to be altered after exiting secondary lymphoid organs as a similar pattern has been found in peripheral blood plasma cells. PCs finally mature in the bone marrow where they become long-lived PCs (37). It has been shown that they express either only significant levels of TLR1, RP105, MD-1 and MD-2 (64) or of TLR1, 5 and 9 (65). These studies (as for most studies on TLR expression) suffer from a lack of reliable protein detection. Indeed, commercially available TLR antibodies fail to give satisfactory results in human cells. Therefore, once available, reevaluation of TLR expression by other means than RT-PCR might help to definitively address the question of the TLR expression profile during PC differentiation. Fortunately, a recent study addressed the question of the level of TLR9 mRNA that correlates with a significant cellular response. This quantitative RNA approach circumvents the problems of protein detection (66). However, the authors show that, above the defined threshold of TLR9 expression, the magnitude of response to CpG-ODN is dependent on tumor cell type.

MM primary cells and human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) express a broad range of TLR (64, 65, 67-70). A study of primary MM cells from 414 patients at diagnosis revealed an almost universal expression of TLR9, and around 30% expressed TLR3, 5 and 7. A comparison of TLR levels of expression by real-time PCR showed that TLR2, 4 and 9 were significantly higher expressed in bone marrow mononuclear cells from MM patients than in control donors (65). Even if the expression on PCs was not directly addressed, this increase suggests that cells of MM bone marrow have good potential to respond to PAMPs. In addition to TLRs, their signaling proteins seem to be expressed in the majority of HMCLs, ie, MYD88, TRIF, and TRAF6 (personal data and (68, 71). TRAF3 expression, however, seems less frequent as it is mutated or deleted in 12,3% of primary MM cells and 17% of HMCLs (72). This lack of expression could impact the growth of MM cells as TRAF3 is a known inhibitor of the non-canonical NF-kB pathway, and could participate to sustain NF-kB signaling. Furthermore, TRAF3 negative MM cells could be more sensitive to TLR ligands. This is supported by the finding that TRAF3 transgenic mice show an increased response to antigen and TLR agonists, which evolves over time into plasmacytosis and hypergammaglobulinemia (73). Distribution of the TLR expression pattern appears heterogeneous when the molecular classification of patients defined by Zhan described above is addressed (Table 1). Indeed, patients with a favorable outcome, such as hyperdiploïd patients, express TLR3 and TLR7 more frequently compared to other groups, but lower levels of TLR4 and 9. Inversely, TLR9 and 4 are overexpressed by MS and MAF groups that both have a poorer prognosis. As Maf is a transcription factor, it could be of interest to determine its involvement in TLR4 expression. On HMCLs, a pattern similar to primary MM cells is observed. Indeed, TLR1, 7, and 9 are the most strongly expressed (96%, 68% and 64% of cell lines respectively). TLR3 and 4 are expressed in nearly half of the HMCLs, whereas TLR2 and 8 are only detected in 28% and 24% of the cell lines, respectively (personal data, n=25).

6. COULD MM PLASMA CELLS ENCOUNTER TLR LIGANDS ?

In MM, normal PC differentiation and survival is blunted due to competition with MM PC for the medullar niche. As a consequence, the level of normal IgG is low and patients are highly susceptible to recurrent and persistent bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. Next to general organ failure, infections are a main cause of death for MM patients (46). A retrospective epidemiological study based on 4641 MM and 2046 MGUS patients has shown that the risk of developing the disease is significantly increased when patients have a history of multiple infections such as pneumonia, hepatitis, meningitis, septicemia, herpes zoster, and poliomyelitis. Risk was also associated with influenza infection, but only for white men (74). Furthermore, a history of pneumonia in the 5 years preceding MGUS appearance has been shown to be a predictor of MGUS risk (75). This finding suggests that infectious agents by themselves, or infection-associated inflammation could be potential triggers for MGUS and/or MM development.

During the course of the disease, several pathogens are associated with MM, such as Gram-positive bacteria (Streptococcus pneumonia, Staphylococcal infections) and Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas, Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli) as well as invasive fungal infections. Numerous sources of PAMP are therefore present in or even associated with MM. One should not forget, however, that even in the absence of a clear correlation of MM progression with a particular infectious agent, the bone marrow environment is still a soup of DAMP. Indeed, MM cells deregulate the balance of bone resorption/formation by inhibiting osteoblastogenesis and promoting osteoclastogenesis. The consequence is a dramatic bone resorption that impairs the patient's quality of life, increasing the release of extracellular matrix proteins, fibronectin, collagen and inflammatory mediators (76). Many of these microenvironment components are described as TLR agonists (77).

High Mobility Group Bex1 (HMGB1) protein is the most abundant chromatin-associated non-histone protein expressed in all nucleated eukaryotic cells. It is also released in the extracellular medium by macrophages after TLR stimulation or during cell death (78). HMGB1 is described as a TLR4 agonist and a TLR3, 7 and 9 co-ligand (79, 80). HMGB1 accelerates the delivery of CpG-ODNs to its receptor (81). Interestingly it is released by bone cells such as osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the bone marrow environment. HMGB1 could therefore act as a co-factor for TLR ligand recognition in the MM niche (82). Furthermore, soluble CD138, a molecule belonging to the heparan sulfate family, is a potent TLR4 agonist, and is highly expressed and released by MM PCs. Of note, the soluble CD138 level correlates with poor prognosis (83).

In conclusion, despite the heterogeneous expression of TLR on MM cells, it is highly probably they will encounter a PAMP or DAMP for which they bear the corresponding TLR.

7. FUNCTION OF TLR IN NORMAL PLASMA CELLS

The strong expression of multiple TLR observed on tonsillar and peripheral PCs suggests that they could respond to a broad range of ligands. However, only a few studies have addressed this question, and it remains crucial to have a complete understanding of the mechanism of humoral responses for vaccine design. PCs located in the tonsils or plasmablasts circulating in the peripheral blood are phenotypically and functionally different from the long-lived bone marrow PCs. This discrepancy is also observed for TLR responses. Indeed, PCs from tonsils and peripheral blood have an increase of total Ig synthesis and secretion upon TLR triggering (63). TLR1/2, 3, 5 and 9 are mainly involved in Ig secretion in tonsillar PCs. TLR1/2 ligands exclusively increase intracellular IgM expression and secretion. TLR3 (poly (I:C)) and 9 ligands (CpG-ODNs) increase IgG expression from tonsillar PCs, whereas TLR7 ligand increases IgG expression only in peripheral blood PCs (63). In addition, our personal data suggest that plasmablasts have increased survival and total immunoglobulin secretion in the presence of TLR9 ligands (unpublished data). On the contrary, a study of normal bone marrow mononuclear cells (as opposed to purified PCs) has shown a lack of response (65). Neither an increase of CD138+ cells (a marker of mature PCs), nor a decrease in apoptosis was detected in the presence of TLR1/2 ligand (Pam3), TLR4 ligand (LPS) or TLR9 ligand (CpG-ODNs). These results are in agreement with an absence or a low TLR expression on mature PCs.

Therefore, TLR expression and functions seem to differ accordingly to their developmental stage. Fully matured and long-lived PCs are quiescent cells that do not seem to be affected by infections or PAMPs as plasmablasts are. They are either less sensitive, or completely insensitive to pathogen-derived signals of activation, and their continuous antibody secretion is not altered. This lack of sensitivity is not a hallmark of bone marrow cells, as TLR ligands directly induce human and mouse hematopoietic stem cells to differentiate towards myelopoïesis (84-86).

8. FUNCTION OF TLR IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA CELLS

8.1. TLR on MM cells as protumoral effectors

Can we consider TLRs as receptors for protumoral ligands (either PAMPs or DAMPs) present in the bone marrow microenvironment? In other words, can MM cells hijack the TLR machinery for their own benefit? This question is worth addressing due to the significant expression of TLR and their signaling molecules found in MM cells. This question can be considered on three different levels: first cell growth, second apoptosis, and finally immune escape.

Proliferation of several HMCLs and primary MM cells can be increased by most of the TLR ligands when receptors are present (64, 67). Most studies, however, focus only on ligands of TLR4 and 9. The increase in proliferation is mainly mediated by an autocrine IL-6 loop that can substitute paracrine IL-6. Indeed, IL-6 is a major proliferation and survival factor for MM cells (87, 88) and circulating IL-6, as well as circulating soluble IL-6R, was found to increase during MM progression (89). In MM, IL-6 originates from the bone marrow microenvironnement. Therefore, this supplementary contribution could enhance the pathogenic potential of the milieu where MM cells emerge, and facilitate their growth or maintenance in the case of an altered niche (as a treatment consequence for example). Autocrine TLR-induced or paracrine IL-6 is not the only cytokine that stimulates growth, as Insulin growth factor -1 (IGF-1) besides IL-6 (either autocrine or paracrine), is also a major cytokine stimulating MM cell growth. However, so far no increase in expression of IGF-1 has been reported after TLR triggering. This could be worth investigating, as TLR2 and 4 agonists can induce an IL-6 independent proliferation of the RPMI-8226 HMCL (64).

Protection against various apoptotic conditions is also a feature of TLR stimulation. Serum or IL-6 deprivation is, accordingly to the IL-6 induction, compensated by TLR4 and 9 (67). Drug-induced apoptosis by dexamethasone or adriamycin (both effective drugs for MM) is partially or totally inhibited by pretreatment of HMCLs by LPS or CpG-ODNs (67, 90). In addition to the action of chemotherapy several effectors of the immune system (CD8+ T cells, gamma-delta T cells and NK cells) have the potential to kill primary MM cells or HMCLs in both antigen-dependent or independent mechanisms (91-93). However, due to the age of MM patients (the median age at diagnosis is 65) and their immune deficiency (for example MM dendritic cell dysfunction (94), and regulatory T cell accumulation (95)) that is somehow common to most cancer patients, immune effectors from MM patients have limited action towards malignant cells. To boost vaccination strategies with myeloma-derived antigen, adjuvant therapies using bacterial extracts, such as BCG (TLR2, and 4 ligands) streptococcus preparation (TLR4 ligand), imiquimod (TLR7 ligand), or CpG-ODNs (TLR9 ligand) have been proposed. Synthetic TLR9 ligands CpG-ODNs are currently the most used adjuvants in cancer therapy. To enhance their half-life from a few minutes to two days (96) and to enhance affinity to TLR9, CpG-ODNs are chemically modified to replace the native phosphodiester backbone by a phosphorothioate (PS) backbone. However, this modification has significant drawbacks, because it induces unexpected TLR9-independent side effects (69, 97, 98). Indeed, synthetic PS-modified CpG-ODNs inhibit the killing of various TRAIL-R2 (DR5) sensitive tumor cells (MM, breast carcinoma and colon carcinoma) through a TLR9-independent, but PS-dependent binding to TRAIL-R2 ligand. Moreover, this inhibition reduces the TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity of NK cells, and could therefore interfere with the clinical efficiency of a TLR9 agonist based adjuvant. Similarly, the apoptosis induced by the bone marrow-originated bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) is inhibited by PS-modified CpG-ODNs in a TLR9 independent manner (98). Encapsulation of CpG-ODNs, which avoids unspecific binding with unexpected consequences, could be used, especially in clinical trials.

The proliferation and cytotoxicity of NK cells and T lymphocytes can be inhibited by immunoregulatory molecules expressed on or released by tumor cells such as B7-H1 and B7-H2 (99). B7-H1 is a ligand for PD-1, and is mainly induced by IFNg in normal cells. Both molecules are overexpressed in MM cells, but not in plasma cells from MGUS patients. TLR4 agonists significantly enhance B7-H1 and B7-H2 expression through a MyD88/TRAF6-dependent pathway involving MAPKs ERK1, 2 (68). Accordingly, LPS and IFN-gamma inhibit both CTL generation and T lymphocyte proliferation with the same capacity, suggesting that B7-H1/2 expression could be a responsible for the effect. Therefore TLR4 and 9 signaling, in addition to their classical adjuvant function on the immune system, could have an unwanted effect on tumors leading to immune evasion.

Several signaling pathways could mediate the proliferative/survival signals triggered by TLR ligands. MM cells have a strong NF-kB activity, owing to activating mutations of NIK, NF-kB1, NF-kB2, TRAF2, TRAF3, or CYLD in 15-20% of the myeloma cells (72), and to NF-kB-inducing cytokines produced by the microenvironement, such as TNF-alpha, Baff or RANKL (100, 101). TLR ligands could be added to this list, acting through either the MYD88 or TRIF-dependent pathway. Indeed, NF-kB activation has been shown in several HMCLs in response to TLR3, TLR4 or TLR9 ligands (65, 66, 70). IL-6 production and IL-6-induced proliferation depend on NF-kB in most HMCLs (65, 70). MAP kinases Erk1, 2 and JNK have also been implicated in MM proliferation (90), or in the overexpression of B7-H1 (68).

8.2. TLR on MM cells as therapeutic targets

We have learned from seminal works on dendritic cells that responses to TLRs are heterogeneous, depending not only on TLR structure and signaling adaptators diversity, but also on the subsets of dendritic cells (102). A similar model can be applied to non immune cells and to cancer cells. In addition to pro-survival signals, which reflect mainly NF-kB and MAP kinase-dependent transcription of genes, apoptotic messages can be generated upon TLR2, 3, 4, 7 or 9 triggering in various cancer cell types (103). TLR3, which signals through a MYD88-independent/TRIF dependent pathway, is the best characterized. The synthetic TLR3 agonist (poly (I:C)) is known to directly induce apoptosis in several solid cancer cells and has been used in clinical trials as an immune activator. This dual anti-tumoral characteristic turns it into a particularly interesting therapeutic target (104). TLR3 is expressed in nearly 50% of HMCLs, and 25% of primary myeloma cells. We found that poly (IC) induces growth inhibition or apoptosis in three out of six TLR3 positive HMCLs studied. In accordance with the results highlighted in HMCLs (64, 70), a decrease of primary myeloma cell viability was observed in two out of four patient samples after in vitro poly (IC) stimulation (personal data). TLR3-dependent apoptotic process in MM was found to be linked to the production of an autocrine IFN-alpha loop, controlled by early p38 MAPK activation (70). Involvement of p38 MAPK activation in IFN-alpha secretion induced by TLRs seemed to be a conserved pathway in MM and pDCs at least (105). Moreover, poly (IC)-induced apoptosis in MM is dependent on caspases 3, 8, and 9. Implication of caspases in poly (IC)/IFN-alpha-dependent apoptosis is in accordance with the results described in melanoma or breast cancer cells (104). TRAF3, a major regulator of type I IFN, does not seem to be involved in the poly (IC) effect as it is mutated and non-functional in some HMCLs induced in apoptosis.

However, we observed that poly (IC) also induced NF-kB activation in all TLR3 positive cell lines, independently of IFN-alpha secretion. In the presence of IFN-alpha, NF-kB could not overcome the apoptosis signal. This suggests that MM cell fate after TLR triggering will depend on the balance of survival versus apoptotic signals. Therefore, to shift the balance in favor of apoptosis, a possible therapeutic approach would be the use of a TLR3 ligand to stimulate the immune system, together with inducers of MM cell death. Activation of the immune system could also be achieved by targeting TLR9 on the surface of plasmacytoid dendritic cells from patients. Indeed, MM-plasmacytoid dendritic cells exhibit altered function and reduced ability to induce T-cell proliferation, which can be reversed by stimulation with CpG-ODNs (106).

9. CONCLUSION

At any one time, a body's population of PCs is heterogeneous, with regard to their localization (mucosa, secondary lymphoid organs, bone marrow), their origin (follicular or extrafollicular), their half-life, and their stage of maturation (plasmablasts, or mature PCs). Similarly, TLR expression and function seem to follow the differentiation process as plasmablasts or PCs from tonsils, but not mature bone marrow PCs, respond to TLR stimulation. Immature PCs and PCs located within sites of B cell activation or pathogen encounter could be therefore still be activated by surrounding molecules from the pathogen during the course of an infection. Later on, once the immune system has been fully mobilized and PCs have found a molecular niche to persist for years in the absence of antigen, the effect of TLRs is no longer needed for the persistence of the serological memory. This review of the literature suggests that TLRs act as an adjuvant of humoral immune responses not only by targeting B cells, but also plasmablasts and immature PCs.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the expansion of autoreactive plasmablasts and PCs (107, 108). Interestingly, many DAMP are present in SLE patients, and endogenous TLR7 and TLR9 ligands have been shown to promote the disease through dendritic cell stimulation (109). IFN-alpha is a major cytokine in SLE physiopathology and a survival factor for PCs. In this context it is of interest that TLR3 is expressed on peripheral blood PCs, and that its stimulation can initiate the production of IFN-alpha by MM PCs. This raises the question if this cytokine production is also a characteristic of normal and SLE plasmablasts. Given this review of the literature, TLRs ligands might participate directly in SLE, contributing to the survival and expansion of the effectors of the disease.

The capacity to respond to TLRs ligands is conserved by MM cells, the malignant counterpart of PCs. MM cells express a broad and heterogeneous range of TLRs associated with various responses in vitro (Figure 1). Heterogeneous responses to TLR ligands are also observed in other hematological and solid malignancies, resulting in either pro-tumoral effects or induction of apoptosis. Thus, cancer therapies using TLRs ligands should first identify predictive biomarkers of apoptotic responses to TLR ligands. Furthermore, the uncoupling of the pro-tumoral effects of TLR ligands from their adjuvant effects on the immune system is mandatory. This could be achieved by a simultaneous neutralization of MM growth factors or survival pathways. Is there a role for PAMP or DAMP in the emergence of MM? Due to the lack of in vivo data available in animal models, we are restricted only to speculate on this. A select few epidemiological studies, together with the appearance of strong TLR expression and co-receptors during the MGUS to MM transition, support this hypothesis. Given their immune adjuvant function during infection or vaccination, TLR ligands could therefore perhaps also act as "tumoral adjuvants" in the context of malignant clone emergence. In this scope, the study of TLR expression and function in MM stem cells is worth being investigated.

10. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by grants from La ligue Contre le Cancer (G.J. and D. C.). We would like to thank S. Shirley for English editing. Table 1 has been reprinted from leukemia Research, 34 (12), David Chiron, Gaetan Jego, Catherine Pellat-Deceunynck, Toll-like receptors: Expression and involvement in Multiple Myeloma, page 1545-50, Copyright (2010), with permission from Elsevier.

11. REFERENCE

1. T. Kawai and S. Akira: The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immuno, 11, 373-84 (2010)
doi:10.1038/ni.1863
PMid:20404851

2. M. S. Jin, S. E. Kim, J. Y. Heo, M. E. Lee, H. M. Kim, S. G. Paik, H. Lee and J. O. Lee: Crystal structure of the TLR1-TLR2 heterodimer induced by binding of a tri-acylated lipopeptide. Cell 130, 1071-82 (2007)
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.008
PMid:17889651

3. J. K. Bell, J. Askins, P. R. Hall, D. R. Davies and D. M. Segal: The dsRNA binding site of human Toll-like receptor 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 8792-7 (2006)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0603245103
PMid:16720699    PMCid:1482657

4. B. S. Park, D. H. Song, H. M. Kim, B. S. Choi, H. Lee and J. O. Lee: The structural basis of lipopolysaccharide recognition by the TLR4-MD-2 complex. Nature 458, 1191-5 (2009)
doi:10.1038/nature07830
PMid:19252480

5. G. Mancuso, M. Gambuzza, A. Midiri, C. Biondo, S. Papasergi, S. Akira, G. Teti and C. Beninati: Bacterial recognition by TLR7 in the lysosomes of conventional dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 10, 587-94 (2009)
doi:10.1038/ni.1733
PMid:19430477

6. F. Hayashi, K. D. Smith, A. Ozinsky, T. R. Hawn, E. C. Yi, D. R. Goodlett, J. K. Eng, S. Akira, D. M. Underhill and A. Aderem: The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 410, 1099-103 (2001)
doi:10.1038/35074106
PMid:11323673

7. T. Haas, J. Metzger, F. Schmitz, A. Heit, T. Muller, E. Latz and H. Wagner: The DNA sugar backbone 2' deoxyribose determines toll-like receptor 9 activation. Immunity 28, 315-23 (2008)
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.01.013
PMid:18342006

8. Y. Okamura, M. Watari, E. S. Jerud, D. W. Young, S. T. Ishizaka, J. Rose, J. C. Chow and J. F. Strauss, 3rd: The extra domain A of fibronectin activates Toll-like receptor 4. J Biol Chem 276, 10229-33 (2001)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M100099200
PMid:11150311

9. A. L. Joly, G. Wettstein, G. Mignot, F. Ghiringhelli and C. Garrido: Dual role of heat shock proteins as regulators of apoptosis and innate immunity. J Innate Immun 2, 238-47 (2010)
doi:10.1159/000296508
PMid:20375559

10. A. Marshak-Rothstein and I. R. Rifkin: Immunologically active autoantigens: the role of toll-like receptors in the development of chronic inflammatory disease. Annu Rev Immunol 25, 419-41 (2007)
doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104514
PMid:17378763

11. T. Kawai and S. Akira: TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ 13, 816-25 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401850
PMid:16410796

12. I. Bekeredjian-Ding and G. Jego: Toll-like receptors--sentries in the B-cell response. Immunology 128, 311-23 (2009)
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03173.x
PMid:20067531    PMCid:2770679

13. D. Chiron, I. Bekeredjian-Ding, C. Pellat-Deceunynck, R. Bataille and G. Jego: Toll-like receptors: lessons to learn from normal and malignant human B cells. Blood 112, 2205-13 (2008)
doi:10.1182/blood-2008-02-140673
PMid:18591383    PMCid:2532798

14. N. L. Bernasconi, E. Traggiai and A. Lanzavecchia: Maintenance of serological memory by polyclonal activation of human memory B cells. Science 298, 2199-202 (2002)
doi:10.1126/science.1076071
PMid:12481138

15. D. Nemazee, A. Gavin, K. Hoebe and B. Beutler: Immunology: Toll-like receptors and antibody responses. Nature (7091), E4; discussion E4 (2006)

16. A. Meyer-Bahlburg, S. Khim and D. J. Rawlings: B cell intrinsic TLR signals amplify but are not required for humoral immunity. J Exp Med 204, 3095-101 (2007)
doi:10.1084/jem.20071250
PMid:18039950    PMCid:2150979

17. A. V. Rubtsov, C. L. Swanson, S. Troy, P. Strauch, R. Pelanda and R. M. Torres: TLR agonists promote marginal zone B cell activation and facilitate T-dependent IgM responses. J Immunol 180, 3882-8 (2008)
PMid:18322196

18. G. Jego, V. Pascual, A. K. Palucka and J. Banchereau: Dendritic cells control B cell growth and differentiation. Curr Dir Autoimmun 8, 124-39 (2005)
doi:10.1159/000082101
PMid:15564719

19. S. A. Oracki, J. A. Walker, M. L. Hibbs, L. M. Corcoran and D. M. Tarlinton: Plasma cell development and survival. Immunol Rev 237, 140-59 (2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00940.x
PMid:20727034

20. R. Elgueta, V. C. de Vries and R. J. Noelle: The immortality of humoral immunity. Immunol Rev 236, 139-50 (2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00924.x
PMid:20636814

21. S. Arce, E. Luger, G. Muehlinghaus, G. Cassese, A. Hauser, A. Horst, K. Lehnert, M. Odendahl, D. Honemann, K. D. Heller, H. Kleinschmidt, C. Berek, T. Dorner, V. Krenn, F. Hiepe, R. Bargou, A. Radbruch and R. A. Manz: CD38 low IgG-secreting cells are precursors of various CD38 high-expressing plasma cell populations. J Leukoc Biol, 75, 1022-8 (2004)
doi:10.1189/jlb.0603279
PMid:15020647

22. I. Gonzalez-Garcia, B. Rodriguez-Bayona, F. Mora-Lopez, A. Campos-Caro and J. A. Brieva: Increased survival is a selective feature of human circulating antigen-induced plasma cells synthesizing high-affinity antibodies. Blood 111, 741-9 (2008)
doi:10.1182/blood-2007-08-108118
PMid:17925487

23. H. E. Mei, T. Yoshida, W. Sime, F. Hiepe, K. Thiele, R. A. Manz, A. Radbruch and T. Dorner: Blood-borne human plasma cells in steady state are derived from mucosal immune responses. Blood 113, 2461-9 (2009)
doi:10.1182/blood-2008-04-153544
PMid:18987362

24. M. Jourdan, A. Caraux, J. De Vos, G. Fiol, M. Larroque, C. Cognot, C. Bret, C. Duperray, D. Hose and B. Klein: An in vitro model of differentiation of memory B cells into plasmablasts and plasma cells including detailed phenotypic and molecular characterization. Blood 114, 5173-81 (2009)
doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-235960
PMid:19846886    PMCid:2834398

25. K. Tarte, F. Zhan, J. De Vos, B. Klein and J. Shaughnessy, Jr.: Gene expression profiling of plasma cells and plasmablasts: toward a better understanding of the late stages of B-cell differentiation. Blood 102, 592-600 (2003)
doi:10.1182/blood-2002-10-3161
PMid:12663452

26. E. Mohr, K. Serre, R. A. Manz, A. F. Cunningham, M. Khan, D. L. Hardie, R. Bird and I. C. MacLennan: Dendritic cells and monocyte/macrophages that create the IL-6/APRIL-rich lymph node microenvironments where plasmablasts mature. J Immunol 182, 2113-23 (2009)
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0802771
PMid:19201864

27. G. Jego, N. Robillard, D. Puthier, M. Amiot, F. Accard, D. Pineau, J. L. Harousseau, R. Bataille and C. Pellat-Deceunynck: Reactive plasmacytoses are expansions of plasmablasts retaining the capacity to differentiate into plasma cells. Blood 94, 701-12 (1999)
PMid:10397737

28. G. Jego, R. Bataille and C. Pellat-Deceunynck: Interleukin-6 is a growth factor for nonmalignant human plasmablasts. Blood 97, 1817-22 (2001)
doi:10.1182/blood.V97.6.1817
PMid:11238125

29. G. Jego, A. K. Palucka, J. P. Blanck, C. Chalouni, V. Pascual and J. Banchereau: Plasmacytoid dendritic cells induce plasma cell differentiation through type I interferon and interleukin 6. Immunity 19, 225-34 (2003)
doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00208-5

30. L. W. Terstappen, S. Johnsen, I. M. Segers-Nolten and M. R. Loken: Identification and characterization of plasma cells in normal human bone marrow by high-resolution flow cytometry. Blood 76, 1739-47 (1990)
PMid:2224123

31. R. A. Manz, A. Thiel and A. Radbruch: Lifetime of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nature 388, 133-4 (1997)
doi:10.1038/40540
PMid:9217150

32. D. M. Sze, K. M. Toellner, C. Garcia de Vinuesa, D. R. Taylor and I. C. MacLennan: Intrinsic constraint on plasmablast growth and extrinsic limits of plasma cell survival. J Exp Med 192, 813-21 (2000)
doi:10.1084/jem.192.6.813
PMid:10993912    PMCid:2193289

33. A. Radbruch, G. Muehlinghaus, E. O. Luger, A. Inamine, K. G. Smith, T. Dorner and F. Hiepe: Competence and competition: the challenge of becoming a long-lived plasma cell. Nat Rev Immunol 6, 741-50 (2006)
doi:10.1038/nri1886
PMid:16977339

34. K. Tokoyoda, T. Egawa, T. Sugiyama, B. I. Choi and T. Nagasawa: Cellular niches controlling B lymphocyte behavior within bone marrow during development. Immunity 20, 707-18 (2004)
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2004.05.001
PMid:15189736

35. I. J. Amanna, N. E. Carlson and M. K. Slifka: Duration of humoral immunity to common viral and vaccine antigens. N Engl J Med 357, 1903-15 (2007)
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa066092
PMid:17989383

36. M. Bonsignori, M. A. Moody, R. J. Parks, T. M. Holl, G. Kelsoe, C. B. Hicks, N. Vandergrift, G. D. Tomaras and B. F. Haynes: HIV-1 envelope induces memory B cell responses that correlate with plasma antibody levels after envelope gp120 protein vaccination or HIV-1 infection. J Immunol 183, 2708-17 (2009)
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901068
PMid:19625640    PMCid:3089979

37. M. K. Slifka, R. Antia, J. K. Whitmire and R. Ahmed: Humoral immunity due to long-lived plasma cells. Immunity 8, 363-72 (1998)
doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80541-5

38. A. E. Hauser, G. F. Debes, S. Arce, G. Cassese, A. Hamann, A. Radbruch and R. A. Manz: Chemotactic responsiveness toward ligands for CXCR3 and CXCR4 is regulated on plasma blasts during the time course of a memory immune response. J Immunol 169, 1277-82 (2002)
PMid:12133949

39. Y. Nie, J. Waite, F. Brewer, M. J. Sunshine, D. R. Littman and Y. R. Zou: The role of CXCR4 in maintaining peripheral B cell compartments and humoral immunity. J Exp Med 200, 1145-56 (2004)
doi:10.1084/jem.20041185
PMid:15520246    PMCid:2211858

40. A. Geffroy-Luseau, G. Jego, R. Bataille, L. Campion and C. Pellat-Deceunynck: Osteoclasts support the survival of human plasma cells in vitro. Int Immunol 20, 775-82 (2008)
doi:10.1093/intimm/dxn035
PMid:18397910

41. V. T. Chu, A. Frohlich, G. Steinhauser, T. Scheel, T. Roch, S. Fillatreau, J. J. Lee, M. Lohning and C. Berek: Eosinophils are required for the maintenance of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nat Immunol 12, 151-9 (2011)
doi:10.1038/ni.1981
PMid:21217761

42. B. P. O'Connor, V. S. Raman, L. D. Erickson, W. J. Cook, L. K. Weaver, C. Ahonen, L. L. Lin, G. T. Mantchev, R. J. Bram and R. J. Noelle: BCMA is essential for the survival of long-lived bone marrow plasma cells. J Exp Med 199, 91-8 (2004)
doi:10.1084/jem.20031330
PMid:14707116    PMCid:1887725

43. M. J. Benson, S. R. Dillon, E. Castigli, R. S. Geha, S. Xu, K. P. Lam and R. J. Noelle: Cutting edge: the dependence of plasma cells and independence of memory B cells on BAFF and APRIL. J Immunol 180, 3655-9 (2008)
PMid:18322170

44. M. Shapiro-Shelef, K. I. Lin, D. Savitsky, J. Liao and K. Calame: Blimp-1 is required for maintenance of long-lived plasma cells in the bone marrow. J Exp Med 202, 1471-6 (2005)
doi:10.1084/jem.20051611
PMid:16314438    PMCid:2213334

45. G. Martins and K. Calame: Regulation and functions of Blimp-1 in T and B lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol 26, 133-69 (2008)
doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090241
PMid:18370921

46. M. S. Raab, K. Podar, I. Breitkreutz, P. G. Richardson and K. C. Anderson: Multiple myeloma. Lancet 374, 324-39 (2009)
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60221-X

47. S. V. Rajkumar: Multiple myeloma: 2011 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 86, 57-65 (2011)
doi:10.1002/ajh.21913
PMid:21181954

48. R. Bataille, G. Jego, N. Robillard, S. Barille-Nion, J. L. Harousseau, P. Moreau, M. Amiot and C. Pellat-Deceunynck: The phenotype of normal, reactive and malignant plasma cells. Identification of "many and multiple myelomas" and of new targets for myeloma therapy. Haematologica 91, 1234-40 (2006)
PMid:16956823

49. D. R. Carrasco, G. Tonon, Y. Huang, Y. Zhang, R. Sinha, B. Feng, J. P. Stewart, F. Zhan, D. Khatry, M. Protopopova, A. Protopopov, K. Sukhdeo, I. Hanamura, O. Stephens, B. Barlogie, K. C. Anderson, L. Chin, J. D. Shaughnessy, Jr., C. Brennan and R. A. Depinho: High-resolution genomic profiles define distinct clinico-pathogenetic subgroups of multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell 9, 313-25 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.019
PMid:16616336

50. F. Pichiorri, S. S. Suh, A. Rocci, L. De Luca, C. Taccioli, R. Santhanam, W. Zhou, D. M. Benson, Jr., C. Hofmainster, H. Alder, M. Garofalo, G. Di Leva, S. Volinia, H. J. Lin, D. Perrotti, M. Kuehl, R. I. Aqeilan, A. Palumbo and C. M. Croce: Downregulation of p53-inducible microRNAs 192, 194, and 215 impairs the p53/MDM2 autoregulatory loop in multiple myeloma development. Cancer Cell 18, 367-81 (2010)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.09.005
PMid:20951946

51. P. Moreau, N. Robillard, G. Jego, C. Pellat, S. Le Gouill, S. Thoumi, H. Avet-Loiseau, J. L. Harousseau and R. Bataille: Lack of CD27 in myeloma delineates different presentation and outcome. Br J Haematol 132, 168-70 (2006)
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05849.x
PMid:16398651

52. H. E. Johnsen, M. K. Kjeldsen, T. Urup, K. Fogd, L. Pilgaard, M. Boegsted, M. Nyegaard, I. Christiansen, A. Bukh and K. Dybkaer: Cancer stem cells and the cellular hierarchy in haematological malignancies. Eur J Cancer 45 Suppl 1, 194-201 (2009)
doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70033-4

53. R. A. Kyle, B. G. Durie, S. V. Rajkumar, O. Landgren, J. Blade, G. Merlini, N. Kroger, H. Einsele, D. H. Vesole, M. Dimopoulos, J. San Miguel, H. Avet-Loiseau, R. Hajek, W. M. Chen, K. C. Anderson, H. Ludwig, P. Sonneveld, S. Pavlovsky, A. Palumbo, P. G. Richardson, B. Barlogie, P. Greipp, R. Vescio, I. Turesson, J. Westin and M. Boccadoro: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 24, 1121-7 (2010)
doi:10.1038/leu.2010.60
PMid:20410922

54. D. Gonzalez, M. van der Burg, R. Garcia-Sanz, J. A. Fenton, A. W. Langerak, M. Gonzalez, J. J. van Dongen, J. F. San Miguel and G. J. Morgan: Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Blood 110, 3112-21 (2007)
doi:10.1182/blood-2007-02-069625
PMid:17634408

55. H. Avet-Loiseau, T. Facon, B. Grosbois, F. Magrangeas, M. J. Rapp, J. L. Harousseau, S. Minvielle and R. Bataille: Oncogenesis of multiple myeloma: 14q32 and 13q chromosomal abnormalities are not randomly distributed, but correlate with natural history, immunological features, and clinical presentation. Blood 99, 2185-91 (2002)
doi:10.1182/blood.V99.6.2185
PMid:11877296

56. F. Zhan, Y. Huang, S. Colla, J. P. Stewart, I. Hanamura, S. Gupta, J. Epstein, S. Yaccoby, J. Sawyer, B. Burington, E. Anaissie, K. Hollmig, M. Pineda-Roman, G. Tricot, F. van Rhee, R. Walker, M. Zangari, J. Crowley, B. Barlogie and J. D. Shaughnessy, Jr.: The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood 108, 2020-8 (2006)
doi:10.1182/blood-2005-11-013458
PMid:16728703    PMCid:1895543

57. M. Chesi, D. F. Robbiani, M. Sebag, W. J. Chng, M. Affer, R. Tiedemann, R. Valdez, S. E. Palmer, S. S. Haas, A. K. Stewart, R. Fonseca, R. Kremer, G. Cattoretti and P. L. Bergsagel: AID-dependent activation of a MYC transgene induces multiple myeloma in a conditional mouse model of post-germinal center malignancies. Cancer Cell 13, 167-80 (2008)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.007
PMid:18242516    PMCid:2255064

58. R. Fonseca, B. Barlogie, R. Bataille, C. Bastard, P. L. Bergsagel, M. Chesi, F. E. Davies, J. Drach, P. R. Greipp, I. R. Kirsch, W. M. Kuehl, J. M. Hernandez, S. Minvielle, L. M. Pilarski, J. D. Shaughnessy, Jr., A. K. Stewart and H. Avet-Loiseau: Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Res 64, 1546-58 (2004)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2876
PMid:14989251

59. G. W. Basak, A. S. Srivastava, R. Malhotra and E. Carrier: Multiple myeloma bone marrow niche. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10, 345-6 (2009)
doi:10.2174/138920109787847493

60. V. M. Lauta: A review of the cytokine network in multiple myeloma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Cancer 97, 2440-52 (2003)
doi:10.1002/cncr.11072
PMid:12733143

61. K. Mahtouk, J. Moreaux, D. Hose, T. Reme, T. Meissner, M. Jourdan, J. F. Rossi, S. T. Pals, H. Goldschmidt and B. Klein: Growth factors in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive analysis of their expression in tumor cells and bone marrow environment using Affymetrix microarrays. BMC Cancer 10, 198 (2010)
doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-198
PMid:20465808    PMCid:2882921

62. K. Podar, D. Chauhan and K. C. Anderson: Bone marrow microenvironment and the identification of new targets for myeloma therapy. Leukemia 23, 10-24 (2009)
doi:10.1038/leu.2008.259
PMid:18843284

63. M. Dorner, S. Brandt, M. Tinguely, F. Zucol, J. P. Bourquin, L. Zauner, C. Berger, M. Bernasconi, R. F. Speck and D. Nadal: Plasma cell toll-like receptor (TLR) expression differs from that of B cells, and plasma cell TLR triggering enhances immunoglobulin production. Immunology 128, 573-9 (2009)
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03143.x
PMid:19950420    PMCid:2792141

64. J. Bohnhorst, T. Rasmussen, S. H. Moen, M. Flottum, L. Knudsen, M. Borset, T. Espevik and A. Sundan: Toll-like receptors mediate proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells. Leukemia 20, 1138-44 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404225
PMid:16617319

65. Y. Xu, Y. Zhao, H. Huang, G. Chen, X. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Chang, Z. Zhu, Y. Feng and D. Wu: Expression and function of toll-like receptors in multiple myeloma patients: toll-like receptor ligands promote multiple myeloma cell growth and survival via activation of nuclear factor-kappaB. Br J Haematol 150, 543-53 (2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08284.x
PMid:20629663

66. A. Assaf, H. Esteves, S. J. Curnow and M. J. Browning: A threshold level of TLR9 mRNA predicts cellular responsiveness to CpG-ODN in haematological and non-haematological tumour cell lines. Cell Immunol 259, 90-9 (2009)
doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.06.003
PMid:19573862

67. G. Jego, R. Bataille, A. Geffroy-Luseau, G. Descamps and C. Pellat-Deceunynck: Pathogen-associated molecular patterns are growth and survival factors for human myeloma cells through Toll-like receptors. Leukemia 20, 1130-7 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404226
PMid:16628189

68. J. Liu, A. Hamrouni, D. Wolowiec, V. Coiteux, K. Kuliczkowski, D. Hetuin, A. Saudemont and B. Quesnel: Plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients express B7-H1 (PD-L1) and increase expression after stimulation with IFN-{gamma} and TLR ligands via a MyD88-, TRAF6-, and MEK-dependent pathway. Blood 110, 296-304 (2007)
doi:10.1182/blood-2006-10-051482
PMid:17363736

69. D. Chiron, C. Pellat-Deceunynck, M. Maillasson, R. Bataille and G. Jego: Phosphorothioate-modified TLR9 ligands protect cancer cells against TRAIL-induced apoptosis. J Immunol 183, 4371-7 (2009)
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901436
PMid:19734228

70. D. Chiron, C. Pellat-Deceunynck, M. Amiot, R. Bataille and G. Jego: TLR3 ligand induces NF-{kappa}B activation and various fates of multiple myeloma cells depending on IFN-{alpha} production. J Immunol 182, 4471-8 (2009)
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803113
PMid:19299748

71. H. Chen, M. Li, R. A. Campbell, K. Burkhardt, D. Zhu, S. G. Li, H. J. Lee, C. Wang, Z. Zeng, M. S. Gordon, B. Bonavida and J. R. Berenson: Interference with nuclear factor kappa B and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase signaling by TRAF6C small interfering RNA inhibits myeloma cell proliferation and enhances apoptosis. Oncogene 25, 6520-7 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209653
PMid:16702955

72. J. J. Keats, R. Fonseca, M. Chesi, R. Schop, A. Baker, W. J. Chng, S. Van Wier, R. Tiedemann, C. X. Shi, M. Sebag, E. Braggio, T. Henry, Y. X. Zhu, H. Fogle, T. Price-Troska, G. Ahmann, C. Mancini, L. A. Brents, S. Kumar, P. Greipp, A. Dispenzieri, B. Bryant, G. Mulligan, L. Bruhn, M. Barrett, R. Valdez, J. Trent, A. K. Stewart, J. Carpten and P. L. Bergsagel: Promiscuous mutations activate the noncanonical NF-kappaB pathway in multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell 12, 131-44 (2007)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.003
PMid:17692805    PMCid:2083698

73. J. M. Zapata, D. Llobet, M. Krajewska, S. Lefebvre, C. L. Kress and J. C. Reed: Lymphocyte-specific TRAF3 transgenic mice have enhanced humoral responses and develop plasmacytosis, autoimmunity, inflammation, and cancer. Blood 113, 4595-603 (2009)
doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-165456
PMid:19074733    PMCid:2680366

74. L. M. Brown, G. Gridley, D. Check and O. Landgren: Risk of multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among white and black male United States veterans with prior autoimmune, infectious, inflammatory, and allergic disorders. Blood 111, 3388-94 (2008)
doi:10.1182/blood-2007-10-121285
PMid:18239085    PMCid:2275008

75. O. Landgren, J. S. Rapkin, L. Mellemkjaer, G. Gridley, L. R. Goldin and E. A. Engels: Respiratory tract infections in the pathway to multiple myeloma: a population-based study in Scandinavia. Haematologica 91, 1697-700 (2006)
PMid:17145609

76. N. Giuliani, R. Bataille, C. Mancini, M. Lazzaretti and S. Barille: Myeloma cells induce imbalance in the osteoprotegerin/osteoprotegerin ligand system in the human bone marrow environment. Blood 98, 3527-33 (2001)
doi:10.1182/blood.V98.13.3527
PMid:11739153

77. A. A. Beg: Endogenous ligands of Toll-like receptors: implications for regulating inflammatory and immune responses. Trends Immunol 23, 509-12 (2002)
doi:10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02317-7

78. J. Gauley and D. S. Pisetsky: The translocation of HMGB1 during cell activation and cell death. Autoimmunity 42, 299-301 (2009)
doi:10.1080/08916930902831522
PMid:19811282

79. S. Akashi-Takamura and K. Miyake: TLR accessory molecules. Curr Opin Immunol 20, 420-5 (2008)
doi:10.1016/j.coi.2008.07.001
PMid:18625310

80. L. Apetoh, F. Ghiringhelli, A. Tesniere, M. Obeid, C. Ortiz, A. Criollo, G. Mignot, M. C. Maiuri, E. Ullrich, P. Saulnier, H. Yang, S. Amigorena, B. Ryffel, F. J. Barrat, P. Saftig, F. Levi, R. Lidereau, C. Nogues, J. P. Mira, A. Chompret, V. Joulin, F. Clavel-Chapelon, J. Bourhis, F. Andre, S. Delaloge, T. Tursz, G. Kroemer and L. Zitvogel: Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nat Med 13, 1050-9 (2007)
doi:10.1038/nm1622
PMid:17704786

81. G. P. Sims, D. C. Rowe, S. T. Rietdijk, R. Herbst and A. J. Coyle: HMGB1 and RAGE in inflammation and cancer. Annu Rev Immunol 28, 367-88 (2010)
doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132603
PMid:20192808

82. J. P. Bidwell, J. Yang and A. G. Robling: Is HMGB1 an osteocyte alarmin? J Cell Biochem 103, 1671-80 (2008)
doi:10.1002/jcb.21572
PMid:17948903

83. A. Purushothaman, T. Uyama, F. Kobayashi, S. Yamada, K. Sugahara, A. C. Rapraeger and R. D. Sanderson: Heparanase-enhanced shedding of syndecan-1 by myeloma cells promotes endothelial invasion and angiogenesis. Blood 115, 2449-57 (2010)
doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-234757
PMid:20097882    PMCid:2845901

84. M. Sioud and Y. Floisand: TLR agonists induce the differentiation of human bone marrow CD34+ progenitors into CD11c+ CD80/86+ DC capable of inducing a Th1-type response. Eur J Immunol 37, 2834-46 (2007)
doi:10.1002/eji.200737112
PMid:17853407

85. K. De Luca, V. Frances-Duvert, M. J. Asensio, R. Ihsani, E. Debien, M. Taillardet, E. Verhoeyen, C. Bella, S. Lantheaume, L. Genestier and T. Defrance: The TLR1/2 agonist PAM (3)CSK (4) instructs commitment of human hematopoietic stem cells to a myeloid cell fate. Leukemia 23, 2063-74 (2009)
doi:10.1038/leu.2009.155
PMid:19641520

86. Y. Nagai, K. P. Garrett, S. Ohta, U. Bahrun, T. Kouro, S. Akira, K. Takatsu and P. W. Kincade: Toll-like receptors on hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulate innate immune system replenishment. Immunity 24, 801-12 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.008
PMid:16782035    PMCid:1626529

87. M. Kawano, T. Hirano, T. Matsuda, T. Taga, Y. Horii, K. Iwato, H. Asaoku, B. Tang, O. Tanabe, H. Tanaka and et al.: Autocrine generation and requirement of BSF-2/IL-6 for human multiple myelomas. Nature 332, 83-5 (1988)
doi:10.1038/332083a0
PMid:3258060

88. B. Klein, X. G. Zhang, M. Jourdan, J. Content, F. Houssiau, L. Aarden, M. Piechaczyk and R. Bataille: Paracrine rather than autocrine regulation of myeloma-cell growth and differentiation by interleukin-6. Blood 73, 517-26 (1989)
PMid:2783861

89. R. Bataille, M. Jourdan, X. G. Zhang and B. Klein: Serum levels of interleukin 6, a potent myeloma cell growth factor, as a reflect of disease severity in plasma cell dyscrasias. J Clin Invest 84, 2008-11 (1989)
doi:10.1172/JCI114392
PMid:2592570    PMCid:304085

90. H. Bao, P. Lu, Y. Li, L. Wang, H. Li, D. He, Y. Yang, Y. Zhao, L. Yang, M. Wang, Q. Yi and Z. Cai: Triggering of toll-like receptor-4 in human multiple myeloma cells promotes proliferation and alters cell responses to immune and chemotherapy drug attack. Cancer Biol Ther 11, 58-67 (2011)
doi:10.4161/cbt.11.1.13878

91. C. Pellat-Deceunynck, G. Jego, J. L. Harousseau, H. Vie and R. Bataille: Isolation of human lymphocyte antigens class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes against autologous myeloma cells. Clin Cancer Res 5, 705-9 (1999)
PMid:10100725

92. K. M. Dhodapkar, J. Krasovsky, B. Williamson and M. V. Dhodapkar: Antitumor monoclonal antibodies enhance cross-presentation ofcCellular antigens and the generation of myeloma-specific killer T cells by dendritic cells. J Exp Med 195, 125-33 (2002)
doi:10.1084/jem.20011097
PMid:11781371    PMCid:2196013

93. E. Alici, K. V. Konstantinidis, T. Sutlu, A. Aints, G. Gahrton, H. G. Ljunggren and M. S. Dilber: Anti-myeloma activity of endogenous and adoptively transferred activated natural killer cells in experimental multiple myeloma model. Exp Hematol 35, 1839-46 (2007)
doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2007.08.006
PMid:18036444

94. D. H. Yang, J. S. Park, C. J. Jin, H. K. Kang, J. H. Nam, J. H. Rhee, Y. K. Kim, S. Y. Chung, S. J. Choi, H. J. Kim, I. J. Chung and J. J. Lee: The dysfunction and abnormal signaling pathway of dendritic cells loaded by tumor antigen can be overcome by neutralizing VEGF in multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 33, 665-70 (2009)
doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2008.09.006
PMid:18922577

95. M. K. Brimnes, A. J. Vangsted, L. M. Knudsen, P. Gimsing, A. O. Gang, H. E. Johnsen and I. M. Svane: Increased level of both CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells and CD14+HLA-DR/low myeloid-derived suppressor cells and decreased level of dendritic cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Scand J Immunol 72, 540-7 (2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1365-3083.2010.02463.x
PMid:21044128

96. A. M. Krieg: Development of TLR9 agonists for cancer therapy. J Clin Invest 117, 1184-94 (2007)
doi:10.1172/JCI31414
PMid:17476348    PMCid:1857270

97. M. A. Guvakova, L. A. Yakubov, I. Vlodavsky, J. L. Tonkinson and C. A. Stein: Phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides bind to basic fibroblast growth factor, inhibit its binding to cell surface receptors, and remove it from low affinity binding sites on extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem 270, 2620-7 (1995)
doi:10.1074/jbc.270.6.2620
PMid:7852327

98. N. N. Norgaard, T. Holien, S. Jonsson, H. Hella, T. Espevik, A. Sundan and T. Standal: CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide inhibits Smad-dependent bone morphogenetic protein signaling: effects on myeloma cell apoptosis and in vitro osteoblastogenesis. J Immunol 185, 3131-9 (2010)
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903605
PMid:20702733

99. H. Dong, S. E. Strome, D. R. Salomao, H. Tamura, F. Hirano, D. B. Flies, P. C. Roche, J. Lu, G. Zhu, K. Tamada, V. A. Lennon, E. Celis and L. Chen: Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med 8, 793-800 (2002)
PMid:12091876

100. M. Romagnoli, G. Desplanques, S. Maiga, S. Legouill, M. Dreano, R. Bataille and S. Barille-Nion: Canonical nuclear factor kappaB pathway inhibition blocks myeloma cell growth and induces apoptosis in strong synergy with TRAIL. Clin Cancer Res 13, 6010-8 (2007)
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0140
PMid:17947462

101. Y. T. Tai, X. F. Li, I. Breitkreutz, W. Song, P. Neri, L. Catley, K. Podar, T. Hideshima, D. Chauhan, N. Raje, R. Schlossman, P. Richardson, N. C. Munshi and K. C. Anderson: Role of B-cell-activating factor in adhesion and growth of human multiple myeloma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment. Cancer Res 66, 6675-82 (2006)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0190
PMid:16818641

102. B. Pulendran: Variegation of the immune response with dendritic cells and pathogen recognition receptors. J Immunol 174, 2457-65 (2005)
PMid:15728447

103. B. Salaun, P. Romero and S. Lebecque: Toll-like receptors' two-edged sword: when immunity meets apoptosis. Eur J Immunol 37, 3311-8 (2007)
doi:10.1002/eji.200737744
PMid:18034428

104. B. Salaun, S. Lebecque, S. Matikainen, D. Rimoldi and P. Romero: Toll-like receptor 3 expressed by melanoma cells as a target for therapy? Clin Cancer Res 13, 4565-74 (2007)
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0274
PMid:17671143

105. Y. Osawa, S. Iho, R. Takauji, H. Takatsuka, S. Yamamoto, T. Takahashi, S. Horiguchi, Y. Urasaki, T. Matsuki and S. Fujieda: Collaborative action of NF-kappaB and p38 MAPK is involved in CpG DNA-induced IFN-alpha and chemokine production in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Immunol 177, 4841-52 (2006)
PMid:16982926

106. D. Chauhan, A. V. Singh, M. Brahmandam, R. Carrasco, M. Bandi, T. Hideshima, G. Bianchi, K. Podar, Y. T. Tai, C. Mitsiades, N. Raje, D. L. Jaye, S. K. Kumar, P. Richardson, N. Munshi and K. C. Anderson: Functional interaction of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with multiple myeloma cells: a therapeutic target. Cancer Cell 16, 309-23 (2009)
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.08.019
PMid:19800576    PMCid:2762396

107. E. Arce, D. G. Jackson, M. A. Gill, L. B. Bennett, J. Banchereau and V. Pascual: Increased frequency of pre-germinal center B cells and plasma cell precursors in the blood of children with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 167, 2361-9 (2001)
PMid:11490026

108. A. Mathian, M. Gallegos, V. Pascual, J. Banchereau and S. Koutouzov: Interferon-alpha induces unabated production of short-lived plasma cells in pre-autoimmune lupus-prone (NZBxNZW)F1 mice but not in BALB/c mice. Eur J Immunol (2011)

109. L. Ronnblom and V. Pascual: The innate immune system in SLE: type I interferons and dendritic cells. Lupus 17, 394-9 (2008)
doi:10.1177/0961203308090020
PMid:18490415

Abbreviations: TLRs: Toll-like receptors. MM: Multiple Myeloma. PC: Plasma-cell. TIR : Toll/IL-1R homology domain. PAMP : pathogen-associated molecular patterns. dsRNA : double stranded RNA. LPS : lipopolysachcaride. CpG : unmethylated 2'-deoxyribo (cytidine-phosphtae-guanosine) . DAMP: danger-associated molecular patterns. MAPKs: mitogen-activated protein kinases. SDF-1: stromal cell-derived factor-1. TNF: tumor necrosis factor. Blimp-1: B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1. MGUS: Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. HMCLs: human Myeloma cell lines. HMGB1: High Mobility Group Box1.

Key Words: Toll-like receptor, Plasma-cell, Plasmablast, Bone-marrow, Multiple myeloma, Humoral, Review

Send correspondance to: Gaetan Jego, INSERM U866, 7 boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, Faculty of Medicine, 21033 Dijon, France, Tel: 33 3-80-39-34-17, Fax: 33-3-80-39-34-34, E-mail:Gaetan.jego@u-bourgogne.fr